Saturday, January 30, 2010

The NLT Interlinear













The NLT Interlinear is available online. Readers of the NLT Interlinear can explore the words, vocabulary, and grammar of the Greek New Testament and compare the Greek words with the translation of the NIV.

To explore the NLT Interlinear, click here.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

Tags: ,

Bookmark and Share

Friday, January 29, 2010

The Shroud of Turin

Heather Pringle, writing for the Archaeology Magazine’s weekly blog, has an article on the Shroud of Turin. The article, “Who Made the Shroud of Turin?,” compares the Shroud of Turin with burial shrouds dating from the first century A.D. The following is an excerpt from the article:

If you are not Catholic, you may not have heard yet that the Vatican has decided to put the very famous Shroud of Turin on public display for six weeks, beginning on April 10th. Exhibitions of the controversial shroud–believed by many devout Catholics to be the winding cloth that covered Jesus after his crucifixion–are relatively rare. Indeed, the Vatican has authorized only five such expositions since 1898. As a result, the faithful are hastening to their computers to obtain online tickets.

I notice that the Vatican will not permit any scientific experimentation or testing of the shroud during the exhibition. Quite possibly, it is a little disenchanted with the latest archaeological findings related to the controversial cloth. In December, Shimon Gibson, an archaeologist and senior research fellow at the W.F. Albright Institute of Archaeological Research in Jersualem, announced tantalizing results from a new study that he and Boaz Zissu, an archaeologist at Bar Ilan University, just completed on a 1st century B.C. shrouded burial they excavated in a tomb in Jerusalem. Gibson and several colleagues published the first part of the study in a paper in PLoS One on December 16th.

The entire study will clearly shed much new light on the authenticity of the more famous Shroud of Turin. As the team points out in the PLoS One paper, archaeologists rarely find ancient shrouded burials in the Jerusalem region: the city’s high levels of humidity quickly destroy organic materials. So, as Gibson recently explained to a reporter at The Catholic Review, ”this is the first shroud from Jesus’ time found in Jerusalem and the first shroud found in a type of burial cave similar to that which Jesus would have been buried in, and (because of this) it is the first shroud which can be compared to the Turin shroud.”

To read Pringle’s article, visit Beyond Stone and Bone by clicking here.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


Bookmark and Share

Stones and Bones or People?

Time Magazine has a very informative article which deals with two controversial issues: politics and archaeological excavation in Jerusalem.

A question asked by the writer of the article provides the tenor for the article. He asked: “What matters more, the stones and bones of antiquity, or the lives of the people who live on top of all that history?”

Read the article in its entirety by visiting Time Magazine online.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


Tags: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

The Bible and the Lunar Calendar


Image: Lunar Cuneiform Tablet 4000 years old

Image Courtesy: Ynet News




According to Ynet News, the Bible Lands Museum in Jerusalem is hosting an international conference titled "Living the Lunar Calendar: Time, Text and Tradition.” The conference will take place on January 30 through February 1, 2010.

Invited speakers include Prof. Lawrence H. Schiffman, New York University; Prof. Sacha Stern, University College London; Prof. Wayne Horowitz, Hebrew University Jerusalem; Prof. John Steel, Brown University USA; Prof. Stanislaw Iwaniszewski, National Institute of Anthropology and History, Mexico; and Dr. Jonathan Ben-Dov, University of Haifa.

The following is an excerpt from the press release published by Ynet News:

The “Living the Lunar Calendar” conference — held under the full moon of the Tu B'Shvat Jewish festival (new Year for trees)— will investigate the place of calendar reckoning in human society and culture.

Focusing on the moon as a marker of the passage of time, the conference will address a wide variety of issues regarding the application of astronomical and calendrical rules to everyday life, and beyond to the shaping of cultural identity.

The conference will begin on Saturday night with introduction lectures to Astronomy, the moon’s movements and its importance in determining the time. The second day of the conference will be devoted to the history of the Jewish calendar: with sessions devoted to Mesopotamia and to the use of the traditional Jewish lunar calendar.

The press release also provides the following information about a 4000 year old cuneiform tablet that contains information about the origins of the Hebrew calendar:

The Bible Lands Museum Jerusalem collection includes an extremely important rare cuneiform tablet is prominently displayed in the heart of the Museum's Gallery of the Patriarchs.

This large clay tablet is written in cuneiform on two sides and careful study and decipherment has revealed text that sheds light on the roots of the Hebrew calendar whose origins stem from Ancient Babylon. It describes the religious practices of the Babylonians from the time of Abraham.

The rare tablet takes the visitors to the ancient month Shabatu, 4,000 years ago. It is an example of a text recording the daily routine followed in the temples of the capital city of Larsa, which neighbored Ur in ancient Mesopotamia. In over six hundred and thirty lines, the tablet registers the rites performed in the temples during the month of Shabatu. This month is identical to the Hebrew month of Shvat and they are both the eleventh month of the year.

Read the article in its entirety by clicking here.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


Tags: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, January 28, 2010

The Timeless Teachings of the Dead Sea Scrolls

Annysa Johnson of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel has written a good article on the timeless teachings of the Dead Sea Scrolls. The following is an excerpt from the article:

They speak of a Teacher of Righteousness and a pierced messiah, of cleansing through water and a battle of light against darkness.

But anyone looking to the Dead Sea Scrolls in search of proof, say, that Jesus of Nazareth was the messiah presaged by the prophets, or that John the Baptist lived among the scroll's authors, will be disappointed.

What the scrolls provide instead, scholars say, is a window into a world of religious ferment 2,000 years ago that gave rise to Judaism and Christianity as we know them today.

"It is an entire library from this crucial period that opens up to us the interreligious debate that is the background for everything that happened after," said Lawrence H. Schiffman, chairman of New York University's Skirball Department of Hebrew and Judaic Studies, who has written extensively on the scrolls.

Read the article in its entirety here.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


Tags: ,

Bookmark and Share

The Birthplace of Emperor Vespasian

A news report has announced that archaeologists have found the birthplace of the Roman emperor Vespasian. The following is an excerpt from the news release:

Rome, January 28 (ANI): Reports indicate that an international team of archaeologists has claimed to have unearthed the 2000-year-old birthplace of the Roman emperor, Vespasian, north of the Italian capital.

Vespasian ruled the Roman empire in the first century A.D. and was behind the construction
of the Colosseum, one of Italy's most popular landmarks.

According to a report by Adnkronos International, archeologists believe they have located his birthplace in the Falacrinae valley near the hill town of Cittareale, 130 km northeast of Rome.

"Ancient Roman historian Suetonius says Vespasian was born in the Falacrinae valley area. Field surveys and information from locals have told us tell us this must be Vespasian's birthplace," one of the project's directors, British archaeologist Helen Patterson told Adnkronos International.

Vespasian was the ninth Roman emperor, who reigned from 69-79 AD.

He was believed to come from humble beginnings and founded the short-lived Flavian dynasty after the civil wars that followed Nero's death in 68 AD.

"During recent excavations, the archaeologists uncovered sumptuous marble floors and mosaics at the site of the 3,000-4,000 square metre Villa of Falacrinae," Patterson said.

The team of 30-60 archaeologists recovered pots, numerous coins, ceramic and metal artefacts from the site which is 820 metres above sea level, overlooking the surrounding Falacrinae valley.

"It was obviously a very,very big structure and very luxurious," she said, adding that the marble
used in the villa's floors had been imported from all over the Mediterranean.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


Tags: ,

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

God’s Covenant with David

In a previous post, I wrote about the Messianic expectation of the Old Testament. In that post I tried to explain how the Messianic hope developed through the centuries. However, in that post I did not explain the origin and the complexity of that hope. As one reader wrote in a comment posted on Facebook, “the concept of Messiah varied greatly from group to group among the Jews. A variety of images appear in the literature describing a Messiah figure.”

His statement is true. It was not my desire in that post to describe the “variety of images” that were present in the Messianic expectation of Israel. These various images were the pieces of the puzzle I alluded to in that post. That would be the subject of another post.

In the present post, I want to discuss the origin of the Messianic hope in the Bible without going into the development of the idea. That, in brief, was the purpose of my first post.

The Messianic hope in the Old Testament begins with God’s covenant with David and God’s promise that David’s throne would be established forever. I consider 2 Samuel 7, the text dealing with God’s covenant with David, to be one of the most important passages in the Old Testament. In this text, God promised to make a house for David, that is, God guaranteed the perpetuity of David’s kingdom by establishing an eternal dynasty for him.

In this post, I will focus on God’s promise to David. God promised that he would be a father to every descendant of David who would sit on David’s throne. I will also deal with two other passages where God’s promise was reaffirmed to a descendant of David.

2 Samuel 7:14

“I will be his father, and he will be my son.”

God’s covenant with David is a unilateral covenant in which God established a new relationship with Israel through David. The Davidic covenant was based upon God’s promise to David that his throne would be established forever. It was an unconditional covenant because it was not based on human behavior. It was God who assured David that his throne would “be established forever” (2 Samuel 7:16). God’s promise to David would bring stability to the monarchy and hope for the permanency of his kingdom in spite of the fact that historical events would threaten the fulfillment of God’s promises.

The promise in 2 Samuel 7:14 was not a reference to Christ and his kingdom, as many interpreters in the past and in the present have understood the passage. In the context of God’s promise to David, the one who would inherit David’s throne and build a house for God’s name would be Solomon:

12 When your days are fulfilled and you lie down with your fathers, I will raise up your offspring after you, who shall come forth from your body, and I will establish his kingdom.

13 He shall build a house for my name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom for ever.

14 I will be his father, and he shall be my son. When he commits iniquity, I will chasten him with the rod of men, with the stripes of the sons of men (2 Samuel 7:12-14).

Although the promise was made to Solomon and after him, to all the sons of David who became king of Judah, none of the kings who sat on the throne of David were able to meet the divine expectations for the ideal king. When Jerusalem was destroyed in 587 B.C. and the dynasty of David came to an end, many people believed that God’s promise to David had failed. However, the people of Israel had to wait many more years, even centuries, before the people could welcome another son of David:

“Hosanna to the Son of David” (Matthew 21:9).

“Blessed is the coming kingdom of our father David” (Mark 11:10).

The concept of the Davidic king being the son of God helps to explain two very important texts in the Old Testament: Psalm 2:7 and Isaiah 9:6.

Psalm 2:6-7

“I have set my king on Zion, my holy hill.” I will tell of the decree of the LORD: He said to me, “You are my son; today I have begotten you.”

Psalm 2 is a Royal Psalm that was used for the celebration of the investiture of a new king. In this psalm God affirms the son of David to be his chosen one because he continues the kingly line of David. The king was proclaimed to be God’s son on Zion, God’s holy hill. God’s words reaffirmed the selection of a descendant of David to be God’s representative on earth and the election of Jerusalem, the city of David, as the place from which the new king would rule.

The “decree of the Lord” was the royal protocol which was given to the king during the investiture ceremony. This document endowed the new king with legitimacy and authority.

The statement, “You are my son; today I have begotten you” carries two important ideas. First, the expression “You are my son” says that on the day the descendant of David was crowned king, the king developed a new relationship with Yahweh, becoming his representative on earth. The day of the king’s coronation was the day when the divine decree took effect. The idea that the king was God’s son was common in the Ancient Near East. The idea of God as the Father and the king as the son also appears in other texts in the Old Testament (cf. Psalm 89:26-27; 1 Chronicles 28:6). Thus, in Judah, the king became the son of God on the day he ascended to the throne of David.

God’s covenant with David was considered to be an eternal covenant. God promised to David that “Your house and your kingdom shall be made sure forever before me; your throne shall be established forever” (2 Samuel 7:16). The divine declaration to the new king in Psalm 2:7 served as an affirmation of the divine promise and as a renewal of God’s relationship with the house of David in the person of the new king.

Second, the expression “today I have begotten you” expresses a symbolic “new birth,” a process by which the son of David became the son of God by adoption. Adoption outside of the royal realm was common in Israel. Rachel adopted Bilhah’s son as her own son and Jacob adopted Ephraim and Manasseh, Joseph’s sons, as his own sons (Genesis 48:5). By this process of investiture and adoption, the new Davidic king became an heir of the divine promise to David and a representative of Yahweh before the people.

God’s words in Psalm 2:7 express the adoption of a new king as God’s son the moment this descendant of David assumed the throne to carry out God’s promise to David and rule over God’s people.

Isaiah 9:6

“For a child has been born for us, a son given to us; authority rests upon his shoulders; and he is named Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.”

This passage, Isaiah 9:5-6 (Hebrew 9:4-5) is a hymn celebrating the coronation of a new king. The rejoicing of the people in 9:3-4 (Hebrew 9:2-3) is the result of the celebration at the enthronement of a new king who will conquer the enemies who oppressed the people.

Verse 4 describes the situation of the oppressed people: “For the yoke of their burden, and the bar across their shoulders, the rod of their oppressor, you have broken as on the day of Midian.” In this verse, the oppressed people are treated like animals of burden. The people carry a heavy yoke upon their shoulders and are forced to labor hard by the rod which chastises them.

The day of the people’s redemption began the day the son of David was crowned king of Judah and ascended the throne of his father. The ascension of a new heir to the throne of David and his adoption by God was seen as the fulfillment of God’s promise to David in 2 Samuel 7:12-14, a promise which brought hope of deliverance from the oppression imposed upon the people of God by the heavy hand of Assyria.

This new king was Hezekiah and the words used by the prophet to describe the new king are the divine ideals for God’s representative and are meant to describe the rule of the one who would sit on David’s throne, but ideals which were never attained by Hezekiah or any other king. It was the failure of the kings of Judah to attain these ideals that forced the people to look to the future and hope for the coming of a new David.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


Tags: , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

The British Museum, Iran, and the Cyrus Cylinder

An article published in The Guardian describes the controversy between the British Museum and Iran over the status of the Cyrus Cylinder. The following is an excerpt from the article:
The discovery of fragments of ancient cuneiform tablets – hidden in a British Museum storeroom since 1881 – has sparked a diplomatic row between the UK and Iran. In dispute is a proposed loan of the Cyrus cylinder, one of the most important objects in the museum's collection, and regarded by some historians as the world's first human rights charter.

The Iranian government has threatened to "sever all cultural relations" with Britain unless the artefact is sent to Tehran immediately. Museum director Neil MacGregor has been accused by an Iranian vice-president of "wasting time" and "making excuses" not to make the loan of the 2,500-year-old clay object, as was agreed last year.

The museum says that two newly discovered clay fragments hold the key to an important new understanding of the cylinder and need to be studied in London for at least six months.

The pieces of clay, inscribed in the world's oldest written language, look like "nothing more than dog biscuits", says MacGregor. Since being discovered at the end of last year, they have revealed verbatim copies of the proclamation made by Persian king Cyrus the Great, as recorded on the cylinder. The artefact itself was broken when it was excavated from the remains of Babylon in 1879. Curators say the new fragments are the missing pieces of an ancient jigsaw puzzle.

Irving Finkel, curator in the museum's ancient near east department, said he "nearly had a coronary" when he realised what he had in his hands. "We always thought the Cyrus cylinder was unique," he said. "No one had even imagined that copies of the text might have been made, let alone that bits of it have been here all along."

Finkel must now trawl through 130,000 objects, housed in hundreds of floor-to ceiling shelving units. His task is to locate other fragments inscribed with Cyrus's words. The aim is to complete the missing sections of one of history's most important political documents.

Read the story in its entirety by visiting The Guardian online.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

Tags: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Monday, January 25, 2010

The Messianic Expectation of the Old Testament

Most Christians have a great desire to understand the Messianic expectation of the Old Testament. A good way of understanding the Messianic hope of the Old Testament is to understand its basic components. When most people think of prophecy in the Bible, probably what comes to mind is the idea of predicting the future. Most prophecies in the Old Testament are not predictions of the future, but they are the prophets’ attempt to communicate God’s words to their contemporaries.

The so-called Messianic expectation of the Old Testament refers to the coming of the expected or the promised deliverer of Israel. When Christians think about the Messiah, they think about Jesus Christ. To them, Jesus is clearly seen as the promised Messiah and as the fulfillment of the Messianic hope of the Old Testament.

However, the notion of the Messiah who would be a descendant of David and who would come to deliver Israel from their captivity and reestablish the kingdom of David, is a post-exilic phenomenon.

After the reign of David and a few generations after the division of the kingdom, people began looking for a good king, one like David who would reunite Israel and bring the tribes together again. The hope for a new David began to develop after many kings failed to rule righteously. This hope caused the people to begin looking for a new king who would bring back the glories of the Davidic kingdom.

Since most kings in Judah failed to meet the people’s expectation of a righteous king as described in Psalm 72, the people of Judah believed that a new David, “the ideal king,” was needed. Micah’s prophecy of a new David reflects the people’s expectation of their Messiah, their Anointed one:

But you, O Bethlehem of Ephrathah, who are one of the little clans of Judah, from you shall come forth for me one who is to rule in Israel, whose origin is from of old, from ancient days (Micah 5:2).

By saying that the new ruler would be born in Bethlehem, the prophet was bypassing Jerusalem, the seat of the government and the place where the palace of the king was located. God would go back to the village of Bethlehem, bypassing the city of Jerusalem, to select one who would rule in Israel.

In addition, the king’s origin would be “from of old, from ancient days.” Contrary to English translations which translate “from ôlām” as “from everlasting” (KJV), “from eternity” (HCSB), “from the eternal days” (BBE), the prophet is not referring to the eternity of the new ruler. A better translation is “whose origin goes back to the distant past, to days of long ago.” The days of the distant past, of long ago is a reference to the days of David. What the prophet is saying is that the new ruler will be another David. This is the reason God was going back to Bethlehem, as he did in the days of David, to select a new ruler who would rule over Judah as David did.

When the temple was destroyed and Judah went into exile, the people’s concept of the Messiah changed. The people now began to look for a new king who would restore the nation to its former glory. At the end of the exile, the people thought that the Messiah would come with the rebuilding of the temple in the sixth century. The prophet Haggai proclaimed:

On that day, says the LORD of hosts, I will take you, O Zerubbabel my servant, son of Shealtiel, says the LORD, and make you like a signet ring; for I have chosen you, says the LORD of hosts. (Haggai 2:23).

Zerubbabel was called the Branch (Zechariah 3:8; 6:12) and God’s signet ring (Haggai 2:23). The title “The Branch” is a reference to the Messianic King in Jeremiah 23:5. The title “God’s signet ring” was attributed to King Jehoiachin (Coniah), the son of Jehoiakim in Jeremiah 22:24.

Zerubbabel was not the Messiah and his disappearance produced a great disappointment in the hopes of the post-exilic community. Since no human king met the people’s expectation for the expected deliverer, in time the people began looking for a deliverer who would come in the distant future.

The ideal king would be the one who would come to Israel from the line of David. The new David would lead the people of Israel to power and rule over them in righteousness. Speaking of the new David, Ezekiel said: “My servant David shall be king over them; and they shall all have one shepherd. They shall follow my ordinances and be careful to observe my statutes” (Ezekiel 37:24-25).

Instead of looking at their present for the deliverer, the people began looking ahead, into the future. The people realized that the promise would not have immediate fulfillment. Thus, the promise gradually suffered an adjustment and was transferred to an eschatological fulfillment. This hope for a future deliverer became known as the messianic expectation that found fulfillment in the person of Christ.

A good way to illustrate the people’s expectation of a Messiah is by comparing this expectation to a puzzle. The Messianic expectation of the Old Testament is like a puzzle. With the passing
of time, more and more pieces of the puzzle were put together. In pre-exilic Israel, with the few pieces of the puzzle that the people had, they could not see clearly what the picture was. With the passing of time and with a few more pieces, the picture began to take shape. The people’s understanding of what that picture was, began to take shape.

Finally, in the fullness of time (Galatians 4:4), when all the pieces were put together, the people could see the final picture. The puzzle was not complete until the last piece was put in the puzzle. For Christians, the final piece of the puzzle was Jesus Christ.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


Tags: , , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, January 23, 2010

The Pope’s Command: Go Forth and Blog

According to a report published by the Associated Press, the Pope has told priests that they should blog in order to spread the gospel and engage in dialogue with people of other cultures. The following is an excerpt from the press release:

VATICAN CITY – Pope Benedict XVI has a new commandment for priests struggling to get their message across: Go forth and blog.

The pope, whose own presence on the Web has heavily grown in recent years, urged priests on Saturday to use all multimedia tools at their disposal to preach the Gospel and engage in dialogue with people of other religions and cultures.

And just using e-mail or surfing the Web is often not enough: Priests should use cutting-edge technologies to express themselves and lead their communities, Benedict said in a message released by the Vatican.

"The spread of multimedia communications and its rich 'menu of options' might make us think it sufficient simply to be present on the Web," but priests are "challenged to proclaim the Gospel by employing the latest generation of audiovisual resources," he said.
Read the story in its entirety here.

I think this is a great idea. If the Pope is telling priests to blog and spread the gospel worldwide, then pastors, ministers, and missionaries should also do the same. I am glad that more and more pastors are blogging regularly and sharing the good news through their blogs.

If every priest begins blogging and if at least half of their blogs will deal with biblical topics, then the list of Biblioblog Top 50 will be so long that soon we will have the Biblioblog Top 500.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

Tags:

Bookmark and Share

Pictures of Khirbet Qeiyafa

Image: Ostracon from Khirbet Qeiyafa




Blackpetero at 80% Blog has a post with several pictures of Khirbet Qeiyafa. Khirbet Qeiyafa has been identified with the Ella Fortress and the biblical site of Sha’arayim.

Sha’arayim (the town appears in the English Bible as Shaaraim) was a town in the Shephelah. After David killed Goliath, the Philistines fled to Gath and Ekron by the way of Sha’arayim: “The troops of Israel and Judah rose up with a shout and pursued the Philistines as far as Gath and the gates of Ekron, so that the wounded Philistines fell on the way from Shaaraim as far as Gath and Ekron” (1 Samuel 17:52).

Read my posts on Khirbet Qeiyafa:





Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


Bookmark and Share

Friday, January 22, 2010

The Location of Solomon’s Temple

In a lecture at New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary, archaeologist Leen Ritmeyer said that he has found the location of Solomon's Temple.

The following is an excerpt from Ritmeyer’s lecture as published by Baptist Press:

According to Ritmeyer, the original Temple Mount platform measured 500 cubits by 500 cubits. The "royal cubit" used for the temple was 20.67 inches long. Later, King Herod expanded the platform on the Temple Mount, doubling its size. It is the expanded, Herodian platform that tourists in Jerusalem visit today.

***

From information in the Mishnah, he theorized that the temple stood where the Dome of the Rock shrine now stands. If so, the Holy of Holies and the Ark of the Covenant would have rested on the rock inside the Dome of the Rock. Though some archaeologists dispute his claims, Ritmeyer presents a compelling case for his view.

The Mishnah stated that the temple was not located in the center of the 500 cubit by 500 cubit platform but was slightly northwest of center. This gave credence to his view. Ritmeyer then looked for confirmation on the surface of the rock.

The archaeologist saw that the large rock had numerous cuts, lines and indentions on its surface. Many other archaeologists had rejected the rock as a source for clues because of the number of cuts on the surface. Not so with Ritmeyer.

"I look at every stone on the Temple Mount as archaeological evidence," Ritmeyer said.

Ritmeyer searched for marks consistent with the information he knew about the Holy of Holies. Again, he relied on the Bible, historical records and a tape measure to test his theory. He speculated that some of the cuts were made to level the site for the temple's foundation.

Ritmeyer knew the dimensions of the Holy of Holies from 1 Kings 6 -- 20 cubits by 20 cubits. He also knew the thickness of the walls. Ritmeyer discovered that cuts on the rock matched the thickness of the walls and the width of the room. He also found cuts made for the back wall of the Holy of Holies.

Another rectangular mark caught Rimeyer's attention. He believed that this depression was the place the Ark of the Covenant stood in Solomon's Temple. Ritmeyer went to Exodus 25 for the ark's dimensions -- two and a half cubits by a cubit and a half. Using photographs and computers to measure the depression, scholars have found that the cut measures two and a half cubits by two cubits -– ample space to receive the ark.

Ritmeyer has presented a compelling argument for finding the original location of Solomon’s temple. Visit Baptist Press online and read all the evidence Ritmeyer has presented in his search for the location of Solomon’s temple.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


Tags: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

William G. Dever and the Existence of Solomon’s Kingdom

In a recent lecture at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary in Fort Worth, Texas, archaeologist William G. Dever defended the existence of an Israelite state in Palestine during the 10th century B.C., the biblical era of Solomon's reign.

The following in an excerpt from Dever’s lecture:

"Tonight, I want to talk about the age of Solomon, but before I do that, I want to set it up by telling you something about a school of European biblical scholarship," Dever said. "These people call themselves revisionists because they are rewriting the history of ancient Israel, but when they finish, there is no history. They call themselves revisionists. I call them nihilists."

According to Dever, the revisionist scholars deny that an Israelite united monarchy, like the biblical kingdom that flourished under Solomon, ever existed. Dever contested this claim, arguing that the archaeological evidence confirms the existence of a centralized Israelite state in 10th century Palestine.

According to a "wonderful, detailed description" in 1 Kings 9:15-17, the Egyptian pharaoh attacked and destroyed the city of Gezer, Dever said. The pharaoh then gave the city as a dowry to his daughter when she married Solomon. The passage then states that Solomon fortified or refortified four sites: Hazor, Megiddo, Gezer and Jerusalem.

"Wouldn't it be wonderful if we had archaeological evidence from those sites for an early stage? Well, we do," Dever said. "And what do you suppose the revisionists make of this evidence? They just ignore it, because it is inconvenient for their theories."

Dever reported that excavations, especially at Hazor, Megiddo and Gezer, have uncovered "monumental architecture" that cannot be explained without reference to a centralized government. The architecture of each of these cities is adapted to topography for strategic military advantage, but all the cities show the same structural patterns, such as six-chambered gates, double or casemate fortification systems, similar palace structures and Phoenician masonry (according to 1 Kings, Solomon utilized Phoenician craftsmen in his building projects).

These architectural structures can be dated to the 10th century B.C., Dever said, with reference to stratigraphy, ceramic typology and ancient Egyptian chronology. This process is aided by the discovery of destruction levels, filled with rubble and showing evidence of fires "so fierce that it melted the limestone and it flowed down like lava." According to Dever, the destruction can be attributed to the military invasions of the Egyptian Pharaoh Sheshonq, that is, the biblical Shishak (1 Kings 14 and 2 Chronicles 12).

"At one time, there stood a monumental Egyptian inscription at the site of Megiddo celebrating the destruction by Shishak," Dever said. Shishak was the first pharaoh in the 22nd Egyptian dynasty, and archaeological evidence shows that he raided Palestine in the late 10th century B.C. Amid the rubble of destruction, archaeologists also have discovered the hand-burnished pottery characteristic of the 10th century. According to Dever, this implies that the monumental architecture that Shishak and his army destroyed "must have been built a generation or so earlier -- and that places us precisely in the middle of the reign of Solomon."

"Of course, the revisionists argue that, 'Well, you've never found anything from the 10th century, nothing monumental in Jerusalem.' That's true, because we never were able to excavate [in Jerusalem]," Dever said. Jerusalem was the fourth city that Solomon refortified, and it was the center of his kingdom. Despite the lack of access to the archaeological evidence that lies below modern Jerusalem, Dever argued that biblical descriptions of Solomon's Temple resemble other 10th-century temples in the Middle East.

"All the descriptions in the Hebrew Bible," Dever said, "make good sense in the light of what we know about ancient architecture."

Revisionist scholars also contend that a centralized state could not have existed in 10th century Israel because literacy was not widespread, and the knowledge of reading and writing is necessary for the administration of a kingdom. Archaeological evidence like the Gezer calendar, however, has shown that even in rural areas young boys were learning to read during the 10th century and earlier, Dever said.

To read the article in its entirety as published in the Baptist Press, click here.

To learn more about Southwestern Seminary's involvement in biblical archaeology, visit http://www.swbts.edu/ or http://www.gezerproject.org/.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


Tags: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Dead Sea Scrolls Fragments of Daniel Chapter 6

The Baptist Press is reporting that fragments of the Dead Sea Scrolls have been acquired by Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary in Fort Worth, Texas. According to the press release, the fragments owned by the seminary include portions of Exodus 23, Leviticus 18 and Daniel 6.

Southwestern Seminary also acquired a pen made from a Palm tree, which was found with the Dead Sea Scrolls and presumably used by the scribes who wrote them. It is only one of three pens known to exist from the Dead Sea Scroll discoveries.

You can read the news release here.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


Tags: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

The Temple of the Cat-goddess Bastet




Image: Cat-goddess Bastet from Kom el-Dekkah

Credit: Egypt’s Supreme Council of Antiquities




Egypt’s Supreme Council of Antiquities is announcing that the remains of a temple of Queen Berenike, who was the wife of King Ptolemy III, have been discovered by archaeologists in the Kom el-Dekkah area of the Mediterranean port city of Alexandria. Egypt.

According to Egyptian archaeologists, the temple dates back more than 2,000 years and it was dedicated to the ancient cat-goddess Bastet. Several Bastet statues were unearthed in three different areas of the temple.

You can read more about the discovery and about the goddess Bastet here and here.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

Tags: , , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Was Moses Left-handed?

The Bible says that Ehud, one of the judges in Israel, was a left-handed man (Judges 3:15), as it were many of the warriors of the tribe of Benjamin (Judges 20:16). The Septuagint, the Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible, says that Ehud was an ambidexter, that is, someone who could use both hands alike. By being an ambidexter, Ehud had an advantage in hand-to-hand combat because he could use both hands.

There is a Jewish tradition that says that Moses was left-handed. This tradition is based on a legendary event that happened when Moses was a child. In his article, “Why Did Moses Stammer? And, Was Moses Left-handed,” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 88 (May 1995): 256-257, Henry Garfinkel provides the details for the Jewish tradition that Moses was left-handed:


Much of this evidence is derived from the Midrashim, a collection of learned books that search for meanings in the Bible which are not initially apparent. The word Midrash is derived from another word 'darash' which means 'to enquire' or 'to investigate'.

Rabbinic legend records that one day the young Moses was playing with Pharaoh and innocently took hold of his crown, placing it on his own head. One can imagine the consternation and horror that swept the palace. Was this an omen that the young Hebrew would one day destroy Pharaoh
and his evil dynasty and become the most powerful man in the country? The tension must have been so agonizing, that the onlookers became paralysed and dumb with fear. Probably all background noise ceased and the atmosphere must have been intense.

Eventually a test was devised. Some authorities believe that Jethro, the future father-in-law of Moses, proposed the trial and others that the angel Gabriel, disguised as a human-being, was responsible. It was proposed that two bowls were to be brought, one filled with chunks of shining gold, or, according to another author, a piece of bright onyx, or according to yet another authority, a date, and the other bowl with pieces of burning coal. These basins were placed in front of Moses. Were he to take a piece of the former, it was declared, this would indicate that he
would one day usurp the throne of Egypt and he would be killed. On the other hand, were he to take one of the red hot embers, the verdict would be: innocent.

One can imagine, that as the trial started, rhythmic melodies were played and the onlookers, especially Pharaoh, were filled with apprehension and foreboding. Moses, according to some, a mere 3 year old at the time, must surely have sensed that a powerful and compelling drama was taking place. The high tension, the throbbing music and his own feelings of fear all predisposed to a likely trance-state in the youngster.

Tradition teaches that Moses moved his hand towards the bowl containing the gold. When it seemed he was just about to take some of the precious metal, the suspense must have been almost palpable. Midrashic legend explains that the angel Gabriel forced Moses' hand away from its intended path to the container with the fiery coal. He clutched a lump of the material and probably dropped it instantly. No doubt, he burnt his fingers and brought his painful hand to his
mouth to suck and cool the digits. Some glowing splinters probably stuck to his hand so that his lips and mouth also became burnt.

At that moment, the palace atmosphere must have changed completely. Pharaoh probably smiled and then laughed with relief. The royal attendants must have followed his example and started to cheer unrestrainedly.

Moses, already in an almost certain trance-state must have been in mental turmoil. The recent events including his inability to move his hand in the direction that he wanted and then the burns of his fingers, lips and tongue, are likely to have resulted in a terrified youngster, hypnotized, immobile and unable to speak. It is easy to understand how, following such an experience, Moses could have been left with a permanent speech defect.

Interestingly, Louis Ginzberg in his authoritative book The Legends of the Jews writes:

... The coal burnt the child's hand, and he lifted it up and touched it to his mouth, and burnt part of his lips and part of his tongue and for all of his life he became slow of speech and of a slow tongue.

It may be relevant to this discussion to note that one of the prayers Jews are expected to say before retiring to bed at night also contains the name of Gabriel '... may Michael be at my right hand, Gabriel, at my left...'. According to Israel Abrahams this passage appeared in a prayer book in the late fourteenth century but there are similar passages in much earlier literature.

This may indicate that the angel Gabriel is somehow protective of the left side of the body. If this supposition is correct then it may have been Gabriel, the guardian of our left, who saved Moses by forcibly moving his left arm and hand. Generally, the dominant upper limb is the one that is likely to reach out for an article and according to this reasoning Moses may, therefore, well have been left-handed.

Tigay (p. 57), in his article discussing Moses’ speech impediment, wrote about the legend of Moses burning his tongue on a hot coal: “For all their popularity, the legend and the interpretation were dismissed as apocryphal as early as the 12th century by Rashbam.”

The Bible does not provide any evidence that Moses was left-handed. The view that Moses was left-handed is based on a Jewish legend about an apocryphal incident that happened when Moses was a child.


Read the companion post, Did Moses Have a Cleft Lip?


Note: The footnotes for Garfinkel’s article can be found in the article cited below.

References:

Henry Garfinkel. “Why Did Moses Stammer? And, Was Moses Left-handed,” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 88 (May 1995): 256-257.

Jeffry H. Tigay, “‘Heavy of Mouth’ and ‘Heavy of Tongue’: On Moses’ Speech Difficulty,” BASOR 231 (1978): 57-67.


Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


Bookmark and Share

Monday, January 18, 2010

Did Moses Have a Cleft Lip?

When God appeared to Moses at Mount Sinai and told him to return to Egypt and bring the people “out of the iron furnace” (Deuteronomy 4:20), Moses presented five objections why he should not go back to Egypt and speak to Pharaoh. In his fourth objection, Moses emphasized what has been commonly interpreted as his lack of eloquence as a public speaker. According to the translation of the New Revised Standard Version, Moses said to the LORD: “Oh, my Lord, I am not eloquent, either in the past or since you have spoken to your servant, but I am slow of speech and of tongue” (Exodus 4:10).

The words of Moses to God, if translated literally, would be as follows: “Not a man of words I . . . for heavy of mouth and heavy of tongue I.” Moses’s words to God have been translated differently be the various English versions:

“I am not a man of words; I have never been so, and am not now, even after what you have said to your servant: for talking is hard for me, and I am slow of tongue” (Exodus 4:10 The Bible in Basic English).

“I'm a terrible speaker. I always have been, and I'm no better now, even after you've spoken to your servant! My words come slowly, my tongue moves slowly” (Exodus 4:10 The Complete Jewish Bible).

“I have never been eloquent-- either in the past or recently or since You have been speaking to Your servant-- because I am slow and hesitant in speech” (Exodus 4:10 Holman Christian Standard Bible).

“ I'm not a good speaker. I've never been a good speaker, and I'm not now, even though you've spoken to me. I speak slowly, and I become tongue-tied easily” (Exodus 4:10 God’s Word to the Nations).

“Lord, I've never been a good speaker. And I haven't gotten any better since you spoke to me. I don't speak very well at all” (Exodus 4:10 New International Reader’s Version).

“I'm not very good with words. I never have been, and I'm not now, even though you have spoken to me. I get tongue-tied, and my words get tangled” (Exodus 4:10 New Living Translation).

These translations have one thing in common: they emphasize that Moses was a poor communicator and that he did not have the ability of speaking eloquently. The translations above reflect the view that the prophet was known by the use of words to proclaim God’s word. The response of Jeremiah to God’s call to the prophetic ministry reflects a similar objection. Jeremiah said to God: “Ah, Lord GOD! Truly I do not know how to speak” (Jeremiah 1:6).

However, some commentators have interpreted Moses’ claim that he was heavy of language to mean that he was unable to speak a foreign language. In this case, Moses was saying that he had forgotten how to speak either Egyptian, Hebrew, or both. According to the traditional view of Moses’ life, he spent forty years in Egypt, forty years in Midian, and forty years in the wilderness (he died at the age of one hundred and twenty years, cf. Deuteronomy 31:2). Thus, Moses’ many years away from Egyptian and Hebrew speaking people caused him to forget one or both languages. This view is based indirectly on Ezekiel 3:5 where God told Ezekiel that he was not sent to minister “to a people of a strange speech and of a hard language.”

In his commentary on Exodus, when dealing with Moses’ speech problem, Adam Clark wrote:

It is possible he was not intimately acquainted with the Hebrew tongue, so as to speak clearly and distinctly in it. The first forty years of his life he had spent in Egypt, chiefly at court; and though it is very probable there was an affinity between the two languages, yet they certainly were not the same. The last forty he had spent in Midian, and it is not likely that the pure Hebrew tongue prevailed there, though it is probable that a dialect of it was there spoken. On these accounts Moses might find it difficult to express himself with that readiness and persuasive flow of language, which he might deem essentially necessary on such a momentous occasion; as he would frequently be obliged to consult his memory for proper expressions, which would necessarily produce frequent hesitation, and general slowness of utterance, which he might think would ill suit an ambassador of God.

The view that Moses’ speech problem was that he was not eloquent or that he had forgotten Egyptian or Hebrew, is not very convincing. The expression “heavy of mouth” seems to describe some kind of physical disability. Genesis 48:10 says that “the eyes of Israel [Jacob] were heavy from age: he could not see (Darby Translation). In Isaiah 6:10, heavy ears belong to people who cannot hear (the same idea is present in the Hebrew of Isaiah 59:1 and Zechariah 7:11).

Because Moses’ words imply the idea of physical disability, many modern commentators have said that Moses’ inability to speak well was caused by a medical condition that caused stammering. According to modern research on the problem of stammering, emotional stress and anxiety can cause a person to stutter. This view says that Moses probably suffered some traumatic experience in his youth that caused him to stammer or that Moses had suffered an intense mental and emotional situation that led him to stutter.

S. Levin, in his article “The Speech Defect of Moses,” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 86 (October 1992): 632-633, has proposed a new theory to explain Moses’ speech problem. Levin proposed that Moses had a cleft lip. Levin wrote that in describing his condition, Moses said he was “heavy of mouth,” “heavy of tongue” (Exodus 4:10) and “uncircumcised of lips” (Exodus 6:12 KJV). Levin said that to the Israelites, the uncircumcision of the Philistines was considered a physical defect and a deformity that needed to be corrected.

According to Levin, Moses’ words in Exodus 4:10 and Exodus 6:12 clearly suggest that there was a problem with Moses’ mouth and that this was the reason Pharaoh would not listen to him: “I am of uncircumcised lips, and how shall Pharaoh hearken unto me?” (Exodus 6:30 KJV).

In his article, Levin provided several examples from the book of Exodus that he said clearly demonstrate that Moses was born with a physical malformation. For example, Levin said that because of his cleft lip, Moses was easily recognized as the person who killed the Egyptian. He said that Moses was not appointed a high priest because the law did not allow a person with a physical defect to serve as a priest (Leviticus 21:16-21). In addition, he said that after Moses was born, his mother hid him for three months because of maternal embarrassment at his physical abnormality.

Levin wrote that cleft lip is a relative frequent anomaly in babies. According to Levin, about 1 in 1000 babies is born with a cleft lip and that this situation in more prevalent in oriental babies and more common in males.

I find Levin’s argument unpersuasive. Although Moses’ words apparently suggest that he was afflicted with some kind of physical disability instead of lack of eloquence, the text does not provide enough information to help interpreters to identify the cause of Moses’ speech problem.

Tigay has made reference to an Akkadian cognate for the Hebrew word heavy (kbd) by saying that the Akkadian word kabātu “is used in medical texts as a symptom of several parts of the body” (p. 58). Parts of the body that are afflicted with “heaviness” include the head, knee, shins, feet, eyes, nose, and mouth.

Thus, English versions that speak of Moses’ ineloquence, that is, that he was a poor speaker, may be providing an interpretation to Moses’ words that is foreign to the text. The view that Moses had forgotten his Egyptian or his Hebrew does not reflect the true meaning of Exodus 4:10. Although the text seems to indicate that Moses had a physical disability, the text does not provide interpreters with enough information to help them diagnose Moses’ medical condition. The view that Moses’ speech difficulty was caused by a medical condition is almost certain. That this medical condition was stammering or a cleft lip is impossible to determine.

My next post will deal with the question of whether Moses was left-handed. Read the post here.

References:

Adam Clark, Clark’s Commentary on the Old Testament. The Ages Digital Library. In loco (Commentary on Exodus 4:10).

S. Levin, “The Speech Defect of Moses,” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 86 (October 1992): 632-33.

Jeffry H. Tigay, “‘Heavy of Mouth’ and ‘Heavy of Tongue’: On Moses’ Speech Difficulty,” BASOR 231 (1978): 57-67.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


Tags: , , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, January 17, 2010

A Shrine Dedicated to Zeus




Image: The Greek god Zeus





Discovery News is reporting that a shrine dedicated to the Greek god Zeus was discovered at an open-air sanctuary atop Mount Lykaion. The following is an excerpt from the article:

Excavations at the Sanctuary of Zeus atop Greece's Mount Lykaion have revealed that ritual activities occurred there for roughly 1,500 years, from the height of classic Greek civilization around 3,400 years ago until just before Roman conquest in 146.

"We may have the first documented mountaintop shrine from the ancient Greek world," says project director David Romano of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia.

Ritual ceremonies were conducted in a part of the open-air sanctuary called the ash altar of Zeus. It now consists of a mound of ash, stone and various inscribed dedications to Zeus, the head god of Greek mythology. Romano's team has found no evidence of a temple or structures of any kind on Mount Lykaion.

Read the article in its entirety by visiting Discovery News online.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


Bookmark and Share

Thursday, January 14, 2010

Women of the Wall

Today I read an article that made me think about the religious struggle of women in modern Judaism. The article, published in Forward, was written by Anat Hoffman who is the director of the Israel Religious Action Center of the Israel Movement for Progressive Judaism and the chair of Women of the Wall. Women of the Wall is an organization that promotes and encourages women to pray at the Kotel.

Her article deals with Jewish women’s desire to freely pray at the Kotel. The Kotel is popularly known as the Western Wall and as the Wailing Wall. The word “Kotel” is a Hebrew word meaning “Wall.” The Western Wall is one of the most important Jewish religious sites in Israel because it was part of the Temple complex. For this reason, the Kotel has become for Jews, a place for prayer and for reading the Torah.

Although women can pray at the Kotel, men and women cannot pray together. When people come to pray, there is a men’s and women’s section at the Wall. Women of the Wall has been gathering at the Kotel to pray every Rosh Hodesh, the first day of the month, since 1988. However, Women of the Wall have encountered strong opposition from ultra-Orthodox Jews who pray at the Western Wall.

Recently, an Israeli woman was arrested for wearing her prayer shawl visibly in the women’s section of the Kotel. When the case came to court, Women of the Wall agreed that they would wear their prayer shawls under their coats and not read from the Torah in the area of the Kotel. Hoffman’s article deals with women’s struggle to pray at the Kotel. The following is an excerpt from the article:

One recent afternoon, while I was riding on a gender-segregated bus in Jerusalem, an Orthodox woman told me she didn’t mind sitting in back and out of sight, because it helped the men “keep cleanliness of the eyes.” Her reasoning was familiar to me; it followed a logic similar to the rationale behind a men-only path at the Western Wall that was cleared just two years ago so that men would not have to look upon women as they make their way to the Kotel to pray. It’s no coincidence that Jerusalem’s first gender-segregated buses were for routes going to and from the Wall.

If you want a quick lesson on the growing gender segregation and discrimination in Israel, I suggest taking a look at the policies in place at the Western Wall, which are being constantly revised to deny women equal access at this sacred space. Things have changed tremendously in my 21 years of going to pray with Women of the Wall every Rosh Hodesh.

Women of the Wall is sometimes accused of protesting against the “status quo” at the Western Wall. In fact, there is no status quo at the Wall — things change all the time. Men and women used to enter the Western Wall plaza together through the Jewish Quarter’s Dung Gate; in 1994, separate, gender-segregated entrances were created. Within the past decade, women soldiers were still allowed to sing the national anthem during ceremonies at the Wall — now they are instructed to be content with mouthing the words.

Simply put, our goal is to obtain the freedom to pray and to do everything that is halachically permitted for women on the women’s side of the mechitza. This includes reciting prayers together that do not require a minyan, and, yes, most of all, it includes reading from the Torah. (Though it has been many years since we have been able to read from the Torah in the women’s section at the Wall.) At a minimum, we want to be allowed to pray at the Wall for one hour each month, free of injury and fear. This should not be a provocative request.

You can read the article in its entirety here

Hoffman concludes her article by saying the Women of the Wall are inspired by the words of Mordecai to Esther. Mordecai told Esther not to keep silent at a time when the Jewish people faced a mortal danger at the hands of Haman. As a result, Esther and Mordecai were able to unite the people as they prayed in support of Esther. Hoffman writes: “The antidote to silence is action; we are now turning to the whole Jewish world, men and women alike, to help us reclaim the Wall for all Jews.”

May the Women of the Wall find in the Kotel a place where they can pray, read the Torah, and sing their praises to God without the fear of violence and retaliation from those who want to segregate women for fear that the presence of women desecrates sacred places.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


Tags: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Full-body Scan and Modesty

A group of observant Jews are concerned that full-body scans in airports may violate the Jewish law of tzniut, or modesty. In an article published in Forward, Josh Nathan-Kazis wrote:

Observant Jews are voicing concerns over modesty and looking for compromise on the Transportation Security Administration’s plan to expand the use of whole-body imaging machines for airport security, after last month’s failed attempt to bomb a Detroit-bound jetliner.

Leaders in both Conservative and Orthodox communities are debating how scanners with the ability to see through clothing intersect with Jewish laws of tzniut, or modesty, which are observed differently among denominations but generally require Jews to cover their bodies.

“It creates a tension between the Jewish value of protecting lives, which is very strong, and the Jewish value of modesty for women and for men,” said David Rosenn, a Conservative rabbi and the executive director of Avodah, a Jewish service program.

****

Conservative and Orthodox rabbis have voiced concern over the scanners, and in some cases they've requested compromises to ensure that their modesty concerns are met. Last June, the Washington office of Agudath Israel, which represents traditional American Orthodox communities, sent a letter to a Senate subcommittee reviewing a TSA-related bill, promoting an amendment to the House version of the bill that limited the use of the full-body scanners to situations in which passengers had already failed a metal detector test, and which would require that those passengers be offered the option of a pat-down search.

"As an organization that represents observant Jews, Agudath Israel finds [full-body imaging] to be offensive, demeaning, and far short of acceptable norms of modesty under the laws and practices of Judaism and many faith communities," the letter read.

Read the article in its entirety by clicking here.

Full-body scan is an invasion of privacy because full-body scanning machines can see pictures of the naked body of the person being scanned. In addition, there is no guarantee that the TSA officers looking at the scanned images will be of the same gender as the individual being scanned.

This new procedure to be introduced nationwide by the TSA raises an important question: should travelers be concerned about someone looking at their naked bodies or be assured that when they travel that they are secure and protected from potential acts of terror?

Unfortunately, it does not matter how one answers that question, the terrorists have won. The aim of terrorists is to disrupt our lives and cause as much inconvenience and disruption as possible. The introduction of full-body scans in airports is evidence that their tactics work.

I believe that the government has an obligation to protect the privacy of individuals even in these perilous times. Maybe the solution is to begin with the metal detector test, the puffs of air to test for explosives, or even a pat-down search, thus limiting the use of full-body scans to selective situations where a passenger fails one of these tests.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


Tags: ,

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Is the Pope the Head of the Baptist Church?

Jimmy Akin, writing for The National Catholic Register, asks the following question:


“Is the Pope Catholic? Current scholars believe he is the head of the Baptist church, but new evidence points in a Catholic direction.”

Now, if Akin’s question were a real question, it would open the door for an interesting debate. However, I want to assure you that I took the question completely out of context. In addition, Akin’s question is only a rhetorical question used as an illustration to answer some issues raised by Professor Gershon Galil’s translation of the Khirbet Qeiyafa’s inscription.

But imagine if Akin’s question were a real question. The history of the church would have to be completely rewritten.

The reason for introducing Akin’s question is just because I could not resist the irony of this rhetorical question.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


Tags:

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

New Cyrus Cylinder Pieces Found in the British Museum



Image: The Cyrus Cylinder




The Cyrus Cylinder contains the decree Cyrus the Great issued after he conquered Babylon in 539 B.C. restoring the proper worship of Marduk in Babylon and allowing the return of the captive gods to their own countries. Cyrus’ decree also allowed the exiled people in Babylon to return to their native lands. The Cyrus the Great cylinder is inscribed in Babylonian cuneiform and is considered by some to be the world’s first charter of human rights.

The Cyrus Cylinder is partially broken, but the British Museum has announced that several new fragments of the Cyrus Cylinder have been found in their archives. The following is an excerpt from a news release announcing the discovery:

Iranian inscription expert Abdolmajid Arfaei says the newly-found pieces of the Cyrus cylinder had been housed in the British Museum.

“The pieces have most probably been housed in the museum and only recently recognized as parts of the Cyrus cylinder.”

The British Museum recently announced that some new parts of the cylinder’s broken pieces have been found, which might be a clue to some other documents sent by Cyrus the Great to other regions.

“If there are any new pieces, then they can provide more information about the contents of the cylinder,” Arfaei said.

I believe the discovery of additional pieces of the Cylinder is very important. If these pieces indeed belong to the Cylinder, they may supply additional information about Cyrus and his decree.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

Tags: , ,

Bookmark and Share

The Taliban and the Lost Tribes of Israel

According to a report published by Arutz Sheva, scientists at the National Institute of Immunohaematology in Mumbai, India have concluded that a large group of Taliban Muslims may be the descendants of the lost Ten Tribes of Israel. The same report also says that an Israeli rabbinical expert agrees with this view.

The following is an excerpt from the report published by Arutz Sheva:

Rabbi Eliyahu Avichayil, who has dedicated his life to seeking out descendants of the Ten Tribes and bringing them to Israel, says he does not need or trust genetic testing for this purpose: “Rashi’s explanation to Jeremiah 31, 20 implies that the way to identify the Ten Lost Tribes will be via the Jewish customs that they maintain – and in this case, there are many of them.”

Rabbi Avichayil says that the Jewish-like customs that have been found among the Pathans - many of whom are now of the Taliban tribe - include sidelocks, ritual circumcision at eight days, cities of refuge for accidental killers, four-cornered garments, ritual immersion for women, and more. They also practice levirate marriage - not according to Moslem custom, which allows for various relatives of the deceased to marry a widow, whether or not she has children, but rather closer to Jewish custom, in that only brothers can marry only childless-widows.

The very name of the Afridi tribe, of which many members belong to the Taliban, indicates its origin from the Israelite Tribe of Ephraim, Rabbi Avichayil says. “The Pathans, 22 million strong, include not only the Afridic tribe, some 7.5 million people, but also the Rabanis, the Gadis, the Asheris, etc. – indications that many of them are of the Ten Tribes.”

Rabbi Avichayil says that the return of the remnant of the lost tribes of Israel will be the fulfilment of Jeremiah 31:20. Jeremiah 31:20 says:

“Truly, Ephraim is a dear son to Me,
A child that is dandled!
Whenever I have turned against him,
My thoughts would dwell on him still.
That is why My heart yearns for him;
I will receive him back in love, declares the LORD.”

These words of Yahweh come at the end a lament (Jeremiah 31:18-20) in which Ephraim is lamenting its sin which caused its exile away from its native land:

Indeed I heard Ephraim pleading:
You disciplined me, and I took the discipline;
I was like a calf untrained.
Bring me back, let me come back,
for you are the Lord my God.

In this lament Ephraim confesses having been disciplined by Yahweh. The mention of the discipline imposed on Ephraim may be a reference to the exile of the Northern tribes which occurred in 722 B.C. after the fall of Samaria and the deportation of 27,290 people by Sargon II, king of Assyria.

Ephraim’s cry, “Bring me back, let me come back,” is an appeal to God, imploring his mercy and forgiveness. More than a return from exile, Ephraim is asking to be restored to fellowship with God without which Ephraim will continue to be separated from God and condemned to remain in the land of his exile. Thus, before Ephraim can be restored, God must act, and act he does:

“Truly, Ephraim is a dear son to Me,
A child that is dandled!
Whenever I have turned against him,
My thoughts would dwell on him still.
That is why My heart yearns for him;
I will receive him back in love, declares the LORD.”

The words of Yahweh in Jeremiah 31:20 reveal the depths of divine pathos and the great love the Lord has for Ephraim. God’s words reveal the tender feelings of a father who truly cares for his son. Thus, God’s words about Ephraim reveal that however much Ephraim has sinned against God, God will still remember him because Ephraim is his beloved son.

It is clear that God’s word in Jeremiah 31:20 was spoken to the remnant of the Northern tribes now in exile. An audience today hearing these words of God probably will understand “that on the other side of judgment is a God of grace and mercy waiting expectantly to receive his wayward child back again” (Lundbom, p. 447).

Jack Lundbom, in his commentary on Jeremiah couples Ephraim’s lament in Jeremiah 31:18-20 with Rachel’s lament in Jeremiah 31:15-17. He wrote:

When both poems in vv 18-20 are heard following the poems in vv 15-17, Rachel’s weeping will be balanced by the tearful confession of Ephraim, and it will be understood that Rachel’s sons are not gone but simply languishing in exile. Both laments receive comforting answers, with Yahweh making clear his intention to bring the exiles home and restore them to favor (p. 447).

If these Taliban Muslims are indeed the remnant of the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel, then their return to Israel may be the fulfillment of God’s words in Jeremiah 31:20.

Bibliography:

Jack R. Lundbom, Jeremiah 21-36. The Anchor Bible. New York: Doubleday, 2004.


Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

Tags: , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Monday, January 11, 2010

An 8,000-year-old Building in Tel Aviv



Photo: Hippopotamus bone discovered at the oldest known building in Tel Aviv.

Courtesy: Israel Antiquities Authority





Haaretz is reporting that archeologists have discovered the remains of an 8,000-year-old building in Tel Aviv. The following is an excerpt from the article:

Remains of a prehistoric building, the earliest ever discovered in the Tel Aviv region and estimated to be between 7,800 and 8,400 years old, were recently discovered in an archaeological excavation in Ramat Aviv.

Ancient artifacts thought to be 13,000 and 100,000 years old were also discovered there.

Archaeologist Ayelet Dayan, director of the excavation on behalf of the Israel Antiquities Authority, said that "this discovery is both important and surprising to researchers of the period. For the first time we have encountered evidence of a permanent habitation that existed in the Tel Aviv region 8,000 years ago."

"The site is located on the northern bank of the Yarkon River, not far from the confluence with Nahal Ayalon. We can assume that this fact influenced the ancient settlers in choosing a place to live. The fertile alluvium soil along the fringes of the streams was considered a preferred location for a settlement in ancient periods," she said.

During the Neolithic period (also known as the New Stone Age) man went from a nomadic existence of hunting and gathering to living in permanent settlements and began to engage in agriculture.

Remains of an ancient building with at least three rooms were discovered at the site. The pottery shards that were found there attest to the age of the site, which dates to the Neolithic period. In addition, flint tools such as sickle blades were discovered, as well as numerous flakes left over from the knapping of these implements, which are indicative of an ancient tool-making industry.

Read the article in its entirety by vising Haaretz online.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

Tags: , , ,

Bookmark and Share