According to a report published by the BBC, a lost ancient Egyptian tomb has been rediscovered by archaeologists in Egypt.
“The tomb belongs to Ptahmes, who was also army chief, overseer of the treasury and a royal scribe under the Pharaohs Seti I and his son Ramses II, during the 13th Century BC.”
Read the news release here.
According to most scholars, Seti I was the pharaoh of the oppression of the Israelite in Egypt and Ramses II was the pharaoh during the Exodus.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Archaeology, Ptahmes, Seti I, Ramses II
This blog is a Christian perspective on the Old Testament and Current Events from Dr. Claude Mariottini, Professor of Old Testament at Northern Baptist Seminary.
Monday, May 31, 2010
The Arizona Immigration Law and the Bible
Arizona adopted the toughest illegal-immigration law in the country at the end of April. The new law has created intense controversy about the situation of millions of undocumented aliens in the country. The laws of the United States declare that in order for a person from another country to enter the United States, that person must have a document declaring that he or she is allowed to enter the country legally.
Have you ever wondered where the concept of closed borders originated? The fact is that from ancient times, travel restrictions were common among nations. It was common for kings to grant permission for people to enter or leave their territory.
A recent article on travel restrictions made the following statement:
The is the letter of King Artaxerxes:
With this royal document, Ezra and the group traveling with him had safe passage to leave Babylon and travel to Judea. Without this permission from the king, Ezra would be unable to leave Babylon and would probably be unable to enter the province of Judea.
Another example of people from one nation asking permission of people from another nation to cross their land in found in the book of Numbers. The occasion for this request came at the time Israel asked the king of Edom for permission to cross his land. The following is the dialogue between the people of Israel and the king of Edom:
The Request:
The Response:
From this incident between Israel and Moan we learn that even in antiquity, people could not cross the borders of a country without the permission of the leaders of that country.
People may disagree with the moral implications of the Arizona law, but there is a Biblical precedent for what they have done.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Immigration, Illegal Aliens, Arizona Law
Have you ever wondered where the concept of closed borders originated? The fact is that from ancient times, travel restrictions were common among nations. It was common for kings to grant permission for people to enter or leave their territory.
A recent article on travel restrictions made the following statement:
The historical equivalent of travel documents were the passport-type letters issued to the messengers of kings confirming their loyalty to a particular king and requesting a safe passage to the destination. The earliest known reference is mentioned in the Hebrew Bible.
King Artaxerxes I of Persia issued a letter to his official travelling to Judea, requesting the governors of the adjoining lands to provide him safe passage.
The is the letter of King Artaxerxes:
From Artaxerxes, the king of kings, to Ezra the priest, the teacher of the law of the God of heaven. I decree that any of the people of Israel in my kingdom, including the priests and Levites, may volunteer to return to Jerusalem with you. I and my council of seven hereby instruct you to conduct an inquiry into the situation in Judah and Jerusalem, based on your God’s law, which is in your hand. We also commission you to take with you silver and gold, which we are freely presenting as an offering to the God of Israel who lives in Jerusalem.
Furthermore, you are to take any silver and gold that you may obtain from the province of Babylon, as well as the voluntary offerings of the people and the priests that are presented for the Temple of their God in Jerusalem. These donations are to be used specifically for the purchase of bulls, rams, male lambs, and the appropriate grain offerings and liquid offerings, all of which will be offered on the altar of the Temple of your God in Jerusalem. Any silver and gold that is left over may be used in whatever way you and your colleagues feel is the will of your God. But as for the cups we are entrusting to you for the service of the Temple of your God, deliver them all to the God of Jerusalem. If you need anything else for your God’s Temple or for any similar needs, you may take it from the royal treasury.
I, Artaxerxes the king, hereby send this decree to all the treasurers in the province west of the Euphrates River: You are to give Ezra, the priest and teacher of the law of the God of heaven, whatever he requests of you. You are to give him up to 7,500 pounds1 of silver, 500 bushels of wheat, 550 gallons of wine, 550 gallons of olive oil, and an unlimited supply of salt” (Ezra 7:12-22).
With this royal document, Ezra and the group traveling with him had safe passage to leave Babylon and travel to Judea. Without this permission from the king, Ezra would be unable to leave Babylon and would probably be unable to enter the province of Judea.
Another example of people from one nation asking permission of people from another nation to cross their land in found in the book of Numbers. The occasion for this request came at the time Israel asked the king of Edom for permission to cross his land. The following is the dialogue between the people of Israel and the king of Edom:
The Request:
While Moses was at Kadesh, he sent ambassadors to the king of Edom with this message: “This is what your relatives, the people of Israel, say: ‘You know all the hardships we have been through. Our ancestors went down to Egypt, and we lived there a long time, and we and our ancestors were brutally mistreated by the Egyptians. But when we cried out to the LORD, he heard us and sent an angel who brought us out of Egypt. Now we are camped at Kadesh, a town on the border of your land. Please let us travel through your land. We will be careful not to go through your fields and vineyards. We won’t even drink water from your wells. We will stay on the king's road and never leave it until we have passed through your territory’” (Numbers 20:14-17).
The Response:
But the king of Edom said, “Stay out of my land, or I will meet you with an army!” The Israelites answered, “We will stay on the main road. If our livestock drink your water, we will pay for it. Just let us pass through your country. That’s all we ask.” But the king of Edom replied, “Stay out! You may not pass through our land.” With that he mobilized his army and marched out against them with an imposing force. Because Edom refused to allow Israel to pass through their country, Israel was forced to turn around (Numbers 20:18-21).
From this incident between Israel and Moan we learn that even in antiquity, people could not cross the borders of a country without the permission of the leaders of that country.
People may disagree with the moral implications of the Arizona law, but there is a Biblical precedent for what they have done.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Immigration, Illegal Aliens, Arizona Law
Dating Ancient Coins
Researchers from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Colorado College and Mount Saint Mary’s University in Emmitsburg, Md., have used chemistry techniques to determine the elemental composition of ancient coins. The researchers have analyzed ancient Judean coins in order to ascertain the places where the metal was mined, and when the coins were struck.
The following is an excerpt from the article:
HT: G.M. Grena
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Archaeology, Ancient Coins, Coins, Numismatics, Herod Agrippa
The following is an excerpt from the article:
To compare the effectiveness of various nondestructive analytical methods with destructive methods often used to determine the age and origin of ancient coins, the group studied coins minted by Kings Herod Agrippa I and Agrippa II in what is modern day Palestine and Israel, a biblically and historically significant period.Read the article in its entirety by clicking here.
The vast numbers of a particular coin, a prutah, found in the archaeological record has led scholars to disagree about when they were struck and by whom. The provenance of the coin is important because it is used to establish dates for places and events in the early years of Christianity and the onset of the Jewish War (66-70 CE) against the Romans and the Diaspora that followed.
To better establish whether the coins were minted by Agrippa I (41-45 CE) or Agrippa II (after 61 CE), the team performed X-ray fluorescence and lead isotope analysis to fingerprint the ores used in the production of the coins. These NDE methods are not commonly used on corroded coins because the corrosion can affect the results—in some cases making it difficult to get a result at all. The team showed that these problems could be overcome using polarizing optics and powerful new software for X-ray fluorescence analysis, combined with careful calibration of the mass spectrometer using Standard Reference Materials from NIST.
The lead isotope analysis, performed at NIST, showed that the coins that had been attributed to Agrippa I were indeed from that era. More interestingly, however, the group found that the copper from which the coins were made most likely came from mines that scholars thought hadn’t been opened until a century later.
HT: G.M. Grena
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Archaeology, Ancient Coins, Coins, Numismatics, Herod Agrippa
Friday, May 28, 2010
Proverbs 25:25
“Like cold water to a thirsty soul, so is good news from a far country” (Proverbs 25:25).
Our nation is a cultural mosaic. America is a nation composed of people who came from almost every nation on earth. We are a society with different ethnic groups, who speak many different languages, and who enjoy a variety of cultural traditions. So, it is natural for people who have come to America from different countries to desire to hear good news from family and from friends, loved people who are far away.
When people are expecting bad news from a distant country, they wait for that news with trepidation, knowing that something bad waits for them, bad news brought by a messenger of doom. When people are expecting good news, that news cannot come soon enough and the news will be welcomed because the messenger of good news will bring news that will gladden the heart of the one who hears it.
This was the sentiment of the prophet Isaiah when he said: “How lovely on the mountains are the feet of him who brings good news, who announces peace and brings good news of happiness” (Isaiah 52:7).
As the wise man wrote, good news has the power to refresh the soul as cold water delights and refreshes the person who is faint from thirst. The expression “thirsty soul” can be translated “a thirsty throat,” but in the context of the book of Proverbs, the word “soul” refers to the whole person.
At times, it is difficult to receive news of any kind from a distant land, primarily when that country is hostile. People who fled their countries because of war, persecution, or oppression often are unable to receive any news from the country they left behind. Thus, when any news is received, it is much better when that news is good news.
When Jacob received news that Joseph, his beloved son, was dead, Jacob became very depressed. At the news of Joseph’s death, Jacob tore his garments, put on sackcloth and mourned for his dead son many days. So depressed was Jacob, that when his sons and daughters tried to comfort him, he rejected their words of encouragement and refused to be comforted. He said: “In mourning will I go down to the grave” (Genesis 37:33-35).
But one day, Jacob received good news from a far country. It was good news from Egypt. After his sons returned from Egypt, Jacob received good news from that far off land: “Joseph is alive” (Genesis 45:26). When Jacob received the news that his son was alive, it was like cool, refreshing water in the throat of a man who was spiritually and emotionally thirsty. The news was so good that Jacob was stunned. So good was that news from Egypt that at first Jacob refused to believe the news his sons brought to him. But when he was assured that the news was good indeed, “the spirit of Jacob revived” (Genesis 45:23-28). So is the power of good news from a far country.
In this impersonal society in which we live, people need good news. Good news can comfort people who are depressed and can lift up their spirits by providing them with hope and determination to face times of loneliness, to bring them out from the depths of their emotional despair, and to provide refreshed determination to help them confront their disappointments and failures.
For people of faith, that good news came from heaven more than two thousand years ago. It was the best news ever heard from a distant place. The heavenly messengers came from a far country to bring good news of great joy that would gladden the heart and refresh the souls of every human being, near and far:
“Do not be afraid. I bring you good news of great joy that will be for all the people. Today in the town of David a Savior has been born to you; he is Christ the Lord” (Luke 2:10-11).
How refreshing it was for the weary shepherds to hear the good news brought by the heavenly messengers that the hoped for Messiah was born in Bethlehem. That proclamation of good news was refreshing to people who lived two thousand years ago and continues to be a refreshing message for people today. This is the power of good news from a far country.
Although God is an ever present God, to many people, he is still a God who is far away. That is the reason the message the angels proclaimed in Bethlehem is good news, because from his distant heaven God sent a message that will serve as good news for every lonely and thirsty soul: “ I am always with you until the end of time” (Matthew 28:20).
This good news from a far away country is good news indeed.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Proverbs 25:25, Good News
Our nation is a cultural mosaic. America is a nation composed of people who came from almost every nation on earth. We are a society with different ethnic groups, who speak many different languages, and who enjoy a variety of cultural traditions. So, it is natural for people who have come to America from different countries to desire to hear good news from family and from friends, loved people who are far away.
When people are expecting bad news from a distant country, they wait for that news with trepidation, knowing that something bad waits for them, bad news brought by a messenger of doom. When people are expecting good news, that news cannot come soon enough and the news will be welcomed because the messenger of good news will bring news that will gladden the heart of the one who hears it.
This was the sentiment of the prophet Isaiah when he said: “How lovely on the mountains are the feet of him who brings good news, who announces peace and brings good news of happiness” (Isaiah 52:7).
As the wise man wrote, good news has the power to refresh the soul as cold water delights and refreshes the person who is faint from thirst. The expression “thirsty soul” can be translated “a thirsty throat,” but in the context of the book of Proverbs, the word “soul” refers to the whole person.
At times, it is difficult to receive news of any kind from a distant land, primarily when that country is hostile. People who fled their countries because of war, persecution, or oppression often are unable to receive any news from the country they left behind. Thus, when any news is received, it is much better when that news is good news.
When Jacob received news that Joseph, his beloved son, was dead, Jacob became very depressed. At the news of Joseph’s death, Jacob tore his garments, put on sackcloth and mourned for his dead son many days. So depressed was Jacob, that when his sons and daughters tried to comfort him, he rejected their words of encouragement and refused to be comforted. He said: “In mourning will I go down to the grave” (Genesis 37:33-35).
But one day, Jacob received good news from a far country. It was good news from Egypt. After his sons returned from Egypt, Jacob received good news from that far off land: “Joseph is alive” (Genesis 45:26). When Jacob received the news that his son was alive, it was like cool, refreshing water in the throat of a man who was spiritually and emotionally thirsty. The news was so good that Jacob was stunned. So good was that news from Egypt that at first Jacob refused to believe the news his sons brought to him. But when he was assured that the news was good indeed, “the spirit of Jacob revived” (Genesis 45:23-28). So is the power of good news from a far country.
In this impersonal society in which we live, people need good news. Good news can comfort people who are depressed and can lift up their spirits by providing them with hope and determination to face times of loneliness, to bring them out from the depths of their emotional despair, and to provide refreshed determination to help them confront their disappointments and failures.
For people of faith, that good news came from heaven more than two thousand years ago. It was the best news ever heard from a distant place. The heavenly messengers came from a far country to bring good news of great joy that would gladden the heart and refresh the souls of every human being, near and far:
“Do not be afraid. I bring you good news of great joy that will be for all the people. Today in the town of David a Savior has been born to you; he is Christ the Lord” (Luke 2:10-11).
How refreshing it was for the weary shepherds to hear the good news brought by the heavenly messengers that the hoped for Messiah was born in Bethlehem. That proclamation of good news was refreshing to people who lived two thousand years ago and continues to be a refreshing message for people today. This is the power of good news from a far country.
Although God is an ever present God, to many people, he is still a God who is far away. That is the reason the message the angels proclaimed in Bethlehem is good news, because from his distant heaven God sent a message that will serve as good news for every lonely and thirsty soul: “ I am always with you until the end of time” (Matthew 28:20).
This good news from a far away country is good news indeed.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Proverbs 25:25, Good News
National Day of Prayer for Creation
A group of Evangelical leaders held the first National Day of Prayer for Creation Care on Tuesday, May 25, 2010 in Washington, D.C. In his prayer for creation, Galen Carey, director of government affairs at the National Association of Evangelicals prayed:
“May we be your faithful servants and may we your people lead the way that others will see not only how to care for your good creation, but will come to know you as their loving creator through the witness of our lives and deeds.”
Read more about the National Day of Prayer for Creation Care by clicking here.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Evangelicals, Creation, Creation Care
“May we be your faithful servants and may we your people lead the way that others will see not only how to care for your good creation, but will come to know you as their loving creator through the witness of our lives and deeds.”
Read more about the National Day of Prayer for Creation Care by clicking here.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Evangelicals, Creation, Creation Care
Thursday, May 27, 2010
Ancient Anatolia: A Pictorial Album

A few years ago, I had the opportunity to visit Turkey. At that time, I visited many archeological sites, especially the places where the seven churches of Revelation were located. Many people are not aware that Turkey is a country rich in archaeological treasures and sites that preserve the remains of countless past civilizations and ancient cultures. The land that once was known as Anatolia was the home of the Hittites, and Catalhoyuk was an important city of antiquity. Other places like Troy, Ephesus, Laodicea and the places where the seven churches of the Book of Revelation were located have attracted many visitors.
The June-July issue of Current World Archaeology Magazine is a special issue on Turkey, featuring some of the most important archaeological sites of the country. Current World Archaeology Magazine has provided a preview of this special issue with 36 pages containing spectacular images of the archaeological sites in Turkey.
If you are unfamiliar with the archaeological sites of Ancient Anatolia, you must look at these beautiful pictures by clicking here.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Archaeology, Anatolia
Ephesus: The City of Glorious Riches

The June-July special issue of Current World Archaeology Magazine is featuring all the latest archaeological news on Ancient Anatolia (modern day Turkey). The following is an excerpt from the article on Ephesus:
During our five-month excavation campaign in 2009, a total of 174 scientists from 11 different countries, and over 60 local workers, were employed at Ephesus. In addition to archaeologists, the following specialist disciplines were also represented: restoration, architectural history, anthropology, archaeozoology, archaeometry, Byzantine studies, numismatics, epigraphy, photography, geodesy, spatial planning, chemistry, geography and geology. We undertook 12 excavation projects, as well as scientific analysis of numerous monuments and artefacts. A highlight of the 2009 excavation was the discovery of the sanctuary for the goddess Meter/Kybele at mount Panayirdag. There, we found 12 marble-reliefs showing Meter, Zeus and Hermes. Together, we are contributing ever greater knowledge and care to this glorious site.
Visit the web page of Current World Archaeology and read the article on Ephesus
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Archaeology, Ephesus
Laodicea: A Long-Lived City

The June-July special issue of Current World Archaeology Magazine is featuring all the latest archaeological news on Ancient Anatolia (modern day Turkey). The following is an excerpt from the article on Laodicea:
Yet more exciting excavations are taking place at the city of Laodicea, about 120km east of Ephesus, on the western border of the ancient Phrygian region of West Anatolia. Laodicea is well sited on a high plateau and surrounded by the rivers Lycos, Kapros and Asopos. Little wonder the city has an ancient history: our excavations in the area have revealed architecture, pottery, obsidian and flint stone finds dating back to the 4th millennium BC.
Visit the web page of Current World Archaeology and read the article on Laodicea.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Archaeology, Laodicea
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
Zephaniah the Prophet
This is my second post on Zephaniah. Read the first study in this series by clicking here.
The book of Zephaniah is the ninth book in the collection known as the Twelve Minor Prophets. These twelve prophets are classified as “Minor Prophets” not because they were minor in significance nor because their message was not relevant to their society. Rather, they are called Minor Prophets because their books are not as large as the books of Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Ezekiel. Zephaniah was a prophet who ministered in Judah during the reign of Josiah (640–609 B.C.). A careful study of the message of Zephaniah indicates that Zephaniah began his prophetic ministry before the religious reforms of Josiah.
A quick survey of the Minor Prophets will reveal that biographical information about the prophets is minimal. Zephaniah is the only canonical prophet with a detailed genealogy. The book of Zephaniah is the only prophetic book that provides extensive genealogical information about a prophet’s family. The four-generation genealogy found at the beginning of the book traces Zephaniah’s lineage back to Hezekiah. The genealogy introducing the ministry and message of Zephaniah says:
“The word of the LORD that came to Zephaniah son of Cushi son of Gedaliah son of Amariah son of Hezekiah, in the days of King Josiah son of Amon of Judah” (Zephaniah 1:1).
This editorial information in the book tells the reader many things about the prophet. First, the superscription tells that Zephaniah was active during the reign of King Josiah, who ruled in Jerusalem in the seventh century B.C. Thus, it is very probable that the message of Zephaniah provided the impetus for the Josianic reforms. The religious reforms of Josiah took place in several stages: “In the eighth year of his reign [632 B.C.], while he was still a boy, he [Josiah] began to seek the God of his ancestor David, and in the twelfth year [628 B.C.] he began to purge Judah and Jerusalem of the high places, the sacred poles, and the carved and the cast images” (2 Chronicles 34:3). Josiah’s reform found its culmination with the discovery of the book of the law of Moses in 622 B.C. (on the reforms of Josiah, read here, and here).
Second, the superscription says that Zephaniah was a descendant of Hezekiah. There are three persons named Hezekiah in the Hebrew Bible. In addition to Hezekiah, the King of Judah, and the great-great-grandfather of the prophet Zephaniah, the only other Hezekiah mentioned in the Bible was the leader of a family that returned from the Babylonian exile (Ezra 2:16). Whether the Hezekiah mentioned in the genealogy of Zephaniah was the Judean king who reigned in Judah in the eighth century B.C. is debated by scholars (more on Hezekiah here, here, and here). However, since Zephaniah is the only prophet who has provided an abnormally long genealogy, the attempt to identify Zephaniah’s ancestors may be an indication that the superscription is trying to convince the readers of the royal ancestry of Zephaniah.
The attempt to provide the genealogy of a prophet’s ancestors to the fourth generation is quite unusual. The primary purpose of a genealogy is to provide legal information about a person. Thus, the genealogy at the beginning of Zephaniah’s book is designed to add credibility or integrity to the message of the prophet. Thus, it is possible to conclude that the mention of Hezekiah in the genealogical list of Zephaniah was of special importance.
Robert Wilson, in his book, Prophecy and Society in Ancient Israel (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1980), p. 279, wrote: “Linear genealogies of this type have only one function: to ground in the past an individual’s claims to power, property, or position.”
If the intent of Zephaniah’s genealogy was to prove that the prophet was a member of the royal family, one would think that the redactor would specifically mention that Hezekiah was the king of Judah. Yet, the linear genealogy found in the book is very common in the Old Testament and does not make an attempt to emphasize any of the persons named in the genealogy other than the prophet himself.
For this reason, whether this Hezekiah was the king of Judah has been a topic of debate among scholars. While some accept the fact that Zephaniah was a member of the royal family, others have rejected the view that Zephaniah was related to King Hezekiah. Personally, I believe that the Hezekiah mentioned in the genealogy of Zephaniah was the one who ruled in Judah in the eighth century B.C.
Third, the genealogical information at the beginning of the book says that the father of Zephaniah was Cushi. In the Hebrew Bible, the name “Cush” has two meanings. Generally, the word “Cush” is translated as Ethiopia. The name “Ethiopia” probably means “the land of the people of burnt faces.” The name given to the land was a reference to the dark skin of the people who lived in Ethiopia (see Jeremiah 13:23). The word “Cush” also appears as the names of two people in the Old Testament. Cushi was the great-grandfather of Jehudi, an officer in King Jehoiakim’s court. The other person who was called Cushi was the father of Zephaniah.
Since the name Cushi is generally identified with Ethiopia, some people think that Zephaniah was a foreigner. For instance, David T. Adamo, in his book Africa and the Africans in the Old Testament (Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2001), p. 116, called Zephaniah “The African Prophet.” Adamo believes that since Hezekiah had more interaction with Africa than any other king of Judah, Hezekiah married an African woman who then gave birth to Zedekiah’s grandfather. Adamo concludes: “Thus to find an African as one of these prophets means that Africans have contributed to the total development of ancient Israel” (p. 119).
It is doubtful that Zephaniah’s father was an Ethiopian or an African. There is no doubt that in the past there were intermarriage and foreign influence in the Judean royal family. However, the fact that all the ancestors of Zephaniah have Hebrew names, indicate that his ancestors were Judeans. In addition, the listing of a genealogy with four generations was probably designed to prove that Zephaniah was not a foreigner, notwithstanding the name of his father and that he was a full Israelite and a member of the royal family.
If Zephaniah was a member of the royal family then one would understand the significant influence that he might have exercised in the religious formation of the young king. If Zephaniah was a relative of Josiah, he probably had access to the young king at the time the king was growing and receiving advice from people who were committed to the ancient religious traditions of Israel.
His passionate message against the social and religious evil present in Judean society developed in the young king a sense of urgency that eventually led him to call Israel to turn from their evil ways.
Zephaniah was called by God to proclaim an urgent message. The Lord placed his messenger in a strategic place and gave him a special mission: to call the king and the people of Judah back to the ancient traditions of Israel.
In a future post I will continue my study on Zephaniah.
Other Studies on Zephaniah:
Prophets in Israel
Zephaniah and the Palestinians
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Zephaniah, Josiah, Hezekiah, Cushi, Ethiopia
The book of Zephaniah is the ninth book in the collection known as the Twelve Minor Prophets. These twelve prophets are classified as “Minor Prophets” not because they were minor in significance nor because their message was not relevant to their society. Rather, they are called Minor Prophets because their books are not as large as the books of Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Ezekiel. Zephaniah was a prophet who ministered in Judah during the reign of Josiah (640–609 B.C.). A careful study of the message of Zephaniah indicates that Zephaniah began his prophetic ministry before the religious reforms of Josiah.
A quick survey of the Minor Prophets will reveal that biographical information about the prophets is minimal. Zephaniah is the only canonical prophet with a detailed genealogy. The book of Zephaniah is the only prophetic book that provides extensive genealogical information about a prophet’s family. The four-generation genealogy found at the beginning of the book traces Zephaniah’s lineage back to Hezekiah. The genealogy introducing the ministry and message of Zephaniah says:
“The word of the LORD that came to Zephaniah son of Cushi son of Gedaliah son of Amariah son of Hezekiah, in the days of King Josiah son of Amon of Judah” (Zephaniah 1:1).
This editorial information in the book tells the reader many things about the prophet. First, the superscription tells that Zephaniah was active during the reign of King Josiah, who ruled in Jerusalem in the seventh century B.C. Thus, it is very probable that the message of Zephaniah provided the impetus for the Josianic reforms. The religious reforms of Josiah took place in several stages: “In the eighth year of his reign [632 B.C.], while he was still a boy, he [Josiah] began to seek the God of his ancestor David, and in the twelfth year [628 B.C.] he began to purge Judah and Jerusalem of the high places, the sacred poles, and the carved and the cast images” (2 Chronicles 34:3). Josiah’s reform found its culmination with the discovery of the book of the law of Moses in 622 B.C. (on the reforms of Josiah, read here, and here).
Second, the superscription says that Zephaniah was a descendant of Hezekiah. There are three persons named Hezekiah in the Hebrew Bible. In addition to Hezekiah, the King of Judah, and the great-great-grandfather of the prophet Zephaniah, the only other Hezekiah mentioned in the Bible was the leader of a family that returned from the Babylonian exile (Ezra 2:16). Whether the Hezekiah mentioned in the genealogy of Zephaniah was the Judean king who reigned in Judah in the eighth century B.C. is debated by scholars (more on Hezekiah here, here, and here). However, since Zephaniah is the only prophet who has provided an abnormally long genealogy, the attempt to identify Zephaniah’s ancestors may be an indication that the superscription is trying to convince the readers of the royal ancestry of Zephaniah.
The attempt to provide the genealogy of a prophet’s ancestors to the fourth generation is quite unusual. The primary purpose of a genealogy is to provide legal information about a person. Thus, the genealogy at the beginning of Zephaniah’s book is designed to add credibility or integrity to the message of the prophet. Thus, it is possible to conclude that the mention of Hezekiah in the genealogical list of Zephaniah was of special importance.
Robert Wilson, in his book, Prophecy and Society in Ancient Israel (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1980), p. 279, wrote: “Linear genealogies of this type have only one function: to ground in the past an individual’s claims to power, property, or position.”
If the intent of Zephaniah’s genealogy was to prove that the prophet was a member of the royal family, one would think that the redactor would specifically mention that Hezekiah was the king of Judah. Yet, the linear genealogy found in the book is very common in the Old Testament and does not make an attempt to emphasize any of the persons named in the genealogy other than the prophet himself.
For this reason, whether this Hezekiah was the king of Judah has been a topic of debate among scholars. While some accept the fact that Zephaniah was a member of the royal family, others have rejected the view that Zephaniah was related to King Hezekiah. Personally, I believe that the Hezekiah mentioned in the genealogy of Zephaniah was the one who ruled in Judah in the eighth century B.C.
Third, the genealogical information at the beginning of the book says that the father of Zephaniah was Cushi. In the Hebrew Bible, the name “Cush” has two meanings. Generally, the word “Cush” is translated as Ethiopia. The name “Ethiopia” probably means “the land of the people of burnt faces.” The name given to the land was a reference to the dark skin of the people who lived in Ethiopia (see Jeremiah 13:23). The word “Cush” also appears as the names of two people in the Old Testament. Cushi was the great-grandfather of Jehudi, an officer in King Jehoiakim’s court. The other person who was called Cushi was the father of Zephaniah.
Since the name Cushi is generally identified with Ethiopia, some people think that Zephaniah was a foreigner. For instance, David T. Adamo, in his book Africa and the Africans in the Old Testament (Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2001), p. 116, called Zephaniah “The African Prophet.” Adamo believes that since Hezekiah had more interaction with Africa than any other king of Judah, Hezekiah married an African woman who then gave birth to Zedekiah’s grandfather. Adamo concludes: “Thus to find an African as one of these prophets means that Africans have contributed to the total development of ancient Israel” (p. 119).
It is doubtful that Zephaniah’s father was an Ethiopian or an African. There is no doubt that in the past there were intermarriage and foreign influence in the Judean royal family. However, the fact that all the ancestors of Zephaniah have Hebrew names, indicate that his ancestors were Judeans. In addition, the listing of a genealogy with four generations was probably designed to prove that Zephaniah was not a foreigner, notwithstanding the name of his father and that he was a full Israelite and a member of the royal family.
If Zephaniah was a member of the royal family then one would understand the significant influence that he might have exercised in the religious formation of the young king. If Zephaniah was a relative of Josiah, he probably had access to the young king at the time the king was growing and receiving advice from people who were committed to the ancient religious traditions of Israel.
His passionate message against the social and religious evil present in Judean society developed in the young king a sense of urgency that eventually led him to call Israel to turn from their evil ways.
Zephaniah was called by God to proclaim an urgent message. The Lord placed his messenger in a strategic place and gave him a special mission: to call the king and the people of Judah back to the ancient traditions of Israel.
In a future post I will continue my study on Zephaniah.
Other Studies on Zephaniah:
Prophets in Israel
Zephaniah and the Palestinians
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Zephaniah, Josiah, Hezekiah, Cushi, Ethiopia
Tuesday, May 25, 2010
Prophets in Israel
Today I begin a series of studies on the prophet Zephaniah. Zephaniah was one of the twelve minor prophets in the Hebrew Bible. He is not as well known as Amos, Hosea, or Micah. Zephaniah was called by YHWH to proclaim his message to the people of Judah in the days prior to the reforms of Josiah in the seventh century (640 B.C.).
Zephaniah’s message spoke against the idolatry and political corruption in Judah that was offensive to God. His message was also focused on the Day of YHWH, a day when YHWH will come to judge his people and judge the nations. To Zephaniah, the Day of the Lord was approaching and his message was a call to the righteous remnant of Judah to prepare for that terrible day.
Before one can adequately understand the message and ministry of Zephaniah, it becomes necessary to gain a basic understanding of the prophetic traditions in Israel. Since its inception in the days of Samuel, who is considered the founder of the prophetic movement in Israel, prophecy was an integral part of the social and religious life of Israel.
The primary word used in the Hebrew Bible to designate a prophet is nabi, a word meaning “one who is called.” Before the classical prophets (or the writing prophets) arose in Israel, most of the prophets of Israel were visionaries. Another word for prophet was ro’eh, a word which means “one who sees.” But after the visionaries fell into disrepute, the seer was displaced by the prophet, but the ministry of the visionaries never truly disappeared in Israel.
This transformation of prophecy in Israel is seen in the statement of 1 Samuel 9:9: “In Israel, back in the old days, when someone went to consult God, he would say, ‘Come, let’s go to the seer,’ because a person now called a prophet used to be called a seer.”
The primary mission of the prophets in Israel was to proclaim the Word of God. They spoke to their own society in order to call the people back to the religion of Yahweh, urging them to repent and to be faithful to the demands of the covenant. And as they proclaimed God’s Word to Israel, the prophets dealt with the religious, political, moral, and social problems that plagued their society.
The prophets did not speak by their own authority. They considered themselves to be God’s instruments. The words they proclaimed to the people came directly from God. The prophets were not divining the future. They spoke against the ills they encountered in their society. They were not social reformers, speaking out against the evils of society, but they believed that the social problems in their society were the result of the people’s violation of the demands of the covenant.
The prophets were not educated theologians trained in prophetic schools. They believed they had received their message directly from God. The prophets were men and women filled with the Spirit of God, people who had a compulsion to speak on behalf of their God. The prophets believed what gave them the authority to speak on behalf of God was a sense of calling, that YHWH had sent them to their society with a message that the people needed to hear.
Early in the prophetic movement in Israel, the prophets formed prophetic guilds and used music and musical instruments to help them acquire prophetic inspiration. After Samuel anointed Saul, Samuel told the newly anointed king: “After that you will go to Gibeah of God, where there is a Philistine outpost. As you approach the town, you will meet a procession of prophets coming down from the high place with lyres, tambourines, flutes and harps being played before them, and they will be prophesying” (1 Samuel10:5).
The prophets were led by a leader known as “the father.” The members of the group were called the “sons of the prophet.” In 2 Kings 2:12, Elisha addressed Elijah by the title “My father.” The followers of Elisha were called “the sons of the prophets” (2 Kings 2:3).
Many of the early prophets served either as cult prophets or court prophets. The cult prophets were attached to various shrines or places of worship in Israel. They not only functioned as prophets, but probably also served in the priestly capacity by offering sacrifices or exercising other religious functions. Samuel was a prophet (1 Samuel 19:20), but he also offered sacrifices unto the Lord (1 Samuel 16:2).
The court prophets served in the king’s court and were at the king’s service. These court prophets were consulted before the king went into battle. Ths work of the court prophets is seen in 1 Kings 22:6: “So the king of Israel gathered the prophets, about 400 men, and asked them, ‘Should I go against Ramoth-gilead for war or should I refrain?’ They replied, ‘March up, and the Lord will hand it over to the king.’” The cult prophets received their compensation from the temple treasury while the court prophets were paid from the king’s wealth.
There was another group of prophets in Israel who was not associated with the temple nor with the court. These prophets were independent of religious and political organizations. Prophets such as Micaiah, Elijah, and Elisha were operating on their own, probably supported by the community, and did not receive any special benefits either from the temple or from the king. They are often known as “peripheral prophets.” Sometimes these independent prophets became leaders of prophetic communities. For instance, Elijah was the leader of a prophetic community from which Elisha came. Isaiah mentions the disciples who were involved in his ministry (Isaiah 8:16).
As mentioned above, the prophets spoke with divine authority. Their message was received from YHWH to be communicated to the people. One of the primary functions of a prophet was to intercede with YHWH on behalf of the people. Before a prophet proclaimed his message to the people, he stood in the “council of YHWH” so that he could see and hear what the Lord had said and receive instructions on what to proclaim to the people (see Jeremiah 23:18).
One of the main reasons why the canonical or writing prophets arose in Israel was because of the problem of false prophets. From almost the beginning of the prophetic movement in Israel until the post-exilic times, many prophets appeared in Israel claiming to speak on behalf of the Lord. These prophets called themselves “nabi,” “prophets,” but their message contradicted the message of the true prophets of YHWH. For instance, the message of Zedekiah contradicted the message of Micaiah (1 Kings 22:11-13). The message of Hananiah contradicted the message of Jeremiah (Jeremiah 28).
The reason the prophets wrote down their words or oracles in a scroll was to vindicate their ministry and to serve as a reminder to future generations that they were speaking the truth and that their oracles were fulfilled. It was in the fulfillment of the prophetic word that the people would recognize that a prophet had spoken the truth on behalf of YHWH. As Jeremiah told Hananiah: “As for the prophet who prophesies peace, when the word of that prophet comes to pass, then it will be known that the LORD has truly sent the prophet” (Jeremiah 28:9).
When Isaiah’s message was rejected by king Ahaz, the prophet said: “Tie up the scroll as legal evidence, seal the official record of God’s instructions and give it to my followers. I will wait patiently for the LORD, who has rejected the family of Jacob; I will wait for him” (Isaiah 8:16-17). Because the people of Judah had refused to listen to his message, God told Jeremiah to write down in a book all the words he had preached. So, at the dictation of Jeremiah, Baruch wrote down in a scroll all the word of the Lord, so that Jeremiah’s message would remind the king and the people of Judah of the coming judgment (Jeremiah 36:1-4).
Thus, the prophets wrote down their words in order to remind the people that they spoke on behalf of YHWH. Their message told the people what God was doing in their world, urging Israel to change their ways, calling the people to repent and to recommit themselves to the covenant which they had made with YHWH.
In a future post I will continue my studies on the book of the prophet Zephaniah.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Prophets, Prophets, Nabi, Seer, Zephaniah, Hebrew Bible
Zephaniah’s message spoke against the idolatry and political corruption in Judah that was offensive to God. His message was also focused on the Day of YHWH, a day when YHWH will come to judge his people and judge the nations. To Zephaniah, the Day of the Lord was approaching and his message was a call to the righteous remnant of Judah to prepare for that terrible day.
Before one can adequately understand the message and ministry of Zephaniah, it becomes necessary to gain a basic understanding of the prophetic traditions in Israel. Since its inception in the days of Samuel, who is considered the founder of the prophetic movement in Israel, prophecy was an integral part of the social and religious life of Israel.
The primary word used in the Hebrew Bible to designate a prophet is nabi, a word meaning “one who is called.” Before the classical prophets (or the writing prophets) arose in Israel, most of the prophets of Israel were visionaries. Another word for prophet was ro’eh, a word which means “one who sees.” But after the visionaries fell into disrepute, the seer was displaced by the prophet, but the ministry of the visionaries never truly disappeared in Israel.
This transformation of prophecy in Israel is seen in the statement of 1 Samuel 9:9: “In Israel, back in the old days, when someone went to consult God, he would say, ‘Come, let’s go to the seer,’ because a person now called a prophet used to be called a seer.”
The primary mission of the prophets in Israel was to proclaim the Word of God. They spoke to their own society in order to call the people back to the religion of Yahweh, urging them to repent and to be faithful to the demands of the covenant. And as they proclaimed God’s Word to Israel, the prophets dealt with the religious, political, moral, and social problems that plagued their society.
The prophets did not speak by their own authority. They considered themselves to be God’s instruments. The words they proclaimed to the people came directly from God. The prophets were not divining the future. They spoke against the ills they encountered in their society. They were not social reformers, speaking out against the evils of society, but they believed that the social problems in their society were the result of the people’s violation of the demands of the covenant.
The prophets were not educated theologians trained in prophetic schools. They believed they had received their message directly from God. The prophets were men and women filled with the Spirit of God, people who had a compulsion to speak on behalf of their God. The prophets believed what gave them the authority to speak on behalf of God was a sense of calling, that YHWH had sent them to their society with a message that the people needed to hear.
Early in the prophetic movement in Israel, the prophets formed prophetic guilds and used music and musical instruments to help them acquire prophetic inspiration. After Samuel anointed Saul, Samuel told the newly anointed king: “After that you will go to Gibeah of God, where there is a Philistine outpost. As you approach the town, you will meet a procession of prophets coming down from the high place with lyres, tambourines, flutes and harps being played before them, and they will be prophesying” (1 Samuel10:5).
The prophets were led by a leader known as “the father.” The members of the group were called the “sons of the prophet.” In 2 Kings 2:12, Elisha addressed Elijah by the title “My father.” The followers of Elisha were called “the sons of the prophets” (2 Kings 2:3).
Many of the early prophets served either as cult prophets or court prophets. The cult prophets were attached to various shrines or places of worship in Israel. They not only functioned as prophets, but probably also served in the priestly capacity by offering sacrifices or exercising other religious functions. Samuel was a prophet (1 Samuel 19:20), but he also offered sacrifices unto the Lord (1 Samuel 16:2).
The court prophets served in the king’s court and were at the king’s service. These court prophets were consulted before the king went into battle. Ths work of the court prophets is seen in 1 Kings 22:6: “So the king of Israel gathered the prophets, about 400 men, and asked them, ‘Should I go against Ramoth-gilead for war or should I refrain?’ They replied, ‘March up, and the Lord will hand it over to the king.’” The cult prophets received their compensation from the temple treasury while the court prophets were paid from the king’s wealth.
There was another group of prophets in Israel who was not associated with the temple nor with the court. These prophets were independent of religious and political organizations. Prophets such as Micaiah, Elijah, and Elisha were operating on their own, probably supported by the community, and did not receive any special benefits either from the temple or from the king. They are often known as “peripheral prophets.” Sometimes these independent prophets became leaders of prophetic communities. For instance, Elijah was the leader of a prophetic community from which Elisha came. Isaiah mentions the disciples who were involved in his ministry (Isaiah 8:16).
As mentioned above, the prophets spoke with divine authority. Their message was received from YHWH to be communicated to the people. One of the primary functions of a prophet was to intercede with YHWH on behalf of the people. Before a prophet proclaimed his message to the people, he stood in the “council of YHWH” so that he could see and hear what the Lord had said and receive instructions on what to proclaim to the people (see Jeremiah 23:18).
One of the main reasons why the canonical or writing prophets arose in Israel was because of the problem of false prophets. From almost the beginning of the prophetic movement in Israel until the post-exilic times, many prophets appeared in Israel claiming to speak on behalf of the Lord. These prophets called themselves “nabi,” “prophets,” but their message contradicted the message of the true prophets of YHWH. For instance, the message of Zedekiah contradicted the message of Micaiah (1 Kings 22:11-13). The message of Hananiah contradicted the message of Jeremiah (Jeremiah 28).
The reason the prophets wrote down their words or oracles in a scroll was to vindicate their ministry and to serve as a reminder to future generations that they were speaking the truth and that their oracles were fulfilled. It was in the fulfillment of the prophetic word that the people would recognize that a prophet had spoken the truth on behalf of YHWH. As Jeremiah told Hananiah: “As for the prophet who prophesies peace, when the word of that prophet comes to pass, then it will be known that the LORD has truly sent the prophet” (Jeremiah 28:9).
When Isaiah’s message was rejected by king Ahaz, the prophet said: “Tie up the scroll as legal evidence, seal the official record of God’s instructions and give it to my followers. I will wait patiently for the LORD, who has rejected the family of Jacob; I will wait for him” (Isaiah 8:16-17). Because the people of Judah had refused to listen to his message, God told Jeremiah to write down in a book all the words he had preached. So, at the dictation of Jeremiah, Baruch wrote down in a scroll all the word of the Lord, so that Jeremiah’s message would remind the king and the people of Judah of the coming judgment (Jeremiah 36:1-4).
Thus, the prophets wrote down their words in order to remind the people that they spoke on behalf of YHWH. Their message told the people what God was doing in their world, urging Israel to change their ways, calling the people to repent and to recommit themselves to the covenant which they had made with YHWH.
In a future post I will continue my studies on the book of the prophet Zephaniah.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Prophets, Prophets, Nabi, Seer, Zephaniah, Hebrew Bible
Friday, May 21, 2010
Pagan Altar Discovered in Ashkelon

Photo: The Pagan Altar Found at Ashkelon
Photo: Courtesy of the Israel Antiquities Authority
The Israel Antiquities Authority is reporting that a pagan altar has been discovered in Ashkelon during development work at the Barzilai Hospital compound in Ashkelon. According to the Israel Antiquities Authority, the place was probably a pagan cemetery.
The following is the news report released by the Israel Antiquities Authority:
The development work for the construction of a fortified emergency room at Barzilai Hospital, which is being conducted by a contractor carefully supervised by the Israel Antiquities Authority, has unearthed a new and impressive find: a magnificent pagan altar dating to the Roman period (first-second centuries CE) made of granite and adorned with bulls' heads and a laurel wreaths. The altar stood in the middle of the ancient burial field.Claude Mariottini
According to Dr. Yigal Israel, Ashkelon District Archaeologist of the Israel Antiquities Authority, "The discovery further corroborates the assertion that we are dealing with a pagan cemetery. It is an impressive find that has survived 2,000 years. The altar is c. 60 centimeters tall and it is decorated with bulls' heads, from which dangle laurels wreaths. There is a strap in the middle of each floral wreath and bull's head. The laurel wreaths are decorated with grape clusters and leaves. This kind of altar is known as an "incense altar". Such altars usually stood in Roman temples and visitors to the temple used to burn incense in them, particularly myrrh and frankincense, while praying to their idols. We can still see the burnt marks on the altar that remain from the fire. The altar was probably donated by one of the families who brought it to the cemetery from the city of Ashkelon".
Dr. Israel adds that during the archaeological supervision of the development work burial structures were discovered, which served as family tombs, and cist tombs that were used for interring individuals. In addition a large limestone sarcophagus (stone coffin) with a decorated lid was also found. The sarcophagus stands 80 centimeters high is 60 centimeters wide and is 2 meters long. Part of the stone in the sarcophagus was left rather high in the spot where the head of the deceased was placed and resembles a kind of pillow.
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Archaeology, Ashkelon, Pagan Altar, Yigal Israel, Myrrh, Frankincense
The End of the Academic Year
As the regular readers of my blog have noticed, I have not posted to the blog lately. I have not stopped blogging. The reason for not posting is that, here at Northern Seminary, we are coming to the end of the academic year and the work is piling up.
Most people do not understand the work of professors at the end of the academic year. There are tons of reading to do, papers to grade, meetings to attend, and preparations for graduation. And I am involved in all of these academic enterprises.
As for the reading, I generally wake up at 6:00 a.m. to read (sometimes even at 5:00 a.m.) and work until 11:00 p.m. During the day, I am so busy that I do not have much time to blog.
In my Hebrew class, my students and I are busy translating from the Hebrew Bible. This quarter, my students have translated the book of Ruth and now are translating from the book of Genesis. As a result of my course on Hebrew exegesis, I have written two posts on Ruth this quarter (here and here).
I am also teaching a course on Old Testament Ethics. My students have written papers on divorce, homosexuality, poverty, war, the repentance of God, and the law dealing with the wife who interferes in a fight to help her husband. As a result of this course, I wrote a three-part study on the law in Deuteronomy 25:11-12 (here, here, and here).
This quarter I am supervising a doctoral thesis for the Doctor of Ministry program. I also served as the second reader on another doctoral thesis. All these involve much reading and rereading in preparation for the submission of the thesis proposal or the final presentation of the thesis.
I am the Faculty Marshal for Northern’s faculty. As such, I am involved in the events related to graduation. In a few days I have to complete the arrangements for the processional and the recessional for the graduation.
All these things I mentioned above take time. This means that something has to give and what has suffered is the time to write for the blog. I hope to begin to blog regularly again on Monday. Until then, thank you for your understanding.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Blogging
Most people do not understand the work of professors at the end of the academic year. There are tons of reading to do, papers to grade, meetings to attend, and preparations for graduation. And I am involved in all of these academic enterprises.
As for the reading, I generally wake up at 6:00 a.m. to read (sometimes even at 5:00 a.m.) and work until 11:00 p.m. During the day, I am so busy that I do not have much time to blog.
In my Hebrew class, my students and I are busy translating from the Hebrew Bible. This quarter, my students have translated the book of Ruth and now are translating from the book of Genesis. As a result of my course on Hebrew exegesis, I have written two posts on Ruth this quarter (here and here).
I am also teaching a course on Old Testament Ethics. My students have written papers on divorce, homosexuality, poverty, war, the repentance of God, and the law dealing with the wife who interferes in a fight to help her husband. As a result of this course, I wrote a three-part study on the law in Deuteronomy 25:11-12 (here, here, and here).
This quarter I am supervising a doctoral thesis for the Doctor of Ministry program. I also served as the second reader on another doctoral thesis. All these involve much reading and rereading in preparation for the submission of the thesis proposal or the final presentation of the thesis.
I am the Faculty Marshal for Northern’s faculty. As such, I am involved in the events related to graduation. In a few days I have to complete the arrangements for the processional and the recessional for the graduation.
All these things I mentioned above take time. This means that something has to give and what has suffered is the time to write for the blog. I hope to begin to blog regularly again on Monday. Until then, thank you for your understanding.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Blogging
Friday, May 14, 2010
Why Did God Give Israel the Torah in the Desert?
Rabbi Berel Wein has an interesting article in which he asks the following question: “Why did God give Israel the Torah (Law) in the Sinai desert?” This is a good question. Why the desert? Rabbi Wein explores the symbolism of the desert in his article.
The following is an excerpt from the article published in the Jewish World Review:
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Torah, Law, Sinai Desert, Rabbi Berel Wein
The following is an excerpt from the article published in the Jewish World Review:
The Torah was granted to us in a desert, in a place of no particular sovereignty, language, culture or government. The Torah, in its general sense, has no limitations of space or time. It represents the Eternal and therefore takes on all of the characteristics of its Creator, Who is unlimited in space and time.Read the article in its entirety by clicking here.
What makes a desert a desert is the lack of rain and water. As Israel has proven with its own Negev desert, water irrigation can push back the desert's grip. However all deserts have particular oases and water holes. These are of immense value simply because there is no other source of water in the desert. An oasis or water hole in a country much rained upon attracts little of any attention or worth.
The Torah foresaw that throughout Jewish history Jews would find themselves at times living in a spiritual desert. Immorality, licentiousness and decadence would reign in the general society. The righteous would be mocked and the wicked would be popularized and exalted. The spiritual desert, its emptiness and jadedness cannot slake our inner thirst for immortality and connection to our Creator.
And the Torah, given and nurtured in the desert would then be recognized as the ultimate oasis of life giving water. The Torah is always symbolized as being water in the words of the prophets and in the Talmud. The prophet implores us that "you who are thirsty [for Godliness and spirituality in your lives] go forth to fetch the water [of the Torah.] Perhaps only one who is wandering and suffering in the desert can truly appreciate the oasis and water hole. Our times demand our presence at the oasis that only the Torah provides for us.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Torah, Law, Sinai Desert, Rabbi Berel Wein
Wednesday, May 12, 2010
Was Ruth Barren?
Last week my wife and I were visiting a church in our neighborhood. It was Sunday and it was Mother’s Day. In his sermon the pastor was finishing a series of sermons on the book of Ruth. On the day we visited, his sermon was on Ruth, Chapter 4.
I had missed the sermons on chapters 1 to 3, but he said something in his message on chapter 4 that caught my attention. After preaching about Boaz’s purchase of the land that belonged to Naomi and her dead husband, and how Boaz also acquired Ruth and the right to raise the name of Ruth’s dead husband by exercising the right of kinsman-redeemer, the preacher discussed the birth of Ruth’s and Boaz’s son.
The preacher said that Ruth was barren and that she tried very hard to have a child, but unsuccessfully. But, after she married Boaz, the Lord opened her womb and she conceived and gave birth to a son whom the women of Bethlehem named Obed (Ruth 4:17).
The statement that caught my attention deals with Ruth being barren. The statement intrigued me because I had just posted on my blog a study on Leah and her struggle with barrenness. In that post I mentioned that the Old Testament lists five women who were barren. The five barren women were Sarah (Genesis 11:30), Rebekah (Genesis 25:21), Rachel (Genesis 29:30), Hannah (1 Samuel 1:2), and Manoah’s wife (Samson’s mother, cf. Judges 13:2). The New Testament says that Elizabeth, the mother of John the Baptist was also barren (Luke 1:7).
The Hebrew word for “barren” is עֲקָרָ֖ה, ‘aqārāh. The word appears 11 times in the Old Testament, however, the word is never used in the book of Ruth. So, how did the preacher come to the conclusion that Ruth was barren?
There are two possible clues in the book that may indicate that Ruth was barren and unable to have children. The first clue is found in Ruth 1:2-4. The text says that Elimelech and his wife Naomi had two sons, Mahlon and Chilion. Because of a famine in Bethlehem, in the land of Judah, Elimelech and his family moved to the country of Moab and lived there many years. In Moab, Mahlon and Chilion “took Moabite wives; the name of the one was Orpah and the name of the other Ruth. They lived there about ten years” (Ruth 1:4).
After the death of Mahlon and Chilion, Naomi returned to Bethlehem with Ruth, while Orpah decided to remain in Moab. Thus, since Mahlon and Ruth were married ten years, and Ruth had no children, it is possible that the preacher believed that Ruth was barren.
The second clue is found in Ruth 4:13, where it says that after Ruth married Boaz, “the LORD gave her conception, and she bore a son.” The idea here is that since the Lord blessed Ruth with conception, then, it is possible that Ruth was barren and unable to conceive before the Lord blessed her.
However, there are several clues within the book of Ruth that may indicate that Ruth was not barren. Although these clues may not be conclusive, I believe they point to the fact that Ruth was not barren. Below are my reasons for affirming that Ruth was not barren.
1. The names of Naomi’s two sons may indicate the root of the problem. The name Mahlon comes from a Hebrew word hlh which means “to be weak,” or “sick.” It is possible that Mahlon’s name indicates that he was a sickly child. The name Chilion comes from a Hebrew word that means “failing,” or “consumption.” Consumption is a wasting disease such as tuberculosis. Thus, it is possible that Naomi’s children were sick from infancy and that their disease did not allow them to father children.
2. Both Ruth and Orpah were married to Naomi’s sons and the biblical text seems to indicate that both Ruth and Orpah did not have children when their husbands died. So, if Orpah was childless when she became a widow, it is possible that the reason that caused Ruth to be a childless widow was the same reason that also caused Orpah to become a childless widow. That reason was their husbands who probably were sterile because of their illness.
Naomi mentioned to Ruth and Orpah the possibility of levirate marriage, where the two widows could have children through another son by Naomi. But Naomi said she was not pregnant and that she was too old to remarry and give birth to children. Naomi’s words clearly indicate she believed that Ruth and Orpah could become pregnant if they remarried.
3. When Ruth married Boaz, it is quite possible that Boaz was an old man. When Boaz called Ruth “my daughter” (Ruth 2:8), this may indicate that there was an age differential between Boaz and Ruth. The age issue appears again in Ruth 3:10. Boaz said to Ruth: “May you be blessed by the LORD, my daughter; you have made this last kindness greater than the first, in that you have not gone after young men, whether poor or rich.”
Thus, when Boaz married Ruth, Boaz was older than Ruth. After the marriage, Ruth had no problem becoming pregnant: “So Boaz married Ruth and had sexual relations with her. The LORD enabled her to conceive and she gave birth to a son” (Ruth 4:13). The fact that the Lord enabled Ruth to conceive was not because she was barren, rather because the child was seen as a gift from God.
The idea that the child was God’s gift is seen in Ruth 4:12. After the wedding, the women of Bethlehem blessed Boaz with the following words: “May your house become like the house of Perez, the son Tamar bore to Judah, because of the offspring the LORD will give you by this young woman.” The reference to “your house” and “the offspring the LORD will give you” may indicate that Boaz was a childless man, and that God blessed him by allowing his new wife to give birth to a son.
Thus, it is my firm conviction that Ruth was not barren.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Ruth, Boaz, Mahlon, Chilion
I had missed the sermons on chapters 1 to 3, but he said something in his message on chapter 4 that caught my attention. After preaching about Boaz’s purchase of the land that belonged to Naomi and her dead husband, and how Boaz also acquired Ruth and the right to raise the name of Ruth’s dead husband by exercising the right of kinsman-redeemer, the preacher discussed the birth of Ruth’s and Boaz’s son.
The preacher said that Ruth was barren and that she tried very hard to have a child, but unsuccessfully. But, after she married Boaz, the Lord opened her womb and she conceived and gave birth to a son whom the women of Bethlehem named Obed (Ruth 4:17).
The statement that caught my attention deals with Ruth being barren. The statement intrigued me because I had just posted on my blog a study on Leah and her struggle with barrenness. In that post I mentioned that the Old Testament lists five women who were barren. The five barren women were Sarah (Genesis 11:30), Rebekah (Genesis 25:21), Rachel (Genesis 29:30), Hannah (1 Samuel 1:2), and Manoah’s wife (Samson’s mother, cf. Judges 13:2). The New Testament says that Elizabeth, the mother of John the Baptist was also barren (Luke 1:7).
The Hebrew word for “barren” is עֲקָרָ֖ה, ‘aqārāh. The word appears 11 times in the Old Testament, however, the word is never used in the book of Ruth. So, how did the preacher come to the conclusion that Ruth was barren?
There are two possible clues in the book that may indicate that Ruth was barren and unable to have children. The first clue is found in Ruth 1:2-4. The text says that Elimelech and his wife Naomi had two sons, Mahlon and Chilion. Because of a famine in Bethlehem, in the land of Judah, Elimelech and his family moved to the country of Moab and lived there many years. In Moab, Mahlon and Chilion “took Moabite wives; the name of the one was Orpah and the name of the other Ruth. They lived there about ten years” (Ruth 1:4).
After the death of Mahlon and Chilion, Naomi returned to Bethlehem with Ruth, while Orpah decided to remain in Moab. Thus, since Mahlon and Ruth were married ten years, and Ruth had no children, it is possible that the preacher believed that Ruth was barren.
The second clue is found in Ruth 4:13, where it says that after Ruth married Boaz, “the LORD gave her conception, and she bore a son.” The idea here is that since the Lord blessed Ruth with conception, then, it is possible that Ruth was barren and unable to conceive before the Lord blessed her.
However, there are several clues within the book of Ruth that may indicate that Ruth was not barren. Although these clues may not be conclusive, I believe they point to the fact that Ruth was not barren. Below are my reasons for affirming that Ruth was not barren.
1. The names of Naomi’s two sons may indicate the root of the problem. The name Mahlon comes from a Hebrew word hlh which means “to be weak,” or “sick.” It is possible that Mahlon’s name indicates that he was a sickly child. The name Chilion comes from a Hebrew word that means “failing,” or “consumption.” Consumption is a wasting disease such as tuberculosis. Thus, it is possible that Naomi’s children were sick from infancy and that their disease did not allow them to father children.
2. Both Ruth and Orpah were married to Naomi’s sons and the biblical text seems to indicate that both Ruth and Orpah did not have children when their husbands died. So, if Orpah was childless when she became a widow, it is possible that the reason that caused Ruth to be a childless widow was the same reason that also caused Orpah to become a childless widow. That reason was their husbands who probably were sterile because of their illness.
Naomi mentioned to Ruth and Orpah the possibility of levirate marriage, where the two widows could have children through another son by Naomi. But Naomi said she was not pregnant and that she was too old to remarry and give birth to children. Naomi’s words clearly indicate she believed that Ruth and Orpah could become pregnant if they remarried.
3. When Ruth married Boaz, it is quite possible that Boaz was an old man. When Boaz called Ruth “my daughter” (Ruth 2:8), this may indicate that there was an age differential between Boaz and Ruth. The age issue appears again in Ruth 3:10. Boaz said to Ruth: “May you be blessed by the LORD, my daughter; you have made this last kindness greater than the first, in that you have not gone after young men, whether poor or rich.”
Thus, when Boaz married Ruth, Boaz was older than Ruth. After the marriage, Ruth had no problem becoming pregnant: “So Boaz married Ruth and had sexual relations with her. The LORD enabled her to conceive and she gave birth to a son” (Ruth 4:13). The fact that the Lord enabled Ruth to conceive was not because she was barren, rather because the child was seen as a gift from God.
The idea that the child was God’s gift is seen in Ruth 4:12. After the wedding, the women of Bethlehem blessed Boaz with the following words: “May your house become like the house of Perez, the son Tamar bore to Judah, because of the offspring the LORD will give you by this young woman.” The reference to “your house” and “the offspring the LORD will give you” may indicate that Boaz was a childless man, and that God blessed him by allowing his new wife to give birth to a son.
Thus, it is my firm conviction that Ruth was not barren.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Ruth, Boaz, Mahlon, Chilion
Sunday, May 09, 2010
Rachel: The Struggles of a Barren Woman
“When Rachel saw that she bore Jacob no children, she envied her sister; and she said to Jacob, ‘Give me children, or I shall die’” (Genesis 30:1).
In ancient Israel, a woman who had many children was greatly honored. She was seen by the community to have been blessed by God. When Rebekah left her family to become Isaac’s wife, her family blessed her with these words: “May you, our sister, become the mother of many thousands of children” (Genesis 24:60).
It is in light of this oriental view of motherhood that one should understand how the words of Rachel are filled with pathos, reflecting the agony of her desperate heart. When one becomes acquainted with the story of Jacob and Rachel, one reads of a beautiful love story, of how Jacob fell in love with Rachel, and of how the seven years he worked for her were “to him but a few days because of the love he had for her” (Genesis 29:20).
Rachel was the woman Jacob loved, but because of the cunning of Laban, Jacob’s father-in-law, Jacob married Leah first, and then he married Rachel. By giving Jacob children, Leah’s position as a wife was affirmed, while Rachel, unable to have children, became jealous of her sister. Rachel was bitter because her sister had children and she had none. Leah had given Jacob four sons and Rachel was barren, unable to conceive. Rachel’s harsh words to her husband give the readers an insight into Jacob’s marriage with Rachel and the tension that existed in the family because of the rivalry between the two sisters.
Rachel’s desire to become a mother was natural. Rachel’s desperate cry was the cry of a childless woman who desperately wanted to become a mother and through motherhood fulfill her destiny as a woman and as a wife.
In the Hebrew Bible women praised the Lord when he gave “the barren woman a home, making her the joyous mother of children” (Psalm 113:9). This was the case of Hannah, the mother of Samuel. After giving birth to Samuel, Hannah said: “My heart exults in the LORD . . . The barren has borne seven” (1 Samuel 2:1, 5).
Rachel’s suffering became more grievous every day as she saw her sister enjoying the love and the affection of her sons. Rachel became jealous of Leah. In Israel the barren wife had no prospect for the future. Barrenness was believed to be a curse from the Lord (Genesis 20:18), thus the reason for Rachel’s desperate cry.
Rachel expressed her frustration as a childless wife by her outburst against her husband: “Give me children, or I shall die” (Genesis 30:1). Jacob’s reply to Rachel also expressed his frustration at the situation because he recognized that his wife was asking the impossible from him. Jacob asked Rachel: “Am I in the place of God, who has withheld from you the fruit of the womb?” (Genesis 30:2).
When Rebekah was unable to have children, Isaac, her husband, prayed for her for twenty years before his prayers were answered (Genesis 25;21). Hannah also prayed to God asking him to give her a son (1 Samuel 1:10). There is no evidence that Jacob ever prayed for Rachel, but by calling children “the fruit of the womb,” Jacob recognized that children are gifts from God (cf. Deuteronomy 28:11: “The LORD will make you abound in . . . the fruit of your womb”). Jacob reminded his wife that the power of conception was not in his hands, that it belonged to God.
Out of her despair, desiring to be a mother, Rachel invoked a custom common in the ancient Near East, the same custom invoked by Sarah when she was unable to give her husband Abraham a son (Genesis 16:2). Rachel gave her maid Bilhah to Jacob as a wife so that the maid could conceive a son on her behalf.
The custom of adoption was common in Mesopotamia in the days of the patriarchs. According to documents from Nuzi, barren couples could adopt a son or a daughter and give them the legal rights and duties of a natural born child. In the process of adoption, the child of the servant was placed upon the mistress’s knees and declared to be her own child. Thus, Rachel told Jacob: “Here is my maid Bilhah; go into her, that she may bear upon my knees, and even I may have children through her” (Genesis 30:3). Later on, Jacob adopted Joseph’s two sons by placing them on his knees (Genesis 48:12). In addition, Genesis 50:23 says that the children of Machir, the son of Manasseh, were born upon Joseph’s knees.
The rivalry between Leah and Rachel continued for many years. One day when Ruben, Leah’s son found some mandrakes in the field, the rivalry between the two sisters became evident again. In the ancient Near East people believed that mandrakes, also known as “love apples,” were aphrodisiacs and that they produced fertility in barren women by aiding conception.
Thus, Rachel hoping that the mandrakes would help her conceive a child for her husband, offered Leah a night with Jacob in exchange for the mandrakes that Ruben had found. When Jacob returned home from the field, Leah told him: “I have hired you with my son’s mandrakes” (Genesis 30:16). After spending the night with Jacob, Leah became pregnant and gave Jacob another son, whom Leah named Issachar.
Then Leah gave birth to a sixth son. At the time her sixth son was born, Leah said: “God has endowed me with a good dowry; now my husband will honor me, because I have borne him six sons, so she called his name Zebulun” (Genesis 30:20). Then, Leah gave birth to a daughter and called her name Dinah.
The rivalry between Leah and Rachel increased more and more as Leah gave birth to children and Rachel continued to be barren. The situation became even worse as the two women saw the hand of God behind this situation. According to the narrator of the story, at the beginning of the rivalry between Leah and Rachel, it was the Lord who allowed Leah to conceive: “When the LORD saw that Leah was hated, he opened her womb; but Rachel was barren” (Genesis 29:31). And Jacob told Rachel that it was the Lord “who has withheld from you the fruit of the womb” (Genesis 30:2).
Finally, the Lord had pity on Rachel and harkened to her desperate prayers: “Then God remembered Rachel. God answered her prayer and made it possible for her to have children” (Genesis 30:22). Rachel became pregnant and gave birth to a son whom she called Joseph. After Rachel became a mother, she said: “God has taken away my disgrace” (Genesis 30:23).
Scholars disagree on whether Rachel became pregnant because of the love apples mentioned in Genesis 30:15-16 or whether her pregnancy followed the birth of Dinah in verse 21. It seems to me that the birth of Joseph should be understood as a continuation of the mandrakes narrative in verse 16.
In spite of the oriental view of the aphrodisiacal power of the mandrakes, the text clearly says that Rachel gave birth because of the grace of God who opened Rachel’s womb. It was Rachel’s faith in God that allowed her to become a mother. Also, it was the grace of God in answering a desperate woman’s prayer that allowed the barren one to bear a son.
The Bible contains many stories of barren women who desperately wanted to become mothers, women who desperately wanted a future for their families. The barren women were Sarah (Genesis 11:30), Rebekah (Genesis 25:21), Rachel (Genesis 29:30), Hannah (1 Samuel 1:2), Manoah’s wife (Samson’s mother, cf. Judges 13:2), and Elizabeth (Luke 1:7).
All these barren women conceived and gave birth to children because of the gracious intervention of God, a God who opens wombs and “gives the barren woman a home, making her the joyous mother of children” (Psalm 113:9). The affirmation that God opens the womb of barren women is affirmed by the prophet Isaiah:
“Sing, O barren one who did not bear; burst into song and shout, you who have not been in labor! For the children of the desolate woman will be more than the children of her that is married, says the LORD” (Isaiah 54:1).
God’s promise to the barren women is incomprehensible. The birth of children to barren women cannot be explained, except when one looks at the powerful and marvelous work of God who creates something new when all seems to be hopeless and lost.
Rachel was blessed by God because he answered her prayers and allowed her to become a mother. The blessing of Rachel is reflected in the words of the women of Bethlehem at the time of the birth of Ruth’s son. After Boaz married Ruth and she gave birth to a son, the women of Bethlehem blessed Boaz with the following blessing: “May the LORD make the woman who is coming into your house like Rachel and Leah, who together built up the house of Israel” (Ruth 4:11).
When God heard Rachel’s prayer by giving her a son, she recognized the work of the Lord. Her disgrace was removed from her and she was granted the desire of her heart: to become a mother.
Happy Mother’s Day, Rachel.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Hebrew Bible, Rachel, Leah, Jacob, Mother’s Day, Barrenness
In ancient Israel, a woman who had many children was greatly honored. She was seen by the community to have been blessed by God. When Rebekah left her family to become Isaac’s wife, her family blessed her with these words: “May you, our sister, become the mother of many thousands of children” (Genesis 24:60).
It is in light of this oriental view of motherhood that one should understand how the words of Rachel are filled with pathos, reflecting the agony of her desperate heart. When one becomes acquainted with the story of Jacob and Rachel, one reads of a beautiful love story, of how Jacob fell in love with Rachel, and of how the seven years he worked for her were “to him but a few days because of the love he had for her” (Genesis 29:20).
Rachel was the woman Jacob loved, but because of the cunning of Laban, Jacob’s father-in-law, Jacob married Leah first, and then he married Rachel. By giving Jacob children, Leah’s position as a wife was affirmed, while Rachel, unable to have children, became jealous of her sister. Rachel was bitter because her sister had children and she had none. Leah had given Jacob four sons and Rachel was barren, unable to conceive. Rachel’s harsh words to her husband give the readers an insight into Jacob’s marriage with Rachel and the tension that existed in the family because of the rivalry between the two sisters.
Rachel’s desire to become a mother was natural. Rachel’s desperate cry was the cry of a childless woman who desperately wanted to become a mother and through motherhood fulfill her destiny as a woman and as a wife.
In the Hebrew Bible women praised the Lord when he gave “the barren woman a home, making her the joyous mother of children” (Psalm 113:9). This was the case of Hannah, the mother of Samuel. After giving birth to Samuel, Hannah said: “My heart exults in the LORD . . . The barren has borne seven” (1 Samuel 2:1, 5).
Rachel’s suffering became more grievous every day as she saw her sister enjoying the love and the affection of her sons. Rachel became jealous of Leah. In Israel the barren wife had no prospect for the future. Barrenness was believed to be a curse from the Lord (Genesis 20:18), thus the reason for Rachel’s desperate cry.
Rachel expressed her frustration as a childless wife by her outburst against her husband: “Give me children, or I shall die” (Genesis 30:1). Jacob’s reply to Rachel also expressed his frustration at the situation because he recognized that his wife was asking the impossible from him. Jacob asked Rachel: “Am I in the place of God, who has withheld from you the fruit of the womb?” (Genesis 30:2).
When Rebekah was unable to have children, Isaac, her husband, prayed for her for twenty years before his prayers were answered (Genesis 25;21). Hannah also prayed to God asking him to give her a son (1 Samuel 1:10). There is no evidence that Jacob ever prayed for Rachel, but by calling children “the fruit of the womb,” Jacob recognized that children are gifts from God (cf. Deuteronomy 28:11: “The LORD will make you abound in . . . the fruit of your womb”). Jacob reminded his wife that the power of conception was not in his hands, that it belonged to God.
Out of her despair, desiring to be a mother, Rachel invoked a custom common in the ancient Near East, the same custom invoked by Sarah when she was unable to give her husband Abraham a son (Genesis 16:2). Rachel gave her maid Bilhah to Jacob as a wife so that the maid could conceive a son on her behalf.
The custom of adoption was common in Mesopotamia in the days of the patriarchs. According to documents from Nuzi, barren couples could adopt a son or a daughter and give them the legal rights and duties of a natural born child. In the process of adoption, the child of the servant was placed upon the mistress’s knees and declared to be her own child. Thus, Rachel told Jacob: “Here is my maid Bilhah; go into her, that she may bear upon my knees, and even I may have children through her” (Genesis 30:3). Later on, Jacob adopted Joseph’s two sons by placing them on his knees (Genesis 48:12). In addition, Genesis 50:23 says that the children of Machir, the son of Manasseh, were born upon Joseph’s knees.
The rivalry between Leah and Rachel continued for many years. One day when Ruben, Leah’s son found some mandrakes in the field, the rivalry between the two sisters became evident again. In the ancient Near East people believed that mandrakes, also known as “love apples,” were aphrodisiacs and that they produced fertility in barren women by aiding conception.
Thus, Rachel hoping that the mandrakes would help her conceive a child for her husband, offered Leah a night with Jacob in exchange for the mandrakes that Ruben had found. When Jacob returned home from the field, Leah told him: “I have hired you with my son’s mandrakes” (Genesis 30:16). After spending the night with Jacob, Leah became pregnant and gave Jacob another son, whom Leah named Issachar.
Then Leah gave birth to a sixth son. At the time her sixth son was born, Leah said: “God has endowed me with a good dowry; now my husband will honor me, because I have borne him six sons, so she called his name Zebulun” (Genesis 30:20). Then, Leah gave birth to a daughter and called her name Dinah.
The rivalry between Leah and Rachel increased more and more as Leah gave birth to children and Rachel continued to be barren. The situation became even worse as the two women saw the hand of God behind this situation. According to the narrator of the story, at the beginning of the rivalry between Leah and Rachel, it was the Lord who allowed Leah to conceive: “When the LORD saw that Leah was hated, he opened her womb; but Rachel was barren” (Genesis 29:31). And Jacob told Rachel that it was the Lord “who has withheld from you the fruit of the womb” (Genesis 30:2).
Finally, the Lord had pity on Rachel and harkened to her desperate prayers: “Then God remembered Rachel. God answered her prayer and made it possible for her to have children” (Genesis 30:22). Rachel became pregnant and gave birth to a son whom she called Joseph. After Rachel became a mother, she said: “God has taken away my disgrace” (Genesis 30:23).
Scholars disagree on whether Rachel became pregnant because of the love apples mentioned in Genesis 30:15-16 or whether her pregnancy followed the birth of Dinah in verse 21. It seems to me that the birth of Joseph should be understood as a continuation of the mandrakes narrative in verse 16.
In spite of the oriental view of the aphrodisiacal power of the mandrakes, the text clearly says that Rachel gave birth because of the grace of God who opened Rachel’s womb. It was Rachel’s faith in God that allowed her to become a mother. Also, it was the grace of God in answering a desperate woman’s prayer that allowed the barren one to bear a son.
The Bible contains many stories of barren women who desperately wanted to become mothers, women who desperately wanted a future for their families. The barren women were Sarah (Genesis 11:30), Rebekah (Genesis 25:21), Rachel (Genesis 29:30), Hannah (1 Samuel 1:2), Manoah’s wife (Samson’s mother, cf. Judges 13:2), and Elizabeth (Luke 1:7).
All these barren women conceived and gave birth to children because of the gracious intervention of God, a God who opens wombs and “gives the barren woman a home, making her the joyous mother of children” (Psalm 113:9). The affirmation that God opens the womb of barren women is affirmed by the prophet Isaiah:
“Sing, O barren one who did not bear; burst into song and shout, you who have not been in labor! For the children of the desolate woman will be more than the children of her that is married, says the LORD” (Isaiah 54:1).
God’s promise to the barren women is incomprehensible. The birth of children to barren women cannot be explained, except when one looks at the powerful and marvelous work of God who creates something new when all seems to be hopeless and lost.
Rachel was blessed by God because he answered her prayers and allowed her to become a mother. The blessing of Rachel is reflected in the words of the women of Bethlehem at the time of the birth of Ruth’s son. After Boaz married Ruth and she gave birth to a son, the women of Bethlehem blessed Boaz with the following blessing: “May the LORD make the woman who is coming into your house like Rachel and Leah, who together built up the house of Israel” (Ruth 4:11).
When God heard Rachel’s prayer by giving her a son, she recognized the work of the Lord. Her disgrace was removed from her and she was granted the desire of her heart: to become a mother.
Happy Mother’s Day, Rachel.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Hebrew Bible, Rachel, Leah, Jacob, Mother’s Day, Barrenness
Saturday, May 08, 2010
Tribute to a Blessed Mother
Note: I have written several posts about mothers. As a tribute to mothers and in preparation of the celebration of Mother’s Day on Sunday, I will republished a few posts I wrote about mothers. The post below was written on May 20, 2008.
My next post on mothers, will be published tomorrow, Mothers Day’s May 9.
“The mother of seven will grow faint and breathe her last. She will die, ashamed and humiliated, while it is still daylight” (Jeremiah 15:9).
In ancient Israel, the symbolism of giving birth to seven children was used as a proverbial expression to describe a woman blessed with children or to refer to a family whose future in Israel was guaranteed because the family name would survive in the memory of the community through the sons. Two classic examples of “mother of seven” appear in the Old Testament.
When Hanna was delivered from her barrenness and gave birth to Samuel, she said: “The barren has borne seven” (1 Samuel 2:5). These words reflect Hannah’s joy in becoming a mother and the awareness that she had conceived a son because of God’s help.
The second example is found in Ruth 4:15. After Ruth married Boaz and gave birth to Obed, the women of Bethlehem paid her the highest compliment by telling Naomi that her daughter-in-law Ruth was better “than seven sons.” This recognition spoke highly of Ruth’s character since being a mother of seven sons was the highest accolade a woman in Israel could receive.
For a woman, to be a mother and to have sons was to be blessed by God. Psalm 113:9 says that the Lord should be praised because “He gives the barren woman a home, making her the joyous mother of children.”
On the other hand, women such as Sarah, Rebekah, Rachel, and Samson’s mother were barren and unhappy. These women carried with them the sorrow of being unable to give children to their husbands and the opprobrium of their society for not being blessed by God.
In light of the positive sentiment that the proverbial expression of being a mother of seven carried in Israel, it is significant that Jeremiah used the same imagery to describe the enormous tragedy and the depth of sorrow that would come to Jerusalem as a result of the judgment that God was bringing upon the nation.
During the invasion of Jerusalem, so many husbands would be killed that the widows of Jerusalem would become “more numerous than the sand of the seas.” So many children would die that mothers would receive news that their sons were killed early in battle (Jeremiah 15:8).
According to Jeremiah, when the judgment arrives upon Jerusalem and a mother of seven hears the news of the death of her children, that mother will be filled with anguish, tormented by the terrible deaths of her children. Robbed of her children in the prime of their lives, the woman grows faint, breathes her last, and dies (Hebrew: “breathes out her life”), ashamed and humiliated because she has lost her seven sons (Jeremiah 15:9).
The imagery of a mother of seven losing her children is used to describe the anguish, pain, and sorrow that will fall upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem. The imagery, although painful, is a good illustration of the paroxysms of emotion evoked by the disaster that came upon Judah in 587 BCE.
There is no greater human sorrow than the one which comes to a home when a mother of many children dies in the prime of her life, leaving her children deprived of maternal love. This is the imagery Jeremiah uses to describe the plight of the people of Judah. Jeremiah, anticipating the coming judgment that the Lord will bring upon Judah, uses the imagery of a husband mourning the death of his wife and the mother of his many children.
Mother Jerusalem (2 Samuel 20:19) has lost her children and her judgment is a reversal of the promise God has made to the ancestors. The promise of life that God had made to Abraham, “I will indeed bless you, and I will make your offspring as numerous as the sand on the seashore,” now becomes the reality of death: “Their widows will be more numerous than the grains of sand on the seashore” (Jeremiah 15:8).
The promise of life once made to Abraham has become an illustration of what will happen to Jerusalem when the destroyer comes. The city that once was full of people will now become like a widow deprived of her children (Lamentations 1:1). The proverbial expression used to describe a woman blessed with God’s favor will now become the symbol of bereavement and death.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Children, Jerusalem, Judgment, Mothers, Widows
My next post on mothers, will be published tomorrow, Mothers Day’s May 9.
The Mother of Seven
“The mother of seven will grow faint and breathe her last. She will die, ashamed and humiliated, while it is still daylight” (Jeremiah 15:9).
In ancient Israel, the symbolism of giving birth to seven children was used as a proverbial expression to describe a woman blessed with children or to refer to a family whose future in Israel was guaranteed because the family name would survive in the memory of the community through the sons. Two classic examples of “mother of seven” appear in the Old Testament.
When Hanna was delivered from her barrenness and gave birth to Samuel, she said: “The barren has borne seven” (1 Samuel 2:5). These words reflect Hannah’s joy in becoming a mother and the awareness that she had conceived a son because of God’s help.
The second example is found in Ruth 4:15. After Ruth married Boaz and gave birth to Obed, the women of Bethlehem paid her the highest compliment by telling Naomi that her daughter-in-law Ruth was better “than seven sons.” This recognition spoke highly of Ruth’s character since being a mother of seven sons was the highest accolade a woman in Israel could receive.
For a woman, to be a mother and to have sons was to be blessed by God. Psalm 113:9 says that the Lord should be praised because “He gives the barren woman a home, making her the joyous mother of children.”
On the other hand, women such as Sarah, Rebekah, Rachel, and Samson’s mother were barren and unhappy. These women carried with them the sorrow of being unable to give children to their husbands and the opprobrium of their society for not being blessed by God.
In light of the positive sentiment that the proverbial expression of being a mother of seven carried in Israel, it is significant that Jeremiah used the same imagery to describe the enormous tragedy and the depth of sorrow that would come to Jerusalem as a result of the judgment that God was bringing upon the nation.
During the invasion of Jerusalem, so many husbands would be killed that the widows of Jerusalem would become “more numerous than the sand of the seas.” So many children would die that mothers would receive news that their sons were killed early in battle (Jeremiah 15:8).
According to Jeremiah, when the judgment arrives upon Jerusalem and a mother of seven hears the news of the death of her children, that mother will be filled with anguish, tormented by the terrible deaths of her children. Robbed of her children in the prime of their lives, the woman grows faint, breathes her last, and dies (Hebrew: “breathes out her life”), ashamed and humiliated because she has lost her seven sons (Jeremiah 15:9).
The imagery of a mother of seven losing her children is used to describe the anguish, pain, and sorrow that will fall upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem. The imagery, although painful, is a good illustration of the paroxysms of emotion evoked by the disaster that came upon Judah in 587 BCE.
There is no greater human sorrow than the one which comes to a home when a mother of many children dies in the prime of her life, leaving her children deprived of maternal love. This is the imagery Jeremiah uses to describe the plight of the people of Judah. Jeremiah, anticipating the coming judgment that the Lord will bring upon Judah, uses the imagery of a husband mourning the death of his wife and the mother of his many children.
Mother Jerusalem (2 Samuel 20:19) has lost her children and her judgment is a reversal of the promise God has made to the ancestors. The promise of life that God had made to Abraham, “I will indeed bless you, and I will make your offspring as numerous as the sand on the seashore,” now becomes the reality of death: “Their widows will be more numerous than the grains of sand on the seashore” (Jeremiah 15:8).
The promise of life once made to Abraham has become an illustration of what will happen to Jerusalem when the destroyer comes. The city that once was full of people will now become like a widow deprived of her children (Lamentations 1:1). The proverbial expression used to describe a woman blessed with God’s favor will now become the symbol of bereavement and death.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Children, Jerusalem, Judgment, Mothers, Widows
Is Satan Behind the 2010 Census?
The Bible says: “Satan rose up against Israel and incited David to take a census of Israel” (1 Chronicles 21:1).
So, is God behind the 2010 Census? Read this article here and then decide for yourself.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Census, 2010 Census, Satan
So, is God behind the 2010 Census? Read this article here and then decide for yourself.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Census, 2010 Census, Satan
Babylon: Restoration or Profit?

Image: Ishtar Gate
Iraqis are divided whether to restore the ancient city of Babylon and preserve its historical heritage or to open the place for tourism. Forbes has an excellent article on this controversy. Below is an excerpt from the article:
BABYLON, Iraq -- A U.S.-funded program to restore the ruins of Iraq's ancient city of Babylon is threatened by a dispute among Iraqi officials over whether the priority should be preserving the site or making money off it.Read the article in its entirety by clicking here.
Local officials want swift work done to restore the crumbling ruins and start building restaurants and gift shops to draw in tourists, while antiquities officials in Baghdad favor a more painstaking approach to avoid the gaudy restoration mistakes of the past.
The ruins of the millennia-old city, famed for its Hanging Gardens and the Tower of Babel, have suffered heavily over the past decades. Deep in Iraq's verdant south, the cluster of excavated temples and palaces were mostly rebuilt by former ruler Saddam Hussein in the 1980s, using modern yellow brick to erect towering structures that marred the fragile remains of the original mud brick ruins.
Founded in the 3rd millennium B.C., Babylon rose to prominence nearly 4,000 years ago under King Hammurabi, whose famous law tablet resides in Paris' Louvre Museum. In subsequent centuries the city was conquered, razed and rebuilt several times, becoming the largest city in the world with 250,000 inhabitants under King Nebuchadnezzar II in 600 B.C.
Nebuchadnezzar built the famed hanging gardens, one of the seven wonders of the world, for his homesick wife. He also exiled the Jewish people from Israel, gaining Babylon a bad rap in the Judeo-Christian tradition and the name of the city has since become synonymous with sin.
Personally, I would like to see the preservation of the old city. The ancient city of Babylon has a rich historical tradition that must be preserved for future generations. However, as a student of ancient history, I would like to see the ancient ruins open to tourists. I would love to visit the ruins of ancient Babylon. If I knew that the journey to the ancient ruins would be safe, I would go to Iraq this summer and visit what has been called “the center of ancient civilization.”
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Archaeology, Babylon
Thursday, May 06, 2010
A Salute To Mother's Love
Note: I have written several posts about mothers. As a tribute to mothers and in preparation of the celebration of Mother’s Day on Sunday, I will republished a few posts I wrote about mothers. The post below was written on May 9, 2008.
The Sons of Rizpah: Reflections on a Mother’s Love
Then Rizpah the daughter of Aiah took sackcloth, and spread it on a rock for herself, from the beginning of harvest until rain fell on them from the heavens; she did not allow the birds of the air to come on the bodies by day, or the wild animals by night. (2 Samuel 21:10).
This coming Sunday is Mother’s Day. On that day most churches will be honoring mothers and the contributions they have made to the lives of their children. As part of the celebration, ministers will be talking about biblical mothers. Generally, sermons about biblical mothers use Hannah, Elizabeth, Mary, and a few other notable women as examples of mothers who love their children and set a positive role model for mothers today.
One mother who probably will never be remembered on Mother’s Day is Rizpah. Ask yourself this question: how many sermons about Rizpah have you heard preached from the pulpit? Probably, you have never heard or you have never preached a sermon about the extreme demonstration of love Rizpah displayed on behalf of her sons. Today, I want to honor Rizpah and her love for her children. Here is her story:
During the days of king David there was a severe famine over all the land that lasted three years. The time of the famine is unknown and except for the reference in 2 Samuel 21:1-10, there is no other reference to this famine in the Bible. Not knowing the reason for the famine, David went to inquire of the Lord in order to ascertain the cause of the famine and the reason the Lord was punishing Israel.
The Lord answered David’s prayer and he was told that Saul and his house were guilty of the massacre he had inflicted upon the Gibeonites. Nothing is known about this event and what caused Saul to shed Gibeonite blood. The Gibeonites were part of the original inhabitants of the land. With their tricks, they deceived Joshua and the people of Israel. Their deception led Joshua and Israel to make a covenant with them.
According to 2 Samuel 21:2, Saul, because of his zeal for the honor of Israel and Judah, tried to destroy the Gibeonites. Saul persecuted the Gibeonites and planned to exterminate them so that they would be completely removed from all the territory of Israel (2 Samuel 21:5). It is possible that the Gibeonites had done something wrong and Saul had used the occasion to exterminate them from Israel.
Because of the revelation from God that Saul’s bloodshed caused the famine, David called the Gibeonites together to decide how to repair the wrong done to them. David said to the Gibeonites: “What shall I do for you? And with what shall I make atonement, that you may bless the inheritance of the Lord?” (v. 3).
The Gibeonites refused to take any money from Saul or from his family. They also recognized that they were not allowed to kill anyone in Israel. When David asked again what he could to make amends for the crime committed against them, the Gibeonites answered:
The man who consumed us and planned to destroy us, so that we should have no place in all the territory of Israel, let seven of his sons be handed over to us, and we will impale them before the Lord at Gibeon on the mountain of the LORD” (2 Samuel 21:5-6).
To save Israel from the famine, David agreed to their request. In making his selection, David spared Mephibosheth, the son of Jonathan, because of the promise he had made to Jonathan. In order to select the seven descendants of Saul, David selected Armoni and Mephibosheth, the two sons of Rizpah, the daughter of Aiah, Saul’s concubine. David also selected the five sons of Merab, Saul’s daughter and the wife of Adriel, the son of Barzillai the Meholathite.
The Gibeonites took the seven descendants of Saul and impaled them on the mountain before the Lord. The seven were impaled at the beginning of the barley harvest.
There, at the foot of the cross, “Rizpah the daughter of Aiah took sackcloth, and spread it on a rock for herself, from the beginning of harvest until rain fell on them from the heavens; she did not allow the birds of the air to come on the bodies by day, or the wild animals by night” (2 Samuel 21:10).
The sackcloth was a type of clothing worn when mourning for the dead. Out of love for her dead sons, Rizpah kept a watch over her dead sons “from the beginning of harvest until rain fell on them from the heavens” (2 Samuel 21:10), that is, from March until October.
Deuteronomy 21:22-23 says that when a person was impaled (or crucified), the body should be removed at the end of the day: “When someone is convicted of a crime punishable by death and is executed, and you hang him on a tree, his corpse must not remain all night upon the tree.” The sons of Rizpah remained on the stake more than six months and Rizpah stayed with her sons until it rained.
The reason the bodies were left on the cross was because they were making atonement f Saul’s sin and they had to remain there until the end of the drought. The coming of the rain was a sign that God’s judgement had come to an end and that the sins of the nation had been forgiven.
Day and night, week after week, Rizpah kept a dreary watch over her dead sons, scaring away scavenger birds from feeding on their bodies during the day and not allowing wild animals to eat their bodies at night.
This demonstration of maternal affection is very moving. Her action is the action of a loving mother moved by grief, deeply affected by the agony her sons suffered on that cruel cross. Her attempt at protecting the integrity of the exposed bodies of her sons reveals the fire of love which burned intensively in Rizpah’s heart.
The tragedy and the agony of Rizpah has been captured in the poem by Felicia Hemans:
The Vigil of Rizpah
Who watches on the mountain with the dead,
Alone before the awfulness of night?
A seer awaiting the deep spirit’s might?
A warrior guarding some dark pass of dread ?
No, a lorn woman! –On her drooping head,
Once proudly graceful, heavy beats the rain;
She reeks not–living for the unburied slain,
Only to scare the vulture from their bed.
So, night by night, her vigil hath she kept
With the pale stars, and with the dews hath wept.
Oh! surely some bright Presence from above
On those wild rocks the lonely one must aid!
Even so; a strengthener through all storm and shade,
The unconquerable Angel: mightiest Love!
Who watches on the mountain with the dead,
Alone before the awfulness of night?
A seer awaiting the deep spirit’s might?
A warrior guarding some dark pass of dread ?
No, a lorn woman! –On her drooping head,
Once proudly graceful, heavy beats the rain;
She reeks not–living for the unburied slain,
Only to scare the vulture from their bed.
So, night by night, her vigil hath she kept
With the pale stars, and with the dews hath wept.
Oh! surely some bright Presence from above
On those wild rocks the lonely one must aid!
Even so; a strengthener through all storm and shade,
The unconquerable Angel: mightiest Love!
May the memory of this loving mother be a blessing to all!
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: David, Gibeonites, Love, Mother, Rizpah
Using the Koran as a Path to Jesus
The New York Times has an interesting article on the controversy among Baptists concerning the issue of using the Koran to introduce Muslims to Jesus. Below is an excerpt from the article:
Read the article in its entirety by clicking here.
One has to read the whole article to understand the nature of the disagreement between the parties involved in this controversy. After reading the article, even I am divided on the effectiveness of the Camel Method.
On one hand, by using the Isa of the Koran, a Christian can open a dialogue with a Muslim and explain who Jesus is. This can be effective in allowing a Christian to discuss his belief about the person of Christ and the nature of his ministry.
However, I have a problem when Christians try to introduce the God of the Bible as Allah. As Caner said:
“You can ask any Muslim: Do you think that the Allah of the Koran had a son? The most important sura in the entire Koran, sura 112, the pre-eminent chapter of the Koran, says explicitly, ‘Allah does not beget, nor is he begotten.’”
It is here that the contextualization of the Gospel ends because the God of the Bible and the god of the Koran are not the same. Thus, one can use the Koran only as a way of opening a path to Jesus, but once that path is open, the path must diverge into another direction.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Camel Method, Koran, Isa, Jesus
Ergun Caner, president of the Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary, in Lynchburg, Va., focused attention on a Southern Baptist controversy when he called Jerry Rankin, the president of the denomination’s International Mission Board, a liar. Dr. Caner has since apologized for his language, but he still maintains that the “Camel Method,” a strategy Dr. Rankin endorses for preaching Christianity to Muslims, is deceitful.
Instead of talking about the Jesus of the New Testament, missionaries using the Camel Method point Muslims to the Koran, where in the third chapter, or sura, an infant named Isa — Arabic for Jesus — is born. Missionaries have found that by starting with the Koran’s Jesus story, they can make inroads with Muslims who reject the Bible out of hand. But according to Dr. Caner, whose attack on Dr. Rankin came in a weekly Southern Baptist podcast, the idea that the Koran can contain the seeds of Christian faith is “an absolute, fundamental deception.”
David Garrison, a missionary who edited a book on the Camel Method by Kevin Greeson, the method’s developer, defends the use of the Koran as a path to Jesus. “You aren’t criticizing Muhammad or any other prophets,” Dr. Garrison said, “just raising Jesus up.”
He explained that after reading the sura in which Maryam, or Mary, gives birth to Isa, a missionary might ask a Muslim, “Do you know of any other prophets born of a virgin?”
And, Dr. Garrison continued: “It says in that passage that Isa would be able to cleanse the leper, even raise the dead. At that point in the conversation with Muslims, we say, ‘Isn’t it interesting that Isa had this tremendous power that God gave to him? Even death was under his power.’
“Then you ask the question, ‘Is there any other prophet that had this kind of power?’ And in Islam, there isn’t.”
“Camel” is not (readers might be gladdened to learn) a reference to a beast of burden in Arab lands. Rather, it is Mr. Greeson’s acronym — Chosen Angels Miracles Eternal Life — to help missionaries remember aspects of Isa’s story.
Read the article in its entirety by clicking here.
One has to read the whole article to understand the nature of the disagreement between the parties involved in this controversy. After reading the article, even I am divided on the effectiveness of the Camel Method.
On one hand, by using the Isa of the Koran, a Christian can open a dialogue with a Muslim and explain who Jesus is. This can be effective in allowing a Christian to discuss his belief about the person of Christ and the nature of his ministry.
However, I have a problem when Christians try to introduce the God of the Bible as Allah. As Caner said:
“You can ask any Muslim: Do you think that the Allah of the Koran had a son? The most important sura in the entire Koran, sura 112, the pre-eminent chapter of the Koran, says explicitly, ‘Allah does not beget, nor is he begotten.’”
It is here that the contextualization of the Gospel ends because the God of the Bible and the god of the Koran are not the same. Thus, one can use the Koran only as a way of opening a path to Jesus, but once that path is open, the path must diverge into another direction.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Camel Method, Koran, Isa, Jesus
Wednesday, May 05, 2010
The New SBL Executive Director
My friend, John F. Kutsko will become the next Executive Director of the Society of Biblical Literature (SBL) on July 1, 2010.
Below is the announcement of the appointment released by the SBL:
I have known John for many years. I am very happy that he was selected to lead the SBL. The SBL will be in good hands under his leadership.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: John Kutsko, SBL
Below is the announcement of the appointment released by the SBL:
John F. Kutsko to Become SBL Executive Director 1 July 2010
Bruce Birch, chair of the SBL Council, has announced that John F. Kutsko has been named the new Executive Director of the Society of Biblical Literature, effective 1 July 2010. After an extensive international search chaired by Fernando Segovia, Birch reported that the search committee’s unanimous and enthusiastic support of Kutsko was affirmed by Council at its April meeting. Birch said, “Strong and insightful leadership has always been a quality valued by SBL whether in our publications, congresses, or programs for professional development. We are looking forward to Kutsko’s leadership of an organization committed to core values of ‘responsiveness to change, scholarly integrity, inclusiveness, collegiality, collaboration, and accountability.’”
Kutsko began his graduate work in Hebrew Bible and the Ancient Near East at the University of Michigan and completed his Ph.D. at Harvard University in 1997 under the mentorship of Peter Machinist. His revised dissertation was published as Between Heaven and Earth: Divine Presence and Absence in the Book of Ezekiel. He has been active in the SBL publishing program (contributing editor of The SBL Handbook of Style) and the Symposium series, as well as the Career Center Advisory Group, the SBL Academic Forum, and the Ezekiel Seminar. And he has been a faculty mentor for fellows at The Fund for Theological Education, where he has taught a dissertation writing and publishing workshop for over a decade.
In addition to his academic contributions, John has over 20 years of publishing, leadership, and executive experience. He has worked on projects such as the The Anchor Bible Dictionary (Doubleday) and Civilizations of the Ancient Near East (Macmillan), and he was Associate Editorial Director at Hendrickson Publishers until 2003.
“I am thrilled to serve the members and mission of SBL. I join a gifted and dedicated staff. I look forward to collaborating with and giving leadership to a scholarly community in ways that enhance and further its teaching and research. I am grateful to follow the remarkable accomplishments of Kent Richards, who is very much the founder of the modern SBL. Kent has digitized, internationalized, and broadened SBL. I’ll bring all my energy to expanding these accomplishments and fostering the future of biblical scholarship.”
He joins SBL from Abingdon Press, the main imprint of The United Methodist Publishing House, where he served as Associate Publisher and began as Director of Academic and Professional Resources in 2003. At Abingdon he directed such projects as The New Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible and The Wesley Study Bible, and led a digital publishing initiative.
“I believe that the skills and experience I have from my rather non-traditional academic cv will help guide SBL’s members through the challenges and opportunities the discipline faces in the scholarly academy and higher education today. I am grateful to SBL for allowing the second half of my career to integrate this level of professional experience.”
I have known John for many years. I am very happy that he was selected to lead the SBL. The SBL will be in good hands under his leadership.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: John Kutsko, SBL
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)