Sunday, November 30, 2008

The Translation of the Kuttamuwa Stele

Several days ago I reported on the discovery of the Kuttamuwa Stele. In a recent post, Jim Getz provided a transliteration of the text based on Dennis Pardee’s presentation at the SBL in Boston.

In recent posts, John Hobbins and Duane Smith have offered their transliterations of the text. They also provide their own translation of the text with some notes and observations.

Although both John and Duane say the translation is a work in progress, their translation is very informative.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

Tags: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, November 20, 2008

The SBL in Boston

My wife and I are leaving Thursday morning to Boston to attend the annual meeting of the Society of Biblical Literature. The annual meeting of the SBL is a great occasion for scholars to present papers offering new ideas and new interpretations to the biblical text.

I enjoy attending the meetings of the SBL because it allows me to interact with the latest research and know what other scholars are thinking. At the meetings one hears great papers as well as papers that could be considered not so great.

For me, one of the greatest joys of attending the SBL is to see old friends and make new ones. Every year I meet people who went to school with me. I also meet scholars whose books I have read. This year I will be attending the reception sponsored by Augsburg Press to celebrate the publication of The People’s Bible, a publication to which I contributed Joel and Jonah.

Since I will be gone for almost a week, I will not be able to post to the blog until after Thanksgiving. I hope you and your family have a happy Thanksgiving. My family will be together for Thanksgiving. This year, as we do every year, my wife and I will host our three sons and their families. It will be nice to see my granddaughters again.

Happy Thanksgiving.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

Tag: ,

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

The Kuttamuwa Stele


Photo: The Kuttamuwa Stele, a funerary monument discovered in southeastern Turkey.

Credit
: Photo by Eudora Struble, University of Chicago (via Science Daily).


According to a report published in Science Daily, archaeologists digging at Zincirli, the site of the ancient city of Sam’al in southeastern Turkey, uncovered an Iron Age chiseled stone slab that provides evidence that people in the region believed that the soul was separate from the body. The excavation was led by David Schloen, Associate Professor at the Oriental Institute and Director of the University’s Neubauer Expedition to Zincirli.

Schloen will present his findings during the annual meeting of the American Schools of Oriental Research on Nov. 22 in Boston.

For more details about the Kuttamuwa stele and its significance, visit the web page of Science Daily.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

Tags: , , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Jeremiah and Hananiah: The Historical Context

In my first post on the confrontation between Jeremiah and Hananiah, I wrote about some of the issues that differentiated Jeremiah from Hananiah. Both individuals were prophets and both were accepted by the people as legitimate representatives of Yahweh. However, their messages were different and their understanding of what Yahweh was doing in the history of Judah was not the same.

Before we deal with the confrontation between Jeremiah and Hananiah in the temple, it is necessary to review some of the historical events that led to this confrontation. What follows is a brief overview of major events that culminated with the deportation of Judah.

The accession of Tiglath Pileser III (745-727) to the throne of Assyria in 745 B.C. inaugurated a new era of Assyrian domination of the Ancient Near East. Those rulers who followed him, Shalmaneser V (726-722), Sargon II (721-705), Sennacherib (704-681) and Esarhaddon (680-669) became powerful overlords who extended Assyrian control ever Mesopotamia, Palestine, and even Egypt.

Manasseh (687-642), king of Judah, recognized that it was almost impossible to resist Assyria. He paid heavy tribute to Assyria during his long reign and officially recognized Assyrian gods. The introduction of Assyrian religious practices into the religion of Judah led to syncretism and to the rejection of many of the ancient religious traditions of the nation. Although Assyria did not force integration of the conquered peoples into their own culture, Manasseh willingly submitted to Assyria and became a faithful vassal as long as he lived.

During the reigns of Shalmaneser V and Sargon II the Northern Kingdom of Israel was conquered by Assyria and became an Assyrian province. Judah made an attempt at independence under Hezekiah, but Hezekiah became a vassal of Assyria and paid tribute to Sennacherib. However, Judah avoided total conquest and integration because of the policy of appeasement adopted by Manasseh. Because of his total submission to Assyria, Manasseh was able to have a long and peaceful reign. His vassalage to Assyria guaranteed that Judah would retain her identity.

During the reign of King Asshurbanapal (668-627 B.C.), Assyria’s dominance of the Ancient Near East began to wane at the same time that the Babylonians began to take steps toward independence from Assyria. Josiah, King of Judah, took advantage of Assyria’s weakness and made a bid for political freedom for Judah. After the Book of the Law was discovered in the temple in 622 B.C., Josiah promoted a major reform to free Judah from the alien religious practices introduced by Manasseh and the political control Assyria had imposed on Judah.

The reform of Josiah was based on the stipulations found in the Book of the Law, probably an early version of Deuteronomy. Josiah was committed to bring Judah back to the old religious traditions established by the covenant which God had given to Moses on Mount Sinai. The book of Deuteronomy contains a version of the law of Moses. The law was reformulated to meet the social and religious conditions of seventh century Judah.

The election of Israel to become God’s special people (Exodus 19:5) was a free act of grace, however the election of Israel as the people of God came with the expectations that the people would obey God’s voice and keep the demands of the covenant. Both Israel and Judah abandoned Yahweh to follow other gods. After the deportation of the Northern Kingdom, Judah was facing God’s judgment because it too failed to live in obedience to Yahweh.

Josiah and the people made a covenant in which they agreed to abide by the stipulations of the covenant. Josiah’s major effort at reformation was the elimination of pagan cults and the destruction of the altars dedicated to pagan deities. The most important aspect of Josiah’s reform was the centralization of the religious life of Judah in the temple of Jerusalem. However, before Josiah could get his reforms firmly established, he was killed in 609 B.C. in a battle in Megiddo against Neco II, king of Egypt.

The death of Josiah brought radical changes to Judah. With Josiah’s death, the reform movement ended. King Neco placed Jehoiakim, Josiah’s son on the throne of Judah, even though the people despised him. Jehoiakim served as a vassal of Egypt and reversed many of the religious changes his father had established.

When Babylon and Egypt met in battle at Carchemish in 605 B.C., the Babylonians defeated Egypt and became the dominant power in the Ancient Near East. At that time, Jehoiakim became a vassal of Nebuchadnezzar. The defeat of Egypt in 605 B.C. and the accession of Nebuchadnezzar to the throne of Babylon assured Jeremiah that the end of Judah was near (Jeremiah 25:1). To Jeremiah, Nebuchadnezzar was "the Servant of Yahweh" who would act as the instrument of God's justice (Jeremiah 25:8-11). In 601 B.C. Egypt and Babylon met again with heavy losses on both sides. Nebuchadnezzar returned home to reorganize his army. At that time Jehoiakim revolted against the Babylonians.

This act of rebellion caused Babylon to invade Judah and besiege Jerusalem in 597 B.C. Jehoiakim’s sudden death probably was the result of an assassination attempt. With the death of Jehoiakim, his son Jehoiachin became the new king of Judah. After three months on the throne, Jehoiachin surrendered to Nebuchadnezzar and was deported to Babylon, together with the members of the royal family, political and military leaders, intellectuals, and many skilled workers. After the deportation of Jehoiachin, the Babylonians made Zedekiah the new king of Judah. Zedekiah made a covenant of fealty with Nebuchadnezzar and served as a vassal of Babylon.

Zedekiah was a weak king. Encouraged by a strong anti-Babylonian factions in his court, Zedekiah plotted a revolt against Babylon. With the promise of Egyptian help, Zedekiah revolted openly against Babylon. Nebuchadnezzar’s army attacked and systematically destroyed the fortified cities of Judah. The temple, the city, and the big houses of Jerusalem were destroyed in 587 B.C. Zedekiah fled the city at night, but he was captured near Jericho. He was taken to Nebuchadnezzar at Riblah, a city in the northern part of Syria, where he was forced to see the slaughter of his sons. Then his eyes were put out. They bound him in fetters and he was sent to Babylon together with a second deportation of the population. With the deportation of Zedekiah, the monarchy of David came to an end.


In a future post, I will discuss the events that led to the confrontation between Jeremiah and Hananiah in the temple.

Other Studies on Jeremiah and Hananiah:

1. Jeremiah and Hananiah

2. Jeremiah and Hananiah: The Historical Context

3. Jeremiah and Hananiah: Jeremiah’s Ministry

4. Jeremiah and Hananiah: The Confrontation in the Temple

5. Jeremiah and Hananiah: True and False Prophecy in Israel

6. Braking Iron and Bronze: Jeremiah's Second Lament

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

Tags: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Monday, November 17, 2008

The Veil in Sumerian Culture

Muazzez Çiğ, a Turkish Sumerologist who worked with the great Sumerologist Samuel Noah Kramer in producing many translations of Sumerian literary texts, was taken to court two years ago at the age of 92 for writing about the veil in Muslim society.

In the Muslim world, conservative Muslims believe that women should keep their heads covered with a veil, while secularists believe wearing them should continue to be banned.

However, according to Çiğ and research that she had been carrying out for several years, Sumerian women who were priestesses and offered sexual services were the first to wear veils.

A Turkish lawyer took Çiğ to court on the grounds that she was fomenting religious hatred. She was acquitted of the charges against her.

Read her story here.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

Tags: ,

Bookmark and Share

A Christian Church on the Temple Mount?


The Byzantine mosaic floor under the Aksa Mosque.
Photo: Courtesy of Israel Antiquities Authority.

According to a report published in The Jerusalem Post, an Israeli archaeologist Zachi Zweig has discovered the photo archives of R.W. Hamilton, the British archeologist who carried out the only archeological excavation ever undertaken at the Temple Mount’s Aksa Mosque. One of the photos shows a Byzantine mosaic floor underneath the mosque that probably was the remains of a church.

The excavation under the Aksa Mosque was carried out in the 1930s by R.W. Hamilton, who was the director of the British Mandate Antiquities Department, in coordination with the Wakf Islamic Trust that administers the compound. The excavation was carried out after several earthquakes badly damaged the mosque in 1927 and 1937.

According to the report, Hamilton discovered the Byzantine mosaic floor and beneath it a mikva (ritual bath) from the Second Temple period.

This finding is very important because it may indicate that the place where the Aksa Mosque is located was a holy place to Christians before it was a holy place to Moslems. And since the mikva was under the mosaic floor, the place was a special place to Jews before it was a special place to Christians and Moslems.

I just wonder how this new discovery will play the Islamic world.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

Tags: , , , ,

Bookmark and Share

New Evidence Surfaces of David’s Kingdom

“New Evidence Surfaces of David’s Kingdom”: This is the title of an article written by Matthew Kalman, a writer for The San Francisco Chronicle and published in the SFGate.

The article describes the discovery of the city of Sha’arayim (Khirbet Qeiyafa), a Hebrew name that means “Two Gates.” The city was discovered by Yosef Garfinkel, an archaeologist at the Hebrew University.

The name of the city is mentioned in 1 Samuel 17:52 as the place where many Philistines were killed: “The troops of Israel and Judah rose up with a shout and pursued the Philistines as far as Gath and the gates of Ekron, so that the wounded Philistines fell on the way from Shaaraim as far as Gath and Ekron.”

The finding of this 10th century city is important because “Garfinkel believes the city provides evidence that King David ruled a kingdom from his capital of Jerusalem.”

He also said that Sha’arayim “appears to have been a fortress on the western border with the Philistines” and “indicates a kingdom with a developed political and military organization that was powerful enough to include a major fortified city.”

The discover of Sha’arayim comes a few weeks after Garfinkel and his team of archaeologists discovered the oldest Hebrew inscription ever found in Israel. That inscription was the 3,000-year-old pottery fragment bearing five lines of text in proto-Canaanite script, a precursor of Hebrew. The ostracon found at the site contains the words “king,” “judge,” and “slave” (see my posts on this Hebrew text here and here).

According to the article, “Garfinkel knew from the biblical text that Sha'arayim was near the location of the famous duel between David and Goliath and wondered whether the ruins might be the city. Locating the second gate confirmed his belief that he had found the only site mentioned in the David and Goliath narrative that has yet to be discovered.

Read the article in its entirety by clicking here.

HT: Jim West

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

Tags: , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Jeremiah and Hananiah

Early in Israel’s history, at the beginning of the monarchy, a group of prophets arose in Israel whose primary function was to challenge the policies of the king. The emergence of the state in Israel brought great changes to the social and religious life of the nation that greatly affected the tribal structures of Israelite society.

Within the development of the prophetic movement in Israel, there arose two types of prophets. The first type was a group of independent prophets who claimed to speak on behalf of Yahweh and who warned the people to return to the old traditions of the covenant. The second type were those prophets who were paid by the temple or the court and who proclaimed the kind of message their patrons desired to hear. The Greek Bible, the Septuagint, called them pseudo prophetes (Jeremiah 14:14 LXX), “false prophets.” These professional prophets came to be known as false prophets not because of their desire to mislead the people, but rather, because they misinterpreted Yahweh’s intentions at times when the nation was facing great dangers.

C. E. Schenk, writing in the International Standard Bible Encyclopedia wrote: “In times of moral darkness the false prophets, predicting smooth things for the nation, independent of repentance, consecration and the pursuit of spiritual ideals, were honored above the true prophets who emphasized the moral greatness of Yahweh and the necessity of righteousness for the nation.”

True prophets proclaimed a message of God’s judgment against the rulers and the people because of their violation of the religious and legal traditions of the nation. On the other hand, false prophets preached a message of peace and salvation and predicted the nation’s deliverance from the hands of their enemies. In the end, true prophets were distinguished from false prophets by the outcome of their respective prophesies: “A prophet who predicts peace must carry the burden of proof. Only when his predictions come true can it be known that he is really from the Lord” (Jeremiah 28:9 NLT).

Two prophets who represent these styles of prophetic ministries were Jeremiah and Hananiah (Jeremiah 28). Jeremiah, son of Hilkiah, was a peripheral prophet who proclaimed God’s judgment against Judah and the exile in Babylon. Hananiah, on the other hand, proclaimed an optimistic message in which he declared that Jehoiachin, the exiled king of Judah, would be restored and that the vessels of the temple which were taken to Babylon, would be returned to Jerusalem within two years.

The ministries of Jeremiah and Hananiah occurred at a time of great crisis in the life of Judah. In 597 B.C., Nebuchadnezzar had come to Jerusalem, deported Jehoiachin, the royal family, political and religious leaders, and had taken many of the vessels of the temple as trophies of war to Babylon.

The confrontation between Jeremiah and Hananiah, the son of Azzur and a prophet from Gibeon, took place in the temple (Jeremiah 28:1). The confrontation was a dispute between two prophets who were guided by different understanding of what God was doing in Judah’s conflict with the Babylonians. On one side was Jeremiah, a prophet whose ministry was based on the old covenant traditions which the Lord had established with Israel at Sinai. Jeremiah was profoundly touched by what he perceived to be Judah’s lack of obedience to the demands of the covenant. Jeremiah, who had been called to preach a message of judgment (Jeremiah 1:10), urged the people to return to Yahweh and avoid the total destruction of the nation. Jeremiah saw the coming of the Babylonians and the deportation of Jehoiachin as the beginning of a long exile that would last seventy years (Jeremiah 25:11).

Jeremiah’s message to Judah was that the nation should submit to Babylonia and not oppose it, for submission to Babylon was ordained by Yahweh and that out of the humiliation of defeat and servitude, a new covenant would be established with Israel and the nation would be renewed for service in the world.

On the other side of the confrontation was Hananiah, a well-known and popular prophet in Judah. Like Jeremiah, Hananiah probably knew the history of Yahweh’s mighty acts of salvation on behalf of Israel. Hananiah was probably a firm believer in the so-called Zion theology, a view that proclaimed the inviolability of Jerusalem. On the basis of this belief, Hananiah proclaimed that God would not allow the Babylonians to destroy the people of Judah.

These conflicting theological traditions became the reason for the confrontation between the two prophets. The narrative of their encounter in the temple is the story of two men striving to hear God’s voice and interpret contemporary events in terms of divine will.

The encounter between Jeremiah and Hananiah is a classic example of a dispute between a true and a false prophet and how they interpreted God’s will for the people and for the nation. Further, the confrontation between Jeremiah and Hananiah provides a window into the problem of discerning a true prophet.

In their effort to interpret what God was doing through the coming of the Babylonians, Jeremiah used a legitimate hermeneutic in the right situation and Hananiah used a legitimate hermeneutic in the wrong context. When the people were confronted with two different understandings of what God was doing, how was the audience in the temple to recognize what God was doing in the midst of the anguish caused by the Babylonian invasion? Faced with two contradictory views of God’s work, which one should the people accept as the legitimate interpretation of God’s will? Which prophet was applying prophetic tradition properly to determine what God was doing in the current situation?

In future posts I will study the confrontation between Jeremiah and Hananiah and will introduce the historical background of the confrontation between the two prophets, the theological perspectives each brought to the confrontation, some biblical characteristics of true prophets, and the outcome of the confrontation.

Posts on Jeremiah and Hananiah:

1. Jeremiah and Hananiah

2. Jeremiah and Hananiah: The Historical Context

3. Jeremiah and Hananiah: Jeremiah’s Ministry

4. Jeremiah and Hananiah: True and False Prophecy in Israel

5, Jeremiah and Hananiah: The Confrontation in the Temple

6. Braking Iron and Bronze: Jeremiah's Second Lament


Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

Tags: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, November 16, 2008

King Tut’s Curse Plagues Rugby Team

The All Blacks are New Zealand’s national rugby team. Rugby is New Zealand’s national sport. However, the All Blacks have not won the Rugby World Cup since 1987.

Fans are trying to find out why the All Blacks have gone without a championship since 1987. A new theory as to why that might be has been submitted and is receiving serious consideration by many people in New Zealand. The reason for the lack of championship: King Tut’s mummy.

Read the story here.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

Tags: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, November 13, 2008

Moses and the Exodus

PBS will air “The Bible’s Buried Secrets” on Tuesday, November 18 at 8 p.m. The two-hour “Nova” program will focus on how the Pentateuch came into existence.

In preparation for the program, PBS has interviewed Carol Meyers, an archeologist and professor of religion at Duke University. In this interview Meyers discusses Moses and the significance of the Exodus.

The following is an excerpt from the interview:

Q: Questions about whether or not events in the Bible really happened evoke strong passions. As a biblical scholar, how do you see the issue of historical authenticity in terms of the earliest biblical accounts-the ones for which there is little archeological evidence?

Carol Meyers: Too often in modern western thinking we see things in terms of black and white, history or fiction, with nothing in between. But there are other ways of understanding how people have recorded events of their past. There's something called mnemohistory, or memory history, that I find particularly useful in thinking about biblical materials. It's not like the history that individuals may have of their own families, which tends to survive only a generation or two. Rather, it's a kind of collective cultural memory.

When a group of people experience things that are extremely important to their existence as a group, they often maintain collective memories of these events over generations. And these memories are probably augmented and elaborated and maybe even ritualized as a way of maintaining their relevance.

We can understand how mnemohistory works by looking at how it operates in more recent periods. We see this, for instance, in legends about figures in American history-George Washington is a wonderful example. Legends have something historic in them but yet are developed and expanded. I think that some of the accounts of the ancestors in the book of Genesis are similar. They are exciting, important, attention-grabbing, message-bearing narratives that are developed around characters who may have played an important role in the lives of the pre-Israelite ancestors.

Q: Let's turn to one of the most vivid figures in the Bible, Moses. Who is the Moses of the Bible, and could there have been such a person?

Read the rest of the interview here.


Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

Tags: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

The Writers of the Bible

PBS will air “The Bible’s Buried Secrets” on Tuesday, November 18 at 8 p.m. The two-hour “Nova” program will focus on how the Pentateuch came into existence.

In preparation for the program, PBS has interviewed Michael Coogan, Professor of Religious Studies at Stonehill College and Director of Publications for the Harvard Semitic Museum. In this interview Coogan presents his views into how scholars today understand the composition of the Pentateuch.

The following is an excerpt from the interview:
Q: Most people may see the Bible as a single text, but is it?

Michael Coogan: One way of thinking about the Bible is that it's like an anthology of literature made over the course of many centuries by different people. Think of an analogy: The Norton Anthology of English Literature, which covers over a thousand years, from Beowulf into the 20th century. The Bible covers a similar span. The earliest texts in the Bible likely date to before 1000 B.C., and the latest texts go at least to the 2nd century B.C., and for Christians, into the 2nd century A.D. So it is an anthology of the literature of ancient Israel and early Judaism, and for Christians, of earliest Christianity, as well.

Like any anthology, it's selective. There were many other texts that the ancient Israelites and early Christians produced that we no longer have. We have reference in the Book of Numbers, for instance, to the Book of the Wars of Yahweh. Yahweh was the name of the God of Israel. And it must have been a wonderful book, but all we have is a kind of learned footnote.

Q: If it's an anthology, what ties the Bible together?

Read the rest of the interview here.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

Tags: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Water’s Effect on Civilization Development – Part 2

Read Part 1 by clicking here.

Water in Canaan

In Canaan, most towns were built on hills, away from the sources of water. Thus the inhabitants of Canaan depended on rains, the morning dew, springs, wadis, brooks, and other sources of water to supply the physical needs of people, flocks, and land. The people who lived in Canaan developed several ways of supplementing the amount of water available to them.

Springs. Common throughout much of the Holy Land, springs are a natural source of water. In fact the land of Canaan is described as “a land with streams of water, springs, and deep water sources, flowing in both valleys and hills” (Deut. 8:7 HCSB). The source of most spring water was the rainfall that seeped into the ground. The amount of water available in a spring varied with the time of the year and the amount of rainfall. Springs furnished sufficient water to be used for drinking, irrigation, and watering their flocks. Some cities build canals running from the source of water located outside the city that would bring water into the city.

Pools. In the form of natural or artificial reservoirs, pools collected rainwater used for drinking, irrigation, and watering the flocks. The Bible mentions several pools: the pools of Gibeon (2 Sam. 2:13), Hebron (4:12), Samaria (1 Kings 22:38), Siloam (Neh. 3:15 NIV), and others. Although the pools held an abundant supply of water, their being open meant evaporation worked against long-term water storage.

Water Tunnels. Some cities built tunnels that went from inside the city, under the walls, to a source of water located outside the city. Archaeology has confirmed the existence of water tunnels in Jerusalem, Megiddo, Gibeon, and Hazor. The tunnel in Jerusalem was designed to reach the water at the Gihon Spring.

These tunnels were built in a rudimentary fashion by the Canaanites before Israel conquered the land and were vastly improved and expanded during the time of the United Monarchy and following. After David became king of Judah, he conquered Jerusalem after Joab used the water shaft (2 Sam. 5:8; 1 Chron. 11:6) to enter the Jebusite city. The Jebusites cut the water shaft in the limestone rock by the Jebusites in the Late Bronze Age to provide access to the Gihon Spring from within the city. The Gihon was the only perennial source of water in Jerusalem.

When Hezekiah, king of Judah, made preparations for war against Sennacherib, king of Assyria, he dug a tunnel under the hill of Ophel, the hill on which David built his city after he conquered Jerusalem (see 2 Kings 20:20; 2 Chr. 32:30). The tunnel served to bring water from the Gihon Spring to a pool inside Jerusalem (Neh. 3:15). After the project was completed, an inscription was carved on the rock marking the completion of the project.

The water shaft of Megiddo was built initially by the Canaanites and was improved many times during the period of Israel’s monarchy. During Ahab’s time, (874-853 B.C.), workers expanded the water system to include an underground passage that led from inside the city to the spring, which was outside the city wall. This water shaft had a flight of steps that led into a tunnel that continued as far as the source of the water. The passage was later expanded and deepened so that the water flowed back into it and thus provided the city with an underground reservoir that served as a permanent water source for the citizens. [1]

Wells. Another way by which people who lived in arid areas tried to obtain fresh water was by digging wells. After Isaac left Gerar, he dug five wells and all of them produced water (Gen. 26: 18-25, 32). People would dig wells in order to collect water from a subterranean spring. Some cities built deep wells inside the city walls, down into underground aquifers. The depth of the well dictated the size, as deeper wells required a wider opening at the top to prevent collapse of the walls.

Because of the scarcity of water in arid places, the discovery of water became an occasion for celebration. When the Lord gave water to Israel, the people sang this song:

“Spring up, well—sing to it!
The princes dug the well;
The nobles of the people hollowed it out
with a scepter and with their staffs”
—Num. 21:16-18 HCSB

Wells were located near major roads and the water was sold to travelers (Deut. 2:6, 28). People also dug in the wilderness (Gen. 16:14), outside a city (Gen. 24:11), near a city gate (2 Sam. 23:16), in a field (Gen. 29:2), and in a courtyard (2 Sam. 17:18). At Beth-Shemesh the Canaanites dug a well that remained in use until the end of the Northern Kingdom. At Gezer, a well dated from the second millennium B.C. was dug by the Canaanite and was still in use by the time of the Israelites. At Gibeon a large circular well was reached by a flight of steps into a cave where the water dripped from the rock. [2]

Wells were protected by a well head (Gen. 29:1-3) or a covering (2 Sam. 17:19) to keep people and animals from falling into the wells. People used leather containers to draw water from the wells (Gen. 21:19), jars (Gen. 24:20) or buckets (John 4:11). The use of rope and the development of rollers and pulley wheels helped people bring well water to the surface.

Cisterns. Natural sources of waters such as rivers and springs are not generally found in most areas and digging for underground water is limited. People who settled in desert areas had to develop the ability to collect and store potable water from runoff during the rainy season. Cisterns provided the solution for storing that rainwater.

Cisterns are artificially constructed reservoirs. Typically bell or bottle-shaped,they differ from wells in that cisterns are filled “by drainage from roofs, streets, or the surface of a slope, or by water channeled from some other source. Wells, on the other hand, might be fed directly from underground springs.” [3]

In Canaan, most cisterns were cut into limestone bedrock, which was always porous. Building better cisterns became possible after the discovery during the Early Iron Age (1200 B.C.) of plasters made of burnt slaked lime that could make the cisterns impermeable. The development of better cisterns contributed to the construction of villages and cities away from the sources of flowing water. [4]

In Canaan the rainy season, on which the cisterns depended, began at the end of October and ended in the beginning of May. Toward the end of summer, springs and wells, either dried up or reduced their flow. When that happened, cisterns and open reservoirs became the only sources of water. Cisterns were fed from surface and roof drainage. Many cisterns were built beside individual houses. The discovery of waterproofing materials allowed the Israelites to build more cisterns, and as a result, the number of houses and public buildings increased. Private cisterns were smaller and were sunk in the rocks within private boundaries, each owner having his own cistern (2 Kings 18:31; Prov. 5:15). [5]

An Impressive Solution

From the earliest days of civilization, having an adequate supply of potable water was a constant struggle. The harsh conditions of people who lived in the desert and arid areas were made easier through various methods of water management. These methods developed over time. Although other societies eventually copied Israel’s water works projects, the complex systems of tunnels, underground storage reservoirs, wells, and individual cisterns was originally an Israelite innovation. These systems were “an extraordinary achievement of local engineers who were well acquainted with hydrological conditions and were capable of carrying out outstanding projects requiring skill, sagacity, and organization of manpower.” [6]

Such a complex system wasnot in place, though, in the early days of Israel’s history. Isaac and his clan were able to survive in the dry area of the Negev because the God of Israel blessed him and because he and his people had the ability to find water in the desert.

Endnotes:

[1] Amihai Mazar, Archaeology of the Land of theBible (New York: Doubleday,1992), 479-80.

[2] James B. Pritchard,”The Water System at Gibeon,” The Biblical Archaeologist 19 (1956), 66-75.

[3] Archibald C. Dickie and Dorothea W. Harvey, “Cistern,” in The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, ed. Geoffrey W.Bromiley,vo.1 (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1979),702.

[4] John P. Oleson, “Water Works, The Anchor Bible Dictionary, 6:887.

[5] See “Water Supply,” in The Archaeological Encyclopedia of the Holy Land, ed. Avraham Negev (Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers, 1986), pp. 394-396.

[6] Mazar, 485.



Note: This is the second part of an article published under the title “. . . and Not a Drop to Drink: Water’s Effect on Civilization Development,” published in the Biblical Illustrator 34 (Winter 2007-08), 10-15. The article is published here with the permission of the publisher.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

Tags: , , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

The Natufian Shaman

Photo: A picture released by Israel's Antiquity Authority shows some of the 50 tortoise shells alongside a 12,000-year-old skeleton of a female shaman during excavations in the Galilee area of northern Israel







Time Online has a good article on the Natufian woman found during excavations in Israel. The article provides additional information on Natufian culture, on shamanism, and other details about the woman and the artifacts discovered in her tomb.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


Tags: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

The Balding Queen of Egypt

In a recent post I wrote about the new pyramid discovered in Egypt. Bloomberg.com is providing additional information on the pyramid discovery and how the discovery may provide additional detail details on Queen Sesheshet, the mother of a sixth dynasty Pharaoh called Teti.

According to Zahi Hawass, the chief Egyptian archaeologist, there are several references to Queen Sesheshet in ancient papyrus texts. In one of these texts, the queen made a request to doctors to find her a cure for hair loss.

Read the story here.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


Tags: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Water’s Affect on Civilization Development – Part 1

At the time when Canaan was experiencing famine, Isaac came to Gerar to live in the city instead of going to Egypt as his father Abraham had done (Gen. 26:1-34). Famine occurred in Canaan during periods of drought, as had happened in the days of Abraham (Gen. 12:10) and Jacob (Gen. 42:5). The lack of rainfall created difficult conditions for the people and their crops, and liveflock.

Life in the Desert

Isaac lived as a seminomad who owned sheep and goats and moved throughout the land in search of better pasture for his flock. Seminomads were dependent on pasture to feed their flocks. Since the flocks needed water, city dwellers perceived nomads as threats to the resources available to them. During times of drought, seminomadic people moved from place to place, as Isaac did, to find water for their flocks. Drought caused disputes between the inhabitants of the cities and seminomads over water rights because the cities also had meadowlands and flocks that needed water.

In Gerar, Isaac planted crops and had an abundant harvest. Because of God’s blessing, he became rich and had a large flock and many servants. The Philistines became hostile towards Isaac and expelled him from their city. Banished from a fertile land, Isaac had to dig wells to provide water for his family and flock.

Gerar was a town in the Negev, a desert region in the southern part of Canaan. Gerar was halfway between Beersheba and Gaza. Although the annual rainfall in the Negev is insufficient to sustain much agriculture, it rains enough to allow people to maintain small flocks and to provide cultivation of basic crop plants.

The arid areas of Canaan created a challenge to human settlement and to economic development. The crucial challenge people faced was the imbalance between the demand for water and its availability, since water supply was too scarce to meet the demand of settled communities. The arid zones of Canaan generally experienced occasional dry spells, and lack of rain extended into long-term droughts (Job 12:15). During these droughts people suffered, the crop failed, and flocks perish (Jer. 14:1-3; Hag. 1:11).

Because of the harsh climatic nature of arid regions, the need for water is most intense just when water availability by natural precipitation is lacking. This imbalance between water supply and water demand was counterbalanced by the development of other means of providing water, such as wells, cisterns, pools, and water tunnels.

Notwithstanding the harsh conditions of the land, people lived in arid regions such as the Negev and many other areas in Canaan. To subsist in desert lands, people must find ways of obtaining additional supplies of water, either by finding underground sources or by collecting water running from the slopes or house tops during short periods of rainfall.

Over the centuries people settled into the arid and semiarid areas of the Ancient Near East and were able to adapt to the harsh conditions of their environment by increasing their water storage and supply. The great civilizations of Mesopotamia and the inhabitants of Canaan and Egypt were able to develop ways of bringing water into their cities. Once water became available beyond the level of subsistence, people built great cities, thus proving that people can build settlements even in areas with extreme dry conditions. In antiquity, the viability of cities depended on their proximity to water sources. [1]

Water in the Ancient Near East

In Egypt, the main source of water was the Nile River. The Nile formed by the merging of the White Nile and the Blue Nile and flowed 1,675 miles after the merger north to the Mediterranean Sea. The Nile River was considered to be the source of life in ancient Egypt. The waters of the Nile allowed the shores of the river to be easily cultivated (Deut. 11:10). The annual flood of the Nile, which occurred between July and November, brought a rich silt called “the black soil” that was deposited on the fields and fertilized the land. Egyptians called this area the Black Land to distinguish it from the Read Land of the desert. Small channels brought the water of the Nile to individual farms and fields. The silt the Nile deposited allowed the Egyptians to irrigate the soil and raise different kinds of crops in quantity, including grain (Gen. 42:1-2) and vegetables such as cucumbers, melons, leeks, onions, and garlic (Num. 11:5). The Nile turned Egypt into a fertile land where people of other cultures could come to buy grain. [2]

On the other side of the Ancient Near East, the Tigris and the Euphrates Rivers provided much of the water that aided the development of the ancient Mesopotamian cultures. The word Mesopotamia means the land “between the rivers.” This section of the Ancient Near East is also known as the Fertile Crescent because of its abundant natural resources and the fertile farmland that made possible an increase in food supply and the growth of cities and villages. The area around the Tigris and the Euphrates was the birthplace of the ancient civilizations of the Sumerians, Akkadians, Assyrians, and the Babylonians. The Tigris and the Euphrates became the main sources of water for the cities and villages. The rivers’ waters, carried by canals, irrigated agricultural fields in the alluvial lands between the rivers.

Endnotes

[1] Keith Schoville, Biblical Archaeology in Focus (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1982), p. 188.

[2] Henry J. Flanders, Jr, Robert W. Crapps, and David A. Smith, People of the Covenant (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996), p. 54.


Note: This is the first part of an article published under the title “. . . and Not a Drop to Drink: Water’s Effect on Civilization Development,” published in the Biblical Illustrator 34 (Winter 2007-08), 10-15. The article is published here with the permission of the publisher.

To Be Continued.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

Tags: , , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

Neolithic Age Crematorium Found in Turkey

Archaeologists have uncovered 8,000-year-old cremation urns from the Neolithic Age. This is probably the first crematorium found that dates back to the Neolithic Period. The following excerpt from the news report describes some of the contents of the cremation urns:

In ancient times, most funerals were held by simply burying (inhumation) or by burning the body (cremation). After cremation the ashes are usually put in ceramic urns or small stone containers, known as “larnax”.

The clothes and jewelry of the deceased were put in containers alongside the urn along with other possible items. For instance, if the deceased was killed by an arrow, the arrow would be included as well. The known forms of cremation in Anatolian Archaeology were seen in the early Bronze Age, but this type of burial was uncommon at Neolithic age excavations that date back 8,000 years.

Inside the urns, ashes wrapped in cloth, daily used dishes and the private belongings of the deceased were found. One urn found contained the skeleton of a baby. Experts said it was very likely this area was a burial site. The theory constructed for previous findings, that they may have been moved to this location by movements of a stream bed is no longer viable.

Read the story by clicking here.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

Tags: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

A New Pyramid Discovered in Egypt

Zahi Hawass, Egypt’s chief archaeologist has announced the discovery of a new pyramid in Egypt. According to the news release, this pyramid is the 118th pyramid discovered in Egypt. Below is the news release announcing the discovery of the pyramid:

SAQQARA, Egypt - Egypt's chief archaeologist has announced the discovery of a 4,300-year-old pyramid in Saqqara, the sprawling necropolis and burial site of the rulers of ancient Memphis.

The pyramid is said to belong to Queen Sesheshet, the mother of King Teti who was the founder of the 6th Dynasty of Egypt's Old Kingdom.

Egypt's antiquities chief Zahi Hawass made the announcement Tuesday at the site in Saqqara, about 12 miles south of Cairo.

Hawass' team has been excavating the site for two years. He says the discovery was only made two months ago when it became clear that the 16-foot-tall structure uncovered from the sand was a pyramid.

Hawass says the new pyramid is the 118th discovered so far in Egypt.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

Tags: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Monday, November 10, 2008

A 2,000 Year Old Gold Earing Found in Jerusalem

Photo: Courtesy of the Israel Antiquities Authority

The Israel Antiquities Authority is announcing that archaeologists Doron Ben-Ami and Yana Tchekhanovets have found a 2,000 year old gold earring, inlaid with precious stones in an excavations in Jerusalem. The following is an excerpt from the report released by the Israel Antiquities Authority:

2,000 year old gold earring inlaid with pearls and precious stones was discovered in excavations that the Israel Antiquities Authority is conducting in the Giv‘ati car park at the City of David, in the “Walls around Jerusalem National Park”. The excavations are being carried out jointly with the Nature and Parks Authority and are underwritten by the Ir David Foundation.

The earring, which is made of a coiled gold hoop, has a large inlaid pearl in its center. Connected to the hoop are two identical gold pendants, each of which is adorned with one emerald and pearl. The emerald is held by a kind of gold cap that connects it to the main hoop by means of a small hoop that is also fashioned from gold. Another pearl that is relatively smaller than the one inlaid in the upper hoop is attached to the other side of the emerald. The pearl is fastened to the emerald by means of a gold finding, which passes through a tiny hole that was drilled in it.

Read the article by clicking here.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

Tags: , ,

Bookmark and Share

The Law of the Hebrew Slave

>Part 1: The Status of Women in Israelite Society

Part 2: The Deuteronomic Concern for Women

Part 3: The Tenth Commandment (Deuteronomy 5:21)

Part 4: The Law of the Hebrew Slave

In my study of the Deuteronomic concern about the status of women in Israelite society during the seventh century B.C., I have attempted to demonstrate that the book of Deuteronomy revises several laws in the Covenant Code in order to provide some relief to oppressive situations faced by women in Israel.

In the present post, I want to study how the book of Deuteronomy deals with the Law of the Hebrew slave in Exodus 21:2-6. The law of the Hebrew slave in the Covenant Code reads as follows:

When you buy a male Hebrew slave, he shall serve six years, but in the seventh he shall go out a free person, without debt. If he comes in single, he shall go out single; if he comes in married, then his wife shall go out with him. If his master gives him a wife and she bears him sons or daughters, the wife and her children shall be her master's and he shall go out alone. But if the slave declares, "I love my master, my wife, and my children; I will not go out a free person," then his master shall bring him before God. He shall be brought to the door or the doorpost; and his master shall pierce his ear with an awl; and he shall serve him for life (Exodus 21:2-6).

This laws is designed to regulate the treatment of Hebrew slaves in Israelite society. The proper understanding of this law requires some identification of the terms used in the text.

Hebrew Slave. The word “Hebrew” is related to the word “Hapiru” (also “Habiru”). The Habiru was not an ethnic group, but the word was used as a pejorative designation to classify a group of people in the Ancient Near East who lived on the fringe of society and who were considered social outcasts.

In the Old Testament the word “Hebrew” is used to differentiate Israelites from Egyptians (Exodus 2:6; 3:18) and Israelites from Philistines (1 Samuel 4:6; 13:3). In the Old Testament the word is used mostly by non-Israelites to describe an individual Israelite. The Israelites used the word to describe themselves to outsiders. The expression “Hebrew slave” was used to designate an Israelite citizen who was sold into slavery (Jeremiah 34:9).

In Israel, many Israelites became slaves because of poverty and the inability to pay their debts (see Amos 2:6-8). Many situations contributed to the impoverishment of people in Israel: heavy taxation, high interest on loans, bad crops, and natural disasters.

A Free Person. The word “free person” (×—ָפְשִׁ’ hopshî) is a technical term, probably related to an Ugaritic word that means “a free commoner.” In the Ancient Near East, the hopshî was an individual whose social status was between a noble and a slave. The word appears sixteen times in the Old Testament and it is generally used to refer to a person who is freed from slavery.

The law of the Hebrew slave in the book of Exodus has several stipulations:

1. The law stipulates that a male Hebrew slave shall be released after six years of labor.

2. After six years of work, that is, in the seventh year, he shall go out a free person, without debt.

3. If the slave comes in single, he shall go out single.

4. If the slave comes in married, then his wife shall go out with him.

5. If his master gives him a wife and she bears him sons or daughters, the wife and her children shall be her master’s and he shall go out alone.

The law stipulates that if the slave’s master gave him a wife and children were born of this union, only the male slave was to go free in the seventh year, because the woman and her children belonged to the master. The woman was a perpetual slave and considered to be property of her master.

The only way the slave could keep his wife was to renounce his right to go free at the end of his time of servitude and remain a permanent slave in the house of his master.

The Book of Deuteronomy revises the law of the Hebrew slave in the book of the Covenant to allow the woman to be released with her husband. The revised law reads as follows:

If your brother, a Hebrew man, or a Hebrew woman, is sold to you, he shall serve you six years, and in the seventh year you shall let him go free from you. And when you let him go free from you, you shall not let him go empty-handed; you shall furnish him liberally out of your flock, out of your threshing floor, and out of your wine press; as the LORD your God has blessed you, you shall give to him. You shall remember that you were a slave in the land of Egypt, and the LORD your God redeemed you; therefore I command you this today. But if he says to you, `I will not go out from you,' because he loves you and your household, since he fares well with you, then you shall take an awl, and thrust it through his ear into the door, and he shall be your bondman for ever. And to your bondwoman you shall do likewise. It shall not seem hard to you, when you let him go free from you; for at half the cost of a hired servant he has served you six years. So the LORD your God will bless you in all that you do (Deuteronomy 15:12-18).

The law of the Hebrew slave in the book of Deuteronomy is a radical revision of the law that appears in the Book of the Covenant. The revised law allows the female slave to be released together with her husband. The book of Deuteronomy is indicating that through marriage, the wife of the slave has now become an integral part of his life. In addition, the book of Deuteronomy added another stipulation to the revised law. When the slave was released at the end of his time of service, the master should be generous with his former slave and provide him with provisions to help him and his family to begin a new life after their release.

At the end of the law (v.17), the author of Deuteronomy again emphasizes the female slave should enjoy the same benefits as the male slave: “You shall do the same with regard to your female slave.” The reason for this injunction is that the female slave is also “Your brother,” that is, she is a kindred of her master. Thus, the intent of the Deuteronomic law was to place the two sexes in a position of equality.

In addition, the law also favored the woman since it limited the power of a father to sell his daughter as a perpetual slave. The law in the Covenant Code reads as follows: “When a man sells his daughter as a slave, she shall not go out as the male slaves do” (Exodus 21:7). Daughters were sold by impoverished parents in order to pay family debts. However, when a woman was sold as a slave, she would “not go out as the male slaves do.” The revised law of Deuteronomy is an effort to protect and support the rights of women as full citizens in Israel.

The Deuteronomic law appeals to the experience of the oppression in Egypt to motivate the master to be generous in the manumission of the Hebrew slaves. The word “Hebrew” serves to develop solidarity between the master and his slaves since in the memory of Israel both the master and his servants were slaves in Egypt.

These charitable innovations reflect the Deuteronomic tendency to be interested in the plight of the downtrodden. This “social idealism” present in the laws of Deuteronomy is part of the humanitarian concern that became the hallmark of the Deuteronomic reformation.

To be continued.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

Tags: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, November 09, 2008

Fighting for Jesus?

This news item was published by the Associated Press on Sunday, November 9, 2008:

JERUSALEM — Israeli police rushed into one of Christianity's holiest churches Sunday and arrested two clergymen after an argument between monks erupted into a brawl next to the site of Jesus' tomb.

The clash broke out between Armenian and Greek Orthodox monks in the Church of the Holy Sepulcher, revered as the site of Jesus' crucifixion, burial and resurrection.

It began as Armenian clergymen marched in an annual procession commemorating the 4th-century discovery of the cross believed to have been used to crucify Jesus. It ended with the arrival of dozens of riot policemen who separated the sides, seizing a bearded Armenian monk in a red-and-pink robe and a black-clad Greek Orthodox monk with a bloody gash on his forehead. Both men were taken away in handcuffs.

Click here to find out the reason the monks were fighting.

The problem with this silly argument is that it gives the world another reason to ridicule Christianity.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

Tags: ,

Bookmark and Share

Gobekli Tepe: The World’s Oldest Temple

The Smithsonian Magazine is reporting that Klaus Schmidt, a German archaeologist, has discovered what Schmidt considers to be the world’s first temple. The fallowing is an excerpt from the article:

Six miles from Urfa, an ancient city in southeastern Turkey, Klaus Schmidt has made one of the most startling archaeological discoveries of our time: massive carved stones about 11,000 years old, crafted and arranged by prehistoric people who had not yet developed metal tools or even pottery. The megaliths predate Stonehenge by some 6,000 years. The place is called Gobekli Tepe, and Schmidt, a German archaeologist who has been working here more than a decade, is convinced it's the site of the world's oldest temple.




The photographs in the slide show were taken by Berthold Steinhilber
The photographs are courtesy of the Smithsonian Magazine.

Visit the Smithsonian Magazine online and read about Gobekli Tepe and the work of Klaus Schmidt.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

Tags: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, November 06, 2008

For Sale: Clay Cylinder of Nebuchadnezzar II, King of Babylon (605-562 B.C.)

Description: Oldest Book - from 605-562 B.C. Large Clay Cylinder of Nebuchadnezzar II, King of Babylon 605-562 B.C. Royal Proclamation of his re-building-to-perfection efforts of the Temple E-barra/E-ulla at Sippar (in ancient country of Babylonia). Nebuchadnezzar II was famous for: The Tower of Babel, The Stepped Pyramid (Ziggurat) & The Hanging Gardens, etc. All for his God Marduk. 8 1/4" high, filled with cuneiform writing. Full translation & documentation included. Fine original condition, no damage. $1,750,000. Bookseller Inventory # 000028

See a photo of the cylinder here.

At this price, I may buy at least two cylinders.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

Tags: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, November 04, 2008

The Transition to Settled Life: The Natufians


Image: Artist's drawing of a possible shaman burial, found near the Sea of Galilee.
Credit: P. Groszman

John Bright, in his book A History of Israel (4th ed.; Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2000), p. 24, writing on the earliest Stone Age settlements in what is known today as the land of Israel, wrote:


“From the terraces of the Nile valley to the highlands of northern Iraq characteristic flints attest the presence of man as far back as the Early Paleolithic (Old Stone) Age, perhaps (but who can say?) two hundred thousand years ago. The succeeding Middle Paleolithic (richly witnessed by skeletal remains, especially in Palestine) and Late Paleolithic found man in his long cave-dwelling stage. He lived entirely by hunting and foraging. It was only as the last ice age ended (in warmer climes the last pluvial period) approximately in the ninth millennium B.C., and the rigors of climate abated, that man was able to take the first steps toward a food-producing economy: he learned that wild grains could be cultivated and animals herded for food. This transition began in the so-called Mesolithic Age (before ca. 8000 B.C.); the Natufian culture of Palestine (so called from caves in the Wadi en-Natuf where it was first discovered) is an illustration of it. Here we see man still living in caves, but having also begun to establish crude settlements for seasonal, and even for continuous, occupation. The earliest settlement at Jericho belongs to this period, and it was in existence by ca. 8000 B.C.), if not earlier still. Although Natufian man lived chiefly by hunting, foraging, and fishing, the presence of sickles, querns, mortars and pestles indicates that he had learned to harvest and prepare wild grains for food. The herding of certain animals seems also to have been practiced.”
Recently, archaeologists in Israel have found a 12,000-year-old grave of a woman who probably was a Natufian. The woman was buried with various animal and human body parts. Archeologists believe that the woman was a shaman.

The Natufian grave was discovered at Hilazon Tachtit, a cave west of the Sea of Galilee in Israel. According to published reports, “Hilazon Tachtit was occupied by the Natufians, a people who inhabited the Near East between about 15,000 and 11,500 years ago. Most archaeologists see Natufian culture as a transition between hunting and gathering and the sedentary lifestyles of early farmers.”

The article published in Science says that a team of archaeologists led by Leore Grosman of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem “has found the remains of at least 25 people, most in collective burials. But one was treated differently. A woman, about 45 years old when she died and whose pelvis and spine were deformed, was buried separately, accompanied by a menagerie of animal remains. Among her grave goods were tail bones from wild cattle, a wing bone from a golden eagle, the shells of 50 tortoises, and a large foot from another person.”

Read the article by clicking here.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

Tags: , , ,

Bookmark and Share




Betting on the Existence of God

The British are betting on the existence of God. Odds for the existence of God have dropped from 33-1 to a mere 4-1.

The Reason for the drop? Atheist Richard Dawkins, the author of The God Delusion.

Richard Dawkins is now proclaiming that “probably” there is no God.

According to Ruth Gledhill, the Religion Correspondent for the Times Online, “The ‘probably’ confirms belief that Dawkins’ atheism contains a kernel of doubt that could in itself be proof of the existence of God.”

Atheist Richard Dawkins seems to be moving toward God. It is possible that one of these days Richard Dawkins may become the new Antony Flew.

To read about Antony Flew’s journey from atheism to theism read the following posts:

Antony Flew: There Is A God

An Interview with Antony Flew

From Atheism to Theism: A Journey Toward God

The Big Bang Theory and the Existence of God

The Origin of Life and the Existence of God

The Laws of Nature and the Existence of God

I wonder what would take to drop the odds from 4-1 to 2-1.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

Tags: , , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Monday, November 03, 2008

Earliest Known Hebrew Text In Proto-Canaanite Script


Science Daily has an excellent article about the ostracon containing the earliest known Hebrew text in proto-Canaanite script.

Excepts:

The Elah Fortress archaeological site could prove the existence of the United Monarchy, which scholars often question ever existed. The artifacts found at the site thus far all indicate that there was most likely a strong king and central government in Jerusalem - earlier than any discovered until now - rather than a number of small villages scattered throughout Judea. This would verify descriptions and narratives found in Samuel and Chronicles.

Over 100 jar handles bear distinct impressions which may indicate a link to royal vessels. Such a large quantity of this feature found in one small locale is unprecedented.

According to Prof. Garfinkel, this is the only site in Israel where one can investigate the historical King David. "The chronology and geography of Khirbet Qeiyafa create a unique meeting point between the mythology, history, historiography and archaeology of Kind David."
Read the article here.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

Tag: , , , ,

Bookmark and Share

How Would God Vote?


According to David Kinghoffer, the Bible commands you to “vote conservative.” David Kinghoffer is the author of the book How Would God Vote? Why the Bible Commands You To Be a Conservative.”

Klinghoffer charges the “liberal-Left” with views that contradict the Bible.

Read a brief survey of the book here.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

Tags: , , , ,

Bookmark and Share