Recently, I found that someone asked this question. The question is a good question, but it was the answer given to the question that made me think. When Answers.com was asked this question, "Who was Jotham in the Old Testament," the answer Answers.com gave was: David’s son.
Now, let us see what the Bible says. There are three Jothams mentioned in the Bible:
1. Jotham was the second of the six sons of Jahdai, a Judahite from the family of Caleb, the Hezronite (l Chronicles 2:47).
2. Jotham was the youngest of Gideon’s seventy sons and the only one who escaped the massacre of Gideon’s sons by Abimelech (Judges 9:5).
3.. Jotham was the eleventh king of Judah and the son of King Uzziah (2 Kings 15:30).
This Jotham, the son of Uzziah, was a descendant of David, but not a son of David. David did not have a son named Jotham. So, the answer provided by Answers.com is wrong.
Moral: be careful with what you read in the Internet.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Jotham
This blog is a Christian perspective on the Old Testament and Current Events from Dr. Claude Mariottini, Professor of Old Testament at Northern Baptist Seminary.
Wednesday, March 31, 2010
Scientific Explanations for the Miracles of Passover.
Writing for Slate, Michael Lukas has an interesting article on the scientific explanations for the miracles of Passover. The following is an excerpt from the article:
Read the article in its entirety by visiting Slate.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Exodus, Passover, Moses
Accepting the biblical account as a "possible 'qualitative' description of an event," Florida State oceanographer Doron Nof set out to investigate whether the parting of the Red Sea is "plausible from a physical point of view." Using a common phenomenon called wind set-down effect, he found that "a northwesterly wind of 20 m/s blowing for 10-14 h is sufficient to cause a sea level drop of about 2.5m." Such a drop in sea level, Nof speculates, might have exposed an underwater ridge, which the Israelites crossed as if it were dry land. Although the event is plausible, Nof estimated that the likelihood of such a storm occurring in that particular place and time of year is less than once every 2,400 years.
While scientists agree that wind set-down effect could have caused the Red Sea to part as described in the Bible, most biblical scholars and archeologists insist that the Israelites' crossing did not take place at the Red Sea at all. The original Hebrew (yam suph), they contend, should be translated as Sea of Reeds, not Red Sea. So where's the Sea of Reeds? It depends whom you ask. In the somewhat specious History Channel documentary Exodus Decoded, Simcha Jacobovici (aka the Naked Archaeologist) places the Israelites' crossing in the Bitter Lakes, a reedy marshland north of the Gulf of Suez that was subsumed during the construction of the Suez Canal. For his part, Walking the Bible author Bruce Feiler concludes that the Sea of Reeds is Lake Timsah, located halfway between Port Said and Suez. But The Miracles of Exodus author Humphreys argues that while the translation of "the Red Sea" may be incorrect, the Sea of Reeds nevertheless refers to the Red Sea, concluding that "there can be little doubt that the Red Sea crossing was made possible by wind setdown at the head of the Gulf of Aqaba."
Before he parted whatever sea it was he parted, the Bible describes Moses and his brother Aaron delivering 10 plagues on the people of Egypt. The Nile turns to blood, all the fish die, frogs are brought forth abundantly, and so on. Drawing on theology, Egyptology, and biology, epidemiologist John Marr developed a "domino theory" to explain each of the 10 plagues in order. Marr believes the plagues were a series of natural disasters and diseases triggered by a bloom of water-borne organisms called dinoflagellates. The dinoflagellates turned the Nile red and killed the frog-eating fish, which in turn caused a population explosion among frogs. The tainted water eventually killed the frogs, causing lice and flies to run rampant, which lead to a number of animal diseases (including African horse sickness) and an outbreak of boils (fancy glanders). This reign of disaster and disease continued through hail, locusts (Schistocerca gregaria, to be precise), and sandstorms until the death of the firstborn sons, which Marr thinks was caused by grain infected with mycotoxins. Others, building on Marr's domino theory, argue that the plagues were triggered by the eruption of the Greek island of Santorini, causing a string of disasters such as those that occurred at Lake Nyos, Cameroon, in 1986.
Read the article in its entirety by visiting Slate.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Exodus, Passover, Moses
Torture Practices in Antiquity
Violence, atrocities, and torture were practiced widely by the nations of antiquity as a mean of subjugating conquered people and as a way discouraging people not to revolt against their overlords.
In a recent article published in Spiegel online, Matthias Schulz describes some of the ways used by the empires of antiquity to torture people. The following is an excerpt from the article:
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Torture, Violence, Atrocities
In a recent article published in Spiegel online, Matthias Schulz describes some of the ways used by the empires of antiquity to torture people. The following is an excerpt from the article:
In the ancient Far East, where there were large states peopled by many different ethnicities, leaders demonstrated their might by inventing ingenious new tortures and agonizing methods of execution -- as a way to keep the population obedient.Read the article in its entirety by clicking here.
The judges of ancient Babylon were particularly enthusiastic. The cutting off of feet, lips and noses, blinding, gutting and the tearing out of the heart were all standard punishments in this corner of the ancient world.
But the Assyrians seem to have been the masters of brutality. They were also extremely verbose about the grisly ends they wreaked upon their enemies. "I will hack up the flesh and then carry it with me, to show off in other countries," exulted Ashurbanipal, an Assyrian king who reigned from 668 to 627 BC. And his heir liked to cut open the bellies of his opponents "as though they were young rams."
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Torture, Violence, Atrocities
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
Jon Piper’s Letter To His Congregation
John Piper, pastor of the Bethlehem Baptist Church in Minneapolis, Minnesota, told his congregation that he is taking a leave of absence from his ministry to make personal adjustments.
According to the letter to the church, Piper said that he needs a “reality check from the Holy Spirit” because of “prideful sipping from the poisonous cup of international fame and notoriety.”
The following is an excerpt from the letter:
I respect John Piper and appreciate his ministry. I will pray for him and his family.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: John Piper
According to the letter to the church, Piper said that he needs a “reality check from the Holy Spirit” because of “prideful sipping from the poisonous cup of international fame and notoriety.”
The following is an excerpt from the letter:
As you may have already heard in the sermon from March 27-28, the elders graciously approved on March 22 a leave of absence that will take me away from Bethlehem from May 1 through December 31, 2010. We thought it might be helpful to put an explanation in a letter to go along with the sermon.Read Piper’s letter in its entirety by clicking here.
I asked the elders to consider this leave because of a growing sense that my soul, my marriage, my family, and my ministry-pattern need a reality check from the Holy Spirit. On the one hand, I love my Lord, my wife, my five children and their families first and foremost; and I love my work of preaching and writing and leading Bethlehem. I hope the Lord gives me at least five more years as the pastor for preaching and vision at Bethlehem.
But on the other hand, I see several species of pride in my soul that, while they may not rise to the level of disqualifying me for ministry, grieve me, and have taken a toll on my relationship with Noël and others who are dear to me. How do I apologize to you, not for a specific deed, but for ongoing character flaws, and their effects on everybody? I’ll say it now, and no doubt will say it again, I’m sorry. Since I don’t have just one deed to point to, I simply ask for a spirit of forgiveness; and I give you as much assurance as I can that I am not making peace, but war, with my own sins.
Noël and I are rock solid in our commitment to each other, and there is no whiff of unfaithfulness on either side. But, as I told the elders, “rock solid” is not always an emotionally satisfying metaphor, especially to a woman. A rock is not the best image of a woman’s tender companion. In other words, the precious garden of my home needs tending. I want to say to Noël that she is precious to me in a way that, at this point in our 41-year pilgrimage, can be said best by stepping back for a season from virtually all public commitments.
I respect John Piper and appreciate his ministry. I will pray for him and his family.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: John Piper
Sacred Prostitution in Antiquity
During the religious reforms that occurred in Judah in the sixth century B.C., Josiah, king of Judah, “broke down the houses of the male cult prostitutes which were in the house of the LORD, where the women wove hangings for the Asherah” (2 Kings 23:7). The Hebrew Bible says that sacred prostitution was practiced in the temple in Jerusalem.
The issue whether sacred prostitution was practiced in antiquity is an item of debate among scholars. A recent article dealing with sacred prostitution was published by Spiegel online. The following is an excerpt from the article:
Read the article in its entirety by clicking here.
HT: Greg Carey
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Sacred Prostitution
The issue whether sacred prostitution was practiced in antiquity is an item of debate among scholars. A recent article dealing with sacred prostitution was published by Spiegel online. The following is an excerpt from the article:
"Holy harlots" in Jerusalem, temple sex in the service of Aphrodite? Many ancient authors describe sacred prostitution in drastic terms. Are the accounts nothing but legends? Historians are searching for the kernel of truth behind the reports.
The "ugliest custom" in Babylon, the historian Herodotus wrote (who is believed to have lived between circa 490 to 425 B.C.), was the widespread practice of prostitution in the Temple of Ishtar. Once in their lifetimes, all women in the country were required to sit in the temple and "expose themselves to a stranger" in return for money.
"Rich and haughty" women, the ancient Greek historian railed, arrived in "covered chariots."
The Persians on the Black Sea were apparently involved in similarly nefarious activities. According to the Greek geographer Strabo, "virgin daughters," hardly 12 years old, were dedicated to cult prostitution. "They treat their lovers with such friendliness that they even entertain them."
There are many such reports from classical antiquity. Tribes from Sicily to Thebes are believed to have indulged in perverse religious customs.
The Jews were also involved in such practices. There are about a dozen passages in the Old Testament that revolve around "Qadeshes," a word for female and male cult practitioners. The Bible calls them "lemans" and "catamites." In the Fifth Book of Moses, male prostitutes are prohibited from donating their "dogs' money" to the House of Yahweh.
Twentieth-century researchers eagerly seized on the references, which were often mysterious. Soon it was considered a fact that priests in the Eastern World performed forced defloration. It was said that there was "dowry prostitution" and "sexual copulation at the cult site."
Temple sex, according to the "Encyclopedia of Theology and the Church," was a "moral and hygienic plague spot on the body of the people."
But is this true? More and more academics are now questioning the erotic fables of the ancients.
Read the article in its entirety by clicking here.
HT: Greg Carey
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Sacred Prostitution
Monday, March 29, 2010
The Titles of God in the Hebrew Bible
The God of the Hebrew Bible has a name: “God said to Moses, ‘You are to tell the Israelites, Yahweh, the God of your ancestors, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob, has sent me to you.’ This is my name for all time, and thus I am to be invoked for all generations to come” (Exodus 3:15 NJB).
Unfortunately, over the years the pronunciation of the name YHWH was forgotten. A form of the divine name is preserved in the names of several individuals in the Bible, names like Mikayah, “Who Is Like Yah,” and Mikayahu, “Who Is Like Yahu.”
In the Ancient Near East, the names of individuals were very important because a name represented the personality of an individual. In the same way, the name and titles of God in the Bible represent an aspect of the nature and the character of God.
Several passages in the Hebrew Bible emphasize the importance of the name of God in the life of the people of Israel. For instance, the name of God was evidence of God’s presence with his people and was a sign of God’s protection and God’s deliverance:
“ May Yahweh answer you in time of trouble, may the name of the God of Jacob protect you” (Psalm 20:1 NJB).
“He restores my soul. He leads me in right paths for his name’s sake” (Psalm 23:3).
It is for this reason that God appears in the Bible with different names. These names are in reality titles that describe one aspect of the theophany, that is, the divine manifestation of God to his people. These titles also express the many ways the people of Israel experienced God.
I have listed below a few of the many titles by which the people of Israel experienced God. The present list is only a small sample of the ways God was described and experienced in the Bible. The titles of God compounded with the word "El," the Hebrew word for God, are many and only a few of them are listed below.
Time and space do not allow me to discuss each title in detail. At this time I will only introduce the list of the divine titles. In future posts, I will introduce each title in more detail. Until then, let us remember what God said about his name: “In every place where I cause my name to be remembered I will come to you and bless you” (Exodus 20:24 ESV).
Yahweh-Yireh
“Abraham named the place Yahweh-Yireh (which means ‘the LORD will provide’). To this day, people still use that name as a proverb: ‘On the mountain of the LORD it will be provided’”
(Genesis 22:14 NLT).
Yahweh-Rophe (or Ropheka)
“If you will diligently listen to the voice of the LORD your God, and do that which is right in his eyes, and give ear to his commandments and keep all his statutes, I will put none of the diseases on you that I put on the Egyptians, for I am the LORD, your healer” [Yahweh-Ropheka] (Exodus 15:26 ESV).
Yahweh-Nissi
“Moses then built an altar and named it Yahweh-Nissi” (Exodus 17:15 NJB).
Yahweh-Mekadesh (or Mekadeshkem)
“Keep my statutes and do them; I am the LORD who sanctifies you” [Yahweh-Mekadeshkem] (Leviticus 20:8 ESV).
Yahweh Shalom
“So Gideon built an altar to the LORD there and called it Yahweh Shalom. It is in Ophrah of the Abiezrites until today” (Judges 6:24 CSB).
Yahweh Sabaoth
“to extend his dominion in boundless peace, over the throne of David and over his kingdom to make it secure and sustain it in fair judgement and integrity. From this time onwards and for ever, the jealous love of Yahweh Sabaoth will do this” (Isaiah 9:7 [Hebrew Isaiah 9:6] NJB).
Yahweh Tzidkenu
“In his days Y'hudah will be saved, Isra'el will live in safety, and the name given to him will be ADONAI Tzidkenu [ADONAI our righteousness]” (Jeremiah 23:6 CJB).
Yahweh-Shamah
“'The perimeter of [the city] will be just under six [miles] long. And from that day on the name of the city will be ADONAI Shamah [ADONAI is there]” (Ezekiel 48:35 CJB).
El Shadday
“When Abram was ninety-nine years old, the LORD appeared to him and said, ‘I am El-Shaddai’–‘God Almighty.’ Serve me faithfully and live a blameless life” (Genesis 17:1 NLT).
El Elyon
“But Abram said to the king of Sodom, ‘I have lifted my hand to the LORD, God Most High [El Elyon], Possessor of heaven and earth’” (Genesis 14:22 ESV).
“But Avram answered the king of S'dom, ‘I have raised my hand in an oath to ADONAI, El 'Elyon, maker of heaven and earth’” (Genesis 14:22 CJB).
El Roi
“Hagar gave a name to Yahweh who had spoken to her, ‘You are El Roi,’ by which she meant, ‘Did I not go on seeing here, after him who sees me?’” (Genesis 16:13 NJB).
El Olam
Abraham planted a tamarisk tree in Beersheba and called there on the name of the LORD, the Everlasting God [El Olam]” (Genesis 21:33 ESV).
El Jeshurun
“No one is like the God of Jeshurun [El Jeshurun]: he rides the heavens to your rescue, rides the clouds in his majesty” (Deuteronomy 33:26 NJB).
El Deoth
“Do not boast so proudly, or let arrogant words come out of your mouth, for the LORD is a God of knowledge [El Deoth], and actions are weighed by Him” (1 Samuel 2:3 CSB).
El Israel
“Awesome is God from his sanctuary; the God of Israel [El Israel]–he is the one who gives power and strength to his people. Blessed be God!” (Psalm 68:35 ESV).
El Kanna
“You must not bow down to these gods or serve them. For I, Yahweh your God, am a jealous God [El Kanna] (Deuteronomy 5:9 NJB).
“Those who know your name put their trust in you, for you, O LORD, have not forsaken those who seek you” (Psalm 9:10 ESV).
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Hebrew Bible, God’s Name, God’s Titles
Unfortunately, over the years the pronunciation of the name YHWH was forgotten. A form of the divine name is preserved in the names of several individuals in the Bible, names like Mikayah, “Who Is Like Yah,” and Mikayahu, “Who Is Like Yahu.”
In the Ancient Near East, the names of individuals were very important because a name represented the personality of an individual. In the same way, the name and titles of God in the Bible represent an aspect of the nature and the character of God.
Several passages in the Hebrew Bible emphasize the importance of the name of God in the life of the people of Israel. For instance, the name of God was evidence of God’s presence with his people and was a sign of God’s protection and God’s deliverance:
“ May Yahweh answer you in time of trouble, may the name of the God of Jacob protect you” (Psalm 20:1 NJB).
“He restores my soul. He leads me in right paths for his name’s sake” (Psalm 23:3).
It is for this reason that God appears in the Bible with different names. These names are in reality titles that describe one aspect of the theophany, that is, the divine manifestation of God to his people. These titles also express the many ways the people of Israel experienced God.
I have listed below a few of the many titles by which the people of Israel experienced God. The present list is only a small sample of the ways God was described and experienced in the Bible. The titles of God compounded with the word "El," the Hebrew word for God, are many and only a few of them are listed below.
Time and space do not allow me to discuss each title in detail. At this time I will only introduce the list of the divine titles. In future posts, I will introduce each title in more detail. Until then, let us remember what God said about his name: “In every place where I cause my name to be remembered I will come to you and bless you” (Exodus 20:24 ESV).
Yahweh-Yireh
“Abraham named the place Yahweh-Yireh (which means ‘the LORD will provide’). To this day, people still use that name as a proverb: ‘On the mountain of the LORD it will be provided’”
(Genesis 22:14 NLT).
Yahweh-Rophe (or Ropheka)
“If you will diligently listen to the voice of the LORD your God, and do that which is right in his eyes, and give ear to his commandments and keep all his statutes, I will put none of the diseases on you that I put on the Egyptians, for I am the LORD, your healer” [Yahweh-Ropheka] (Exodus 15:26 ESV).
Yahweh-Nissi
“Moses then built an altar and named it Yahweh-Nissi” (Exodus 17:15 NJB).
Yahweh-Mekadesh (or Mekadeshkem)
“Keep my statutes and do them; I am the LORD who sanctifies you” [Yahweh-Mekadeshkem] (Leviticus 20:8 ESV).
Yahweh Shalom
“So Gideon built an altar to the LORD there and called it Yahweh Shalom. It is in Ophrah of the Abiezrites until today” (Judges 6:24 CSB).
Yahweh Sabaoth
“to extend his dominion in boundless peace, over the throne of David and over his kingdom to make it secure and sustain it in fair judgement and integrity. From this time onwards and for ever, the jealous love of Yahweh Sabaoth will do this” (Isaiah 9:7 [Hebrew Isaiah 9:6] NJB).
Yahweh Tzidkenu
“In his days Y'hudah will be saved, Isra'el will live in safety, and the name given to him will be ADONAI Tzidkenu [ADONAI our righteousness]” (Jeremiah 23:6 CJB).
Yahweh-Shamah
“'The perimeter of [the city] will be just under six [miles] long. And from that day on the name of the city will be ADONAI Shamah [ADONAI is there]” (Ezekiel 48:35 CJB).
El Shadday
“When Abram was ninety-nine years old, the LORD appeared to him and said, ‘I am El-Shaddai’–‘God Almighty.’ Serve me faithfully and live a blameless life” (Genesis 17:1 NLT).
El Elyon
“But Abram said to the king of Sodom, ‘I have lifted my hand to the LORD, God Most High [El Elyon], Possessor of heaven and earth’” (Genesis 14:22 ESV).
“But Avram answered the king of S'dom, ‘I have raised my hand in an oath to ADONAI, El 'Elyon, maker of heaven and earth’” (Genesis 14:22 CJB).
El Roi
“Hagar gave a name to Yahweh who had spoken to her, ‘You are El Roi,’ by which she meant, ‘Did I not go on seeing here, after him who sees me?’” (Genesis 16:13 NJB).
El Olam
Abraham planted a tamarisk tree in Beersheba and called there on the name of the LORD, the Everlasting God [El Olam]” (Genesis 21:33 ESV).
El Jeshurun
“No one is like the God of Jeshurun [El Jeshurun]: he rides the heavens to your rescue, rides the clouds in his majesty” (Deuteronomy 33:26 NJB).
El Deoth
“Do not boast so proudly, or let arrogant words come out of your mouth, for the LORD is a God of knowledge [El Deoth], and actions are weighed by Him” (1 Samuel 2:3 CSB).
El Israel
“Awesome is God from his sanctuary; the God of Israel [El Israel]–he is the one who gives power and strength to his people. Blessed be God!” (Psalm 68:35 ESV).
El Kanna
“You must not bow down to these gods or serve them. For I, Yahweh your God, am a jealous God [El Kanna] (Deuteronomy 5:9 NJB).
“Those who know your name put their trust in you, for you, O LORD, have not forsaken those who seek you” (Psalm 9:10 ESV).
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Hebrew Bible, God’s Name, God’s Titles
Saturday, March 27, 2010
Does Archeological Evidence Support the Biblical Story of Sodom and Gomorrah?
Rabbi Leibel Reznick says that it does!
In an article published in Aish, Rabbi Leibel Reznick demonstrates how the archeological data support the Biblical story. The following is the introduction to his article:
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Archaeology, Sodom, Gomorrah
In an article published in Aish, Rabbi Leibel Reznick demonstrates how the archeological data support the Biblical story. The following is the introduction to his article:
The Torah tells us the story of the rise and downfall of Sodom and Gomorrah. To the non-believer, the Biblical story seems so incredible that it must be relegated to the realm of myth and fantasy. The 20th-century German Bible critic, Theodor Noldeke asserted that "The whole story of Sodom and Gomorrah is unhistorical and comparatively late in origin." J. Maxwell Miller of Emory University boldly claims, "These narratives of Sodom and Gomorrah are purely products of the storyteller's art, which of course raises serious questions about their usefulness for historical reconstruction." John H. Hayes, a colleague of the aforementioned J. Maxwell Miller, confirms Professor Miller's belief. Are the assertions of these skeptics based on facts or are they merely the distorted opinions of non-believers? Let us examine the facts of the case and see for ourselves.After examining the archeological date, Rabbi Reznick presents the following conclusions:
After reviewing the archaeological data, Rabbi Reznick is convinced that the story related in the Bible is accurate. Read his article here and decide whether the archaeological data support the Biblical story of the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah.To summarize, the archaeology evidence as to the destruction of the five Cities of the Plain is inconclusive. However the preponderance of other evidence with regards to the Torah's story of Sodom and Gomorrah is overwhelming.1. The Bible refers to a metropolis of five cities in the Dead Sea area.
Five, and only five cities, have been found in the Dead Sea area.
2. The Bible refers to a conquest by the Mesopotamians.
The artifacts found in the Dead Sea area show a Mesopotamian influence.
3. The Midrash describes the metropolis as a thriving population.
The enormous number of burials in the large cemeteries attests to a great population.
4. The Talmud and the Midrash describe the area as an agricultural wonderland.
The great diversity of agricultural products found in the ruins verify the lush produce enjoyed by the area's inhabitants.
5. According to the Talmud, there was a span of only 26 years between a war in the area and the ultimate destruction.
Devastation levels found in Numeira (Sodom) are consistent with the Talmud's assertion.
6. The Talmud states that Sodom, unlike other cities in the area, only existed for 52 years.
The ruins in Numeira (Sodom) indicate that the city lasted less than 100 years.
7. The Bible attributes the destruction of the cities to a fiery storm that rained down from above.
Thick layers of burnt material covering the remains of the cities in the area bear this out.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Archaeology, Sodom, Gomorrah
Thursday, March 25, 2010
Your Brother Will Rise Again
Last December I retired from the pastorate of Trinity Baptist Church, the church I served for twenty years. Since my retirement, I have been called back to perform three funerals.
The funeral of Christians can be a time of sadness and a time of celebration. It is a time of sadness because Christians have to say farewell to family and friends, people who they loved and who had meant so much to them.
It is when people attend a funeral that they come face to face with the reality of their own mortality: “For everything there is a season, and a time for every matter under heaven: a time to be born, and a time to die” (Ecclesiastes 3:1-2). The death of relatives, friends, and fellow believers diminishes all of us, because we are part of the whole.
However, the death of a believer is also a time of celebration. When a believer dies, other believers know that death is not the end of everything, but it is the beginning of a new life for that believer.
At the time of death, believers enter into a wonderful new relationship with the Lord. This is the reason the Bible says that “Precious in the sight of the LORD is the death of his saints” (Psalm 116:15). What makes the death of a believer a time of celebration is the resurrection of Christ.
The Bible says that when God became a man and was born in Bethlehem, he became as human as we are human. And just as people will die and be buried someday, Jesus Christ died and was buried. The writer of Hebrews wrote: “Since therefore the children share in flesh and blood, he himself likewise partook of the same nature, that through death he might destroy him who has the power of death” (Hebrews 2:14).
Jesus was buried, but the grave had no power over him. Three days after he died and was buried, he rose again. The death of Christ was the death of death. Death is the end of earthly life and the beginning of eternal life, a life that the believer has already experienced by faith in Christ.
The resurrection of the believer to life is the Christian answer to the problem of death. And the grounds for this hope is found in the work of Christ. We see a glimpse of this hope in the death of Lazarus.
When Lazarus, Jesus’ friend, died, Jesus came to where Lazarus was buried to comfort Lazarus’ family. When Jesus arrived in Bethany, Martha, Lazarus’s sister, said to Jesus: “Lord, if you had been here, my brother would not have died” (John 11:21). Jesus told Martha: “Your brother will rise again” (John 11:23).
Jesus tried to comfort Martha and assure her that death was not the end of her brother’s life. Jesus told Martha: “I am the resurrection and the life; he who believes in me, though he die, yet shall he live, and whoever lives and believes in me shall never die. Do you believe this?” (John 11:25-26).
This is precisely what Christians believe. They believe they will rise again after they die because they have been redeemed. They believe they will rise again because the enemy called death has been defeated in the resurrection of Christ: “The last enemy to be destroyed is death” (1 Corinthians 15:26). “Death is swallowed up in victory” (1 Corinthians 15:54).
Non-believers do not have the hope of life after death. How can they believe in life after death when they do not believe in Jesus Christ, the Son of God who rose from the grave? And yet, even those who deny the existence of God and the possibility of life after death, whenever confronted with the reality of death, they hope for something beyond the grave.
Take the case of Robert Ingersol, a man who died in 1899. In his days, Ingersoll was called “The Great Agnostic,” and “The Great Atheist.” Ingersoll was a great orator and his speeches mesmerized many people. He was a prolific writer who specialized in proving that the Bible was wrong and that the church and religion were evil.
Ingersoll ridiculed the notion that there was a God or that there was life after death. He rejected the supernatural, the reality of faith, the possibility of prayer, and denied that the Bible was a record of God’s revelation to human beings.
One of his memorable speeches was the eulogy spoken at the time of the death of his brother, E. C. Ingersoll. It is here that we can see Robert Ingersoll’s wish for the existence of a God. His words are a request for someone who could answer prayer and provide hope after death. Speaking about the death of his brother, Ingersoll wrote:
The contrast between the fear and despair that grips an individual in the presence of death and the vibrancy of faith that comes out of the resurrection of Christ, is vividly portrayed in the words of the prophet. Speaking of the wicked, the prophet wrote:
(Revelation 14:13).
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Death, Funeral, Resurrection
The funeral of Christians can be a time of sadness and a time of celebration. It is a time of sadness because Christians have to say farewell to family and friends, people who they loved and who had meant so much to them.
It is when people attend a funeral that they come face to face with the reality of their own mortality: “For everything there is a season, and a time for every matter under heaven: a time to be born, and a time to die” (Ecclesiastes 3:1-2). The death of relatives, friends, and fellow believers diminishes all of us, because we are part of the whole.
However, the death of a believer is also a time of celebration. When a believer dies, other believers know that death is not the end of everything, but it is the beginning of a new life for that believer.
At the time of death, believers enter into a wonderful new relationship with the Lord. This is the reason the Bible says that “Precious in the sight of the LORD is the death of his saints” (Psalm 116:15). What makes the death of a believer a time of celebration is the resurrection of Christ.
The Bible says that when God became a man and was born in Bethlehem, he became as human as we are human. And just as people will die and be buried someday, Jesus Christ died and was buried. The writer of Hebrews wrote: “Since therefore the children share in flesh and blood, he himself likewise partook of the same nature, that through death he might destroy him who has the power of death” (Hebrews 2:14).
Jesus was buried, but the grave had no power over him. Three days after he died and was buried, he rose again. The death of Christ was the death of death. Death is the end of earthly life and the beginning of eternal life, a life that the believer has already experienced by faith in Christ.
The resurrection of the believer to life is the Christian answer to the problem of death. And the grounds for this hope is found in the work of Christ. We see a glimpse of this hope in the death of Lazarus.
When Lazarus, Jesus’ friend, died, Jesus came to where Lazarus was buried to comfort Lazarus’ family. When Jesus arrived in Bethany, Martha, Lazarus’s sister, said to Jesus: “Lord, if you had been here, my brother would not have died” (John 11:21). Jesus told Martha: “Your brother will rise again” (John 11:23).
Jesus tried to comfort Martha and assure her that death was not the end of her brother’s life. Jesus told Martha: “I am the resurrection and the life; he who believes in me, though he die, yet shall he live, and whoever lives and believes in me shall never die. Do you believe this?” (John 11:25-26).
This is precisely what Christians believe. They believe they will rise again after they die because they have been redeemed. They believe they will rise again because the enemy called death has been defeated in the resurrection of Christ: “The last enemy to be destroyed is death” (1 Corinthians 15:26). “Death is swallowed up in victory” (1 Corinthians 15:54).
Non-believers do not have the hope of life after death. How can they believe in life after death when they do not believe in Jesus Christ, the Son of God who rose from the grave? And yet, even those who deny the existence of God and the possibility of life after death, whenever confronted with the reality of death, they hope for something beyond the grave.
Take the case of Robert Ingersol, a man who died in 1899. In his days, Ingersoll was called “The Great Agnostic,” and “The Great Atheist.” Ingersoll was a great orator and his speeches mesmerized many people. He was a prolific writer who specialized in proving that the Bible was wrong and that the church and religion were evil.
Ingersoll ridiculed the notion that there was a God or that there was life after death. He rejected the supernatural, the reality of faith, the possibility of prayer, and denied that the Bible was a record of God’s revelation to human beings.
One of his memorable speeches was the eulogy spoken at the time of the death of his brother, E. C. Ingersoll. It is here that we can see Robert Ingersoll’s wish for the existence of a God. His words are a request for someone who could answer prayer and provide hope after death. Speaking about the death of his brother, Ingersoll wrote:
Life is a narrow vale between the cold and barren peaks of two eternities. We strive in vain to look beyond the heights. We cry aloud, and the only answer is the echo of a wailing cry. From the voiceless lips of the unreplying dead there comes no word; but in the night of death hope sees a star and listening love can hear the rustle of a wing. He who sleeps here, when dying, mistaking the approach of death for the return of health, whispered with his latest breath, “I am better now.” Let us believe, in spite of doubts and dogmas and tears and fears, that these dear words are true of all the countless dead.It is in those words, “in the night of death hope sees a star” that we see a crack in the wall of atheism, the faint light that begins to shine in the dark heart of an atheist, the evidence that an unspoken hope is present. The expression, “the peaks of two eternities” may reflect the awareness that there is life here and life beyond. The expression “We cry aloud, and the only answer is the echo of a wailing cry” may reflect the struggle atheists encounter when confronted with the reality of death and the end of existence. But Ingersoll’s words, “Let us believe, in spite of doubts and dogmas” may be the loophole he was looking for to give him a ray of hope that his brother would rise again.
The contrast between the fear and despair that grips an individual in the presence of death and the vibrancy of faith that comes out of the resurrection of Christ, is vividly portrayed in the words of the prophet. Speaking of the wicked, the prophet wrote:
“They are dead, they will not live; they are shades, they will not arise; to that end you have visited them with destruction and wiped out all remembrance of them” (Isaiah 26:14).Of the righteous, the prophet wrote:
“Your dead shall live; their bodies shall rise. You who dwell in the dust, awake and sing for joy! For your dew is a dew of light, and the earth will give birth to the dead” (Isaiah 26:19).As the Scriptures say: “‘Blessed are the dead who die in the Lord from now on.’ ‘Blessed indeed,’ says the Spirit, ‘that they may rest from their labors, for their deeds follow them!’”
(Revelation 14:13).
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Death, Funeral, Resurrection
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
Digging Up Controversy in Jerusalem
Erika Solomon, writing for Reuters News Service, discusses the many controversies that have come out of recent archaeological excavations in Jerusalem. The Palestinians and many Jews oppose excavating Jerusalem in order to preserve or restore ancient Jewish heritage.
The following is an excerpt from the article:
Read the article in its entirety here.
The controversy over the issue of excavating in Jerusalem will not be resolved soon. As long as Jews and Palestinians continue to argue over the future of the city, the debate will not only continue, but it will intensify.
“Pray for the peace of Jerusalem” (Psalm 122:6).
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Archaeology, Jerusalem, Eilat Mazar
The following is an excerpt from the article:
Critics like Hani Nur al-Din from the Palestinian Al Quds University in Jersualem accuses some Holy Land archaeologists of caring more about publicity than scholarly peer review.
He names Eilat Mazar, of Hebrew University in Jerusalem, who drew attention last month after excavating a wall she says was built by the biblical King Solomon in the 10th century BC.
"She doesn't give any archaeological context to her findings other than dating pottery shards," Nur al-Din charged. "The Bible should be put aside. It's not a history book."
But Mazar, scion of an illustrious Israeli archaeology dynasty, disputes that: "Excavating Jerusalem without knowing the Bible is impossible," she says. She said she would write a scientific report of her find following laboratory study.
Pointing out the freshly excavated wall, Mazar says the Bible offers a "core of reality": "We've got a fantastic 10th century fortification line that indicates a central, powerful regime," she said. "The Bible tells us there was such a king at this time, and his name was Solomon. Why ignore it?
"The question is if we can trace that core and prove it existed. Well, here it is."
Read the article in its entirety here.
The controversy over the issue of excavating in Jerusalem will not be resolved soon. As long as Jews and Palestinians continue to argue over the future of the city, the debate will not only continue, but it will intensify.
“Pray for the peace of Jerusalem” (Psalm 122:6).
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Archaeology, Jerusalem, Eilat Mazar
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
Unicorns and Dragons in the Bible
Joel M. Hoffman has an excellent post on Unicorns, Dragons, and Other Animals You Meet in the Bible.
Since people have so many questions about these Biblical animals, I highly recommend Joel’s post to people who want to know more about the unicorns, the dragons, and the other strange animals they meet in the Bible.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Dragons, Unicorns
Since people have so many questions about these Biblical animals, I highly recommend Joel’s post to people who want to know more about the unicorns, the dragons, and the other strange animals they meet in the Bible.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Dragons, Unicorns
Preserving Ancient Babylon
The New York Times has a good article about efforts to preserve the ruins of ancient Babylon.
The following is an excerpt from the article:
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Archaeology, Babylon
The following is an excerpt from the article:
The most immediate threat to preserving the ruins of Babylon, the site of one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World, is water soaking the ground and undermining what is left in present-day Iraq of a great city from the time of King Nebuchadnezzar II.Read the article in its entirety here.
It is also one of the oldest threats. The king himself faced water problems 2,600 years ago. Neglect, reckless reconstruction and wartime looting have also taken their toll in recent times, but archaeologists and experts in the preservation of cultural relics say nothing substantial should be done to correct that until the water problem is brought under control.
A current study, known as the Future of Babylon project, documents the damage from water mainly associated with the Euphrates River and irrigation systems nearby. The ground is saturated just below the surface at sites of the Ishtar Gate and the long-gone Hanging Gardens, one of the seven wonders. Bricks are crumbling, temples collapsing. The Tower of Babel, long since reduced to rubble, is surrounded by standing water.
Leaders of the international project, describing their findings in interviews and at a meeting this month in New York, said that any plan for reclaiming Babylon as a tourist attraction and a place for archaeological research must include water control as “the highest priority.”
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Archaeology, Babylon
Monday, March 22, 2010
Moses and His Crocodile
After God called Moses on Mount Sinai and sent him back to Egypt to bring the people out of their oppression, Moses presented himself before Pharaoh as God’s messenger, one appointed by God himself to speak to Pharaoh on his behalf.
But God warned Moses that Pharaoh would not listen to his voice, that he would harden his heart and would not allow the people to leave Egypt. God also warned Moses that Pharaoh would request a sign that Moses had the authority to speak of the behalf of the God of Israel. When that happened, God told Moses to perform a sign as a means of showing to Pharaoh that he spoke with authority. Gold told Moses:
“What is that in your hand?” He said, “A rod.” Then God said, “Cast it on the ground.” So Moses cast it on the ground, and it became a serpent; and Moses fled from it.”
The word used for serpent in verse 3 is nāhāsh, a word that appears 41 times in the Hebrew Bible and is translated “serpent,” “snake,” or “viper.”
The second word is tannin and it is used three times in Exodus 7:9-12, in the passage quoted above. The word tannin has a variety of meanings in the Hebrew Bible. According to H. Niehr, in an article in The Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament, the word tannin can be translated as “dragon,” “serpent,” “crocodile,” or “sea monster.” In addition, Niehr said that the tannin lives in the sea, lakes and rivers, and the netherworld.
In the creation context, the word tannin is associated with the battle between Yahweh and the forces of chaos: “You divided the sea by your might; you broke the heads of the sea monsters on the waters” (Psalm 74:13 ESV). The ESV translates the word tannin as “sea monsters” and the KJV translates the same word as “dragons.”
The word tannin is also used metaphorically to describe political powers, primarily leaders of nations who oppressed the Israelites.
In Ezekiel 29:3, the word tannin is used as a metaphor for Pharaoh who was sprawling in the middle of the Nile like a great sea monster, claiming that he made the Nile for himself:
Thus says the Lord GOD: “Behold, I am against you, Pharaoh king of Egypt, the great dragon [tannin] that lies in the midst of his streams, that says, ‘My Nile is my own; I made it for myself.’”
This metaphor is used again for Pharaoh in Ezekiel 32:2. God told Ezekiel:
In light of these and several other examples in the Hebrew Bible, the word tannin in Exodus 7:9-12 should be translated by something more monstrous than a “serpent.” John Durham, in his commentary on Exodus, translated the word tannin as “a monstrous snake” (p. 89). A. Cassuto, in his commentary on Exodus translated the word as “a crocodile” (p. 94-95).
A. Fuller, in his commentary on Exodus wrote:
Terence Fretheim, in his commentary on Exodus suggests that Pharaoh, who represents Egypt, “is an embodiment of the forces of chaos” (p. 106). Writing about the tannin of Moses swallowing the tanninim (the plural of tannin) of the magicians of Egypt, Fretheim wrote:
Pharaoh’s obstinacy required a demonstration of divine power. The transformation of Moses’ rod into a tannin is what is generally called a miracle. Moses went before Pharaoh on a divine mission and for him to accomplish his mission, God gave him the power to make extraordinary signs for the purpose of demonstrating his authority and commission. Moses’ rod became a tannin for that purpose. Now, whether the rod became a serpent, a crocodile, or any other animal is difficult to know. However, the important truth of the sign Moses performed before Pharaoh was that because of the work of Moses and the outstretched arm of God, Israel came out of Egypt to become God’s people with a mission to the nations.
REFERENCES:
A. Cassuto, A Commentary of the Book of Exodus. Jerusalem: The Magness Press, 1967.
Durham, Exodus. Waco: Word Books, Publisher, 1987.
Terence E. Fretheim, Exodus. Luisville: John Knox Press, 1991.
A. Fuller, Exodus-Ruth. Ages Digital Library. In loco.
H. Niehr, “tannin,” Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament. Vol. 15. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2006.
Douglas K. Steward, Exodus. Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers, 2006.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Moses, Moses’ Rod, Serpent, Tannin, Crocodile, Exodus 7:9-12
But God warned Moses that Pharaoh would not listen to his voice, that he would harden his heart and would not allow the people to leave Egypt. God also warned Moses that Pharaoh would request a sign that Moses had the authority to speak of the behalf of the God of Israel. When that happened, God told Moses to perform a sign as a means of showing to Pharaoh that he spoke with authority. Gold told Moses:
“When Pharaoh says to you, Prove yourselves by working a miracle, then you shall say to Aaron, ‘Take your rod and cast it down before Pharaoh, that it may become a serpent.’ So Moses and Aaron went to Pharaoh and did as the LORD commanded; Aaron cast down his rod before Pharaoh and his servants, and it became a serpent. Then Pharaoh summoned the wise men and the sorcerers; and they also, the magicians of Egypt, did the same by their secret arts. For every man cast down his rod, and they became serpents. But Aaron’s rod swallowed up their rods” (Exodus 7:9-12).On his new program, “Beasts of the Bible,” to be presented in the USA on Animal Planet, on Thursday, April 1st at 8:00 p.m. ET, Simcha Jacobovici, the Naked Archaeologist, said about Moses’ rod that became a snake:
“Did you know that, when facing Pharaoh, it is not Moses that throws down his staff; it is his brother Aaron and, according to the original Hebrew, it did not turn into a snake but a crocodile? Since the Egyptians worshipped the crocodile god - Sobek, when Aaron's crocodile swallowed up the Egyptian crocodiles, Pharaoh understood that the God of Israel was more powerful than his entire pantheon. All this is lost if the Hebrew word ‘tanin’ is mistranslated as ‘snake’ instead of ‘crocodile.’”Many readers of the Bible do not realize that two different words are used in the book of Exodus to describe what happened to Moses’ rod. The first word appears in Exodus 4:2-3. God told Moses:
“What is that in your hand?” He said, “A rod.” Then God said, “Cast it on the ground.” So Moses cast it on the ground, and it became a serpent; and Moses fled from it.”
The word used for serpent in verse 3 is nāhāsh, a word that appears 41 times in the Hebrew Bible and is translated “serpent,” “snake,” or “viper.”
The second word is tannin and it is used three times in Exodus 7:9-12, in the passage quoted above. The word tannin has a variety of meanings in the Hebrew Bible. According to H. Niehr, in an article in The Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament, the word tannin can be translated as “dragon,” “serpent,” “crocodile,” or “sea monster.” In addition, Niehr said that the tannin lives in the sea, lakes and rivers, and the netherworld.
In the creation context, the word tannin is associated with the battle between Yahweh and the forces of chaos: “You divided the sea by your might; you broke the heads of the sea monsters on the waters” (Psalm 74:13 ESV). The ESV translates the word tannin as “sea monsters” and the KJV translates the same word as “dragons.”
The word tannin is also used metaphorically to describe political powers, primarily leaders of nations who oppressed the Israelites.
In Ezekiel 29:3, the word tannin is used as a metaphor for Pharaoh who was sprawling in the middle of the Nile like a great sea monster, claiming that he made the Nile for himself:
Thus says the Lord GOD: “Behold, I am against you, Pharaoh king of Egypt, the great dragon [tannin] that lies in the midst of his streams, that says, ‘My Nile is my own; I made it for myself.’”
This metaphor is used again for Pharaoh in Ezekiel 32:2. God told Ezekiel:
Son of man, raise a lamentation over Pharaoh king of Egypt and say to him: “You consider yourself a lion of the nations, but you are like a dragon [tannin] in the seas; you burst forth in your rivers, trouble the waters with your feet, and foul their rivers.”The same metaphor is also applied to Nebuchadnezzar, who like a monster [tannin], has swallowed Israel: “Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babylon has devoured me; he has crushed me; he has made me an empty vessel; he has swallowed me like a monster [tannin]” (Jeremiah 51:34).
In light of these and several other examples in the Hebrew Bible, the word tannin in Exodus 7:9-12 should be translated by something more monstrous than a “serpent.” John Durham, in his commentary on Exodus, translated the word tannin as “a monstrous snake” (p. 89). A. Cassuto, in his commentary on Exodus translated the word as “a crocodile” (p. 94-95).
A. Fuller, in his commentary on Exodus wrote:
A serpent. A word different from that in Exodus 4:3. Here a more general term, Tanniyn, is employed, which in other passages includes all sea or river monsters, and is more specially applied to the crocodile as a symbol of Egypt. It occurs in the Egyptian ritual, nearly in the same form, Tanem, as a synonym of the monster serpent which represents the principle of antagonism to light and life.Douglas K. Steward, in his commentary on Exodus (Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers, 2006), p. 195, quotes P. Galpaz-Feller who “suggests that the term [tannin] refers rather to the crocodile, an animal that in ancient Egyptian religion was understood as a voracious devourer and one who could devour magical spells. By this reasoning Aaron’s staff’s devouring of the other staffs was no accident but a symbol of the impending demise of Egyptian power in the face of Yahweh’s.”
Terence Fretheim, in his commentary on Exodus suggests that Pharaoh, who represents Egypt, “is an embodiment of the forces of chaos” (p. 106). Writing about the tannin of Moses swallowing the tanninim (the plural of tannin) of the magicians of Egypt, Fretheim wrote:
“This act functions as a sign of things to come in a very specific way: the fate of the Egyptians at the Red Sea. The only other use of the verb ‘swallow’ (bala‘) in Exodus occurs in 15:12, where it refers to the swallowing of the Egyptians in the depths of the earth beneath the sea . . . The seemingly innocuous reference to snake swallowing is thus an ominous sign for Pharaoh: it is a sign of his fate.”
Pharaoh’s obstinacy required a demonstration of divine power. The transformation of Moses’ rod into a tannin is what is generally called a miracle. Moses went before Pharaoh on a divine mission and for him to accomplish his mission, God gave him the power to make extraordinary signs for the purpose of demonstrating his authority and commission. Moses’ rod became a tannin for that purpose. Now, whether the rod became a serpent, a crocodile, or any other animal is difficult to know. However, the important truth of the sign Moses performed before Pharaoh was that because of the work of Moses and the outstretched arm of God, Israel came out of Egypt to become God’s people with a mission to the nations.
REFERENCES:
A. Cassuto, A Commentary of the Book of Exodus. Jerusalem: The Magness Press, 1967.
Durham, Exodus. Waco: Word Books, Publisher, 1987.
Terence E. Fretheim, Exodus. Luisville: John Knox Press, 1991.
A. Fuller, Exodus-Ruth. Ages Digital Library. In loco.
H. Niehr, “tannin,” Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament. Vol. 15. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2006.
Douglas K. Steward, Exodus. Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers, 2006.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Moses, Moses’ Rod, Serpent, Tannin, Crocodile, Exodus 7:9-12
Saturday, March 20, 2010
N.T. Wrong and the Bibliobloggers
James Crossley has published an article, “N.T. Wrong and the Bibliobloggers,” in which he studies the “phenomenon of biblical scholars blogging,” that is, biblioblogging. Crossley uses N. T. Wrong’s blog as the basis for his study of biblioblogging.
The article was published in The Bible and Critical Theory, Volume 6, No. 1 (March 2010), Pages 3.1-3.15. The Bible and Critical Theory is published by Monash University ePress.
The following is the abstract of the article:
The article is available online at Monash University ePress but readers have to pay to read the article.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Blogging, N. T. Wrong, James Crossley
The article was published in The Bible and Critical Theory, Volume 6, No. 1 (March 2010), Pages 3.1-3.15. The Bible and Critical Theory is published by Monash University ePress.
The following is the abstract of the article:
This article builds upon an earlier political analysis of the phenomenon of biblical scholars blogging (‘bibliobloggers’) by incorporating the pseudonymous biblioblogger, ‘N.T. Wrong’. Developing Herman and Chomsky’s Propaganda Model and various ideas concerning surveillance, it is clear Wrong was (and is) a stark opposite to the consistent trend among bibliobloggers that buys into the language and ideas of US-led power, most notably concerning the ‘war on terror’ and Orientalism. Through the pseudonymous persona, Wrong’s blog also ran counter to a culture of surveillance, of which blogging and related internet phenomena are now an integral part. While running counter to these trends in biblioblogging, Wrong became the exception proving the ‘rule’ of the Propaganda Model. Through bibliobloggers ignoring Wrong’s politics on issues relating to US foreign policy so central to the Propaganda Model (and while freely discussing equally ‘non-biblical’ topics), the analysis of biblioblogging as a reflection of the concerns of the Propaganda Model is reinforced. This is shown through dicussion of a number of Wrong’s blog entries and further suggestions are then made concerning the function of liberal and former leftist supporters of imperialism in relation to biblioblogging and the Propaganda Model.
The article is available online at Monash University ePress but readers have to pay to read the article.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Blogging, N. T. Wrong, James Crossley
Friday, March 19, 2010
Rahab: A Prostitute or an Innkeeper?
When the Israelites were preparing to enter the land of Canaan after the death of Moses, Joshua sent spies from Shittim to Jericho. Shittim was located in Transjordan, in the land of Moab, across from Jericho (Numbers 33:48-49). The purpose of sending the spies was to ascertain the strength of the city’s protection against an invasion by hostile forces.
Rahab’s story is told in Joshua chapters 2 and 6. According to the story, the two spies “came into the house of a prostitute whose name was Rahab and lodged there” (Joshua 2:1). Rahab received the spies and when their arrival became known, the king of Jericho sent men to apprehend the spies. However, Rahab hid them and helped them escape through a window of her house.
Some scholars believe that in addition to being a prostitute, that Rahab was also in the business of manufacturing linen and engaged in the art of dyeing, since the flat roof of her house was covered with stalks of flax put there to dry.
Rahab’s house was located on the wall of the city, probably near the town gate. The location of her house made it convenient for people to come into her house and easy for them to leave the city. Since traders and merchants would frequently pass through Jericho, they probably would patronize the house of Rahab and make it easy for her to be well informed of events outside of Jericho. This is the reason she was aware of the events in Egypt and what the Israelites had done in their journey toward the land of Canaan.
Rahab is introduced as a zōnāh, a word that means “prostitute” or “harlot.” And since she is also introduced as the head of the household, it is possible that Rahab may have been a madam. The spies went to Rahab’s house because they knew who she was, where she lived, and what her profession was. Thus, the arrival of strangers at the house of a prostitute would not raise much suspicion to the inhabitants of the city.
Joshua 2:1 says that when the spies arrived in Jericho, they “entered into the house of a woman that was a harlot named Rahab, and lodged with her.” The word translated “lodge” means to “sleep with” and may carry a sexual connotation. The same word was used when Potiphar’s wife asked Joseph “to lie” with her. The NET Bible translates Genesis 39:7 as follows: “Soon after these things, his master's wife took notice of Joseph and said, "Have sex with me” (Genesis 39:7 NET).”
Some scholars have suggested that Rahab was a sacred prostitute or a qedēšā. The word qedēšā was a technical word used to identify the women who participated in the Canaanite fertility cult.
Thus, those who identify Rahab as a member of the fertility cult would then identify Rahab as a sacred prostitute and probably a priestess of the moon god. The view that Rahab was a priestess of the moon god is derived from a popular meaning of the name Jericho, a name that comes from a word meaning “moon” (yareah).
However, it is doubtful that Rahab was a sacred prostitute. The women who served as sacred prostitutes in the fertility cult were called qedēšā but Rahab is called a zōnāh, a word used to identify a common prostitute.
Josephus, in this work, The Antiquity of the Jews, V, 1, 2 said that Rahab was an innkeeper:
Based on Josephus’ view that Rahab was an innkeeper, one author came to the conclusion that Rahab was a successful business woman and that the word “harlot” was used as a pejorative because of her success. He wrote:
The reason Josephus was trying to play down the fact that Rahab was a prostitute was because of the role she played in Jewish history. According to the Babylonian Talmud, Rahab was one of the ancestresses of the prophet Jeremiah.
The writer of the book of Joshua says that the house of Rahab survived in Israel. He wrote: “But Rahab the prostitute, with her family and all who belonged to her, Joshua spared. Her family has lived in Israel ever since. For she hid the messengers whom Joshua sent to spy out Jericho” (Joshua 6:25).
This statement by the Deuteronomistic writer clearly indicates that the story of Rahab does not end with the book of Joshua. It is possible that Rahab became a proselyte and converted to the faith of Israel and that a group of people who were identified with Rahab survived in Israel. It is possible that the three hundred forty-five people from Jericho who returned with Ezra from Babylon (Ezra 2:34; Nehemiah 7:36) and the men of Jericho who helped Nehemiah in rebuilding the walls of Jerusalem (Nehemiah 3:2) were descendants of Rahab.
As for Rahab herself, the gospel of Matthew (Matthew 1:5 ) says that Rahab became the wife of Salmon, the son of Nahshon, and the ancestress of Boaz who was Jesse’s grandfather. Thus, Matthew says that Rahab, through Salmon and Boaz, became the mother of the line from which David’s family sprang, and through David, Jesus Christ. Rahab was one of the four foreign women mentioned in the genealogy of Christ: Tamar, Rahab, Ruth, and Bathsheba.
Rahab also appears in the list of the people who lived by faith and who were saved by faith. In Hebrews 11:31 Rahab is praised as an example of faith:
In James 2:25 Rahab is praised for saving the spies and in the process finding justification through what she did for the cause of God:
There is no reason to avoid the embarrassment of calling Rahab a prostitute. Rahab stands as evidence of the transforming power of God. By believing in the God of Israel, Rahab, a woman who submitted herself to the desires of men, found forgiveness when she submitted herself to the will of God and was added to a great list of people whose lives were transformed when they believed in God.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Hebrew Bible, Old Testament, Rahab, Prostitute, Joshua
Rahab’s story is told in Joshua chapters 2 and 6. According to the story, the two spies “came into the house of a prostitute whose name was Rahab and lodged there” (Joshua 2:1). Rahab received the spies and when their arrival became known, the king of Jericho sent men to apprehend the spies. However, Rahab hid them and helped them escape through a window of her house.
Some scholars believe that in addition to being a prostitute, that Rahab was also in the business of manufacturing linen and engaged in the art of dyeing, since the flat roof of her house was covered with stalks of flax put there to dry.
Rahab’s house was located on the wall of the city, probably near the town gate. The location of her house made it convenient for people to come into her house and easy for them to leave the city. Since traders and merchants would frequently pass through Jericho, they probably would patronize the house of Rahab and make it easy for her to be well informed of events outside of Jericho. This is the reason she was aware of the events in Egypt and what the Israelites had done in their journey toward the land of Canaan.
Rahab is introduced as a zōnāh, a word that means “prostitute” or “harlot.” And since she is also introduced as the head of the household, it is possible that Rahab may have been a madam. The spies went to Rahab’s house because they knew who she was, where she lived, and what her profession was. Thus, the arrival of strangers at the house of a prostitute would not raise much suspicion to the inhabitants of the city.
Joshua 2:1 says that when the spies arrived in Jericho, they “entered into the house of a woman that was a harlot named Rahab, and lodged with her.” The word translated “lodge” means to “sleep with” and may carry a sexual connotation. The same word was used when Potiphar’s wife asked Joseph “to lie” with her. The NET Bible translates Genesis 39:7 as follows: “Soon after these things, his master's wife took notice of Joseph and said, "Have sex with me” (Genesis 39:7 NET).”
Some scholars have suggested that Rahab was a sacred prostitute or a qedēšā. The word qedēšā was a technical word used to identify the women who participated in the Canaanite fertility cult.
Thus, those who identify Rahab as a member of the fertility cult would then identify Rahab as a sacred prostitute and probably a priestess of the moon god. The view that Rahab was a priestess of the moon god is derived from a popular meaning of the name Jericho, a name that comes from a word meaning “moon” (yareah).
However, it is doubtful that Rahab was a sacred prostitute. The women who served as sacred prostitutes in the fertility cult were called qedēšā but Rahab is called a zōnāh, a word used to identify a common prostitute.
Josephus, in this work, The Antiquity of the Jews, V, 1, 2 said that Rahab was an innkeeper:
(6) Now those that met them took no notice of them when they saw them, and supposed they were only strangers, who used to be very curious in observing everything in the city, and did not take them for enemies;
(7) but at even they retired to a certain inn that was near to the wall, whither they went to eat their supper;
(8) which supper when they had done, and were considering how to get away, information was given to the king as he was at supper, that there were some persons come from the Hebrews’ camp to view the city as spies, and that they were in the inn kept by Rahab, and were very solicitous that they might not be discovered. So he sent immediately some to them, and commanded to catch them, and bring them to him, that he might examine them by torture, and learn what their business was there.
Based on Josephus’ view that Rahab was an innkeeper, one author came to the conclusion that Rahab was a successful business woman and that the word “harlot” was used as a pejorative because of her success. He wrote:
It is our considered opinion, based upon what we have read in the Bible and in the Writings of Josephus that Rahab made fine clothing (the reason for all the flax that she had on her roof, enough to hide the two spies in). Her customers, often having to travel long distances to purchase her fine linen needed to be put up. Rahab also ran a [sic] inn, and she often put her clients up in her inn. Why did people of that time label a successful business woman "a harlot?" Maybe her business did better than their business.
The reason Josephus was trying to play down the fact that Rahab was a prostitute was because of the role she played in Jewish history. According to the Babylonian Talmud, Rahab was one of the ancestresses of the prophet Jeremiah.
The writer of the book of Joshua says that the house of Rahab survived in Israel. He wrote: “But Rahab the prostitute, with her family and all who belonged to her, Joshua spared. Her family has lived in Israel ever since. For she hid the messengers whom Joshua sent to spy out Jericho” (Joshua 6:25).
This statement by the Deuteronomistic writer clearly indicates that the story of Rahab does not end with the book of Joshua. It is possible that Rahab became a proselyte and converted to the faith of Israel and that a group of people who were identified with Rahab survived in Israel. It is possible that the three hundred forty-five people from Jericho who returned with Ezra from Babylon (Ezra 2:34; Nehemiah 7:36) and the men of Jericho who helped Nehemiah in rebuilding the walls of Jerusalem (Nehemiah 3:2) were descendants of Rahab.
As for Rahab herself, the gospel of Matthew (Matthew 1:5 ) says that Rahab became the wife of Salmon, the son of Nahshon, and the ancestress of Boaz who was Jesse’s grandfather. Thus, Matthew says that Rahab, through Salmon and Boaz, became the mother of the line from which David’s family sprang, and through David, Jesus Christ. Rahab was one of the four foreign women mentioned in the genealogy of Christ: Tamar, Rahab, Ruth, and Bathsheba.
Rahab also appears in the list of the people who lived by faith and who were saved by faith. In Hebrews 11:31 Rahab is praised as an example of faith:
“By faith Rahab the harlot did not perish with those who were disobedient, because she had given friendly welcome to the spies.”
In James 2:25 Rahab is praised for saving the spies and in the process finding justification through what she did for the cause of God:
“And in the same way was not also Rahab the harlot justified by works when she received the messengers and sent them out another way?”
There is no reason to avoid the embarrassment of calling Rahab a prostitute. Rahab stands as evidence of the transforming power of God. By believing in the God of Israel, Rahab, a woman who submitted herself to the desires of men, found forgiveness when she submitted herself to the will of God and was added to a great list of people whose lives were transformed when they believed in God.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Hebrew Bible, Old Testament, Rahab, Prostitute, Joshua
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Proverbs 29:18
Proverbs 29:18 is one of the better known of the many proverbs in the book of Proverbs, but one that is least understood and one that is abused the most. Proverbs 29:18 has been used to defend political causes and to promote environmental issues.
The primary reason for this misuse of Proverbs 29:18 is because of the translation of this verse as it appears in the King James Version of the Bible. The KJV translates Proverbs 29:18 as follows:
“Where there is no vision, the people perish: but he that keepeth the law, happy is he” (Proverbs 29:18 KJV).
Now, compare the KJV with the translation that appears in the New Revised Standard Version (NRSV): “Where there is no prophecy, the people cast off restraint, but happy are those who keep the law.”
The reason for this difference is that the Hebrew word for vision, hazôn, is generally used to designate the revelation of God’s will to prophets. The word hazôn is used to describe the visions of Isaiah (Isaiah 1:1) and of Nahum (Nahum 1:1).
What the wiseman is trying to communicate to his audience is that without prophetic revelation and without the preaching of the prophets calling the people into a faithful relationship with God and obedience to his word, people lose restraint and abandon God’s law.
The word of the wiseman reminded the people of the darkest time in the history of Israel when prophetic visions were not widespread: “In those days [the days of Samuel] the word of the LORD was rare and prophetic visions were not widespread” (1Samuel 3:1 HCSB).
A few scholars have understood the lack of prophetic vision to mean that at the time this proverb was coined that there were no prophets in Israel and that the preaching of the prophets was silent. However, this may not be necessarily the case.
Several times in the Bible it is said that divine revelation was withheld in times of Israel’s apostasy. In the days when there was no king in Israel and people did whatever they wanted (Judges 21:25), the word of the LORD was rare and there was no frequent vision (1Samuel 3:1).
The same sentiment was expressed by writers who were dealing with the consequences of the fall of Jerusalem:
“Zion’s gates have fallen to the ground; He has destroyed and shattered the bars on her gates. Her king and her leaders live among the nations, instruction is no more, and even her prophets receive no vision from the LORD” (Lamentations 2:9 HCSB).
“Disaster after disaster will come, and there will be rumor after rumor. Then they will seek a vision from a prophet, but instruction will perish from the priests and counsel from the elders” (Ezekiel 7:26 HCSB).
The role of the prophets as interpreters of God’s will to the people is reflected in the translation of Proverbs 29:18 in the Septuagint (LXX): “There shall be no interpreter to a sinful nation: but he that observes the law is blessed.” When there is no one to teach, inspire, and exhort the people to be faithful to God, people perish.
Without God’s word to guide them, “people cast off restraint.” This same Hebrew word was used twice to describe the people’s depraved behavior during the celebration associated with the making of the golden calf:
“Moses saw that the people were out of control, for Aaron had let them get out of control” (Exodus 32:25).
The moral and spiritual problem of the community comes when prophecy ceases. The people cast off restraint when the voice of the prophets falls silent. When there is no one to bring a divine revelation to them, people will desperately seek God’s word:
“They shall wander from sea to sea, and from north to east; they shall run to and fro, seeking the word of the LORD, but they shall not find it” (Amos 8:12).
The wiseman says that people who willingly and earnestly submit themselves to the word of
God are truly happy people. Law or Torah in Proverbs 29:18 means divine teaching, the word of God.
The word “law” may be used in Proverbs 29:18 as a reference to the Law of Moses, to the teachings of the prophets, or to the instructions of the wisemen. Whatever the meaning of the word “law,” the law here stands for God’s word. Obedience to God’s word is essential to the well-being of a nation or an individual: “Blessed is the nation whose God is the LORD, the people he chose for his inheritance” (Psalm 33:12).
People who hear and obey God’s word enjoy a special blessing from God. However, they perish and are destroyed for lack the knowledge of God’s word:
“My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge. . . . [They] have forgotten the law of God” (Hosea 4:6).
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Proverbs 29:18, Prophets, Vision
The primary reason for this misuse of Proverbs 29:18 is because of the translation of this verse as it appears in the King James Version of the Bible. The KJV translates Proverbs 29:18 as follows:
“Where there is no vision, the people perish: but he that keepeth the law, happy is he” (Proverbs 29:18 KJV).
Now, compare the KJV with the translation that appears in the New Revised Standard Version (NRSV): “Where there is no prophecy, the people cast off restraint, but happy are those who keep the law.”
The reason for this difference is that the Hebrew word for vision, hazôn, is generally used to designate the revelation of God’s will to prophets. The word hazôn is used to describe the visions of Isaiah (Isaiah 1:1) and of Nahum (Nahum 1:1).
What the wiseman is trying to communicate to his audience is that without prophetic revelation and without the preaching of the prophets calling the people into a faithful relationship with God and obedience to his word, people lose restraint and abandon God’s law.
The word of the wiseman reminded the people of the darkest time in the history of Israel when prophetic visions were not widespread: “In those days [the days of Samuel] the word of the LORD was rare and prophetic visions were not widespread” (1Samuel 3:1 HCSB).
A few scholars have understood the lack of prophetic vision to mean that at the time this proverb was coined that there were no prophets in Israel and that the preaching of the prophets was silent. However, this may not be necessarily the case.
Several times in the Bible it is said that divine revelation was withheld in times of Israel’s apostasy. In the days when there was no king in Israel and people did whatever they wanted (Judges 21:25), the word of the LORD was rare and there was no frequent vision (1Samuel 3:1).
The same sentiment was expressed by writers who were dealing with the consequences of the fall of Jerusalem:
“Zion’s gates have fallen to the ground; He has destroyed and shattered the bars on her gates. Her king and her leaders live among the nations, instruction is no more, and even her prophets receive no vision from the LORD” (Lamentations 2:9 HCSB).
“Disaster after disaster will come, and there will be rumor after rumor. Then they will seek a vision from a prophet, but instruction will perish from the priests and counsel from the elders” (Ezekiel 7:26 HCSB).
The role of the prophets as interpreters of God’s will to the people is reflected in the translation of Proverbs 29:18 in the Septuagint (LXX): “There shall be no interpreter to a sinful nation: but he that observes the law is blessed.” When there is no one to teach, inspire, and exhort the people to be faithful to God, people perish.
Without God’s word to guide them, “people cast off restraint.” This same Hebrew word was used twice to describe the people’s depraved behavior during the celebration associated with the making of the golden calf:
“Moses saw that the people were out of control, for Aaron had let them get out of control” (Exodus 32:25).
The moral and spiritual problem of the community comes when prophecy ceases. The people cast off restraint when the voice of the prophets falls silent. When there is no one to bring a divine revelation to them, people will desperately seek God’s word:
“They shall wander from sea to sea, and from north to east; they shall run to and fro, seeking the word of the LORD, but they shall not find it” (Amos 8:12).
The wiseman says that people who willingly and earnestly submit themselves to the word of
God are truly happy people. Law or Torah in Proverbs 29:18 means divine teaching, the word of God.
The word “law” may be used in Proverbs 29:18 as a reference to the Law of Moses, to the teachings of the prophets, or to the instructions of the wisemen. Whatever the meaning of the word “law,” the law here stands for God’s word. Obedience to God’s word is essential to the well-being of a nation or an individual: “Blessed is the nation whose God is the LORD, the people he chose for his inheritance” (Psalm 33:12).
People who hear and obey God’s word enjoy a special blessing from God. However, they perish and are destroyed for lack the knowledge of God’s word:
“My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge. . . . [They] have forgotten the law of God” (Hosea 4:6).
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Proverbs 29:18, Prophets, Vision
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
Forsaking Their “Hesed”
My Hebrew students have been translating the book of Jonah this Spring quarter. Recently, while translating Jonah, chapter 2, my students discussed Jonah 2: 9 and how the translations render this intriguing verse.
The Hebrew text of Jonah 2:9 reads:
The English translations of Jonah 2:9 translate this verse in different ways:
The Holman Christian Standard Bible (HCSB): “Those who cling to worthless idols forsake faithful love.”
The Douay-Rheims: “They that are vain observe vanities, forsake their own mercy.”
The English Standard Version (ESV): “Those who pay regard to vain idols forsake their hope of steadfast love.”
The King James Version (KJV): “They that observe lying vanities forsake their own mercy.”
The New American Standard Bible (NASB) : “Those who regard vain idols Forsake their faithfulness.”
The NET Bible (NET): “Those who worship worthless idols forfeit the mercy that could be theirs.”
The New International Version (NIV): “Those who cling to worthless idols forfeit the grace that could be theirs.”
The New Living Translation (NLT): “Those who worship false gods turn their backs on all God's mercies.”
The New Revised Standard Version (NRSV): “Those who worship vain idols forsake their true loyalty.”
The Tanak (TNK): “They who cling to empty folly Forsake their own welfare.”
In this prayer of deliverance, the writer addressed his audience, the people of Israel. From the belly of the great fish, Jonah mentioned those who do not worship Yahweh, the true God. To understand the words of Jonah in verse 9, what the Hebrew says, and how the English translations interpret the Hebrew, it becomes necessary to look at the words of the text.
The word מְשַׁמְּרִים (mesharim) is the participle masculine plural of the verb שָׁמַר (shāmar), a word that means "to keep" or "to guard." Only here is the word shāmar translated "worship" or "revere." Thus, I think that the word should be understood as "those who keep" or "those who possess." The Hebrew word implies more than just worshiping idols. It includes the idea of owning or possessing idols.
The word הֶבֶל (hebel) is generally translated as "vanity" as in Ecclesiastes 1:2: "Vanity of vanities, saith the Preacher, vanity of vanities; all is vanity." It is also translated as "nothing" and as "idols" because the idols were considered to be nothing.
The word שָׁוְא (šāwʼ) means "worthless" "in vain." The combination of hebel and šāwʼ , הַבְלֵי־שָׁ֑וְא, means that "which is worthless," that is, an idol.
The last two words, חַסְדָּ֖ם יַעֲזֹֽבו literally mean "forsake their hesed." The key to the verse is in the meaning of the word hesed.
I have written several posts on the word hesed (you can read a few of them here, here, and here). The word hesed is generally translated as "mercy," as the King James Version does (see above).
Since the word hesed is a word related to the covenant between Israel and God, a better translation of hesed is "faithfulness" (NASB) or "true loyalty" (NRSV). I like to translate the word hesed as "commitment" since hesed is what brings the two parties together in a committed relationship. This is the reason that in many commentaries the word hesed is translated as "covenant love."
The issue in Jonah 2:9 is whose hesed is the writer talking about? Is it God's hesed or is it human hesed? In his commentary on Jonah, Wolf, using Nelson Glueck's study on the word hesed, wrote that in Jonah 2:9 the word hesed is "a synonym for God" (p. 138). Wolf wrote:
"Here חֶסֶד [hesed], 'steadfast love,' does not mean human faithfulness. It means the divine attitude which in the Psalter is continually extolled as God's faithfulness, goodness, and graciousness, which is the one true help for human beings."
Using the understanding of hesed, Wolff is saying that those who worship idols are forsaking God, their source of hope. This is the approach taken by the ESV, the HSCB, the NET, the NIV, and the NLT.
Those who take the word hesed to be a reference to human loyalty imply that those who worship idols abandon their covenant obligation to be faithful to God. That is the position taken by the KJV, the NASB, and the NRSV.
I believe that the word hesed in Jonah 2:9 refers to a human attitude in which the people forsake their commitment to God when they place their trust in idols. This was the complaint of Hosea when he wrote: “Hear the word of the LORD, you Israelites! For the LORD has a covenant lawsuit against the people of Israel. For there is neither faithfulness nor loyalty (hesed) in the land, nor do they acknowledge God” (Hosea 4:1 NET).
So, understanding the word hesed to refer to loyalty towards God, I think that Jonah 2:9 should be translated as follows: "Those who worship worthless idols forsake their commitment [to the LORD].
Reference:
Hans Walter Wolff, Obadiah and Jonah. Minneapolis: Augsburg Publishing House, 1977.
Hebrew Fonts:
If you are having problems reading the Hebrew in the text, download the Hebrew fonts and installed them in you computer. Download them here.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Hebrew Bible, Hesed, Jonah 2:9, Idols, Vanity
The Hebrew text of Jonah 2:9 reads:
שַׁמְּרִ֖ים הַבְלֵי־שָׁ֑וְא חַסְדָּ֖ם יַעֲזֹֽבוּ
The English translations of Jonah 2:9 translate this verse in different ways:
The Holman Christian Standard Bible (HCSB): “Those who cling to worthless idols forsake faithful love.”
The Douay-Rheims: “They that are vain observe vanities, forsake their own mercy.”
The English Standard Version (ESV): “Those who pay regard to vain idols forsake their hope of steadfast love.”
The King James Version (KJV): “They that observe lying vanities forsake their own mercy.”
The New American Standard Bible (NASB) : “Those who regard vain idols Forsake their faithfulness.”
The NET Bible (NET): “Those who worship worthless idols forfeit the mercy that could be theirs.”
The New International Version (NIV): “Those who cling to worthless idols forfeit the grace that could be theirs.”
The New Living Translation (NLT): “Those who worship false gods turn their backs on all God's mercies.”
The New Revised Standard Version (NRSV): “Those who worship vain idols forsake their true loyalty.”
The Tanak (TNK): “They who cling to empty folly Forsake their own welfare.”
In this prayer of deliverance, the writer addressed his audience, the people of Israel. From the belly of the great fish, Jonah mentioned those who do not worship Yahweh, the true God. To understand the words of Jonah in verse 9, what the Hebrew says, and how the English translations interpret the Hebrew, it becomes necessary to look at the words of the text.
The word מְשַׁמְּרִים (mesharim) is the participle masculine plural of the verb שָׁמַר (shāmar), a word that means "to keep" or "to guard." Only here is the word shāmar translated "worship" or "revere." Thus, I think that the word should be understood as "those who keep" or "those who possess." The Hebrew word implies more than just worshiping idols. It includes the idea of owning or possessing idols.
The word הֶבֶל (hebel) is generally translated as "vanity" as in Ecclesiastes 1:2: "Vanity of vanities, saith the Preacher, vanity of vanities; all is vanity." It is also translated as "nothing" and as "idols" because the idols were considered to be nothing.
The word שָׁוְא (šāwʼ) means "worthless" "in vain." The combination of hebel and šāwʼ , הַבְלֵי־שָׁ֑וְא, means that "which is worthless," that is, an idol.
The last two words, חַסְדָּ֖ם יַעֲזֹֽבו literally mean "forsake their hesed." The key to the verse is in the meaning of the word hesed.
I have written several posts on the word hesed (you can read a few of them here, here, and here). The word hesed is generally translated as "mercy," as the King James Version does (see above).
Since the word hesed is a word related to the covenant between Israel and God, a better translation of hesed is "faithfulness" (NASB) or "true loyalty" (NRSV). I like to translate the word hesed as "commitment" since hesed is what brings the two parties together in a committed relationship. This is the reason that in many commentaries the word hesed is translated as "covenant love."
The issue in Jonah 2:9 is whose hesed is the writer talking about? Is it God's hesed or is it human hesed? In his commentary on Jonah, Wolf, using Nelson Glueck's study on the word hesed, wrote that in Jonah 2:9 the word hesed is "a synonym for God" (p. 138). Wolf wrote:
"Here חֶסֶד [hesed], 'steadfast love,' does not mean human faithfulness. It means the divine attitude which in the Psalter is continually extolled as God's faithfulness, goodness, and graciousness, which is the one true help for human beings."
Using the understanding of hesed, Wolff is saying that those who worship idols are forsaking God, their source of hope. This is the approach taken by the ESV, the HSCB, the NET, the NIV, and the NLT.
Those who take the word hesed to be a reference to human loyalty imply that those who worship idols abandon their covenant obligation to be faithful to God. That is the position taken by the KJV, the NASB, and the NRSV.
I believe that the word hesed in Jonah 2:9 refers to a human attitude in which the people forsake their commitment to God when they place their trust in idols. This was the complaint of Hosea when he wrote: “Hear the word of the LORD, you Israelites! For the LORD has a covenant lawsuit against the people of Israel. For there is neither faithfulness nor loyalty (hesed) in the land, nor do they acknowledge God” (Hosea 4:1 NET).
So, understanding the word hesed to refer to loyalty towards God, I think that Jonah 2:9 should be translated as follows: "Those who worship worthless idols forsake their commitment [to the LORD].
Reference:
Hans Walter Wolff, Obadiah and Jonah. Minneapolis: Augsburg Publishing House, 1977.
Hebrew Fonts:
If you are having problems reading the Hebrew in the text, download the Hebrew fonts and installed them in you computer. Download them here.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Hebrew Bible, Hesed, Jonah 2:9, Idols, Vanity
Sunday, March 14, 2010
My New Blog Address
After agonizing for a few days with what to do with my blog, I decided to remain with Blogger. I seriously considered moving my blog to WordPress, but after looking at the pros and cons of moving, I decided that since I am familiar with Blogger and since the transition would be easier by remaining with Blogger, I decided to remain with the familiar, rather than learning a new system.
Those who subscribe to my blog, please note the new blog address:
http://doctor.claudemariottini.com/
The new subdomain, with the title “doctor,” came by necessity. My son had already created a subdomain with the title “blog,” but when I tried to create a CNAME, I was unable to use “blog.” So, in order to create another CNAME, I decided to use the title “doctor” since that title also appears on the title of my blog.
Because of the problems with the transition, I was unable to blog for a few days. Now that the transition is complete, I hope to return to a more regular schedule for posting.
I want to thank all my readers for the support you have given to my blog by visiting it regularly. I hope you will continue visiting my blog at its new address.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Blogging
Those who subscribe to my blog, please note the new blog address:
http://doctor.claudemariottini.com/
The new subdomain, with the title “doctor,” came by necessity. My son had already created a subdomain with the title “blog,” but when I tried to create a CNAME, I was unable to use “blog.” So, in order to create another CNAME, I decided to use the title “doctor” since that title also appears on the title of my blog.
Because of the problems with the transition, I was unable to blog for a few days. Now that the transition is complete, I hope to return to a more regular schedule for posting.
I want to thank all my readers for the support you have given to my blog by visiting it regularly. I hope you will continue visiting my blog at its new address.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Blogging
Child Sex Abuse in the Church and the Pope
Nicholas Kulish and Rachel Donadio, in an article published in The New York Times, write about a case of child sexual abuse in Germany. The article also says that Pope Benedict may have mishandled the case at the time he was the head of the Archdiocese of Munich and Freising.
The following is an excerpt from the article:
I think the alleged accusation of child abuse by priests is a tragedy that brings shame to the church and the cause of Christ. No individual, Catholic or Protestant, who commits this kind of sexual immorality should be allowed to remain in the ministry.
At times, church leaders, in order to avoid further embarrassment to the church, try to deal with the matter quietly without exposing the perpetrator. The result is that the situation grows worse and when it is exposed to the public, the public may not understand the church’s desire for mercy because the public is crying out for justice.
In cases like this, the church must act decisively and not allow those accused of child abuse to remain in the ministry.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Child Sex Abuse, Catholic Church, Pope Benedict
The following is an excerpt from the article:
BERLIN — A widening child sexual abuse inquiry in Europe has landed at the doorstep of Pope Benedict XVI, as a senior church official acknowledged Friday that a German archdiocese made “serious mistakes” in handling an abuse case while the pope served as its archbishop.Read the article in its entirety by visiting The New York Times online.
The archdiocese said that a priest accused of molesting boys was given therapy in 1980 and later allowed to resume pastoral duties, before committing further abuses and being prosecuted. Pope Benedict, who at the time headed the Archdiocese of Munich and Freising, approved the priest’s transfer for therapy. A subordinate took full responsibility for allowing the priest to later resume pastoral work, the archdiocese said in a statement.
The Vatican spokesman, the Rev. Federico Lombardi, said he had no comment beyond the statement by the Archdiocese of Munich and Freising, which he said showed the “nonresponsibility” of the pope in the matter.
The expanding abuse inquiry had come ever closer to Benedict as new accusations in Germany surfaced almost daily since the first reports in January. On Friday the pope met with the chief bishop of Germany, Archbishop Robert Zollitsch, the head of the German Bishops Conference, to discuss the church investigations and media reports.
Problems in the German church have already come close to the pope, whose brother, Msgr. Georg Ratzinger, 86, directed a choir connected to a boarding school where two former students have come forward with abuse claims. In an interview this week, Monsignor Ratzinger, who directed the choir from 1964 to 1994, said the accusations dated from before his tenure. He also apologized for slapping students.
At a news conference following a one-on-one meeting with Benedict on Friday, Archbishop Zollitsch said the pope was “greatly upset” and “deeply moved” by the abuse allegations, and had urged the German church to seek the truth and help the victims.
***
Experts said the scandals could undermine Benedict’s moral authority, especially because they cut particularly close to the pope himself. As head of the Vatican’s main doctrinal arm, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, he led Vatican investigations into abuse for four years before assuming the papacy in 2005.
“What is at stake, and at great risk, is Benedict’s central project for the ‘re-Christianization’ of Christendom, his desire to have Europe return to its Christian roots,” said David Gibson, the author of a biography of Benedict and a religion commentator for Politicsdaily.com. “But if the root itself is seen as rotten, then his influence will be badly compromised.”
When a sex abuse scandal broke in Boston church in 2002, Pope Benedict — then Cardinal Ratzinger — was among the Vatican officials who made statements that minimized the problem and accused the news media of blowing it out of proportion.
But as the abuse case files landed on his desk at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, his colleagues said he was deeply disturbed by what he learned. On his first visit to the United States as pope, Benedict met with abuse victims from Boston and said he was “deeply ashamed” by priests who had harmed children.
But victims’ advocates accuse the pope of doing little to discipline the bishops who permitted abusers to continue serving in ministry. The case in Munich, which was brought to the attention of the diocese by the daily newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung, was a result of “serious mistakes,” the archdiocese said in its statement.
I think the alleged accusation of child abuse by priests is a tragedy that brings shame to the church and the cause of Christ. No individual, Catholic or Protestant, who commits this kind of sexual immorality should be allowed to remain in the ministry.
At times, church leaders, in order to avoid further embarrassment to the church, try to deal with the matter quietly without exposing the perpetrator. The result is that the situation grows worse and when it is exposed to the public, the public may not understand the church’s desire for mercy because the public is crying out for justice.
In cases like this, the church must act decisively and not allow those accused of child abuse to remain in the ministry.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Child Sex Abuse, Catholic Church, Pope Benedict
Saturday, March 13, 2010
The Bible among the Myths

My review of The Bible among the Myths: Unique Revelation or Just Ancient Literature (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2009), by John Oswalt, has been published in Review of Biblical Literature.
The following is an excerpt from the review:
Evangelicals affirm that the Bible is a unique book because it is the result of divine
revelation and not merely the work of human authors. However, the discovery of several religious writings from other ancient Near Eastern cultures has led many biblical scholars to deny the claim that the Bible is the result of divine revelation. The issue Oswalt addresses in his book is whether the Bible is a unique revelation from God or just another literary product among the religious literature of the ancient Near East.
Oswalt believes that the way Israel conceived and thought about its God and the way other cultures in the ancient Near East thought about their gods was so different that scholarly views that Israel adapted their religious ideas from the religions of their neighbors could not explain this difference. Was Israelite religion another religion comparable to other religions in the West Semitic world, or was the religion of the Bible unique because God revealed himself in the historical events narrated in the Bible?
Many people today do not accept the idea that the Bible, although written by human beings, is the product of divine revelation.
I believe that Oswalt is right on his assessment of the Bible. Modesty apart, I believe that you should read my review because what Oswalt writes is what evangelicals need to read.
To read the review, visit the Review of Biblical Literature website by clicking here.
You can buy the book at Amazon.com.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Hebrew Bible, Bible, Myth, John Oswalt
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
This blog has moved
This blog is now located at http://doctor.claudemariottini.com/.
You will be automatically redirected in 30 seconds, or you may click here.
For feed subscribers, please update your feed subscriptions to
http://doctor.claudemariottini.com/feeds/posts/default.
Hitler Finds Out Blogger FTP Service is Ending
Hitler Finds Out Blogger FTP Service is Ending
This is how that 5% of bloggers who blog through FTP felt when Blogger announced they were ending FTP services.
HT: Erik Aronesty
NOTICE: My blog has moved to a new address. If you enjoyed reading this post, you can subscribe to my blog by visiting my web page or subscribing to my blog here:
Dr. Claude Mariottini
Subscription
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Blogging, Blogger, Google
This is how that 5% of bloggers who blog through FTP felt when Blogger announced they were ending FTP services.
HT: Erik Aronesty
NOTICE: My blog has moved to a new address. If you enjoyed reading this post, you can subscribe to my blog by visiting my web page or subscribing to my blog here:
Dr. Claude Mariottini
Subscription
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Blogging, Blogger, Google
An Introduction to the Bible
Eerdmans Publishing Company has published a new introduction to the Bible. The book, An Introduction to the Bible, was written by Robert Kugler and Patrick Hartin. The book was written for college students and for those who desire to gain a better understanding of the Bible.
This introduction shows “how to read the Bible on the literary, historical, and theological levels.”
Eerdmans has made available online (in PDF format), a general introduction to the book and an introduction to the books of Joshua, the book of Amos, to the Gospel of Matthews, and to the books of Galatians and Romans.
Read the General Introduction here, the Introduction to the Book of Joshua here, the Introduction to the Book of Amos here, the Gospel of Matthews here, and the books of Galatians and Romans here.
NOTICE: My blog has moved to a new address. If you enjoyed reading this post, you can subscribe to my blog by visiting my web page or subscribing to my blog here:
Dr. Claude Mariottini
Subscription
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Hebrew Bible, Book of Joshua, Book of Amos, Gospel of Matthews, Galatians, Romans
This introduction shows “how to read the Bible on the literary, historical, and theological levels.”
Eerdmans has made available online (in PDF format), a general introduction to the book and an introduction to the books of Joshua, the book of Amos, to the Gospel of Matthews, and to the books of Galatians and Romans.
Read the General Introduction here, the Introduction to the Book of Joshua here, the Introduction to the Book of Amos here, the Gospel of Matthews here, and the books of Galatians and Romans here.
NOTICE: My blog has moved to a new address. If you enjoyed reading this post, you can subscribe to my blog by visiting my web page or subscribing to my blog here:
Dr. Claude Mariottini
Subscription
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Hebrew Bible, Book of Joshua, Book of Amos, Gospel of Matthews, Galatians, Romans
How Do You Explain That God Does Not Exist?
How do you explain that God does not exist? In his absurd answer, atheist John W. Loftus begins with absurdity.
I want to thank Marcus McElhaney for this information.
NOTICE: My blog has moved to a new address. If you enjoyed reading this post, you can subscribe to my blog by visiting my web page or subscribing to my blog here:
Dr. Claude Mariottini
Subscription
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Atheism, John Loftus
I want to thank Marcus McElhaney for this information.
NOTICE: My blog has moved to a new address. If you enjoyed reading this post, you can subscribe to my blog by visiting my web page or subscribing to my blog here:
Dr. Claude Mariottini
Subscription
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Atheism, John Loftus
Tuesday, March 09, 2010
An Introduction to the Book of Amos
Eerdmans Publishing Company has published a new introduction to the Bible. The book, An Introduction to the Bible, was written by Robert Kugler and Patrick Hartin. The book was written for college students and for those who desire to gain a better understanding of the Bible.
This introduction shows “how to read the Bible on the literary, historical, and theological levels.”
Eerdmans has made available online (in PDF format) a general introduction to the book and an introduction to the book of Amos. Read the General Introduction here and the Introduction to the Book of Amos here.
NOTICE: My blog has moved to a new address. If you enjoyed reading this post, you can subscribe to my blog by visiting my web page or subscribing to my blog here:
Dr. Claude Mariottini
Subscription
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Hebrew Bible, Book of Amos
This introduction shows “how to read the Bible on the literary, historical, and theological levels.”
Eerdmans has made available online (in PDF format) a general introduction to the book and an introduction to the book of Amos. Read the General Introduction here and the Introduction to the Book of Amos here.
NOTICE: My blog has moved to a new address. If you enjoyed reading this post, you can subscribe to my blog by visiting my web page or subscribing to my blog here:
Dr. Claude Mariottini
Subscription
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Hebrew Bible, Book of Amos
An Introduction to the Book of Joshua
Eerdmans Publishing Company has published a new introduction to the Bible. The book, An Introduction to the Bible, was written by Robert Kugler and Patrick Hartin. The book was written for college students and for those who desire to gain a better understanding of the Bible.
This introduction shows “how to read the Bible on the literary, historical, and theological levels.”
Eerdmans has made available online (in PDF format) a general introduction to the book and an introduction to the book of Joshua. Read the General Introduction here and the Introduction to the Book of Joshua here.
NOTICE: My blog has moved to a new address. If you enjoyed reading this post, you can subscribe to my blog by visiting my web page or subscribing to my blog here:
Dr. Claude Mariottini
Subscription
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Hebrew Bible, Book of Joshua
This introduction shows “how to read the Bible on the literary, historical, and theological levels.”
Eerdmans has made available online (in PDF format) a general introduction to the book and an introduction to the book of Joshua. Read the General Introduction here and the Introduction to the Book of Joshua here.
NOTICE: My blog has moved to a new address. If you enjoyed reading this post, you can subscribe to my blog by visiting my web page or subscribing to my blog here:
Dr. Claude Mariottini
Subscription
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Tags: Hebrew Bible, Book of Joshua
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)