Tuesday, October 26, 2010

Christ the Redeemer - A Panoramic View

The “Christ the Redeemer” statue in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil has been declared one of the seven wonders of the modern world. The statue is 105-foot-tall (38-meter-tall) and is one of the many attractions in Rio.

Recently, someone used the image of Christ the Redeemer to show some of the panorama of Rio. This video of Christ the Redeemer includes beautiful special effects.





Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.


Tags:

Bookmark and Share

Monday, October 25, 2010

Solomon and Social Oppression - Part 5

In my previous post (Part 4), I discussed how Solomon instituted a system of taxation in order to provide for the needs of his kingdom. Judging by the number of people supported by Solomon, the political and economic expansion of the kingdom, and the extensive building program began by Solomon, it is clear that taxation eventually became a huge burden on a people who probably were already struggling to meet their own needs.

Solomon’s revenue came primarily from the agricultural surpluses produced by a rural population and from income derived from tolls received from caravans transiting through the kingdom and from commercial ventures.

For a time, the income received from taxes, tolls, and commercial ventures was able to provide for the needs of the state. However, as the kingdom’s upper class grew, a class of people who were nonproducers, Solomon had to institute new policies to bring more revenue, policies that were counterproductive and produced limited resources.

Solomon’s economic policies were successful in providing a life of luxury and prosperity for a small group of privileged people. However, life for the common people was marginal and it was this situation that created the grievances and the discontentment which led to the division of the kingdom. Walter Brueggemann, in his article “‘Vine and Fig Tree’: A Case Study in Imagination and Criticism,” The Catholic Biblical Quarterly 43 (1981) p. 194 wrote: “The criticism regularly mounted in ancient Israel is against present arrangements which terrify and usurp the life-goods from one table to put them on another, more fortunate table.”

Solomon’s massive building program is described in 1 Kings chapters 6 to 9. When Solomon became king after the death of David, he chose not to expand the borders of the kingdom he inherited from his father. Thanks to the stable government Solomon received from the hands of David, he was able to embark on an ambitious building program that lasted twenty years.

Solomon’s greatest achievement was the building of the Temple on the land David had purchased from Araunah the Jebusite for an altar (2 Samuel 24:8-25). According to the Deuteronomic historian, Solomon’s temple was a magnificent structure that rivaled other great buildings in antiquity.

David had not been allowed to build a temple for God in Jerusalem. In the covenant established with David, the Lord spoke through Nathan the prophet telling David that he would have a son who would “build a house for my name.” Solomon was chosen to build the temple for God which his father had desired to build.

Solomon was determined to build a magnificent, permanent shrine for the Ark of the Lord. However, the reality was that Solomon, with all his wealth and riches, did not possess the necessary knowledge and technology or the needed materials to build such a complex structure. Since he did not have the skilled workers and the material he needed for the construction of the temple, Solomon made an alliance with Hiram, king of Tyre. The temple was a tripartite structure designed by Phoenicians and it was built following a Canaanite pattern. The introduction of Canaanite workers to design and build the temple also brought Canaanite religious themes into Israelite religion.

Solomon believed that God’s temple and his kingdom should rival all others, and in a brilliant capitalistic move, he negotiated with Hiram, who was the king of a more culturally progressive country, to help with his building projects.

In the past Hiram had helped David with material to build his own palace in Jerusalem. Now, because of his friendship with David, Hiram desired to help Solomon build the temple and his palace complex. In the process, Hiram helped Solomon extend his political influence since he also helped him establish a strong economy. Thus, through this agreement with Solomon, Hiram showed that he was very interested in maintaining good diplomatic relation between their two countries. On the other hand, Solomon was so interested in keeping good relationships with Phoenicia that he married one of Hiram’s daughters to seal the alliance between the two nations.

According to 2 Chronicles 2, Solomon approached Hiram with a proposal for working together on his building projects. Solomon desired to purchase raw material and precious metals from Hiram. Solomon proposed that the servants of the two kings work together and he would pay Hiram’s men the wages set by Hiram.

According to 1 Kings 5, Hiram modified Solomon’s proposal. Hiram was fully aware that the Israelites did not know the proper techniques for cutting the cedar and cypress timber, which was a well-established craft in Phoenicia. So, Hiram proposed that his men would cut the lumber and transport the timber to the coast of Palestine, and Solomon’s men would remove it and take it to the location of the temple.

Solomon was to pay Hiram for the work of his servants. According to 1 Kings 5:6 (Hebrew: 1 Kings 5:20), Solomon wrote to Hiram: “My servants will join your servants, and I will give you whatever wages you set for your servants; for you know that there is no one among us who knows how to cut timber like the Sidonians.” In addition to paying the wages of Hiram’s servants, Solomon agreed to send Hiram “an annual payment of 100,000 bushels of wheat for his household and 110,000 gallons of pure olive oil” (1 Kings 5:11 NLT [Hebrew: 1 Kings 5:25]).

Solomon’s annual payment to Hiram forced the peasant population to expand their agricultural surplus. Solomon’s taxation program siphoned off the wealth from small farmers to provide for a government bureaucracy, thus placing a severe strain on the social and economic structures of families and villages.

Solomon spent seven years building the Temple and thirteen years building the palace complex. The palace complex consisted of the king’s palace, several governmental buildings, and a palace for Pharaoh’s daughter.

Solomon fortified several cities outside of Jerusalem, including Gezer, Megiddo, and Hazor. These chariot cities and his army, composed of horse-drawn chariots, were designed to protect his empire and provide protection for the trade routes that brought riches from Egypt, Arabia, and Phoenicia (1 Kings 4:26, 9:10, 10:16).

In addition to the temple and his palace, Solomon also constructed a seaport at Ezion-geber where he was able to build a fleet of ships to extend his commercial enterprises to distant lands. The sailing vessels were built with the help of Hiram. The fleet of ships of Tarshish carried exotic cargoes including gold, silver, ivory, apes, and peacocks (1 Kings 10:22). Solomon purchased chariots from Egypt and horses from Cilicia. His traders sold horses and chariots to other nations at a profit (1 Kings 10:28-29).

It is possible that the visit of the Queen of Sheba to Solomon was designed to establish a commercial agreement with Solomon because his commercial ventures were cutting into her camel caravan trade in Arabia and other parts of the Ancient Near East.

After twenty years of building and expansion, Solomon was so deep in debt to Hiram that he was eventually forced to sell twenty cities as payment for the massive quantities of precious metals, particularly gold, which were borrowed from the rich Phoenician nation to complete his building projects. The Deuteronomic writer describes Solomon’s action as follows:

"At the end of twenty years, in which Solomon had built the two houses, the house of the LORD and the king's house, King Hiram of Tyre having supplied Solomon with cedar and cypress timber and gold, as much as he desired, King Solomon gave to Hiram twenty cities in the land of Galilee (1 Kings 9:10-11)."

By selling twenty Galilean cities to a Canaanite king, Solomon was returning to the Canaanites part of the land that God had given to Israel. The Israelites who lived in those cities were forced to live under a foreign ruler, just as Israel lived under the control of the king of Egypt. This intolerable situation fueled the fires of rebellion because the people living under the oppressive policies of Solomon bore the brunt of their king’s grandiose ambitions.

Solomon was able to carry out his ambitious building program and his commercial ventures by means of a harsh program of taxation and the exploitation of the citizenry through labor for the government.

To pay for all these programs, Solomon divided the kingdom into twelve districts for the purpose of taxation. Each district had an officer in charge who was responsible for providing for the needs of the palace for one month (see Part 4 of this study).

Another method Solomon used to provide for the expenses of the government and for the manual labor for his building program was the establishment of a program of forced labor. Solomon’s oppressive program of forced labor will be discussed in Part 6 of this series of studies.


Other Studies in this Series:

Solomon and Social Oppression - Part 1

Solomon and Social Oppression - Part 2

Solomon and Social Oppression - Part 3

Solomon and Social Oppression - Part 4


Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.

Tags: ,

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, October 23, 2010

The Miners’ Goddess

Image: Goddess Hathor






According to a report published in Al Ahram Weekly, there was an attempt at stealing a statue of the goddess Hathor, the ancient Egyptian protector of miners. The following is an excerpt from the article:

As world attention was focussed on a gold and copper mine in Chile, it emerged that there may have been a failed bid to steal one of the remaining sandstone statues of the goddess Hathor, the ancient Egyptian protector of miners. Nevine El-Aref accompanied the statues as they were transferred to a Sinai gallery for restoration

Some few thousand years ago, ancient Egyptians made their way overland to the Sinai peninsula -- or travelled there across the Red Sea -- in search of minerals. Their chief targets were the turquoise and copper veins which had been mined in the Sinai mountains since time immemorial.

Once they had achieved mastery over Sinai, the Egyptian overseers set up a large and systematic mining operation at Serabit Al-Khadim in South Sinai, where they carved out great quantities of turquoise which was so highly valued that it became an important part of ritual symbolism in their religious ceremonies. Even today, pure, unveined turquoise is weight-for-weight more costly than gold.

To mine the turquoise the Egyptians would hollow out large galleries in the mountains, carving at the entrance to each as a representation of the reigning Pharaoh who was the symbol of the authority of the Egyptian state over the mines

Read the article in its entirety by clicking here.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.


Tags: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Fire at Virginia Theological Seminary

Dr. Stephen L. Cook reported on his blog that a catastrophic fire that started about 4 PM on Friday, October 22, 2010 destroyed the Virginia Theological Seminary’s chapel.



You can see a video of the fire here.

There is another video of the fire here.

We should pray for the Christian family at Virginia Theological Seminary.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.


Tags:










Bookmark and Share

The Walls of Nineveh




Photo: The Walls of Nineveh
Photograph: by Randy Olson
Courtesy: National Geographic



National Geographic has compiled a list of twelve ancient landmarks that are on the verge of vanishing. Among them are the walls of the ancient city of Nineveh.

Below is how National Geographic describes the situation with the walls of ancient Nineveh:

The rebuilt gates and mud-brick walls around the ancient city of Nineveh, near modern-day Mosul, Iraq, are popular tourist attractions.

Nineveh was the capital of the Assyrian Empire from 705 to 612 B.C., but the city was reduced to rubble by attacks from Medes, Babylonians, and Susianians. Archaeologists found the "lost" city in the mid-19th century and began excavations and reconstructions.

Still—like many of the sites on the Global Heritage Fund list—Nineveh suffers from the pressures of modern society. "At site after site after site, you are losing half the site to new development, encroachment, [and] you're getting looting of the site," the group's Morgan said. "We are not even talking about natural disasters."

Read more about the twelve ancient landmarks on the verge of vanishing by visiting National Geographic online.


Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.


Tags: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Friday, October 22, 2010

The Interpretation of Scriptures

The Jerusalem Institute for Advanced Studies has announced a program to study the interpretation of scripture through Jewish, Christian and Muslim perspectives:

A joint research project headed by Rabbi Mordechai Cohen of Yeshiva University and Professor Meir Bar-Asher at Jerusalem’s Hebrew University has launched a comparative study of early
Biblical scholarship in the world’s three major monotheistic faiths.

The study, which began September 1 at the Jerusalem Institute for Advanced Studies, examines early Jewish, Christian and Muslim strategies of Scriptural reading and their contemporary implications.

Researchers are focusing on ways in which Scripture was understood by – and at the same time shaped – the literature, learning and culture of the three faith communities. The project runs through February 28, 2011.

Read more about this program here.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.

Tags: ,

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, October 21, 2010

Lesley Stahl, 60 Minutes, and Jerusalem

Ricki Hollander, writing an article for The Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America has a review of Lesley Stahl’s “60 Minutes” segment on Jerusalem. The review criticizes Lesley Stahl for presenting a distorted view of the Jewish ties to the city of Jerusalem.

The following is an excerpt from the review:

The efforts to delegitimize Israel's claim to Jerusalem have generally been limited to Arab and Muslim leaders, but recently, international media outlets have jumped on board to support them. The latest one to join the fray is Lesley Stahl of CBS News's "60 Minutes" in an October 17th segment entitled "Controversy in Jerusalem: The City Of David."

Ms. Stahl did not bother to engage in any serious journalism, research or fact-checking. She simply followed the playbook of Time Magazine, the Economist, and BBC's “Panorama” with a "paint-by-numbers" exercise calling on the same cast of characters, repeating the same distorted claims and reading from the same overall script. Parroting colleagues at the aforementioned media outlets, Ms. Stahl demonstrated how to promote Arab political propaganda with shoddy and partisan journalism:

1) Characterize it as "controversial" for Israel to publicize archeological findings of Israelite history in Jerusalem, discredit the field of biblical archeology and dismiss archeological excavations as something run by a "settler organization."

According to Ms. Stahl:

It's controversial that the City of David uses discoveries to try to confirm what's in the Bible, particularly from the time of David, the king who made Jerusalem his capital...

...But for all the talk of King David, one thing is glaringly missing here at the City of David. There`s actually no evidence of David, right?

Read the article in its entirety here.

People who saw the “60 Minutes” segment on Jerusalem and even those who did not watch the program should read this article in order to understand the issues involved in the controversy between Arabs and Jews over the city of Jerusalem.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.


Tags: , , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Did Solomon Discover America?

An article published in Arutz Sheva argues that it is possible that Solomon's sailors traveled to America many years before Christopher Columbus.

The same article also argues that Cherokee legends say that some of the Jews who escaped from Masada became the Cherokees. One example cited in the article for Jewish presence in the New World is a coin from the time of the Bar Kochba revolt found at a site along the Ohio River.

The following is an excerpt from the article:

There are many similarities to Judaism in some Native American tribes, specifically the Cherokee nation. The Cherokees were monotheistic, believing in one G-d, as opposed to other Indian tribes who believed in several gods/spirits. Some of the words in the Cherokee's language are similar to Hebrew words of the same meaning, and the name of their G-d was similar to the Hebrew name of G-d. The Cherokee Indians also celebrated their holidays akin to some Jewish holidays. They also had one day a week of rest from work, and observed fasts. They reportedly practiced circumcision, had a city of refuge for man-slayers, and they didn't eat the meat of the hollow of the thigh of an animal. In addition, their appearance also hints of a possible Jewish ancestry; their 2 braids at the side of their head resembling long sidelocks (payot), the fringes on their clothes resembling TzitTzit (the 'ritual fringes' a Jewish man wears on his 4 cornered garment), and some Cherokees clearly had semitic facial features.

Read the article in its entirety here.

Personally, I do not believe that Solomon’s sailors visited the New World. The information in the article can be explained in other ways, without resorting to the theory of ancient Jewish sailors traveling the Mississippi River or the Sicarii who escaped from Masada coming to America.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.


Tags: , ,

Bookmark and Share

A Jewish Dilemma: To Open or to Close on Shabbat?

The National Museum of American Jewish History was faced with a dilemma even before it opened its doors. The issue was: should the Museum open on Saturday, the Jewish Sabbath, or should the museum close on Shabbat and thus observe Jewish law?

Faced with a difficult decision, the Board of Directors of the Museum “reached a distinctly American resolution on the matter.”

Read more about this “distinctly American resolution” to be problem by reading the article in its entirety here.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.

Tags: ,

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, October 20, 2010

A Pledge of Loyalty from Tayinat

According to an article published in The Independent (U.K.), archaeologists excavating a 2,700 year old temple at Tayinat, an ancient city in southeastern Turkey, “have discovered evidence that its inhabitants prominently displayed a tablet which bore a pledge of loyalty to the heir of an Assyrian king.”

The following is an excerpt from the article published in The Independent:

The city of Tayinat was built on the Amuq plain, on the Orontes River near the modern day Syrian border. The Assyrian Empire conquered it in 738 BC, with a governor being appointed to oversee it. The city's temple is about 12 meters by six meters in size, and pre-dates the conquest. The excavations at Tayinat are led by Professor Tim Harrison of the University of Toronto.

The discovery of the tablets adds new insight into how the Assyrians controlled Tayinat. Using careful field recording and textual analysis the team discovered that it was elevated on a platform in the temple’s cella, a part of the building also known as the “holy of holies.”

The oath declares that the city’s governor, and possibly other citizens, would recognize Ashurbanipal as the heir to the throne of the Assyrian Empire, after his father’s (king Esarhaddon's) death. Nearly identical oaths have been found at the site of Nimrud in modern day Iraq.

“You shall protect him in country and in town, fall and die for him. You shall speak with him in the truth of your heart, give him sound advice loyally, and smooth his way in every respect,” the oaths read. A long list of curses is cast upon anyone who breaks the oath.

The presence of the oath tablet at Tayinat affirms Ashurbanipal’s claim that his father caused all the people of Assyria, great and small, to take the oath,” said team epigrapher Professor Jacob Lauinger of John Hopkins University.

Read the article in its entirety here.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.

Tags: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

The Dead Sea Scrolls Online



Image: A Fragment of the Deuteronomy Scroll

Device Magazine has an excellent article about Google’s project to digitize the Dead Sea Scrolls. The Dead Sea Scrolls Digital Library "will include hi-resolution and multi spectra images of the entire collection — 900 manuscripts that have some 30,000 Dead Sea Scrolls fragments."

The article includes several pictures of the Dead Sea Scroll manuscripts. Among the pictures in the article, there is one of the Deuteronomy Scroll with the Ten Commandments.

Read the article here.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.


Tags: ,

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

Drought and the Dead Sea

A video produced by the BBC shows how the water level in the Dead Sea is diminishing and how the Dead Sea’s future is in danger.

Watch the video here.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.

Tags:

Bookmark and Share

A Tragedy in the Making: Crystal Cathedral Files for Bankruptcy

As I reported several months ago, the Crystal Cathedral, the church founded in the mid-1950s by Robert H. Schuller, was facing a financial crisis. Now, the church has filled for bankruptcy because of a debt that exceeds $43 million.

Read more about the situation of the Crystal Cathedral here.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.


Tags:

Bookmark and Share

The Dead Sea Scrolls Online

Google has announced that it will put the Dead Sea Scrolls online. According to a press release, the scrolls will be put online in both the original language and in translation.

Read the press release here.

UPDATE: Read this more detailed article which contains pictures of many of the manuscripts.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary



If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.


Tags: ,

Bookmark and Share

Monday, October 18, 2010

Is Jerusalem the City of David?

Watch Lesley Stahl from 60 Minutes report from under the city of Jerusalem from a controversial archeological dig that has become a flashpoint in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The video is a segment that first appeared on 60 Minutes.

WARNING: The video is sponsored by Viagra and there is a commercial for Viagra at the beginning of the video.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.


Tags: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Solomon and Social Oppression - Part 4

When Solomon became king, he saw the need to modernize a country which for centuries had an agricultural basis for its economy. Saul and David were not forced upon the people as kings, but they were chosen by popular acclamation in order to deal with the oppressive situation imposed by Philistine domination. Solomon, however, came into power through palace intrigue and a struggle for power. Thus, tribal influence upon his policies was minimal.

With the establishment of the monarchy, the modernization of the machinery of the state became imperative if the nation was to survive as a political entity and if Israel was to continue to consolidate itself as a nation in the Ancient Near East. This process of modernization impelled both David and Solomon to search for models which could provide the foundation for a stable government and the basis for expansion and consolidation.

Since Israel had been an agricultural society, David and Solomon looked to those nations which had stable government and which were modern by comparison. They took from these nations the institutions which appeared to enable them to generate power. These changes did mean the destruction of old forms of government, institutions, and tribal traditions, and would be costly both in material and personal ways, but they were willing to pay the price.

Modernization is a process by which institutions adapt themselves to changing functions or pressures for expansion. This process can be at the same time creative and destructive. However, modernization provides new opportunities and prospects for transformation but at a high price in human dislocations and suffering. In the formation of states, the models adopted by leaders for modernizing a new nation, except in societies that were the first to modernize, are always derived in a considerable degree from outside of their own society.

Thus, in establishing the kingdom, Solomon took upon himself the oriental role of the absolute monarch who could do no wrong. He brought foreign patterns of government drawn from the Egyptians and the Canaanites. He depended on builders, artisans, and assorted specialists who provided a foreign model for his temple and palace. He depended on Phoenician sailors for the development of his maritime enterprises. He dealt with foreign merchants and he brought heavy taxation and a despised system of forced labor to Israel.

Beyond these policies, Solomon weakened tribal loyalty by integrating the Canaanite population into the state. Israel did not cease being a farming nation, but a commercia1 and industrial structure was imposed on the traditionally pastoral Israelite society. The many building projects established by Solomon must have drawn thousands of people from the villages into the main cities, cutting many of them away from their tribal ties and ancient traditions and reducing agricultural production. In Jerusalem, an urban culture heretofore unknown in Israel developed from which evolved a group of privileged individuals who had a higher standard of living than most other citizens. These privileged individuals were a class of non-producers. They composed the royal retinue, the nobles, the merchants and the soldiers: a class of people who were dependent mostly on the peasant population, who produced most of the goods to satisfy their needs.

It is obvious that in the process of modernizing the nation, Solomon had practically ended tribal independence, for the state, not the covenant became the guarantor and the basis of social obligations. The tribes were now under central control; they had political obligations to a government that was outside of the sphere of their influence. As a consequence of these oppressive acts by Solomon, there developed a great social unrest in Israel. The nation itself felt involved in the justice or injustice of the king; one important aspect of the king was his responsibility for the administration of justice within the realm.

Solomon's commercial policies, his building programs, and his extravagant court life brought prosperity mostly to the inhabitants of Jerusalem and those associated one way or the other with Solomon and his projects. The noble families and the many leaders of Judah received certain privileges not afforded to others. This sense of unfairness increased the tension between Solomon and the oppressed peoples, between the northern and the southern tribes.

The absorption of the Canaanite population brought into Israelite society thousands of people of feudal background, people who had no notion of covenant law, to whom class distinction was a matter of fact. Meanwhile, the growth of a wealthy class increased the gap between rich and poor. Thus, there developed in Israel a proletariat composed of hired labor, slaves, poor and marginalized people who were seen by the aristocracy as subjects to be possessed.

In order to provide for the economic needs of his kingdom, Solomon implemented a system of taxation dividing the northern tribes into twelve districts, of which only five resembled anything like the old tribal boundaries. Solomon designed new boundaries for the districts in order to weaken tribal loyalties and to bring all the separate tribes into one nation under a central authority.

The division of the tribes into districts for the purpose of taxation was not warmly received by the people. One of the reasons for this discontent, apart from the heavy taxation imposed by Solomon, was the fact that the southern tribe of Judah was not included among the districts. Judah was considered a separate entity and it was administered independently from the other tribes, a situation which only served to increase the hostility between the northern and southern tribes.

The responsibility of each of the twelve district officials was to administer the collection of taxes to supply the needs of the court. According to 1 Kings 4:7, the twelve officers “supplied provisions for the king and the royal household. Each one had to provide supplies for one month in the year.” According to 1 Kings 4:27-28 (Hebrew: 1 Kings 5:7-8), “The district officers, each in his month, supplied provisions for King Solomon and all who came to the king's table. They saw to it that nothing was lacking. They also brought to the proper place their quotas of barley and straw for the chariot horses and the other horses.”

The taxes provided by the districts were designed to support Solomon and the members of the royal family, his royal officials, the military establishment, for the expenses of the state, and to provide for international trade. According to 1 Kings 4:22-23 (Hebrew: 1 Kings 5:2-3), the daily provisions for Solomon’s court required much from the people: “The daily food requirements for Solomon's palace were 150 bushels of choice flour and 300 bushels of meal; oxen from the fattening pens, 20 pasture-fed cattle, 100 sheep or goats, as well as deer, gazelles, roe deer, and choice poultry.”

Judah does not seem to have any part in this taxation system, which meant that the burden rested totally on Israel. Marvin Sweeney, in his commentary on I & II Kings (Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2007), p. 89, wrote: “Solomon treated the northern tribes differently than Judah. Whereas he apparently ruled Judah directly as his home tribe, he ruled Israel through administrators much as one would rule a foreign or a subject state.”

It is also evident that in the many government reforms and in all the improvements that were implemented, Solomon gave special consideration to Judah, for even though not completely exempt from taxation and forced labor, Judah received most of the benefits from the taxation system established by Solomon.

To be continued.

Other Studies in this Series:

Solomon and Social Oppression - Part 1

Solomon and Social Oppression - Part 2

Solomon and Social Oppression - Part 3


Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.

Tags: ,

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, October 07, 2010

Solomon and Social Oppression - Part 3

Solomon was chosen to succeed David as king of the United Monarchy as the result of a careful strategy developed by Nathan the prophet and Bathsheba, Solomon’s mother.

When Solomon became king, the political climate at home and abroad was one of moderate peace and stability. David had secured his kingdom and the kingdom was not experiencing any major military threat from its neighbors, particularly Egypt.

The political weakness of Egypt is clearly demonstrated in the political alliance established between the king of Egypt and Solomon. The alliance was ratified by the marriage of Pharaoh’s daughter to Solomon (1 Kings 3:1).

Assyria did not become a political threat to the nations of Canaan for another century. The neighboring nations had become vassals under David or had made political alliances with Solomon. Thus, when Solomon became king, Israel was enjoying a time of great peace and prosperity. The nation was united and Solomon was in complete control of his kingdom. Solomon was able to exploit these conditions to promote economic growth, commercial ventures, and develop a program to build the temple and his palace.

Solomon came to power after a struggle with his half-brother Adonijah. When Adonijah realized that David was too old to continue as king (1 Kings 1:4), he exalted himself and said: “I will be king” (1 Kings 1:5).

Since Adonijah was the oldest surviving son of David, he and the members of David’s court took for granted that he, Adonijah, would be the next king of a united Israel. He gathered unto himself a large retinue, consisting of the political, religious, and military leaders of Israel as well as horsemen and men on chariots.

Among those supporting Adonijah were Joab, the commander of the national army, Abiathar, the high priest who ministered to the Israelite population, the sons of David, and many of the palace officials. This group went to En-rogel and offered sacrifices and proclaimed “Long live King Adonijah” (1 Kings 1:9, 25).

When Nathan the prophet heard that Adonijah had been anointed king, he called Bathsheba and offered her advice on how to deal with this situation. Nathan said to Bathsheba: “Now therefore come, let me give you advice, so that you may save your own life and the life of your son Solomon” (1 Kings 1:12). Nathan and Bathsheba developed a plan to persuade David to select Solomon as the next king of Israel instead of Adonijah.

Some of the people who supported the kingship of Solomon were probably not Israelites. Nathan, the prophet, was a man whose place of birth and genealogy is unknown. Zadok was a priest who probably represented the Jebusite population of Jerusalem. Benaiah was the commander of the mercenary army which was composed of the Cherethites (Cretans) and the Pelethites (the Philistines). Bathsheba was the former wife of Uriah the Hittite, one of the elite warriors in David’s army.

Solomon was brought to the Gihon Spring (1 Kings 1:33) on David’s mule and there he was anointed king in a hasty ceremony orchestrated by the group which supported Solomon and with the tacit approval of David. Because Solomon had the support of the mercenary troops as well as the support of David and most of the palace establishment, he was able to be proclaimed king, even though there was no apparent popular support for his election.

Throughout the narrative of Solomon’s accession to the throne, the text presents Solomon as a passive instrument in the hands of others, a man who did not do anything to ensure his own selection as king over his half-brother Adonijah.

After the death of David, Solomon now moved from a passive to an active role in the story. Solomon moved swiftly to establish and secure his kingdom by eliminating those who posed a threat to his throne. By the hands of Benaiah, Solomon killed Adonijah and Joab. He banished Abiathar to his ancestral home in Anathoth. Thus, by removing those who posed a threat to his throne, “ the kingdom was established in the hand of Solomon” (1Kings 2:46).

Solomon ruled with absolute power and without concern for the ancient social and religious traditions of Israel, caring little for the well-being of the people. Solomon was a very ambitious and selfish man. The lavish palace life and the extravagant lifestyle of the court reflect the ambitious accomplishments of Solomon and his disregard for the oppressive situation in which the people lived.

Surrounded by the wealth David left behind and not worried about attacks from neighboring nations and the great empires of the Ancient Near East, Solomon was able to turn his full attention to establishing his kingdom, developing the economy of Israel through trade, commercial ventures, and taxation. Solomon also began a building program that would become the source of pride and symbol of unity for the united kingdom.

It is precisely at this point that the reader begins to see another side of Solomon. Solomon faced a problem with which he would struggle throughout his reign. How can Solomon maintain the glory of his kingdom and develop such a huge building program with the limited resources available to him? How could Solomon maintain his faithfulness to Yahweh and yet satisfy the needs of his many wives, when most of them worshiped other gods? These are some of the questions with which the writer of the book of Kings wrestled as he wrote the story of Solomon’s kingdom and these are some of the questions I will address in future posts.

The words of Samuel to the elders of Israel about the evils of kingship became a reality with the oppressive policies of Solomon. Warning the elders about the oppressive policies of the king, Samuel said:

“These will be the ways of the king who will reign over you: he will take your sons and appoint them to his chariots and to be his horsemen, and to run before his chariots; and he will appoint for himself commanders of thousands and commanders of fifties, and some to plow his ground and to reap his harvest, and to make his implements of war and the equipment of his chariots. He will take your daughters to be perfumers and cooks and bakers. He will take the best of your fields and vineyards and olive orchards and give them to his courtiers. He will take one-tenth of your grain and of your vineyards and give it to his officers and his courtiers. He will take your male and female slaves, and the best of your cattle and donkeys, and put them to his work. He will take one-tenth of your flocks, and you shall be his slaves.” (1 Samuel 8:11-17).

These things Solomon did and much more.

To be continued.

Other Studies in this Series:

Solomon and Social Oppression - Part 1

Solomon and Social Oppression - Part 2

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.

Tags: ,

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, October 06, 2010

The Hebrew Bible for the iPhone

Davka Corporation has announced the release of Totally Tanach, the Hebrew/English Bible study app for the iPhone and the iPad. Totally Tanach features verse-by-verse synchronization of English, Hebrew and Rashi’s commentary, and perfect positioning of Hebrew vowels and cantillation marks.

A press release describes Totally Tanach: “Users can browse and study all 24 books of the Bible – from Genesis through Chronicles – search the texts with the program’s Hebrew search function, and bookmark and email selections for future reference. Totally Tanach is an ideal study tool for all students of the Hebrew Bible.”

You can read more about Totally Tanach here.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.

Tags: ,

Bookmark and Share

The James Ossuary and the Trial of Oded Golan



Image: The James Ossuary



The trial of Oded Golan is coming to an end. The defense has presented its argument and the case has gone to the judge to render his decision.

The case against Golan is whether the ossuary containing a Hebrew inscription that reads “James son of Joseph brother of Jesus” is authentic. This burial box was discovered in 2002. If the ossuary is authentic, then it may have a direct link to James, the brother of Jesus.

However, archaeologists at the Israel Antiquities Authority have declared the ossuary to be a forgery. Oded Golan, an antique collector, was charged in 2004 with faking the ossuary and other archaeological artifacts.

The judge in the Golan case, Judge Aharon Farkash, is expected to submit his ruling in a few months. He must decide on issues that the experts themselves could not agree. His decision will have a huge impact on the future of the market for archaeological artifacts.

A recent article on this case summarizes the implication of the judge’s ruling:


The criminal, scholarly and scientific implications of his verdict are immense. If genuine, the artifacts are of historic importance and worth millions. An acquittal would be a severe setback for the Israel Antiquities Authority and its special investigators, who accused Golan and his co-defendants of making millions of dollars as part of an international chain of forgers planting sophisticated fakes in the world's museums.

An acquittal would also be an acute embarrassment for the isotope experts at the Israel Geological Survey and professor Yuval Goren of Tel Aviv University, who spent many days on the stand defending scientific tests that they said showed the items must be fakes.

A guilty verdict, on the other hand, would destroy the reputation of one of the world's leading collectors of biblical antiquities and drive the entire Israeli market underground. The Israel Antiquities Authority has made no secret of its desire to shut down the trade in Bible-era artifacts, which it believes encourages grave robbers, who spirit the choicest finds out of the country.

Government officials and many scholars say the market is riddled with forgeries, and they are skeptical of any item that does not come from a licensed, supervised excavation where its provenance can be proved.

But Golan said he had never seen a forgery that wasn't immediately obvious and pointed out that some of Israel's greatest archaeological treasures came from dealers. Indeed, the most striking example is one of the most important biblical finds ever: the Dead Sea Scrolls, which a Bedouin shepherd sold to an Israeli professor half a century ago.

Read more about this case here.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.


Tags: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Scofield and the Age of the Universe

David Heddle has a fascinating post on Scofield and the age of the universe. If you use the Scofield notes or even if you do not, this post will show you something interesting about the Scofield Bible.

HT: Darrell Pursiful

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.

Tags: , , ,


Bookmark and Share

My Study Bible

LifeWay, the publishing arm of the Southern Baptist Convention, has launched a new online study Bible to help Christians study the Bible and gain a deeper knowledge of Scriptures.

The new study Bible is available at MyStudyBible.com. The site offers two versions of the Bible: the Holman Christian Standard Bible (HCSB) and the King James Version. It also offers study notes, dictionaries, commentaries, and word studies.

The study Bible is available here.

The site also provides a video explaining the many features available on the site.



Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary

If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.

Tags:

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, October 05, 2010

The Tea Enhancement Act

Philip R. O'Connor has written an amazing piece of Americana. This item was published in the Chicago Tribune, on Sunday, October 3, 2010:

President George Washington signed the Tea Enhancement Act (TEA) requiring all Americans over the age of 12 to partake weekly of the stimulating beverage at a tea shoppe or pay a tax penalty. Penalty funds will be used to buy tea for low-income citizens and small businesses. "Regularly taking tea together will honor the brave men who carried out the Boston Tea Party, even though in their enthusiasm they insensitively impersonated Native Americans and polluted Boston Harbor," said the president. "Tea kept us warm at Valley Forge and I believe that tea, rather than foul-tasting coffee, should be our national drink." A New York senator supported the law, saying that "making tea parties mandatory will prevent some extremist group in the future from nefariously purloining the tea party brand.

George Washington did not know that in the future, most Americans would prefer “foul-tasting coffee” rather than tea.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.


Tags: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Israeli Scientist Fired. The Issue: Creation vs. Evolution

From Israel Today:

Dr. Gabi Avital, the chief scientist of Israel’s Education Ministry, was fired on Monday after reiterating his position that evolution is just a theory, and that it should be taught alongside creationism as the two most widely held beliefs regarding how our world originated.

In an interview with Israel’s Ma’ariv newspaper last month, Avital insisted that “the conditions [for life on earth] were not accidental. [Charles] Darwin was a great scientist, but he took his theory in dangerous directions, and we need to teach the flaws of that theory, too.”

Speaking to Israel National News a day after being fired, Avital insisted the education of Israel’s young people is incomplete because it does not take into account the “numerous studies that refute the science of evolution” and show that a human being is not just a “substance without a soul.”

Shortly after being appointed to the post of chief scientist in December 2009, Avital advocated for adding creationism to the school curriculum.

Read the article in its entirety here.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.


Tags: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Friday, October 01, 2010

Herod’s Theater Box

Israeli archaeologists have excavated a lavish, private theater box in a 400-seat facility at King Herod's winter palace in the Judean desert, the team's head said Tuesday.

Ehud Netzer of Jerusalem's Hebrew University said the room provides further evidence of King Herod's famed taste for extravagance.

Herod commissioned Roman artists to decorate the theater walls with elaborate paintings and plaster moldings around 15 B.C., Netzer said. Its upper portions feature paintings of windows overlooking a river and a seascape with a large sailboat.

Read the more about this archaeological discovery here (photos included)..

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.

Tags: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Do you speak Babylonian?

In this brief audio, Assyriologist Martin Worthington explains how the sound of ancient Babylonian language was recreated.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.

Tags: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Reading the Epilogue to the Code of Hammurabi

Do you know Akkadian?

In this brief audio, Aage Westenholz reads the Epilogue to the Code of Hammurabi in its original Akkadian language.

Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary


If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.

Tags: , , ,

Bookmark and Share