Saturday, August 28, 2010

End of Life Decisions

According to an article published in the Journal of Medical Ethics, “doctors who are atheist or agnostic are twice as likely as those with deeply religious beliefs to take decisions that might shorten a terminally-ill patient's life.”

Below is a review of the article:

Terminally-ill patients would be well advised to find out the religious beliefs of their doctor, according to research showing the effect of faith on a doctor's willingness to make decisions that could hasten death.

Doctors who are atheist or agnostic are twice as likely to take decisions that might shorten the life of somebody who is terminally ill as doctors who are deeply religious – and doctors with strong religious convictions are less likely even to discuss such decisions with the patient, according to Professor Clive Seale, from the centre for health sciences at Barts and the London school of medicine and dentistry.

"If I were a patient facing end of life care, I would want to know what my doctor's views were on religious matters – whether they are non-religious or religious and whether the doctor felt that would influence them in the kinds of decisions they were looking at," said Seale.

This is a thorny issue. Whether a doctor is a Christian, an atheist, or an agnostic should make no difference in the treatment of terminally-ill patients. Christians believe that human life is sacred and that humans were created in the image of God. It is for this reason that they also believe that any attempt to “shorten the life of somebody who is terminally ill” is an assault on human dignity.

I am against assisted suicide. However, there are times when a person is so sick that the suspension of treatment may be required. In these situations, the members of the family and the doctor, whether Christian or agnostic, involved in the treatment of that person, need to discuss the treatments available and decide what is the better for the patient.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.

Tags: ,

Bookmark and Share

American Christianity from a British Perspective

In this dialogue, a British visitor to America experiences Christianity, American style:

In a downtown drugstore, an assistant offers to help pack my bags at checkout.

“Thank you,” I say.

“Glory be to our God,” he replies.

I realise that somewhere between the conveyor belt and the trolley I seem to have misplaced an item. Then I notice that he’s packed it underneath the trolley basket.

“There it is,” I say.

“Praise the Lord!” he cries.

Praising the Lord comes naturally to many in America in a way that many of us in the UK (even in our supposedly Bible-thumping bit of it) would find odd or over-the-top.

In our secular society today, some people are not comfortable with genuine demonstrations of praise and gratitude. To me and countless others, these demonstrations of praise are beautiful; to others, they are “odd or over-the top.”

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.


Tags: ,

Bookmark and Share

God and the Ground Zero Mosque

Headlines:

“God only knows how US will sort Ground Zero mosque crisis.”


My question: “Should we involve God in this issue?

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.


Tags:

Bookmark and Share

Friday, August 27, 2010

The New President of Wheaton College

One of my favorite writers and one of my favorite preachers, Philip Ryken, has become the eighth president of Wheaton College. Ryken graduated from Wheaton College in 1988. He received a Master’s degree in divinity from Westminster Theological Seminary and a doctorate in historical theology from the University of Oxford.

Philip Ryken is the author of more than 30 books about Christianity and the Bible. Before coming to Wheaton, Ryken was on the pastoral staff of historic Tenth Presbyterian Church in Philadelphia. He began his ministry in Philadelphia in 1995. Then, in 2000, he became the church’s senior pastor.

Read more about Philip Ryken here.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.

Tags: ,

Bookmark and Share

Oil Found in Israel

For many years, a group of Christian investors have invested millions of dollars searching for oil in Israel. These Christians were convinced that there was oil in Israel because they believed that the Bible declared there was oil there.

A recent report is announcing that scientists have discovered an oil field in central Israel. The following is an excerpt from the news release announcing the discovery:

The Givat Olam umbrella organization confirmed for investors in Jerusalem on Monday the discovery of a large commercially-viable oil field in central Israel.

Hundreds of investors from around the world, many of them Christian Zionists, have been pouring money into Givat Olam for years in the hopes of helping secure Israel's energy independence

Read the news report here.

If oil has indeed been found in Israel, this will help Israel become energy independent. The discovery will also affirm the confidence of these investors that oil would be found in Israel.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.

Tags:

Bookmark and Share

Digging at Hazor

Archaeologists have finished their 21st season of work digging at Hazor. The dig was conducted under the leadership of the co-directors Professor Amnon Ben-Tor and Dr. Sharon Zuckerman.

In a previous post, I wrote about one of the most important finds this season at Hazor. Archaeologists discovered two fragments of a legal tablet written in Akkadian. The tablets were dated to the Middle Bronze age and are contemporary with, and similar to laws found in the Code of Hammurabi.

In the excerpt below, the archeologists describe their plans for the 2011 season:

By the end of the 2009 season, we had removed most of the eighth-century walls and strata. At the beginning of this season, we spent the first week finishing that job. The next level of occupation was the ninth-century. I thought it would take a season to excavate the remains from that period. We blew through it in a couple of weeks. Area M is outside the Solomonic city so there were no tenth-century domestic dwellings outside the city. Thus we began to penetrate down to the Late Bronze Age palace. By the end of the season, we were on top of the palace and some monumental stones were beginning to appear.

It is in Area M that Dr. Sharon Zuckerman has suggested that the administrative palace of Hazor was and the Canaanite archive of the Late Bronze level would be located. When the archive(s) are found at Hazor, it/they will be a major contribution to Biblical studies and go a long way to resolve some of the thorny issues in Biblical Archaeology.

We should be on the floor of the palace next season so I know I will have a lot of sifting to do. Please join us next season as we seek to explore the LB Palace at Hazor. Who knows what is on the floors in some of the rooms!

Read the complete report of the 2010 season here.

By the way, if you are interested in going to Israel to participate in the 2011 season, the archaeologists digging at Hazor are looking for volunteers. Join them in 2011 and be part of history, as the archeologists (hopefully) find the Canaanite archives.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.

Tags: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, August 26, 2010

Who Will Never Die: God or Us?

In a previous post, I wrote about the work of the sopherim (scribes) and the Masoretes. The work of the sopherim was to copy and preserve the transmission of the consonantal text. The scribes were committed to the integrity and preservation of the consonantal text. However, in the transmission and preservation of the text, the scribes introduced some conjectures, explanatory notes, and even some corrections of their own.

The corrections that the scribes made in the Biblical text are called Tiqqune Sopherim, the “emendation of the scribes.” According to Masoretic tradition, there are eighteen passages in the Hebrew Bible that were emended by the scribes for theological reasons. These changes were made by the scribes early in the transmission of the text to remove irreverent expressions concerning God.

I have already written one post dealing with one of the tiqqun sopherim (an emendation of the scribes). That post dealt with Genesis 18:22, a passage that comes at the beginning of the dialogue between Yahweh and Abraham concerning the fate of Sodom and Gomorrah. You can read that post here.

Today I want to write about another tiqqun sopherim. This scribal emendation is found in Habakkuk 1:12. Before I discuss how the emendation affects the understanding of Habakkuk’s prayer, let us see how four versions translate Habakkuk 1:12:

King James Version (KJV):

“Art thou not from everlasting, O LORD my God, mine Holy One? we shall not die.”

New International Version (NIV):

“O LORD, are you not from everlasting? My God, my Holy One, we will not die.”

New Revised Standard Version (NRSV):

“Are you not from of old, O LORD my God, my Holy One? You shall not die.”

Holman Christian Standard Bible (HCSB):

“Are You not from eternity, Yahweh my God? My Holy One, You will not die.”

As can be seen from the translations above, the KJV and the NIV translate Habakkuk 1:12 “we shall not die.” The NRSV and the HCSB translate “You shall not die.”

The difference between the “you” and the “we” in these translations is found in the emendation that scribes made in the Hebrew text for theological reasons. In order to understand the emendation, it is necessary to summarize Habakkuk’s dialogue with God.

In Habakkuk 1:1-2:5, there are two dialogues between the prophet and God. The first dialogue is Habakkuk 1:1-11 and the second is Habakkuk 1:12-2:4. In both dialogues, Habakkuk is complaining about the horrible political and religious situation in Judah.

He begins his first dialogue in unequivocal terms: “O LORD, how long shall I cry for help, and you will not listen? Or cry to you ‘Violence!’ and you will not save?” (Habakkuk 1:2). God responds in 1:5-11 by saying that he is bringing the Babylonians as his instrument of justice.

Habakkuk did not like God’s reply. In his second prayer, Habakkuk’s words to God do not show respect and reverence. Rather, the expression “Are you not” (Hebrew: hălō) has the force of a rebuke. The prophet, in another words, is rebuking God for sending the Babylonians, a wicked people, to “swallow those more righteous than they” (Habakkuk 1:13).

In his prayer to God, Habakkuk calls God holy and eternal, but this altercation with God reveals the prophet’s anguish at the situation. This is the reason “we shall not die” is out of place in the dialogue between the prophet and God. The prophet is affirming one of the characters of God, that God is immortal, “You shall not die” and not the immortality of human beings, “we shall not die.”

A reading of the Masorah (the textual notes preserved by the Masoretes) shows that the Masoretes were unanimous in their opinion that “You shall not die” (Hebrew lō’ tāmût) is the original reading, rather than the “we shall not die” (Hebrew: lō’ nāmût) of the Masoretic text (MT).

It is difficult to understand why the scribes emended the text. Reverence for the nature of God as an eternal God may be one of the reasons for the change, since the mention of God dying, even when the intent was to deny it, was offensive to some of the scribes.

Another reason for the change may be that in the mind of the scribes, just to say that God does not die might raise doubts in the mind of the reader that it might not be true. However, the reading “we shall not die” is not a better reading since it may convey the idea of human immortality.

Francis I. Andersen, is his book, Habakkuk: A New Translation With Introduction and Commentary (Anchor Bible. New York: Doubleday, 2001), p. 178, has an interesting suggestion to preserve the MT reading. He suggests that nāmût is a Niphal participle of mwt ("to die") with middle meaning. As such, he suggests that the translation should be “the one who does not die.” However, the major problem with his suggestion is that no such form of the verb appears in the Hebrew Bible.

I believe that Habakkuk 1:12 is a genuine tiqqun sopherim, a genuine emendation of the scribes. The reason for the emendation is that the scribes found the original words disrespectful of God. Even though the scribes had a high respect for preserving the text, their reverence for God trumped their reverence for the text. It was for this reason that they changed the text.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.

Tags: , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

The Anglican Church and the Bible

African bishops are accusing the Anglican Church of departing from the teachings of the Bible:

The Anglican church in the West no longer adheres to the word of God, African bishops said Tuesday at a continental conference attended by the Archbishop of Canterbury.

Read the news report here.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.


Tags:

Bookmark and Share

Sex and Abstinence

Baptist Press has an article in which discusses the Obama administration’s reaction to a pro-abstinence study. This article is worth reading. The following is an excerpt from the article:

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (BP)--In response to public pressure, the Department of Health and Human Services has disclosed a taxpayer-funded study that reflects positively on abstinence education, having first kept the full study under wraps while funding for such programs was slashed.

The National Survey of Adolescents and Their Parents in 2008 found that about 70 percent of parents agreed with the statement, "It is against your values for your adolescent to have sexual intercourse before marriage," as well as "Having sexual intercourse is something only married people should do." A majority of adolescents in the survey responded similarly.

Though the survey was presented at two conferences last year, when Lisa Rue, a researcher at the University of Northern Colorado, asked for a copy of the full survey, her request was denied. She tried again, the second time filing under the Freedom of Information Act. That request also was denied.

"The second denial from the Obama administration leaves me to reflect on the role of cultural values with regard to prevention science," Rue wrote in an editorial. "If we are truly interested in learning how to prevent two critical epidemics currently devastating our country (out-of-wedlock child bearing and sexually transmitted infections), then the nationally representative findings provide momentum and support for accessing cultural values of parents and children which promote optimal health choices for adolescents."

This article is worth reading. To read the article click here.

Parents with children understand that sex education is very important, but at times the government usurps that authority that belongs to parents.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.


Tags: , , ,




Bookmark and Share

The Masoretes

The Masoretes were a group of Jewish scholars who collected all kinds of grammatical and textual notes in order to preserve the text of the Hebrew Bible. This collection of information was called “Masorah,” a word that means “tradition.”

The work of the Masoretes was related to the work of the sōpěrîm. The word sōpěrîm is generally translated as “scribes.” However, the word literally means “”those who count.” The work of the sōpěrîm was to copy and preserve the transmission of the consonantal text. The work of the Masoretes was to collect information about the text, make corrections when necessary, and make observations about the books, words, and letters of the Bible.

In order to preserve the traditional pronunciation and chants of the words in the text, the Masoretes developed a system of vowel-points and accents. These vowels and accents are never used in the texts used in the liturgy of the synagogue. However, they are used in texts designed for scholarly study.

The following information is an example of the work of the Masoretes. The Masoretes prepared a list of how many times the Hebrew letters appear in the Hebrew Bible.

א Aleph occurs 42,377 times.

ב Beth occurs 38,218 times.

ג Gimel occurs 29,537 times.

ד Daleth occurs 32,530 times.

ה He occurs 47,554 times.

ו Vaw occurs 76,922 times.

ז Zain occurs 22,867 times.

ח Heth occurs 23,437 times.

ט Tet occurs 11,052 times.

י Yod occurs 66,420 times.

כ Kaph occurs 48,253 times.

ל Lamed occurs 41,517 times.

מ Mem occurs 77,778 times.

נ Nun occurs 41,696 times.

ס Samech occurs13,580 times.

ע Ayn occurs 20,175 times.

פ Pe occurs 22,725 times.

צ Tsade occurs 21,882 times.

ק Koph occurs 22,972 times.

ר Resh occurs 22,147 times.

ש Shin occurs 32,148 times.

ת Tav occurs 59,343 times.

The Masoretes applied themselves to the study of the Hebrew Scriptures. Their labor of love and their commitment to the integrity and preservation of the text prevented these Scriptures from perishing in the dispersion of the Jewish people throughout the centuries.

It is true that in the transmission and preservation of the text, the scribes and the Masoretes introduced some conjectures, explanatory notes, and even some corrections of their own. However, notwithstanding these minor changes made by the scribes, their work established the Hebrew text that serves as the basis for the modern translations of the Bible.


Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.

Tags: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, August 24, 2010

Jesus Will Return in 2050

A recent poll conducted by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press and Smithsonian Magazine reveals that 41% of Americans believe that Jesus’ Second Coming will occur in the next 40 years.

Read the report here.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.

Tags: ,

Bookmark and Share

Was Hitler Jewish?

According to the results of DNA tests conducted on Hitler’s relatives and published in an article in the Flemish-language magazine Knack, scientists have concluded that Hitler had Jewish roots.

In the study, geneticists identified groups of chromosomes called haplogroups, ‘genetic fingerprints’ that define populations. According to the study, Hitler’s second most dominant haplogroup is the one found most commonly in Ashkenazi Jews.

Read the report here.

One wonders what would have happened if Hitler knew that he had Jewish blood in him.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.

Tags: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Messianic Jews

Did you know that there are more than 15,000 Messianic Jews in Israel?

Did you know that there are more than 350,000 Messianic Jews in the USA?

Read the testimony of Messianic Jews in this article published by Ynetnews.

According to this report, Messianic Jews face many challenges. The article about Messianic Jews published by Ynetnews concludes with this statement:

For a community living under the perpetual wrath of the haredim, who for the most part alienate and discriminate against them, Messianic Jews remain inexplicably optimistic. Perhaps it is because they still follow in the footsteps of that Galilee-born Jew who wandered into Jerusalem 2,000 years ago, the one who believed in turning the other cheek.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.

Tags:

Bookmark and Share

The Bible Dissected

Many years ago, an anonymous writer published a summary of Bible facts that he believed would be of interest to students of the Bible. His Old and New Testament Dissected took three years to prepare and it was done at a time when there was no computer.

This information is based on the King James Version. This summary of the Bible reflects the work of an individual who believed that the Bible should be read and studied. His work reflects his commitment to search the Scriptures. The following is the result of his work:

Old Testament
  1. Books in the Old Testament: 39
  2. Chapters in the Old Testament: 929
  3. Verses in the Old Testament: 23,214
  4. Words in the Old Testament: 592,439
  5. Letters in the Old Testament: 2,728,800

New Testament
  1. Books in the New Testament: 27
  2. Chapters in the New Testament: 260
  3. Verses in the New Testament: 7,959
  4. Words in the New Testament: 181,253
  5. Letters in the New Testament: 838,380

The Whole Bible
  1. Books in the Bible: 66
  2. Chapters in the Bible: 1,189
  3. Verses in the Bible: 31,173
  4. Words in the Bible: 773,692
  5. Letters in the Bible: 3,567,180

Other Information about the Bible

  1. The middle chapter of the Bible is Psalm 117
  2. The smallest chapter of the Bible is Psalm 117
  3. The middle verse of the Bible is Psalm 118, verse 8
  4. The word “and” occurs 46,227 times in the Bible
  5. The word “Yahweh” occurs 6855 times in the Bible
  6. The 21st verse of the 7th chapter of Ezra has all the letters in the alphabet except the letter j
  7. The 19th chapter of 2 Kings and the 37th chapter of Isaiah are alike

Other Information about the Old Testament
  1. The middle book of the Old Testament is Proverbs
  2. The middle chapter of the Old Testament is Job chapter 29
  3. There is no middle verse in the Old Testament, since the number of verses is even. If there was a middle verse, it would be 2 Chronicles 20, between verses 17 and 18
  4. The shortest verse of the Old Testament is 1 Chronicles Chapter 1, verse 25
  5. The word “and” occurs 35,543 times in the Old Testament

Other Information about the New Testament
  1. The middle book of the New Testament is 2 Thessalonians
  2. There is no middle chapter in the New Testament since the number of chapters is even. If there was a middle chapter, it would be between Romans Chapters 13 and 14
  3. The middle verse of the New Testament is Acts Chapter 17, verse 17
  4. The shortest verse of the New Testament is John Chapter 11, verse 35
  5. The word “and” occurs 10,684 times in the New Testament

When was the last time you read all the 1,189 chapters of the Bible? I hope this information will encourage you read all the 31,173 verses of the Bible.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.

Tags:

Bookmark and Share

Monday, August 23, 2010

Zephaniah and the Judgment of God

Today I resume my studies on the book of the prophet Zephaniah. For the previous studies on this series, follow the links mentioned below.

In my previous studies, I mentioned Zephaniah’s relationship with Hezekiah, king of Judah. I also emphasized that Zephaniah preached in the days of king Josiah and that his message was instrumental in bringing about the religious reforms that Josiah implemented in order to purify the religious life of Judah.

A cursory reading of the book will clearly show that Zephaniah did not limit his message of divine judgment to the royal family alone. Zephaniah took his message into the streets of Jerusalem and spoke to all who were willing to listen.

Zephaniah was familiar with the geography of the city. In his book, he refers to the Fish Gate (Zephaniah 1:10), to the Second Quarter (Zephaniah 1:10), and to the Mortar (Zephaniah 1:11). The Fish Gate was a gate on the northern wall that protected Jerusalem. The Second Quarter was a section of Jerusalem, west of the Tyropoeon Valley, the valley that divided Jerusalem into two sections. The Mortar was a trading district in Jerusalem.

The message of Zephaniah is firmly rooted in the prophetic traditions of his predecessors. Zephaniah’s book contains oracles against Judah (1:2-2:3), against foreign nations (2:4-15), and oracles of hope and restoration (3:8-20). The book is short. It is composed of only 3 chapters and 53 verses. However, the book contains typical pre-exilic elements of judgement on the people with a promise of restoration. The book also features major elements of post-exilic apocalyptic eschatology that includes the destruction of the enemy, the ingathering of the exile, and the restoration of the nation.

In the seventh century, at the time Zephaniah was ministering in Jerusalem, Judah was facing a time of religious apostasy. Zephaniah preached to a people who had rejected the demands of the covenant. The people of Judah had become indifferent to their religious practices and had neglected the worship of Yahweh to follow other gods. They had become complacent in their religious duties, driven by the syncretism present in their society and by the excessive religious tolerance introduced by their political and religious leaders.

As mentioned in a previous post, Manasseh introduced astral worship and other pagan practices in the Temple. Because Judah had been an Assyrian vassal for several decades, the gods of Assyria had become a part of the religious life of the people for as long as that generation could remember.

The people who turned away from following Yahweh were probably those who were born during the reign of Manasseh. Those who from their youth had never submitted to Yahweh were being called to faithfulness and repentance. Many of these people were born after the religious reforms of Hezekiah. With the syncretism introduced by Manasseh, these people were not committed to follow the Lord or to keep his laws. The religious persecution under Manasseh (2 Kings 22:16) drove the prophets underground, probably after Isaiah’s ministry ended in 687. No prophet arose in Judah until Zephaniah appeared at the beginning of the reign of Josiah.

Zephaniah’s message was very critical of the political and religious leadership of the nation who lived in Jerusalem. He said: “The officials within it are roaring lions; its judges are evening wolves that leave nothing until the morning. Its prophets are reckless, faithless persons; its priests have profaned what is sacred, they have done violence to the law” (Zephaniah 3:3-4).

The most severe criticism Zephaniah uttered against the people and their leaders, indeed, against the whole nation, is found in Zephaniah 2:1, where he called them a “shameless nation.” The word used here for “nation” is gôy, a word generally used to designate pagan nations. The interpretation that gôy in this context is used derogatorily is based on the meaning of the word kāsaph in verse 1. Although the meaning of the word in this context is not very clear, the two words are translated “shameless nation” (NRSV), “shameful nation” (NIV), “undesirable nation” (HCSB), and “a nation not worthy to be loved” (Douay-Rheims). With these words, Zephaniah accused the people of Judah of behaving like the gentiles.

Zephaniah accused the people worshiping in the Temple of practicing pagan rituals alien to Yahwism. The people were serving both Yahweh and idols. This is the reason Yahweh announced a severe judgment upon their pagan practices:
“I will stretch out my hand against Judah, and against all the inhabitants of Jerusalem; and I will cut off from this place every remnant of Baal and the name of the idolatrous priests; those who bow down on the roofs to the host of the heavens; those who bow down and swear to the LORD, but also swear by Milcom; those who have turned back from following the LORD, who have not sought the LORD or inquired of him” (Zephaniah 1:2-6).
One important aspect of the message of Zephaniah is his emphasis on the inevitable coming of the “Day of the Lord” or the “Day of Yahweh.” This motif appears in several prophetic books prior to Zephaniah. In the eighth century, Amos warned the people of Israel that the day of Yahweh would be a time of calamity, a day when Yahweh would bring judgment, beginning with his own people:
“Disaster for you who long for the Day of Yahweh! What will the Day of Yahweh mean for you? It will mean darkness, not light, as when someone runs away from a lion, only to meet a bear; he goes into his house and puts his hand on the wall, only for a snake to bite him. Will not the Day of Yahweh be darkness, not light, totally dark, without a ray of light?” (Amos 5:18-20 NJB).
For Zephaniah, the “Day of Yahweh” will be a time when Yahweh will bring severe judgment upon the nation. The strong language that accompanies the prophet’s message surpasses even the strong language of Amos, a prophet who probably influenced him. In a series of graphic, memorable phrases, the prophet proclaimed what the people would experience on that dark day when Yahweh visits his people. That day will be “the day of the LORD’s sacrifice” (1:8), “the day of the LORD’s wrath” (1:18), “a day of wrath, a day of distress and anguish, a day of ruin and devastation, a day of darkness and gloom, a day of clouds and thick darkness” (Zephaniah 1:15 ), and “a day of trumpet blast and battle cry” (Zephaniah 1:16). And, according to Zephaniah, “the great day of the LORD is near, near and hastening fast” (Zephaniah 1:14).

Zephaniah not only condemned the people of Judah, but he also indicted the foreign nations by proclaiming that they also would be judged by Yahweh. Zephaniah proclaimed oracles against the Philistines (2:4-7), against Moab and Ammon (2:8-11), against Ethiopia (2:12), and against Assyria (2:13-15). On that day, Yahweh will defeat the gods of the earth (2:11). Fire will consume the earth and the nations will feel the impact of God’s wrath (3:9).

However, Zephaniah was much more interested on the judgement that was coming upon Jerusalem. Zephaniah called the people of Judah to repentance. He stood against the idolatry of the temple priests (Zephaniah 1:4; 3:4), he rebuked the palace officials and the king’s sons who dressed themselves in foreign attire (Zephaniah 1:8), he called the people involved in pagan worship to return to Yahweh.

Zephaniah charged that Jerusalem was not worthy of her king because of the corruption found within the city: “Woe to her that is rebellious and defiled, the oppressing city! She listens to no voice, she accepts no correction. She does not trust in the LORD, she does not draw near to her God” (Zephaniah 3:1-2 RSV).

Throughout the book, Zephaniah’s message is mainly concerned with the imminent coming of the Day of Yahweh and God’s judgment upon the nations. But the Day of Yahweh will be focused not only on the judgment of Judah and the nations, but also on salvation. According to Zephaniah, on that day the nations will come to know God: “I shall purge the lips of the peoples, so that all may invoke the name of Yahweh and serve him shoulder to shoulder” (Zephaniah 3:9 NJB).

The last words of Zephaniah were a message of hope to Israel. A remnant will survive the judgment of God. This remnant will be gathered and brought together by Yahweh into one place, “my holy mountain” (Zephaniah 3:11). The book of Zephaniah concludes by saying that the judgment of God came in order to purge Israel of its sin and disobedience. The land and the people had to be purified prior to the remnant’s return to Jerusalem.


Other Studies on Zephaniah:

The Historical Context of Zephaniah’s Ministry

Prophets in Israel

Zephaniah the Prophet

Zephaniah and the Palestinians


Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.

Tags: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, August 21, 2010

Dating with Carbon-14

One of the most difficult tasks of archaeology is dating the material found in archaeological digs. One method archaeologists use comes from the physical sciences. This method of dating is based on Carbon-14.

Carbon-14 dating was developed by Willard Libby in 1948. Libby worked at the Institute of Nuclear Studies at the University of Chicago. Carbon-14 dating is based on the fact that living organisms absorb radioactive carbon from nature. After that organism dies, the Carbon-14 present in that organism disintegrates at a known rate.

By using this method, archaeologists can determine the date of the object by measuring the amount of Carbon-14 remaining in the sample.

The process of dating with Carbon-14 is complicated, but scientists have perfected the procedures for dating archaeological samples with Carbon-14.

To understand the process of dating archaeological material with Carbon-14 and the problems related to contamination of samples, watch this video on dating with Carbon-14.


Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.


Tags: ,

Bookmark and Share

Friday, August 20, 2010

The Bible as Literature

I have been highly involved in reading books and articles this summer and as a result, my daily blogging has suffered. The new academic year is just around the corner and much needs to be done before I go back to the classroom.

I have also been involved in writing. I have a writing project due at the end of August. I have done much research in preparation to write the article. Even though it is a short article, I read more than I should have, but I believe that now I am ready to write the article. I hope to take all of next week writing this article.

After I finish writing this article, I have one more to write and I hope to be able to finish writing it by the end of September. I have already done most of the research for the article. I just need to go to the library and begin putting my thoughts on paper. Now you understand what has prevented me from blogging regularly this summer.

I recently finished reading the book The Bible as Literature (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006). The book was written by John B. Gabel, Charles B. Wheeler, Anthony D. York, and David Citino. This is one of the books I am planning to use in a new course I am teaching this fall.

The book introduces students to the Bible as literature. This approach will be refreshing to my students because I am sure that most of them have never considered the literary aspect of the Bible. Most Christians study the Bible devotionally, that is, they seek to find in Scriptures spiritual guidance and comfort, the kind of help that will strengthen their faith and their relationship with God.

However, the Bible is a body of writing produced by people who were influenced by their culture and society. As such, the Bible is a literary production and a human work. To people of faith, the Bible was written by real people under the influence of the Holy Spirit. This is the reason the Bible is a special book.

Thus, the writers of The Bible as Literature want to present the Bible as a human document that has been used for millennia as a vehicle that provides inspiration, moral guidance, and religious teaching to people of faith.

In their presentation, the authors deal with the literary aspects of the Bible and how the Bible relates to other literature of the Ancient Near East. They discuss topics such as the historical and physical settings of the Old Testament and the New Testament, the formation of the canon, and the nature of prophecy, wisdom, apocalypse, and Gospel.

The authors also deal with the text of the Bible, issues of translations and interpretation, and the different aspects of biblical criticism. They conclude the book with a study of women in the Bible.

In four appendices they deal with the name of the God of Israel, writing in biblical times, Palestine in the intertestamental period, and the critical study of the Bible.

I enjoyed reading this book. For people who teach the Bible regularly, much of the content of this book is not new. However, for pastors and college or seminary students, the book provides a wealth of information addressing the basic concepts that are essential to a scholarly study of the Bible.

I am sure that some Christians may not like the approach taken by the authors of this book because they view the Bible from a literary perspective. However, this book provides answers to many of the questions seminary students ask in class. I highly recommend this book.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.

Tags: ,

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, August 14, 2010

How Would Jesus Worship?

Would Jesus worship in a church where the pastor’s sermon was on “Biblical Oral Sex?”

Would Jesus worship is a church that quotes Stephen Colbert and Lady Gaga as sources of authority?

Judge for yourself.

You must read this article on the “the emerging church.”

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.

Tags:

Bookmark and Share

Friday, August 13, 2010

God’s Torah in the Book of Hosea

The book of the prophet Hosea has many textual problems. Scholars have proposed many reasons for the poor condition of the text. One reason given by scholars is that the book originated in the Northern Kingdom. Another reason is that the Hebrew text of Hosea may reflect the Hebrew dialect spoken in Israel rather than the Hebrew spoken in Judah.

The poor condition of the text of Hosea is reflected in the different English translations of the book. Take, for instance, the translation of Hosea 8:12 in the following versions:

New Revised Standard Version (NRSV):

“Though I write for him the multitude of my instructions, they are regarded as a strange thing.”

Revised Standard Version (RSV):

“Were I to write for him my laws by ten thousands, they would be regarded as a strange thing.”

New International Version (NIV):

“I wrote for them the many things of my law, but they regarded them as something alien.”

Douay-Rheims American Edition (DRA):

“I shall write to him my manifold laws, which have been accounted as foreign.”

The difference between these four translations is that the NIV and the DRA follow the Hebrew text, the Ketib, and the NRSV and the RSV follow the emendation proposed by the scribes, the Qere .

Also, notice that the NRSV and the RSV present the writing of the Torah as hypothetical. The NRSV is hypothetical in the present “Though I write” while the RSV is hypothetical in the future “Were I to write.” The NIV puts the writing in the past, “I wrote,” and the DRA places the writing in the future, “I shall write.”

The form of the Hebrew verb in Hosea 8:12 is difficult to translate into English. The verbal form is Qal Imperfect, which generally is translated with a future idea: “I will write.” However, the sense of the word in English requires a past tense meaning: “I wrote.” The reason for the past tense is that if God threatened the people by saying that he would write something in the future, a future act of God would not reflect the intent of Hosea’s words. Hosea’s words to the people of the Northern kingdom reflected a present reality in the prophet’s day: the people’s transgression of God’s Torah.

The Hebrew word for “instructions” or “laws” is “Torah.” The mention of God’s Torah implies that Hosea knew a form of written Torah. However, the text does not indicate the content of the Torah mentioned by Hosea. One possible way of understanding the content of this Torah is found in Hosea 4:2 where Hosea mentions several of the commandments found in the Decalogue:

“There is only cursing, lying and murder, stealing and adultery; they break all bounds, and bloodshed follows bloodshed” (Hosea 4:2).

In Hosea 4:2, the prophet mentioned cursing (3rd Commandment), lying (9th Commandment), murder (6th Commandment), stealing (8th Commandment), and adultery (7th Commandment). These references to the Decalogue in Hosea are consistent with the laws given to Israel during the establishment of the covenant between God and Israel at Sinai.

In fact, in Hosea 8:1 the word covenant appears in parallel with Torah: “Set the trumpet to your lips! One like a vulture is over the house of the LORD, because they have broken my covenant, and transgressed my law.” Hosea emphasized that through the covenant, Yahweh established a relationship with Israel in which he would become their God and they would become his special people. Although Hosea does not specifically speak of the Sinai covenant, Hosea emphasized that this special relationship began at the Exodus:

“I have been Yahweh your God since your days in Egypt” (Hosea 12:10 NJB).

“I have been Yahweh your God since your days in Egypt when you knew no god but me, since you had no one else to save you” (Hosea 13:4 NJB).

“When Israel was a child I loved him, and I called my son out of Egypt” (Hosea 11:1 NJB).

In his accusation against the people of Israel and against the political and religious leaders of the Northern Kingdom, Hosea accused them of abandoning the Torah (instructions or laws) of God in order to sacrifice to idols and to dedicate themselves to the worship of Baal. The reason the laws of God were a strange thing to the people was because the priests and the prophets were negligent in teaching them to the people (Hosea 4:5-6).

According to Hosea, Israel was treating the Torah of their God as though these laws were alien instructions, that is, that the Torah they had received at Sinai was the teachings of a strange God. The people considered God’s Torah as a strange thing, because, as Hosea had said, they were rebelling against God’s Torah: “They have violated my covenant and been unfaithful to my Law” (Hosea 8:1).

The Hebrew word for “strange thing” in Hosea 8:12 is zār. The word zār appears in the singular in Isaiah 43:12 and it is translated as “strange god,” and in the plural it appears in Deuteronomy 32:16 and it is translated as “strange gods.”

In the Torah, God demanded Israel to reject the worship of strange gods. Deuteronomy 32:16 says that Israel made Yahweh “jealous with strange gods, with abhorrent things they provoked him.” The unfaithfulness of Israel is revealed in the list of the strange gods they worshiped: “They sacrificed to demons, non-gods, gods that they had never known, new gods that had come up lately, which your ancestors had not feared” (Deuteronomy 32:17).

Hosea declared that Israel had no reason to rebel against God. God had written his instructions to them at the time the covenant was established at Sinai. Israel should obey the great and manifold laws of God. In addition, Israel should keep God’s laws in their minds and in their hearts. Instead, they regarded God’s law as alien and strange and made them to be laws that made no demands on them.

These words of Hosea convey a great lesson to people today. God has given us his words to be our guide in life. The Bible contains divine instructions to help us live a better life and avoid the errors that can bring pain and distress. Wise people will search the Scriptures because in them they will discover what is necessary for moral and spiritual guidance: “All Scriptures are useful for teaching, pointing out errors, correcting people, and training them for a life that has God’s approval” (2 Timothy 3:16).

The laws of God were ignored and rejected by the people of Israel. They considered God’s law as something outmoded, outdated, something that should be rejected and not followed. And this is precisely what we find today in our society. Some people believe that the Bible contains many beautiful stories and that it may even contain many truths, but they reject the idea that the teachings of the Bible should be imposed on them as binding truths or as the basis for moral decisions. To them, the teachings of the Bible belong to an ancient people, not to people who live in the 21st century. Thus, the teachings of the Bible are foreign to them. God’s Torah is a strange thing to them as it was for Israel.

Joseph Parker, in his book The People’s Bible. Vol. 17: Hosea-Malachi (New York: Funk and Wagnalls Company, 1892), p. 67 wrote some basic truths that are relevant today. He wrote:

Great dangers lie around this line of thinking. God protests that he has not written the Bible as a thing of ancient times, but that he is writing it now, writing it every day, writing it as a direct message to every soul. We lose everything when we lose the modernness of the Bible. It may be perfectly true that man cannot live by rules a thousand years old; but in the case of the Bible the rule is not a day old in any sense that divests it of immediate dignity and claim and pertinence; it is the last utterance of God; the breath with which he uttered it is still warm upon the ear of the listener.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.

Tags: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, August 11, 2010

Gold Coin Found in Israel



Photo: Ptolemaic Gold Coin
Credit: Photo Courtesy Israel Antiquities Association


According to a report published by Arutz Sheva, archaeologists have found an ancient gold coin dated to the reign of King Ptolemy V, 200 BCE. The following is an excerpt from the article:

Archaeologists working in Tel Kedesh in northern Israel have uncovered an extremely rare 2,200-year-old gold coin, minted in Alexandria by King Ptolemy V.

The head of the Coin Department of the Israel Antiquities Association, long-time American immigrant Dr. Donald T. Ariel, said, “This is the heaviest and most valuable ancient gold coin ever found in an excavation in Israel.” The coin depicts a queen, believed to be Arsinoe II Philadelphus, who was married to her half-brother Ptolemy II. It is possible, however, that it may actually be Ptolemy V's wife Cleopatra I, daughter of Antiochus III."

According to Ariel, the discovery of the coin is very significant. He said:

“It is rare to find Ptolemaic coins in Israel dating after the country came under Seleucid rule in 200 BCE.” “The only other gold Ptolemaic coin from an excavation in Israel (from Akko) dates from the period of Ptolemaic hegemony, in the third century BCE, and weighs less than two grams.”

Read the article in its entirety by clicking here.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.

Tags: , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Metaphors and Similes in the Book of Hosea

The Bible is full of metaphors and similes. A metaphor is a comparison between two objects or ideas. For instance, when the Psalmist makes a distinction between the righteous and the wicked (Psalm 1), he compares the righteous to a “tree planted by streams of water” and the wicked to “chaff that the wind drives away.”

People are not trees and they are not chaff. However, the Biblical writers used metaphors to make their writing more interesting or more accessible to their audience. In general, the Biblical writers used ideas and examples taken from the everyday experience of their audience to convey truths about God and about life.

A simile is related to metaphors. A simile is a figure of speech that compares two different things. In literature, similes are introduced by the words “like,” and “as.”

In his book, The Hebrew Prophets (Atlanta: John Knox Press, 1984), p. 34, James D. Newsome, Jr. has compiled a list of the similes and metaphors in the book of Hosea which the prophet used to express the character of God and the sinful condition of Israel before God.

In Hosea, Yahweh is like:

a husband (2:2)
a father (11:1)
a physician (7:1)
a lion (5:14)
a leopard (13:7)
a she-bear (13:8)
the dew (14:5)
the rain (6:3)
a cypress (14:8)
a moth (5:12)
dry rot (5:12)

In Hosea, Israel is like:

a wife (2:2)
a sick person (5:13)
a silly dove (7:11)
a trained heifer (10:11)
a luxuriant grapevine (10:1)
grapes (9:10)
a lily (14:5)
an olive tree (14:6)
a woman in labor (13:13)
an unborn son (13:3)
an oven (7:4)
a cake of bread (7:8)
a bow (7:4)
morning mist and dew (13:3)
chaff blown from the threshing floor (13:3)
smoke that rises from the window (13:3).

As can be seen from the list, Hosea’s similes and metaphors are drawn from everyday life in order to emphasize his message to the people of Israel.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.

Tags: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Monday, August 09, 2010

The Dilemma Facing Today’s Pastors

G. Jeffrey MacDonald, a minister in the United Church of Christ, has written an op-ed in The New York Times that pastors must read. The following is the introduction to MacDonald’s op-ed article:

THE American clergy is suffering from burnout, several new studies show. And part of the problem, as researchers have observed, is that pastors work too much. Many of them need vacations, it’s true. But there’s a more fundamental problem that no amount of rest and relaxation can help solve: congregational pressure to forsake one’s highest calling.

The pastorate in itself is hard work, but congregations today are making the work of the pastor even more difficult. As it is, there is no easy answer to this problem, unless Christians return to the practices of authentic Christianity, which I believe, it will be hard to do in the society in which we live.

Pastors, read this article. Here is the link.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.

Tags: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, August 07, 2010

The Bible and Mathematics

I have not confirmed the calculations made in the presentation of this video, but the concept is fascinating.

If the mathematical calculations are right, then, one must wonder: is this coincidence or design?




Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.


Tags: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, August 05, 2010

The Problem of Many Altars

Joseph Parker was a Congregational pastor in London. He died on November 28, 1902. He was a great preacher and many of his sermons were published and had wide distribution both in England and America. His sermons made Joseph Parker one of the best known preachers of his time. Below is an excerpt of a sermon preached on Hosea 8:

“Because Ephraim hath made many altars to sin, altars shall be unto him to sin " (Hosea 8:11).

The Lord will not permit the plural form of any word which he has consecrated. The word "altar" is right, but the word "altars" is wrong. The word "temple" is permitted, but when Israel buildeth " temples" he offends against God. Ephraim became busily religious. It was not enough for Ephraim to have an altar; he must have an altar everywhere! Thus his very religion became irreligious. His piety became practical atheism.

Ephraim tried to do what men are in every age attempting—to make up for the complete, solemn, grand, overwhelming idea of God by the creation of an endless number of petty and distracting details; hence we have creeds, standards, dogmas, forms, tests of orthodoxy, and other altars innumerable and unnameable. We should not pluralise God's singularity. We must not attempt to complicate that which God has made strikingly simple; so simple that a child-mind can approach it and comprehend it.

The altars which Ephraim built were to be unto him as occasions of sin. Where Ephraim meant to pray he was to find a new temptation created by his own evil genius. We are led astray by our own craftiness. Our theological wisdom often becomes the means of our practical impiety. We turn religion into a scheme, a plan, a philosophy, something which human genius can create, invent, administer, overrule, patronise, and thus we drag down an idea which ought to be infinitely transcendent within the limits of our own understanding, and within the influence of our own humiliating patronage.

The time will come when men will be ashamed of their formal mechanism and creeds which they intended to be as altars and final tests of religious correctness. Let us beware of our inventions, for they come out of a heart that is not right; let us beware of our formal orthodoxies, for they may be the offspring of a cleverness that is itself perverted.

Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God is one Lord ; there is one Lord, one faith, one baptism ; there is one Mediator between God and man, the Man Christ Jesus. God always insists upon the singular number; there is only one Name given under heaven amongst men whereby we must be saved; there is one cross, one atonement, one priesthood, one revelation, one baptism of the Eternal Spirit. To split up the unity into diversity, and to find multiplicity in what was intended to be simplicity, is a temptation to which the human heart is constantly exposed ; it brings its own stings and pains; it leads to confusion, humiliation, and disgrace.

These words spoken so long ago, are still relevant today.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.


Tags: , ,

Bookmark and Share