Today I would like to offer some of you a free seminary course. If you are an alum of Northern Seminary, you are able to audit one course each year for free. Auditing a course is a great way to continue learning or gain knowledge and practice in an area of ministry you feel more education would be helpful.
Today I begin a course in the area of Old Testament Theology. The title of the course is: “The God of the Old Testament.” This course will help students understand ancient Israel’s religious ideas and beliefs. The focus of this course will be on Israel’s understanding of their God.
Some of the topics to be covered during the quarter will include the following: God and the “Gods,” God and Creation, Election and Covenant, Worship and Sacrifice, Kingship in Israel, Ethics and Ethical Questions, God and the Future, and God and the Nations.
If you are an alum of Northern Seminary or if you are interested in taking this course, visit our web page at www.seminary. edu and let us know that you are interested in taking this course. If you are not an alum of Northern Seminary, just send me an email and I will be in contact with you as soon as possible.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Hebrew Bible, Old Testament Theology
This blog is a Christian perspective on the Old Testament and Current Events from Dr. Claude Mariottini, Professor of Old Testament at Northern Baptist Seminary.
Thursday, March 31, 2011
Utensils in the Hebrew Bible

The Het Oudtestamentisch Werkgezelschap (the Dutch Society for Old Testament Studies) has made available an important study resource that is available free online in PDF format.
This resource is called the כלי Database: Utensils in the Hebrew Bible. The Database provides information on tools, utensils and other implements mentioned in the Bible.
Below is an introduction to the Database:
The problem with identifying utensils in the Hebrew Bible is that their common everyday use made it superfluous to provide detailed descriptions of the vessels or implements in written form. Everyone knew from experience what was meant. As a result dictionaries of biblical Hebrew often have to content themselves with non-descript generalisations like "bowl", "jar", "pot", "knife". Mostly the shape and purpose of a given utensil can not be established on the basis of context alone because the number of occurrences is too low. Archaeology has brought to light large quantities of pottery and implements, but in many cases we do not know which word in ancient Hebrew was used for the object unearthed.
Meanwhile the possibilities for resolving such problems have increased dramatically. Not only archaeology, but also comparative linguistics, iconography, anthropology, improved understanding of the ancient versions of the Bible have enhanced our chances to come closer to the precise nature of the objects.
The Database will become an invaluable Hebrew resource for pastors and students of the Hebrew Bible. You can view the Database here.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Hebrew Bible, Hebrew Tools
Wednesday, March 30, 2011
Christopher Hitchens and the Beginning of Hope
Christopher Hitchens, the notorious atheist, is crediting evangelical Francis Collins for providing him with some hope in the treatment of his cancer. Hitchens, who wrote a book titled God is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything, is dying with esophageal cancer.
Last year Collins wrote an article for The Washington Post titled “Everybody Pray for Hitchens Day.” I have also called Christians to pray for Hitchens.
In an interview, Hitchens said that "he will not convert on his deathbed unless he is 'very ill' or 'half demented, either by drugs or pain where I wouldn’t have control over what I say.'"
Even in Hitchens’ denial we see the beginning of hope.
Read the story here.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Christopher Hitchens, Francis Collins
Last year Collins wrote an article for The Washington Post titled “Everybody Pray for Hitchens Day.” I have also called Christians to pray for Hitchens.
In an interview, Hitchens said that "he will not convert on his deathbed unless he is 'very ill' or 'half demented, either by drugs or pain where I wouldn’t have control over what I say.'"
Even in Hitchens’ denial we see the beginning of hope.
Read the story here.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Christopher Hitchens, Francis Collins
God Feminine – A Hidden Side of the Biblical God

Image: Anthropomorphic Female Figurine: Symbol of Fertility Religion
“God Feminine – A Hidden Side of the Biblical God” was the title of an exhibition presented in the Museum für sakrale Kunst (Jesuitenkirche), Heidelberg, Germany, on October 10 through December 19, 2010.
Olaf Rölver, from the University of Bamberg, Germany, has written a review of the exhibit. Below are a few excerpts from the review. The review was translated into English by Robert Schick.
Origin
The exhibit “Gott weiblich – eine verborgene Seite des biblischen Gottes” “God Feminine – A Hidden Side of the Biblical God” is a loanable, traveling exhibit that has been shown so far in the Museum für Kunst und Geschichte in Fribourg, Switzerland (2007/2008), in the diocesan museums in Rottenburg (2008) and Bamberg (2010) as well as in the Museum für sakrale Kunst und Liturgie (Jesuitenkirche) in Heidelberg. It is based on the collection of the project Bibel + Orient Museum in Fribourg, and was conceived by Dr. Othmar Keel, who was also the curator along with Dr. Thomas Staubli.
Goal
The exhibit has a message that is primarily theological: against the dominant discourse of God as ‘Father’ and ‘Lord’ it seeks to show that the images of God that the Christians usually made have a flip side regarding God’s gender. God is not to be conceived as one-sided and exclusively masculine. Rather, feminine sides must also be integrated into any human attempt to conceive of the divine (fig. 1). Within church discourse, the exhibit places a provocative finger in the wound of continuing gender inequality
The figure 1 mentioned in the review, represented by the image above, is one of the many “voluptuous anthropomorphic female figurines [which] are symbols of the fertility of the land and of the life of people and animals.”
The review of the exhibition contains several images symbolizing the concept of God feminine and fertility religion. You can see the images and read the review here.
It is important to notice that fertility religion was a characteristic of Canaannite religion. Astarte, the fertility goddess, played a prominent role in Canaanite religion. Archaeology has uncovered iconographic representations of fertility goddesses with exaggerated sexual features as seen in some of the images included in the review of the exhibition.
The influence of Canaanite religion and fertility practices was widespread in Israel and Judah, primarily among the remnant of the Canaanite population that remained from the days of the conquest of the land. However, the prophets strongly condemned fertility religion and the association of Yahweh with the fertility goddess as an alien practice that was a violation of the covenantal faith of Israel.
For additional information about the syncretistic practices of Israel and Judah, read the three posts listed below.
Religious Syncretism in Israel and Judah - Part I
Religious Syncretism in Israel and Judah - Part II
Religious Syncretism in Israel and Judah - Part III
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Syncretism, Fertility Religion, Astarte, Goddess
Do You Understand the King James Bible?
Joel Hoffman has prepared a video to test your knowledge of the King James Bible. Before you watch the video, do the following:
1. Find a pen and paper
2. Write your answers as Joel asks the questions
3. Compare your answers with Joel’s answers
4. Then, decide whether you understand the King James Bible
So, how did you do?
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: King James Bible
1. Find a pen and paper
2. Write your answers as Joel asks the questions
3. Compare your answers with Joel’s answers
4. Then, decide whether you understand the King James Bible
So, how did you do?
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: King James Bible
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Bob Bell’s Love Wins: A Review
The Evangelical Alliance in the UK has published a review of Bob Bell’s new book Love Wins. The review of the book also includes a response in which the Evangelical Alliance presents its position on the nature of hell.
Below is an excerpt from the book review written by Derek Tidball, a member of the Evangelical Alliance:
Read Tidball’s review and the Evangelical Alliance statement on the nature of hell here.
I have not read Love Wins yet, but when I do I will publish my own review of the book.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Bob Bell, Love Wins, Derek Tidball, Evangelical Alliance
Below is an excerpt from the book review written by Derek Tidball, a member of the Evangelical Alliance:
Love Wins is full of confusing half-truths - and each of those words is important!
Love Wins contains truth. It's true that "the indestructible love of God is an unfolding, dynamic reality" and we're all "endlessly being invited to trust, accept, believe, embrace and experience it". Much of what he says about the cross is straight out of the Bible. His criticism of some evangelicals for their superficial and misplaced judgmentalism rings true. He's right: biblical teaching on heaven and 'the age to come' is misrepresented if all it does is encourage some to boast, "I've got a ticket to heaven". The Bible presents Christ's work as much wider than the salvation of a few individuals. It is about the restoration and renewal of a fallen creation. Eternal life doesn't start "when we die but is about a quality of life lived now'. Amen to that. But I learned that in the Brethren Assembly where I grew up, many decades ago! There are many 'Jesuses' being spoken about and it's vital we get the authentic one and not one of our own creation. All this and much more is true.
Love Wins however only presents half the truth, which is disturbing to those who believe in the other half of the truth. Old Testament verses are strung together which speak of God's grace triumphing over Israel's sin and that their punishment will have a 'sale by' date. But he never mentions repentance in this connection as the prophets do, nor the fact that it was a remnant restored to the homeland. His teaching on hell ducks some hard issues while firing out a lot of questions of his own. God's wrath, and his holiness, is touched on only very inadequately and insubstantially. He says the sacrificial understanding of the cross belongs to a primitive cultural world we no longer inhabit, so he sidesteps a key understanding of the cross. He assumes that people will come round to accept God's love in the end, and doesn't see why death is the irreversible cut-off point. But why does he think people will 'repent' after death when they haven't done so before? He uses some parables that appear to fit his argument but ignores others and uses them all in a somewhat interesting way.
Read Tidball’s review and the Evangelical Alliance statement on the nature of hell here.
I have not read Love Wins yet, but when I do I will publish my own review of the book.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Bob Bell, Love Wins, Derek Tidball, Evangelical Alliance
Christian Writing from the First Century
Image: Early Christian BookThe BBC is reporting that a Bedouin has found in a cave in Jordan more than 70 books that may be Christian writing from the first century. According to the report, the books may be almost 2,000 years old.
Preliminary study of the writings indicates that the content of the books may provide information about the death and resurrection of Christ.
The director of the Jordan’s Department of Antiquities said the books were written by Christian disciples a few years immediately after Christ’s crucifixion.
Below is an excerpt from the article in which Philip David gives his interpretation of the finding:
Philip Davies, Emeritus Professor of Old Testament Studies at Sheffield University, says the most powerful evidence for a Christian origin lies in plates cast into a picture map of the holy city of Jerusalem.This finding is a very important archaeological discovery because if the books are from the early days of Christianity, then these documents may indeed provide vital information about how the early Christians understood the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.
"As soon as I saw that, I was dumbstruck. That struck me as so obviously a Christian image," he says.
"There is a cross in the foreground, and behind it is what has to be the tomb [of Jesus], a small building with an opening, and behind that the walls of the city. There are walls depicted on other pages of these books too and they almost certainly refer to Jerusalem."
It is the cross that is the most telling feature, in the shape of a capital T, as the crosses used by Romans for crucifixion were.
"It is a Christian crucifixion taking place outside the city walls," says Mr. Davies.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Archaeology, Early Christian Writing, Philip Davis
Monday, March 28, 2011
The Prophets of Israel
Today I begin teaching a class on the Major Prophets to my students at Northern Baptist Seminary. Teaching a course on the prophets, especially on Jeremiah, is one of the most pleasant experiences I have as a teacher. The reason for this joy is that the ministry of the prophets of Israel mirrors the work of ministers today.
People today who speak on behalf of God have much to say about the moral, social, and religious conditions of our nation. Like the prophets of old, ministers today can speak on behalf of the poor, the oppressed, and those who are politically weak. Ministers can also speak forcefully against the political structures that diminish the lives of individuals, against the religious practices that are devoid of the fear of God, and the standards of behavior that are destroying the moral foundations of our nation.
One of the marks of true prophets was the call they received from Yahweh to be a prophet. As men and women called by God, the prophets spoke to Israel and Judah on behalf of God. The Hebrew word nabi [נָביא] is translated “prophet” in English, but its literal meaning is “the one who is called.”
Jeremiah emphasized his call when he described his commission to be a prophet of God. Although Jeremiah says that the word of Yahweh came to him on the thirteenth year of Josiah’s reign (Jeremiah 1:2), he understood that his call to the prophetic ministry came even before he was born: “Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, and before you were born I consecrated you; I appointed you a prophet to the nations” (Jeremiah 1:5).
God called people to be prophets in different ways and in different places. Moses was tending his father-in-law’s flock when God called him (Exodus 3:1). The same thing happened to Amos. One day when he was taking care of his flock, the Lord told him: “Go, prophesy to my people Israel” (Amos 7:15). Isaiah was called when he was worshiping in the temple (Isaiah 6:1), and Samuel was called one night while he was sleeping (1 Samuel 3:3).
Human response to God’s call also varies from individual to individual. Isaiah willingly accepted the call to be a prophet. When God called him, Isaiah responded: “Here am I; send me” (Isaiah 6:8). When God called Jeremiah, Jeremiah resisted God’s call by saying that he was too young to be a prophet (Jeremiah 1:6). When God called Moses, he rejected God’s call by saying: “O my Lord, please send someone else” (Exodus 4:13). When Jonah received his call, he fled “from the presence of the LORD” (Jonah 1:3).
However, most prophets never mentioned their call to the ministry. It is possible that in Israel some people refused the call to be a prophet. Others, like Jeremiah, resisted the call only to respond at a later time. Although many of the prophets who appear in the Hebrew Bible received a call from Yahweh, the fact that they left no record of their call does not indicate they did not have a personal encounter with God. These prophets were called by God and sent with a mission and a message to Israel. Habakkuk, for instance, received a vision from Yahweh, but left no written statement declaring how the Lord spoke to him.
Another characteristic of the prophets of Israel was that they were called to proclaim the word of Yahweh to Israel. When God called Jeremiah, the Lord told him: “I have put my words in your mouth” (Jeremiah 1:9). The Lord also told Jeremiah: “You shall speak whatever I command you” (Jeremiah 1:7). When the unknown prophet of the exile was called to proclaim the words of Yahweh to the people who were exiled in Babylon, he asked: “What shall I proclaim?” And the voice of the Lord told him the message he was to proclaim: “[Proclaim that] all people are grass, their constancy is like the flower of the field” (Isaiah 40:6).
Each prophet received a special message from Yahweh. When the prophet spoke, it was the message of Yahweh he spoke. In their proclamation, the prophets confronted the people of Israel with their rebellion against Yahweh and their violation of the demands of the covenant.
The outcome of the message the prophets proclaimed depended on the response of the people. If they repented, the Lord would change his mind and forgive the people. When the Lord told Jeremiah to write down his sermons and read them in the temple, the Lord told Jeremiah: “It may be that when the house of Judah hears of all the disasters that I intend to do to them, all of them may turn from their evil ways, so that I may forgive their iniquity and their sin” (Jeremiah 36:3).
However, if the people refused to listen to the word of Yahweh in the mouth of his prophets, then judgment would come upon the nation. In explaining the fall of Samaria by the hands of Assyria, the writer of 2 Kings wrote: “The LORD warned Israel and Judah by every prophet and every seer, saying, ‘Turn from your evil ways and keep my commandments and my statutes, in accordance with all the law that I commanded your ancestors and that I sent to you by my servants the prophets.’ They would not listen [because they] were stubborn” (2 Kings 17:13-14).
Another characteristic of the prophets of the Old Testament is that they were able to see historical events in terms of God’s will. The prophets knew that God was at work in history, even when people around them could not understand what God was doing. When the prophet Habakkuk complained about the work of the Chaldeans, the Lord told him: “Look among the nations, and see; wonder and be astounded. For I am doing a work in your days that you will not believe even when you are told” (Habakkuk 1:5).
Jack Lundbom, in his book The Hebrew Prophets (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2010), pp. 20-21 wrote: “Prophets have vision in the broad sense; that is, they have the capacity to perceive things ordinary people cannot perceive. They see that the times are out of joint, that human life before God is far from what it should be, that judgment is forthcoming, and that after judgment they are the first to anticipate Yahweh’s salvation.”
A third characteristic of the prophets of Israel was that they were endowed with the Spirit of God. The prophets were filled with God’s Spirit which gave them the power to act as God’s representative and to speak with divine authority.
An unknown prophet spoke about his mission as a messenger of Yahweh: “The spirit of Lord Yahweh is on me for Yahweh has anointed me. He has sent me to bring the news to the afflicted, to soothe the broken-hearted, to proclaim liberty to captives, release to those in prison, to proclaim a year of favour from Yahweh and a day of vengeance for our God, to comfort all who mourn” (Isaiah 61:1-2 NJB).
In Israel there were prophets who claimed to have the Spirit of God, but their message proved they were false prophets. The prophet Micah spoke of these false prophets as follows: “If a man of the spirit came and invented this lie, ‘I prophesy wine and liquor for you,’ he would be the prophet for a people like this” (Micah 2:11). In contrast to these false prophets and their message, Micah spoke of himself: “But as for me, I am filled with power, with the Spirit of the LORD, and with justice and might, to declare to Jacob his transgression and to Israel his sin” (Micah 3:8).
In Hebrew, the word for “Spirit” is ruah, a word which means “wind.” When addressing the false prophets of his days, Jeremiah played on the double meaning of the word ruah and said that the false prophets, the “men of the spirit,” were nothing but windbags: “The prophets are wind, for the word is not in them” (Jeremiah 5:13).
Another characteristic of the prophets of Israel was that they were intercessors on behalf of Israel. In a sense, a prophet was a mediator between God and the people. In the Old Testament, Moses and Samuel were known as great intercessors (Jeremiah 15:1). Speaking about the false prophets in Judah, Jeremiah affirmed the work of the prophet as an intercessor. Jeremiah said: “If indeed they are prophets, and if the word of the LORD is with them, then let them intercede with the LORD of hosts” (Jeremiah 27:18).
When God called Amos and announced the judgment that was coming upon the Northern Kingdom, Amos interceded on behalf of Israel. Yahweh heard Amos’ prayer and did not send the judgment which Amos had seen in his vision.
The people knew that the prophets were men of prayer. Hezekiah sent messengers to the prophet Isaiah asking him to pray for the people left in Judah (2 Kings 19:1-4). When King Zedekiah and the people of Judah were facing a Babylonian invasion, the king said to Jeremiah: “Intercede for us with Yahweh our God” (Jeremiah 37:3). After the fall of Jerusalem, the military leaders who remained in Judah, fearing for their life, asked Jeremiah to pray for them: “Intercede with Yahweh your God for us” (Jeremiah 42:2).
Since one of the most important works of the prophets was to pray for the people, it is surprising that three times the Lord told Jeremiah not to pray for the people (Jeremiah 7:16, 11:14; 14:11). The Lord told Jeremiah: “You, for your part, must not intercede for this people, nor raise either plea or prayer on their behalf; do not plead with me, for I will not listen to you” (Jeremiah 7:16). The reason for the prohibition was because Yahweh knew that Jeremiah was an intercessor who prayed for the people, and since Yahweh was determined to bring judgment against the people, Yahweh was not willing to answer the prayer of his prophet.
The prophets of Israel taught the people of Israel and believers of all ages how God’s people should live. The message of the prophets was that God demanded justice from his people but that he was willing to forgive them if they turned from their evil ways. The prophet’s message of personal morality and exclusive worship of the true God is one that needs to be heard in the twenty-first century.
Other Studies on the Prophets:
Prophets in Israel
Jeremiah 1:1-10: The Call to Preach
Jeremiah 20:7: The Call to Prophetic Ministry
Jeremiah and Hananiah
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Note: If you cannot see the Hebrew letters, download the biblical fonts (Hebrew and Greek) and install them in your computer. Click here to download the biblical fonts.
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Hebrew Bible, Old Testament, Prophets, Jeremiah, Ministry
People today who speak on behalf of God have much to say about the moral, social, and religious conditions of our nation. Like the prophets of old, ministers today can speak on behalf of the poor, the oppressed, and those who are politically weak. Ministers can also speak forcefully against the political structures that diminish the lives of individuals, against the religious practices that are devoid of the fear of God, and the standards of behavior that are destroying the moral foundations of our nation.
One of the marks of true prophets was the call they received from Yahweh to be a prophet. As men and women called by God, the prophets spoke to Israel and Judah on behalf of God. The Hebrew word nabi [נָביא] is translated “prophet” in English, but its literal meaning is “the one who is called.”
Jeremiah emphasized his call when he described his commission to be a prophet of God. Although Jeremiah says that the word of Yahweh came to him on the thirteenth year of Josiah’s reign (Jeremiah 1:2), he understood that his call to the prophetic ministry came even before he was born: “Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, and before you were born I consecrated you; I appointed you a prophet to the nations” (Jeremiah 1:5).
God called people to be prophets in different ways and in different places. Moses was tending his father-in-law’s flock when God called him (Exodus 3:1). The same thing happened to Amos. One day when he was taking care of his flock, the Lord told him: “Go, prophesy to my people Israel” (Amos 7:15). Isaiah was called when he was worshiping in the temple (Isaiah 6:1), and Samuel was called one night while he was sleeping (1 Samuel 3:3).
Human response to God’s call also varies from individual to individual. Isaiah willingly accepted the call to be a prophet. When God called him, Isaiah responded: “Here am I; send me” (Isaiah 6:8). When God called Jeremiah, Jeremiah resisted God’s call by saying that he was too young to be a prophet (Jeremiah 1:6). When God called Moses, he rejected God’s call by saying: “O my Lord, please send someone else” (Exodus 4:13). When Jonah received his call, he fled “from the presence of the LORD” (Jonah 1:3).
However, most prophets never mentioned their call to the ministry. It is possible that in Israel some people refused the call to be a prophet. Others, like Jeremiah, resisted the call only to respond at a later time. Although many of the prophets who appear in the Hebrew Bible received a call from Yahweh, the fact that they left no record of their call does not indicate they did not have a personal encounter with God. These prophets were called by God and sent with a mission and a message to Israel. Habakkuk, for instance, received a vision from Yahweh, but left no written statement declaring how the Lord spoke to him.
Another characteristic of the prophets of Israel was that they were called to proclaim the word of Yahweh to Israel. When God called Jeremiah, the Lord told him: “I have put my words in your mouth” (Jeremiah 1:9). The Lord also told Jeremiah: “You shall speak whatever I command you” (Jeremiah 1:7). When the unknown prophet of the exile was called to proclaim the words of Yahweh to the people who were exiled in Babylon, he asked: “What shall I proclaim?” And the voice of the Lord told him the message he was to proclaim: “[Proclaim that] all people are grass, their constancy is like the flower of the field” (Isaiah 40:6).
Each prophet received a special message from Yahweh. When the prophet spoke, it was the message of Yahweh he spoke. In their proclamation, the prophets confronted the people of Israel with their rebellion against Yahweh and their violation of the demands of the covenant.
The outcome of the message the prophets proclaimed depended on the response of the people. If they repented, the Lord would change his mind and forgive the people. When the Lord told Jeremiah to write down his sermons and read them in the temple, the Lord told Jeremiah: “It may be that when the house of Judah hears of all the disasters that I intend to do to them, all of them may turn from their evil ways, so that I may forgive their iniquity and their sin” (Jeremiah 36:3).
However, if the people refused to listen to the word of Yahweh in the mouth of his prophets, then judgment would come upon the nation. In explaining the fall of Samaria by the hands of Assyria, the writer of 2 Kings wrote: “The LORD warned Israel and Judah by every prophet and every seer, saying, ‘Turn from your evil ways and keep my commandments and my statutes, in accordance with all the law that I commanded your ancestors and that I sent to you by my servants the prophets.’ They would not listen [because they] were stubborn” (2 Kings 17:13-14).
Another characteristic of the prophets of the Old Testament is that they were able to see historical events in terms of God’s will. The prophets knew that God was at work in history, even when people around them could not understand what God was doing. When the prophet Habakkuk complained about the work of the Chaldeans, the Lord told him: “Look among the nations, and see; wonder and be astounded. For I am doing a work in your days that you will not believe even when you are told” (Habakkuk 1:5).
Jack Lundbom, in his book The Hebrew Prophets (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2010), pp. 20-21 wrote: “Prophets have vision in the broad sense; that is, they have the capacity to perceive things ordinary people cannot perceive. They see that the times are out of joint, that human life before God is far from what it should be, that judgment is forthcoming, and that after judgment they are the first to anticipate Yahweh’s salvation.”
A third characteristic of the prophets of Israel was that they were endowed with the Spirit of God. The prophets were filled with God’s Spirit which gave them the power to act as God’s representative and to speak with divine authority.
An unknown prophet spoke about his mission as a messenger of Yahweh: “The spirit of Lord Yahweh is on me for Yahweh has anointed me. He has sent me to bring the news to the afflicted, to soothe the broken-hearted, to proclaim liberty to captives, release to those in prison, to proclaim a year of favour from Yahweh and a day of vengeance for our God, to comfort all who mourn” (Isaiah 61:1-2 NJB).
In Israel there were prophets who claimed to have the Spirit of God, but their message proved they were false prophets. The prophet Micah spoke of these false prophets as follows: “If a man of the spirit came and invented this lie, ‘I prophesy wine and liquor for you,’ he would be the prophet for a people like this” (Micah 2:11). In contrast to these false prophets and their message, Micah spoke of himself: “But as for me, I am filled with power, with the Spirit of the LORD, and with justice and might, to declare to Jacob his transgression and to Israel his sin” (Micah 3:8).
In Hebrew, the word for “Spirit” is ruah, a word which means “wind.” When addressing the false prophets of his days, Jeremiah played on the double meaning of the word ruah and said that the false prophets, the “men of the spirit,” were nothing but windbags: “The prophets are wind, for the word is not in them” (Jeremiah 5:13).
Another characteristic of the prophets of Israel was that they were intercessors on behalf of Israel. In a sense, a prophet was a mediator between God and the people. In the Old Testament, Moses and Samuel were known as great intercessors (Jeremiah 15:1). Speaking about the false prophets in Judah, Jeremiah affirmed the work of the prophet as an intercessor. Jeremiah said: “If indeed they are prophets, and if the word of the LORD is with them, then let them intercede with the LORD of hosts” (Jeremiah 27:18).
When God called Amos and announced the judgment that was coming upon the Northern Kingdom, Amos interceded on behalf of Israel. Yahweh heard Amos’ prayer and did not send the judgment which Amos had seen in his vision.
The people knew that the prophets were men of prayer. Hezekiah sent messengers to the prophet Isaiah asking him to pray for the people left in Judah (2 Kings 19:1-4). When King Zedekiah and the people of Judah were facing a Babylonian invasion, the king said to Jeremiah: “Intercede for us with Yahweh our God” (Jeremiah 37:3). After the fall of Jerusalem, the military leaders who remained in Judah, fearing for their life, asked Jeremiah to pray for them: “Intercede with Yahweh your God for us” (Jeremiah 42:2).
Since one of the most important works of the prophets was to pray for the people, it is surprising that three times the Lord told Jeremiah not to pray for the people (Jeremiah 7:16, 11:14; 14:11). The Lord told Jeremiah: “You, for your part, must not intercede for this people, nor raise either plea or prayer on their behalf; do not plead with me, for I will not listen to you” (Jeremiah 7:16). The reason for the prohibition was because Yahweh knew that Jeremiah was an intercessor who prayed for the people, and since Yahweh was determined to bring judgment against the people, Yahweh was not willing to answer the prayer of his prophet.
The prophets of Israel taught the people of Israel and believers of all ages how God’s people should live. The message of the prophets was that God demanded justice from his people but that he was willing to forgive them if they turned from their evil ways. The prophet’s message of personal morality and exclusive worship of the true God is one that needs to be heard in the twenty-first century.
Other Studies on the Prophets:
Prophets in Israel
Jeremiah 1:1-10: The Call to Preach
Jeremiah 20:7: The Call to Prophetic Ministry
Jeremiah and Hananiah
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
Note: If you cannot see the Hebrew letters, download the biblical fonts (Hebrew and Greek) and install them in your computer. Click here to download the biblical fonts.
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Hebrew Bible, Old Testament, Prophets, Jeremiah, Ministry
Tuesday, March 22, 2011
Holy Ignorance
Daniel J. Mahoney, Professor of Political Science at Assumption College, wrote a review of the book Holy Ignorance, written by the French social theorist Olivier Roy, in which Roy discusses the role of religion in a secular society. The review of the book was published in The Wall Street Journal. The quote below is the conclusion of Mahoney’s review:
The question Roy raised in his book and Mahoney addressed in his review is whether religion has a role to play in a secularized society in the twenty-first century. I believe it does, but for religion to play a role in modern society, it must return to its biblical roots and become once again that vibrant movement that transformed the Roman world in the first century.
According to Mahoney’s review of the book, Roy believes that one of the reasons for religion’s loss of influence in our secular society is that religion “has been relegated to the private sphere, becoming mostly an ‘interior’ search for spiritual well-being.”
But this internalization of the believer’s faith was never Jesus’ view of what his disciples should be and do in the world. Jesus said:
Eugene Peterson, translating the same passage in The Message, puts it this way:
God is not a secret to be kept, but when Christians withdraw from the world by keeping their faith private and by refusing to share with others the good news of what God has done in Christ, God becomes the great unknown. People only know God by hearsay (Job 42:5 NJB) and most of the time, the information they receive about God is distorted and defamatory.
The questions Mr. Roy asked in the conclusion of his book need to be repeated so we may try to find answers that will honor God and revitalize Christianity in the secular society in which we live. Roy asked:
1. “How can religion be passed along to children when it is no longer a reliable part of the culture they will inherit?”
2. “What hold can religion have on the souls of human beings when it increasingly becomes . . . an intensely personal, inward experience?”
The answer to question number two is easy to formulate. Christians must remember the reason God called them to become part of God’s family. The Apostle Peter provides the best reason for our call to be God’s people. Peter wrote:
“Once you were not a people, but now you are the people of God. You are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, God’s own people, in order that you may proclaim the mighty acts of him who called you out of darkness into his marvelous light” (1 Peter 2:9-10).
We are called to proclaim the mighty acts of God. This prohibits Christians from withdrawing from society, from emphasizing the privacy of faith, and a religious commitment that is relegated to the four walls of the church.
Religious faith can take hold of the soul of human beings when they learn to live the vibrancy of faith in private as well as in public. Living in fellowship with God is an amazing experience that can permeate every aspect of life. However, as long as Christians keep their faith private and refuse to proclaim the mighty acts of God, people will never know the amazing love of God and the wonderful experience of living in relationship with him.
The first question is more difficult to answer because many times secular society becomes more influential than the Christian home. The secularized education children receive in schools has become a “movement from the authority of tradition to the authority of reason.” But the only way our faith can be passed on to our children is to follow God’s instructions in Deuteronomy 6:5-7:
“Love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength. These commandments that I give you today are to be upon your hearts. Impress them on your children. Talk about them when you sit at home and when you walk along the road, when you lie down and when you get up.”
Again, such an injunction becomes a challenge for Christians to make their faith and their commitment to God relevant in a secular society. Christians must allow their faith to address the issues of the day, so that they may teach their children, not “holy ignorance,” but a faith that can deal with issues children face in school and in the world.
Although modern society tends to ridicule religious faith, faith in God has the power to transform the lives of individuals and in the process it can also change the ways people deal with the moral degeneracy that prevails in a secular society.
The problem is not religion; the problem is the trivialization of one’s commitment to God. As Mahoney wrote in the conclusion of his essay: “The tendency of modern society to trivialize the most important decision a human being can make is arguably a far greater threat to the integrity of faith than secularization ever was.”
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Holy Ignorance, Daniel J. Mahoney, Olivier Roy, Secularism, Modernity
Above all else, Mr. Roy is able to show us vividly how much has changed with the secularization that Weber predicted—how formerly Christian societies have lost a sense of their own religious foundation. As religion has floated free of culture, he notes, it has not only turned inward; it has also made desperate attempts to go to market, turning to everything from the Internet to popular music to sell itself to generations that have lost even an elementary religious literacy. By transforming itself into another instrument of "therapeutic" satisfaction, Mr. Roy observes, religion risks losing its soul.
"Holy Ignorance" ends with a profound set of questions: How can religion be passed along to children when it is no longer a reliable part of the culture they will inherit? What hold can religion have on the souls of human beings when it increasingly becomes a "consumer" choice—or, as Mr. Roy emphasizes, an intensely personal, inward experience—and when people dispose of the faith of their fathers as they might dispose of clothes that are no longer fashionable? The tendency of modern society to trivialize the most important decision a human being can make is arguably a far greater threat to the integrity of faith than secularization ever was.
The question Roy raised in his book and Mahoney addressed in his review is whether religion has a role to play in a secularized society in the twenty-first century. I believe it does, but for religion to play a role in modern society, it must return to its biblical roots and become once again that vibrant movement that transformed the Roman world in the first century.
According to Mahoney’s review of the book, Roy believes that one of the reasons for religion’s loss of influence in our secular society is that religion “has been relegated to the private sphere, becoming mostly an ‘interior’ search for spiritual well-being.”
But this internalization of the believer’s faith was never Jesus’ view of what his disciples should be and do in the world. Jesus said:
“You are the light of the world. A city located on a hill cannot be hidden. People do not light a lamp and put it under a basket but on a lampstand, and it gives light to all in the house. In the same way, let your light shine before people, so that they can see your good deeds and give honor to your Father in heaven” (Matthew 5:14-16 NET).
Eugene Peterson, translating the same passage in The Message, puts it this way:
“You’re here to be light, bringing out the God-colors in the world. God is not a secret to be kept. We’re going public with this, as public as a city on a hill. If I make you lightbearers, you don’t think I’m going to hide you under a bucket, do you? I’m putting you on a light stand. Now that I’ve put you there on a hilltop, on a light stand–shine! Keep open house; be generous with your lives. By opening up to others, you’ll prompt people to open up with God, this generous Father in heaven.”
God is not a secret to be kept, but when Christians withdraw from the world by keeping their faith private and by refusing to share with others the good news of what God has done in Christ, God becomes the great unknown. People only know God by hearsay (Job 42:5 NJB) and most of the time, the information they receive about God is distorted and defamatory.
The questions Mr. Roy asked in the conclusion of his book need to be repeated so we may try to find answers that will honor God and revitalize Christianity in the secular society in which we live. Roy asked:
1. “How can religion be passed along to children when it is no longer a reliable part of the culture they will inherit?”
2. “What hold can religion have on the souls of human beings when it increasingly becomes . . . an intensely personal, inward experience?”
The answer to question number two is easy to formulate. Christians must remember the reason God called them to become part of God’s family. The Apostle Peter provides the best reason for our call to be God’s people. Peter wrote:
“Once you were not a people, but now you are the people of God. You are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, God’s own people, in order that you may proclaim the mighty acts of him who called you out of darkness into his marvelous light” (1 Peter 2:9-10).
We are called to proclaim the mighty acts of God. This prohibits Christians from withdrawing from society, from emphasizing the privacy of faith, and a religious commitment that is relegated to the four walls of the church.
Religious faith can take hold of the soul of human beings when they learn to live the vibrancy of faith in private as well as in public. Living in fellowship with God is an amazing experience that can permeate every aspect of life. However, as long as Christians keep their faith private and refuse to proclaim the mighty acts of God, people will never know the amazing love of God and the wonderful experience of living in relationship with him.
The first question is more difficult to answer because many times secular society becomes more influential than the Christian home. The secularized education children receive in schools has become a “movement from the authority of tradition to the authority of reason.” But the only way our faith can be passed on to our children is to follow God’s instructions in Deuteronomy 6:5-7:
“Love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength. These commandments that I give you today are to be upon your hearts. Impress them on your children. Talk about them when you sit at home and when you walk along the road, when you lie down and when you get up.”
Again, such an injunction becomes a challenge for Christians to make their faith and their commitment to God relevant in a secular society. Christians must allow their faith to address the issues of the day, so that they may teach their children, not “holy ignorance,” but a faith that can deal with issues children face in school and in the world.
Although modern society tends to ridicule religious faith, faith in God has the power to transform the lives of individuals and in the process it can also change the ways people deal with the moral degeneracy that prevails in a secular society.
The problem is not religion; the problem is the trivialization of one’s commitment to God. As Mahoney wrote in the conclusion of his essay: “The tendency of modern society to trivialize the most important decision a human being can make is arguably a far greater threat to the integrity of faith than secularization ever was.”
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Holy Ignorance, Daniel J. Mahoney, Olivier Roy, Secularism, Modernity
Monday, March 21, 2011
The Lost Tribes of Israel in Africa
A report published in the Ghana News claims that the Ga-Dangmes people of Ghana are part of the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel. Below is an excerpt from the article:
As I have written before, I do not give credence to these claims that the lost tribes of Israel have been found. If all these claims were true, then Israel would have more than ten lost tribes.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Ten Lost Tribes
Oral history had it that Ga-Dangmes people migrated from Israel about 6th Century B.C through Egypt, then to Ethiopia, having been expelled or exiled by the Assyrians (Hebrew Biblical Revelations, July 2008). In Ethiopia, they settled in the Gonder Province in northern Ethiopia, where the Blue Nile originates. That is where the name NAI WULOMO, meaning, HIGH PRIES OFTHE NILE comes from. In 640 B.C, the Assyrians attacked the Ga-Dangmes again while they were in Ethiopia. From Ethiopia, they travelled through Southern Sudan and settled for a period of time at Sameh in Niger and then to Ileife in Nigeria. They migrated again in 1100 A.D and settled at Dahome and later, travelled to Huatsi in Togo where they stayed briefly.
From Huatsi, the Ga-Dangmes travelled to the eastern banks of River Volta (know as JOR). From there, they crossed the Volta River at a place between the Old Kpong and Akuse and established settlements on the plains of Tag-logo where they lived till 1200 A.D. Later, the Ga-Dangmes migrated to the plains of Lorlorvor between Lorlorvor and Osudoku Hills. The Shai occupied a settlement in Shai highlands.
The Ga-Dangmes claim to be descendants DAN and GAD, the fifth and seventh sons of Jacob. Biblical history suggests that Jacob, whom God named YISRAEL had Leah as his wife who gave birth to four sons for him. When Leah noticed that she had passed child-bearing age, she gave her maid servant, ZILPAH to wife. Through Zilpah, Jacob had Dan and Gad and four more sons. Jacob has two sons with Rachel. Gad’s fifth son was Eri who later formed a clan known as Erites (Genesis 30:9, Genesis 46:16, Numbers 26:15-19 and Deuteronomy 3:12; Genesis 30:4-8 3:12.The descendant of Eri, son of Gad are believed to have founded the Nri Kingdom around 900 A.D of the South Eastern and parts of the mid-western Igboland in Nigeria with other tribes of Levi, Zebulon, Ephraim and possibly more. In the Book of numbers, the Bible had made extensive references to the children of Israel, which includes Gad and Dan and their children (Numbers 1:1-54).
As I have written before, I do not give credence to these claims that the lost tribes of Israel have been found. If all these claims were true, then Israel would have more than ten lost tribes.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Ten Lost Tribes
In Search of Atlantis: It is the Biblical City of Tarshish
Simcha Jacobovici, the Naked Archaeology, has claimed that the Biblical city of Tarshish is the lost city of Atlantis. His claim is based on the work of Professor Richard Freund which has been presented in a documentary aired on The National Geographic Channel. Freund has been excavating the old Spanish city of Tartessos located in southern Spain.
Below is an excerpt of a report published in The Jerusalem Post:
Below is a video featuring Professor Freund:
I have to say that I do not believe that Atlantis was the Biblical city of Tarshish. I saw the documentary and was not convinced that Atlantis was in Spain.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Atlantis, Tarshish
Below is an excerpt of a report published in The Jerusalem Post:
Hartford University Prof. Richard Freund’s work in uncovering Atlantis is the subject of the documentary Finding Atlantis, which the National Geographic Channel began airing this month. The film was largely an Israeli creation, produced in part by Israeli producer Simcha Jacobovici.
According to Jacobovici, “it is generally acknowledged that the Biblical Tarshish is what the historians call Tartessos, which was in southern Spain. In the Tanach, Tarshish is a great city with a huge navy, with silver and gold. Jonah sails towards Tarshish. Solomon has naval expeditions with Tarshish. Tarshish disappears from the Biblical record. Tartessos disappears from the historical record.”
Says Jacobovici, “Tarshish is Atlantis itself.”
Below is a video featuring Professor Freund:
I have to say that I do not believe that Atlantis was the Biblical city of Tarshish. I saw the documentary and was not convinced that Atlantis was in Spain.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Atlantis, Tarshish
The God Who Rewards
“Bless the LORD, O my soul, and all that is within me, bless his holy name. Bless the LORD, O my soul, and do not forget all his benefits–who forgives all your iniquity, who heals all your diseases, who redeems your life from the Pit, who crowns you with steadfast love and mercy, who satisfies you with good as long as you live so that your youth is renewed like the eagle’s” (Psalm 103:1-5).
The everlasting source of God’s blessings, forgiveness, and healing is God’s hesed, his faithful love. God’s love is not mere feelings nor acts of kindness. God’s love is manifested in his grace toward his people. It is because of his grace that God forgives the iniquities of his people, heals their diseases, delivers them from death, and renews their strength. For God’s people to truly enjoy God’s blessings it is necessary for them to have a heart which is susceptible TO loving God.
The true reward of the believer in this life, as well as in the life to come, is not riches and glory, but the faithful love and the mercy of God because God’s love is the true source of blessings.
Another reason the psalmist composed his song of praise was because he had experienced God as the God who rewards. He said: “Bless the LORD, O my soul, and all that is within me, bless his holy name. Bless the LORD, O my soul, and do not forget all his benefits–who crowns you with steadfast love and mercy.”
The word “crown” in Hebrew expresses the bestowal of dignity as well as favor. A king was crowned on the day of his enthronement. On that day he received the honor bestowed on all those who reigned over God’s people as God’s representative. The psalmist also had received a special honor and a special favor from Yahweh. Yahweh had forgiven and healed him. Yahweh had delivered him from death.
Now, the psalmist, like a king on his enthronement day, was rejoicing because he had received the approval of God. His dignity was restored and he was rewarded for his faithfulness and faith in God. However, the reward of the psalmist was not a crown of silver or gold. His reward was not physical or material. His reward was God himself. He knew that the greatest reward in life was a closer relationship with God. God crowned him with steadfast love. The psalmist’s reward was to enjoy God’s love and mercy.
The word “steadfast love” in Hebrew is hesed, a word that could be translated as faithfulness, loyalty, faithful love, and commitment. It is one of the most beautiful words in the Hebrew language, a word that expresses personal relationship. Hesed is what God is and what God gives. Israel experienced God’s hesed because he established a personal relationship with each individual Israelite. That relationship between God and the nation, between God and every Israelite, between God and the psalmist was established through the covenant that God gave to Israel on Mount Sinai.
In the Book of Hosea, the prophet compares the relationship between God and his people to the relationship between husband and wife. In a sense, God had a personal relationship with every Israelite because they were his people.
The psalmist knew that in life, people might become sick. He also knew that some day he would come close to death again. He knew that in life all things and everyone might fail him. However, he also knew that because of the special relationship he had with God, that he could always count on God’s faithfulness, on God’s commitment, and on God’s love, the love that would never depart from him.
God’s hesed, the faithful love of God, was what gave meaning to the psalmist’s life, to his existence as an individual, to his relationship with God. Thus, as a person who lived in relationship with God, his reward was to enjoy the abundance of God’s mercy. The word for “mercy” in Hebrew is the word rahamim. The basic meaning of the word is to love deeply. Thus, the word refers to the deep love a person has for another. The Hebrew word for “womb” is derived from the word raham. The word rahamim can also express the deep love a mother has for the fruit of her womb.
The word rahamim is used in the Hebrew Bible to express the strong ties God has for those whom he calls his children. So when the psalmist experienced the grace of God and deliverance from his illness, he knew that as a result of surviving his ordeal, that he would enjoy a different and a closer relationship with God.
This is the reason the psalmist said: “As a father has compassion for his children, so the Lord has compassion for those who fear Him” (Psalm 103:13). His statement deserves to be repeated for emphasis: “As a father has compassion for his children, so the Lord has compassion for those who fear Him.” The words of the psalmist reflect the sentiment of an individual who enjoyed a personal and intimate relationship with his God.
The Hebrew word for “fear” in this context and in many other contexts of the Hebrew Bible carries the idea of reverence and worship. People who fear the Lord are those who worship him, those who have reverence for God.
God delights in the lives of those people who worship him. After the psalmist experienced the grace of God in his life, he came to the temple with those who had reverence for God to express his gratitude to the God who had forgiven and healed him. And there in the temple, together with the community of faith, he said: “Bless the LORD, O my soul, and all that is within me, bless his holy name. Bless the LORD, O my soul, and do not forget all his benefits.”
True worship occurs when people remember what God has done in their lives. From the perspective of the psalmist, God looks upon his people with love and compassion in the same way a father looks with love and compassion upon his own children. It was because the psalmist had experienced the love of God in a special way in his life that he knew that better than silver and gold, the special relationship he enjoyed with God would be his greatest reward. God’s faithful love and God’s abundant mercy were the psalmist’s rewards for trusting and believing that God was able to redeem him.
As we approach and read this psalm, we must ask an important question: “What lessons can we learn from the experience of the psalmist?” I think that all of us must join the psalmist and say: “Bless the LORD, O my soul, and all that is within me, bless his holy name. Bless the LORD, O my soul, and do not forget all his benefits.”
Why should we bless God? Because like the psalmist of old, you and I bless God because we believe in a God who has forgiven our sins. We bless God because we believe in a God who has healed our diseases. We bless God because we believe in a God who has redeemed our soul from the grave. We bless the Lord because we believe in a God who rewards us with his faithful commitment and his tender love.
What else can we give to God but our thanksgiving, our praises and our worship? As we experience the goodness of God, we have to say with the psalmist, “Bless the Lord, O my soul and forget not all that God has done for us.”
If we go to worship God and we do not remember the many blessings God has given to us, we have failed to worship God. Worship is a personal encounter with a God who cares, with a God who loves, with a God who is concerned for each one of us. May each one of us today be challenged by the words of this psalm.
Let this be our prayer today: “How grateful we are, O Lord, for your faithfulness, for your tender love, for your care for each one of us. We open our hearts and our minds to bless you and to praise your holy name because like the psalmist, we have experienced your love. We have experienced your goodness. We know that you are a God who has redeemed us. We know you are God who rewards us. So, Lord, accept our lives and accept our gratitude.”
Amen.
Other Studies on Psalm 103:
1. Bless the Lord, O My Soul
2. The God Who Forgives
3. The God Who Heals
4. The God Who Redeems
5. The God Who Rewards
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Hebrew Bible, Psalm 103, Hesed, God’s Love
The everlasting source of God’s blessings, forgiveness, and healing is God’s hesed, his faithful love. God’s love is not mere feelings nor acts of kindness. God’s love is manifested in his grace toward his people. It is because of his grace that God forgives the iniquities of his people, heals their diseases, delivers them from death, and renews their strength. For God’s people to truly enjoy God’s blessings it is necessary for them to have a heart which is susceptible TO loving God.
The true reward of the believer in this life, as well as in the life to come, is not riches and glory, but the faithful love and the mercy of God because God’s love is the true source of blessings.
Another reason the psalmist composed his song of praise was because he had experienced God as the God who rewards. He said: “Bless the LORD, O my soul, and all that is within me, bless his holy name. Bless the LORD, O my soul, and do not forget all his benefits–who crowns you with steadfast love and mercy.”
The word “crown” in Hebrew expresses the bestowal of dignity as well as favor. A king was crowned on the day of his enthronement. On that day he received the honor bestowed on all those who reigned over God’s people as God’s representative. The psalmist also had received a special honor and a special favor from Yahweh. Yahweh had forgiven and healed him. Yahweh had delivered him from death.
Now, the psalmist, like a king on his enthronement day, was rejoicing because he had received the approval of God. His dignity was restored and he was rewarded for his faithfulness and faith in God. However, the reward of the psalmist was not a crown of silver or gold. His reward was not physical or material. His reward was God himself. He knew that the greatest reward in life was a closer relationship with God. God crowned him with steadfast love. The psalmist’s reward was to enjoy God’s love and mercy.
The word “steadfast love” in Hebrew is hesed, a word that could be translated as faithfulness, loyalty, faithful love, and commitment. It is one of the most beautiful words in the Hebrew language, a word that expresses personal relationship. Hesed is what God is and what God gives. Israel experienced God’s hesed because he established a personal relationship with each individual Israelite. That relationship between God and the nation, between God and every Israelite, between God and the psalmist was established through the covenant that God gave to Israel on Mount Sinai.
In the Book of Hosea, the prophet compares the relationship between God and his people to the relationship between husband and wife. In a sense, God had a personal relationship with every Israelite because they were his people.
The psalmist knew that in life, people might become sick. He also knew that some day he would come close to death again. He knew that in life all things and everyone might fail him. However, he also knew that because of the special relationship he had with God, that he could always count on God’s faithfulness, on God’s commitment, and on God’s love, the love that would never depart from him.
God’s hesed, the faithful love of God, was what gave meaning to the psalmist’s life, to his existence as an individual, to his relationship with God. Thus, as a person who lived in relationship with God, his reward was to enjoy the abundance of God’s mercy. The word for “mercy” in Hebrew is the word rahamim. The basic meaning of the word is to love deeply. Thus, the word refers to the deep love a person has for another. The Hebrew word for “womb” is derived from the word raham. The word rahamim can also express the deep love a mother has for the fruit of her womb.
The word rahamim is used in the Hebrew Bible to express the strong ties God has for those whom he calls his children. So when the psalmist experienced the grace of God and deliverance from his illness, he knew that as a result of surviving his ordeal, that he would enjoy a different and a closer relationship with God.
This is the reason the psalmist said: “As a father has compassion for his children, so the Lord has compassion for those who fear Him” (Psalm 103:13). His statement deserves to be repeated for emphasis: “As a father has compassion for his children, so the Lord has compassion for those who fear Him.” The words of the psalmist reflect the sentiment of an individual who enjoyed a personal and intimate relationship with his God.
The Hebrew word for “fear” in this context and in many other contexts of the Hebrew Bible carries the idea of reverence and worship. People who fear the Lord are those who worship him, those who have reverence for God.
God delights in the lives of those people who worship him. After the psalmist experienced the grace of God in his life, he came to the temple with those who had reverence for God to express his gratitude to the God who had forgiven and healed him. And there in the temple, together with the community of faith, he said: “Bless the LORD, O my soul, and all that is within me, bless his holy name. Bless the LORD, O my soul, and do not forget all his benefits.”
True worship occurs when people remember what God has done in their lives. From the perspective of the psalmist, God looks upon his people with love and compassion in the same way a father looks with love and compassion upon his own children. It was because the psalmist had experienced the love of God in a special way in his life that he knew that better than silver and gold, the special relationship he enjoyed with God would be his greatest reward. God’s faithful love and God’s abundant mercy were the psalmist’s rewards for trusting and believing that God was able to redeem him.
As we approach and read this psalm, we must ask an important question: “What lessons can we learn from the experience of the psalmist?” I think that all of us must join the psalmist and say: “Bless the LORD, O my soul, and all that is within me, bless his holy name. Bless the LORD, O my soul, and do not forget all his benefits.”
Why should we bless God? Because like the psalmist of old, you and I bless God because we believe in a God who has forgiven our sins. We bless God because we believe in a God who has healed our diseases. We bless God because we believe in a God who has redeemed our soul from the grave. We bless the Lord because we believe in a God who rewards us with his faithful commitment and his tender love.
What else can we give to God but our thanksgiving, our praises and our worship? As we experience the goodness of God, we have to say with the psalmist, “Bless the Lord, O my soul and forget not all that God has done for us.”
If we go to worship God and we do not remember the many blessings God has given to us, we have failed to worship God. Worship is a personal encounter with a God who cares, with a God who loves, with a God who is concerned for each one of us. May each one of us today be challenged by the words of this psalm.
Let this be our prayer today: “How grateful we are, O Lord, for your faithfulness, for your tender love, for your care for each one of us. We open our hearts and our minds to bless you and to praise your holy name because like the psalmist, we have experienced your love. We have experienced your goodness. We know that you are a God who has redeemed us. We know you are God who rewards us. So, Lord, accept our lives and accept our gratitude.”
Amen.
Other Studies on Psalm 103:
1. Bless the Lord, O My Soul
2. The God Who Forgives
3. The God Who Heals
4. The God Who Redeems
5. The God Who Rewards
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Hebrew Bible, Psalm 103, Hesed, God’s Love
Friday, March 18, 2011
A New Look at Mona Lisa
I am sure that almost everyone in the world has seen a picture of the Mona Lisa. The Mona Lisa is considered the most famous painting in the world. It was painted by Leonardo da Vinci in the 16th-century.
Over the years, people have used the Mona Lisa to communicate different messages at different occasions.
Below is a new look at the Mona Lisa.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Mona Lisa
Over the years, people have used the Mona Lisa to communicate different messages at different occasions.
Below is a new look at the Mona Lisa.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Mona Lisa
Thursday, March 17, 2011
The Chinese Perspective on Judaism: Culture and Tradition
Chinese television broadcasted a documentary in which they presented an extended view of Judaism. The program consists of several segments, each dealing with a facet of Judaism.
The documentary is narrated in Chinese with English subtitles. Since a large number of readers of this blog are Chinese, I will post a few of these segments in the coming days for the benefit of my Chinese readers. However, I am sure you will also enjoy watching this documentary because there are many new things to learn just by watching this series of videos on Judaism.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Chinese Documentary, Judaism, Jewish Culture
The documentary is narrated in Chinese with English subtitles. Since a large number of readers of this blog are Chinese, I will post a few of these segments in the coming days for the benefit of my Chinese readers. However, I am sure you will also enjoy watching this documentary because there are many new things to learn just by watching this series of videos on Judaism.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Chinese Documentary, Judaism, Jewish Culture
The Chinese Perspective on Judaism: Jerusalem
Chinese television broadcasted a documentary in which they presented an extended view of Judaism. The program consists of several segments, each dealing with a facet of Judaism.
The documentary is narrated in Chinese with English subtitles. Since a large number of readers of this blog are Chinese, I will post a few of these segments in the coming days for the benefit of my Chinese readers. However, I am sure you will also enjoy watching this documentary because there are many new things to learn just by watching this series of videos on Judaism.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Chinese Documentary, Judaism, Jerusalem
The documentary is narrated in Chinese with English subtitles. Since a large number of readers of this blog are Chinese, I will post a few of these segments in the coming days for the benefit of my Chinese readers. However, I am sure you will also enjoy watching this documentary because there are many new things to learn just by watching this series of videos on Judaism.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Chinese Documentary, Judaism, Jerusalem
Tuesday, March 15, 2011
Sinai Artifacts from Kuntillet Ajrud
Image: A drawing from Kuntillet AjrudHershel Shanks, the editor of Biblical Archaeology Review, has written an article published in The Jerusalem Post in which he reports that the artifacts found at Sinai and returned to Egypt 35 years ago have been found.
Among the artifacts found and returned to the Egyptian Museum in Cairo are the famous storage vessels found at Kuntillet Ajrud, a caravanserai located in Northern Sinai. These vessels contain inscriptions that refer to “Yahweh of Samaria and his Asherah.”
The drawing on these pithoi are very significant because of what they reveal about the religious practices of Northern Kingdom of Israel in the eighth century B.C.
Those who are not familiar with the Kuntillet Ajrud artifacts should read Shanks’ article. The image above is one of the drawings found on one of the pithoi. According to some archaeologists, the woman playing the lyre is Asherah, Yahweh’s consort.
You can read the article here.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Archaeology, Kuntillet Ajrud
Replacement Theology
David Parsons, Media Director for the International Christian Embassy Jerusalem, has written an interesting article on Fulfillment Theology. The article appears in The Jerusalem Post. Fulfillment Theology teaches that God has finished working with Israel and that the calling of Israel has been fulfilled with the birth of the church.
The following is an excerpt taken from Parsons’ article:
Parsons criticizes Replacement Theology by discussing how God promises the restoration of Israel in fulfillment of God’s covenant with David. He concludes that “natural Israel still has a redemptive role to play” since natural Israel is still the elect people of God, “even in their unbelief.”
You can read the article in its entirety here.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Replacement Theology, Fulfillment Theology
The following is an excerpt taken from Parsons’ article:
While most born-again Christians today are supportive of Israel, there is a growing movement among Evangelicals which is sympathetic to Palestinian suffering and claims to statehood. Yet to provide a biblical basis for their position, they are generally uncomfortable with being identified with classical Replacement theology, due to its malevolent fruit – namely the pogroms, inquisitions and expulsions, right up to the Holocaust.
So instead, these Christians are turning to the trendy new answer of Fulfillment theology. This is a biblical outlook which does give natural Israel some credit for having been chosen by God for redemptive purposes. But this calling is seen as having been already “fulfilled” with the coming of Christ and the birth of the Church. Thus it ends up at the same place as Replacement theology in concluding that God is finished with Israel, albeit with less inherent hostility toward the Jews.
Parsons criticizes Replacement Theology by discussing how God promises the restoration of Israel in fulfillment of God’s covenant with David. He concludes that “natural Israel still has a redemptive role to play” since natural Israel is still the elect people of God, “even in their unbelief.”
You can read the article in its entirety here.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Replacement Theology, Fulfillment Theology
Monday, March 14, 2011
A Christian Chapel in Thessaloniki
Archaeologists have found a Christian chapel built around the fourth-century A.D. Archaeologists believe the chapel may be the oldest Christian worship place in Thessaloniki, Greece. Thessaloniki is the modern name for the ancient city of Thessalonica. The apostle Paul wrote two letters to the believers at Thessalonica.
Below is an excerpt of the news report announcing the discovery:
You can read more about this discovery here.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Archaeology, Thessaloniki, Thessalonica
Below is an excerpt of the news report announcing the discovery:
Among the highlights of the find is a mosaic floor uncovered when structures of the later basilica were removed. This was showed a white field with a clematis theme, dominated by a phoenix with a halo and 13 rays in the centre. On either side are a number of birds, of which seven still survive, two of the right and five on the left.
Archaeologists surmise that there were originally 12 birds, six on either side of the phoenix, and that the picture allegorically represents Christ and the 12 apostles.
You can read more about this discovery here.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Archaeology, Thessaloniki, Thessalonica
The God Who Redeems
“Bless the LORD, O my soul, and all that is within me, bless his holy name. Bless the LORD, O my soul, and do not forget all his benefits–who forgives all your iniquity, who heals all your diseases, who redeems your life from the Pit, who crowns you with steadfast love and mercy, who satisfies you with good as long as you live so that your youth is renewed like the eagle’s” (Psalm 103:1-5).
The context of Psalm 103 indicates that this is the song of praise of an individual who was in the temple, worshiping with the community of faith. He invited all of the people there to bless the Lord and he asked himself to use everything in him to bless the Holy name of God. The blessing that the psalmist had received from God had touched him so much that now he called on his whole being to worship God. He came to the temple to worship the Lord and in worship he met a very special God–the God who forgives and the God who heals.
This was the reason the psalmist was so eager to bless God’s holy name. In worship he came face to face with the majesty and the holiness of God. This the is reason he called on himself to remember everything that God had done for him. Because as one who had experienced the grace of God, the psalmist knew that in worship, God could not be praised with less than his whole being.
The psalmist had many reasons to praise God. In previous posts, I mentioned that he had experienced God as a God who forgives. He also had experienced God as the God who heals (see the links below). In the present post, I want to emphasize another reason the psalmist came to the temple to praise God. The reason the author of Psalm 103 was praising God was because he had also experienced God as a God who redeems.
In the Hebrew Bible both human life and property could be redeemed. Since the first born belonged to Yahweh, the first born could be redeemed by a money payment. If a person lost property because of debt, that property could be redeemed by a relative who would provide the money to redeem what was sold because of the debt.
God was known as the redeemer of Israel because he delivered his people from Egypt (Exodus 6:6; Psalm 78:35). In the same way God was the redeemer of Israel, God was also the redeemer of an individual Israelite. In the midst of his suffering, Job believed there was a redeemer who would vindicate him: “For I know that my Redeemer lives” (Job 19:25).
Yahweh is the one who redeems Israel from their iniquity: “It is he who will redeem Israel from all its iniquities” (Psalm 130:8). The Bible is also clear that there is no self-redemption for the consequences of sin. Psalm 49:7 says that no one can redeem the life of another because of sin nor give to God sufficient money to compensate for one’s sins.
Aware that no self-redemption is possible, the psalmist recognized that the redemption of his life was the work of God, since he associated his illness with his sins. He said:
“Bless the LORD, O my soul, and all that is within me, bless his holy name. Bless the LORD, O my soul, and do not forget all his benefits–who redeems your life from the Pit.”
The word goel (“the one who redeems”) is used to designate the near relative who was responsible for regaining possession of a property which had been sold to pay a debt or the relative who married a widow in order to preserve the name of a relative who died without a son.
In the Old Testament, the responsibility of the goel was to redeem a member of the family from difficult situations or from personal danger. The case of Boaz and Ruth is a classic example of the action of a goel, a kinsman redeemer, in Israel. When Ruth and Naomi came back from the field of Moab to Bethlehem, Boaz acted as the redeemer of Naomi’s family by buying the property that belonged to Naomi and by marrying Ruth in order to provide her with a son who would carry on the name of her deceased husband.
In the Hebrew Bible, God is the ultimate goel of Israel. He stands up for his people and vindicates them. Since he is the creator and the giver of life, he is also the one who can redeem a person from physical or spiritual death.
One example of God acting as a redeemer on behalf of Israel was the deliverance of his people from the house of oppression in Egypt. It is in this sense that the psalmist experienced God. In this psalm, the reader discovers that the psalmist was afflicted with an illness and his illness brought him close to death. But because he prayed, because he trusted in the power of God, God by His grace, healed him and delivered him from the Pit.
The Hebrew word translated “Pit” is shahat, a word which means “pit,” “destruction,” and “grave.” The word is generally used to refer to the abode of the dead. In the Hebrew Bible the word shahat is used to refer to death and the decay that occurs after death: “You will not abandon me to the realm of the dead, nor will you let your faithful one see decay” (Psalm 16:10).
The word “Pit” in Psalm 103 is used to refer to the grave or the abode of the dead. The psalmist used the word shahat to refer to the place he would go after he died. At the time the psalmist wrote his song of praise, it is possible that the people of Israel did not have a definite understanding of the concept of the resurrection of the dead, a view that developed late in Israel’s theology. In the understanding of the psalmist, once a person died, that person would go to Sheol and that person would be forgotten forever.
However, since his illness had brought him near death, in the psalmist’s mind, his healing was understood as a redemption, as a deliverance from the grave. With these words of praise, the psalmist was expressing the same faith and hope expressed by Job.
The story of Job is familiar to all readers of the Bible. After months of sickness and affliction, after his rejection by his family and friends, Job, near the end of his ordeal, cried out both in desperation and in hope: “I know that my redeemer lives.” That cry was Job’s affirmation that God was his redeemer, that God would vindicate him by redeeming him from his misery.
Job knew that, as a friend and as his redeemer, God would outwardly redeem him from his desperate situation. No one around Job ever saw any hope, not his friends, not his family, not even his society. But Job had faith that his redeemer would act on his behalf. Job knew that at the end of his ordeal that he would “see God” (Job 19:26). His desire was to meet God face to face and present his case to him, so that God, acting as his Redeemer, would vindicate his life. In his vindication, Job would experience God as that redeemer he was expecting God to be.
And, yet, what Job only desired, the psalmist experienced in a very personal way. And now he could not be silent. Now he wanted to praise God and thank God for his redemption. He wanted to invite the community of faith to know that for sure the redeemer was alive and that the redeemer of Israel was also the redeemer of each individual in the nation. That is the reason why he praised God and called his soul to rejoice in God.
Other Studies on Psalm 103:
1. Bless the Lord, O My Soul
2. The God Who Forgives
3. The God Who Heals
4. The God Who Redeems
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Hebrew Bible, Psalm 103, Sheol, The Pit, Goel, Redeemer
The context of Psalm 103 indicates that this is the song of praise of an individual who was in the temple, worshiping with the community of faith. He invited all of the people there to bless the Lord and he asked himself to use everything in him to bless the Holy name of God. The blessing that the psalmist had received from God had touched him so much that now he called on his whole being to worship God. He came to the temple to worship the Lord and in worship he met a very special God–the God who forgives and the God who heals.
This was the reason the psalmist was so eager to bless God’s holy name. In worship he came face to face with the majesty and the holiness of God. This the is reason he called on himself to remember everything that God had done for him. Because as one who had experienced the grace of God, the psalmist knew that in worship, God could not be praised with less than his whole being.
The psalmist had many reasons to praise God. In previous posts, I mentioned that he had experienced God as a God who forgives. He also had experienced God as the God who heals (see the links below). In the present post, I want to emphasize another reason the psalmist came to the temple to praise God. The reason the author of Psalm 103 was praising God was because he had also experienced God as a God who redeems.
In the Hebrew Bible both human life and property could be redeemed. Since the first born belonged to Yahweh, the first born could be redeemed by a money payment. If a person lost property because of debt, that property could be redeemed by a relative who would provide the money to redeem what was sold because of the debt.
God was known as the redeemer of Israel because he delivered his people from Egypt (Exodus 6:6; Psalm 78:35). In the same way God was the redeemer of Israel, God was also the redeemer of an individual Israelite. In the midst of his suffering, Job believed there was a redeemer who would vindicate him: “For I know that my Redeemer lives” (Job 19:25).
Yahweh is the one who redeems Israel from their iniquity: “It is he who will redeem Israel from all its iniquities” (Psalm 130:8). The Bible is also clear that there is no self-redemption for the consequences of sin. Psalm 49:7 says that no one can redeem the life of another because of sin nor give to God sufficient money to compensate for one’s sins.
Aware that no self-redemption is possible, the psalmist recognized that the redemption of his life was the work of God, since he associated his illness with his sins. He said:
“Bless the LORD, O my soul, and all that is within me, bless his holy name. Bless the LORD, O my soul, and do not forget all his benefits–who redeems your life from the Pit.”
The word goel (“the one who redeems”) is used to designate the near relative who was responsible for regaining possession of a property which had been sold to pay a debt or the relative who married a widow in order to preserve the name of a relative who died without a son.
In the Old Testament, the responsibility of the goel was to redeem a member of the family from difficult situations or from personal danger. The case of Boaz and Ruth is a classic example of the action of a goel, a kinsman redeemer, in Israel. When Ruth and Naomi came back from the field of Moab to Bethlehem, Boaz acted as the redeemer of Naomi’s family by buying the property that belonged to Naomi and by marrying Ruth in order to provide her with a son who would carry on the name of her deceased husband.
In the Hebrew Bible, God is the ultimate goel of Israel. He stands up for his people and vindicates them. Since he is the creator and the giver of life, he is also the one who can redeem a person from physical or spiritual death.
One example of God acting as a redeemer on behalf of Israel was the deliverance of his people from the house of oppression in Egypt. It is in this sense that the psalmist experienced God. In this psalm, the reader discovers that the psalmist was afflicted with an illness and his illness brought him close to death. But because he prayed, because he trusted in the power of God, God by His grace, healed him and delivered him from the Pit.
The Hebrew word translated “Pit” is shahat, a word which means “pit,” “destruction,” and “grave.” The word is generally used to refer to the abode of the dead. In the Hebrew Bible the word shahat is used to refer to death and the decay that occurs after death: “You will not abandon me to the realm of the dead, nor will you let your faithful one see decay” (Psalm 16:10).
The word “Pit” in Psalm 103 is used to refer to the grave or the abode of the dead. The psalmist used the word shahat to refer to the place he would go after he died. At the time the psalmist wrote his song of praise, it is possible that the people of Israel did not have a definite understanding of the concept of the resurrection of the dead, a view that developed late in Israel’s theology. In the understanding of the psalmist, once a person died, that person would go to Sheol and that person would be forgotten forever.
However, since his illness had brought him near death, in the psalmist’s mind, his healing was understood as a redemption, as a deliverance from the grave. With these words of praise, the psalmist was expressing the same faith and hope expressed by Job.
The story of Job is familiar to all readers of the Bible. After months of sickness and affliction, after his rejection by his family and friends, Job, near the end of his ordeal, cried out both in desperation and in hope: “I know that my redeemer lives.” That cry was Job’s affirmation that God was his redeemer, that God would vindicate him by redeeming him from his misery.
Job knew that, as a friend and as his redeemer, God would outwardly redeem him from his desperate situation. No one around Job ever saw any hope, not his friends, not his family, not even his society. But Job had faith that his redeemer would act on his behalf. Job knew that at the end of his ordeal that he would “see God” (Job 19:26). His desire was to meet God face to face and present his case to him, so that God, acting as his Redeemer, would vindicate his life. In his vindication, Job would experience God as that redeemer he was expecting God to be.
And, yet, what Job only desired, the psalmist experienced in a very personal way. And now he could not be silent. Now he wanted to praise God and thank God for his redemption. He wanted to invite the community of faith to know that for sure the redeemer was alive and that the redeemer of Israel was also the redeemer of each individual in the nation. That is the reason why he praised God and called his soul to rejoice in God.
Other Studies on Psalm 103:
1. Bless the Lord, O My Soul
2. The God Who Forgives
3. The God Who Heals
4. The God Who Redeems
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Hebrew Bible, Psalm 103, Sheol, The Pit, Goel, Redeemer
Friday, March 11, 2011
The Church Fathers on Divine Impassibility
One of my readers left a comment on my post The Passibility of God: A Response to Doug Chaplin. In his comment, Andy called my attention to an article by John Sanders titled “The Early Church Fathers on Hellenism and Impassibility.”
In his article, Sanders deals with the issue of how the church fathers dealt with the issue of divine impassibility. Below is an excerpt from Sander’s article:
In his article, Sanders discusses divine impassibility in relation to the full divinity of the Son and the Christological controversies facing the early church. You can read the article in its entirety here.
I want to thank Andy for calling my attention to this article.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Divine Impassibility, Passibility of God, Christological Controversies
In his article, Sanders deals with the issue of how the church fathers dealt with the issue of divine impassibility. Below is an excerpt from Sander’s article:
From the second through fourth centuries there was no standard definition of divine “impassibility.” For Christian writers it did not mean that God was apathetic, distant, or lacked compassion. God did experience mercy and love. Christians disagreed with one another whether God experienced anger depending on whether or not they thought this emotion “fitting” for God. The word functioned in a couple of ways. First, it was a way of qualifying the distinction between creator and creatures. God is incorruptible while we are not. But we will be made impassible (incorruptible) in the eschaton. Also, we are prone to be overwhelmed by emotions, particularly negative ones, but God is not. Hence, it was used to safeguard divine transcendence (aseity) rather than deny psychological emotions to God. Second, it functioned to distance the Christian God from the gods of polytheism. They were passible in the sense that acted capriciously and lost control of themselves. In contrast, the Christian God faithfully loved, was patient, and acted consistently. Hence, it is clear that when the fathers said God was impassible they did not intend to rule out that he has emotions or that he is affected by and responds to us.
In his article, Sanders discusses divine impassibility in relation to the full divinity of the Son and the Christological controversies facing the early church. You can read the article in its entirety here.
I want to thank Andy for calling my attention to this article.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Divine Impassibility, Passibility of God, Christological Controversies
Thursday, March 10, 2011
The Passibility of God: A Response to Doug Chaplin
Doug Chaplin recently wrote a post in which he responded to my post on “The Passibility of God.” In his post Doug defends the traditional view of God, the view that the God of the Bible is a God “without body, parts, or passions.” Doug is quoting “The Thirty-Nine Articles of the Church of England.” The Thirty-Nine Articles, which were established in 1563, define the doctrines of the Anglican Church.
Doug also kind of chastised me for quoting Matthew Henry. Probably Doug did not see my sarcasm when I quoted Matthew Henry. Matthew Henry was a Calvinist and his Calvinism is seen throughout his commentary. My point was: if a Calvinist can believe in the passibility of God, then anyone can.
Although Doug and many other people who reject the passibility of God refuse to admit it, the passibility of God is based on biblical revelation. If the God of the Old Testament revealed himself in Jesus Christ, then the God of the Bible is a God who suffers and has emotions. In his book, The Humanity of God, Karl Barth said that the human characteristics of God are enthroned in heaven.
The passibility of God is true to biblical revelation, not to theological dogmas based on Greek philosophy. Those who desire to understand how Greek philosophy has affected our understanding of God should read Emil Brunner’s view on the attributes of God. Biblical teaching reveals God to be a personal God, a God who enters into a genuine relationship with the people of Israel. By establishing a covenant relationship with Israel, God gave the people real freedom to make decisions, even when those decisions could contradict what God intended for them.
In creation we see God as the Creator, a God who makes human beings in his own image. God gives genuine freedom to human beings to make real decisions, either to obey God or to go against his will. In this process of give and take, God chose to act in response to human choices. When humans obeyed God, he blessed them. When humans disobeyed, God acted as a righteous judge to bring his divine justice upon those who rebelled against his authority.
A good example of God’s dealing with human beings is found in the story of the flood. When God saw how evil human beings had become on the earth and that their actions were continually evil, “The LORD was grieved that he had made man on the earth, and his heart was filled with pain” (Genesis 6:6 NIV). God’s pain was real, not imaginary.
This assessment of the human condition and the response of God is very revealing. While every inclination of the human heart was evil all the time, God’s heart was broken, filled with pain. God was grieving for his creation, distressed because the bearers of his image had departed from the ideal he had established for them at creation.
The word for “grieving,” niham is used in the Hebrew Bible to describe both human and divine pain. The rebellious attitude of Israel in the wilderness caused much pain and agony to God’s heart: “How often they rebelled against him in the wilderness and grieved him in the desert! They tested God again and again, and provoked the Holy One of Israel” (Psalm 78:40-41).
The word niham is also used to reflect changes in God. The word is generally translated “repent”: “And God saw their works, that they turned from their evil way; and God repented of the evil, that he had said that he would do unto them; and he did it not” (Jonah 3:10 KJV).
More often, though, the word is translated as “regretting” or “changing one’s mind.”
“I greatly regret that I have set up Saul as king” (1 Samuel 15:11 NKJ).
“The LORD was sorry that he had made humans on the earth, and he was heartbroken” (Genesis 6:6 GWN).
These different translations of the word niham express God’s disappointment with human beings and his consternation that they had failed to achieve his purpose for them. The word niham also anticipates the suffering of God that was to be the result of the judgment he was bringing upon the world because of their rebellion.
Another passage that reflects the pain and suffering of God as a result of Israel’s sins and rebellion is found in Exodus 32-34 when Israel violated the demands of the covenant by fashioning a golden calf to worship while Moses was on Mount Sinai receiving the law from God.
God’s reaction to the apostasy of the people reflects another aspect of the nature of God. After calling Moses’ attention to what the people had done, Yahweh said to Moses: “Now leave me alone so that my anger may burn against them and that I may destroy them” (Exodus 32:10).
God’s disappointment with Israel was real. He had entered into a relationship with them so that the nation would accomplish God’s work in the world. Israel had become God’s special people, separated from the other nations to model a different type of life in the world.
The proper understanding of God’s words to Moses indicate that God was planning to bring a severe judgment against the people. However, God’s words also indicate that God expected Moses to intervene and pray on behalf of Israel. Thus, God wants to be left alone so that he can execute the punishment on his rebellious people.
But, Moses does not leave God alone. To the contrary, Moses spoke boldly, defending the people and asking for divine mercy for Israel. This dialogue between God and Moses demonstrates how seriously God values the relationship he had established with his people.
When it came to the future of Israel, God was not the only one who had a say in the matter. Moses argued with God and in a forceful way presented several reasons why God should not destroy the people.
Moses’ arguments on behalf of Israel moved God to change his mind about the punishment he had decreed to bring upon Israel: “And the LORD changed his mind about the disaster that he planned to bring on his people” (Exodus 32:14 NRSV) or as the RSV translated: “And the LORD repented of the evil which he thought to do to his people.”
God’s changing his mind is not a mere human way of describing what happened to God. To the contrary, the text speaks of a divine reversal taken because of Moses’ intervention on behalf of Israel. In the Hebrew Bible, God never “repents” of sins. The word “repent” reflects God’s decision to change his mind and reverse a decision made to bring judgment upon the people.
The word niham is translated “repent” thirty-eight times in the Bible. Most of the places where the word is translated “repentance,” it refers to God’s repentance, not human repentance. When the Bible says that God changes his mind or repents, it indicates that God’s decision about judgment is not set in cement. God is open to a change in human conduct. When people change their ways or repent, that change also brings a change in how God will deal with them.
An example of this is found in God’s words to Jeremiah. In the fourth year of Jehoiakim, king of Judah, God told Jeremiah to write down the words that he had proclaimed against Israel and Judah and read them in the temple as the people came to worship (Jeremiah 36:1-7). The Lord told Jeremiah:
“Perhaps, when the house of Judah hears all the evil I have in mind to do to them, they will turn back each from his evil way, so that I may forgive their wickedness and their sin” (Jeremiah 36:3 NAB).
And Jeremiah spoke to Baruch:
“Perhaps they will lay their supplication before the LORD and will all turn back from their evil way; for great is the fury of anger with which the LORD has threatened this people” (Jeremiah 36:7 NAB).
Twice the word “perhaps” is used in the same context. The use of the word “perhaps” by God and Jeremiah indicates that neither God nor Jeremiah knew how the reading of the scrolls would affect the people.
The shape of Judah’s future was based on how the people would react to the reading of the scrolls. God’s judgment upon Judah was coming, and it was coming rapidly. However, if the people would repent, God would change his mind and not bring the judgment. God had already said as much before: “Perhaps they will listen and turn back, each from his evil way, so that I may repent of the evil I have planned to inflict upon them for their evil deeds” (Jeremiah 26:3 NAB).
These few examples (there are many more) are sufficient to show that the passibility of God is biblical and rooted in biblical revelation. All that people know about God is derived from biblical revelation and what we learn from biblical revelation is that the God of the Bible reveals himself as a personal being who chose to enter into a personal relationship with human beings, a relationship in which God makes himself vulnerable for the sake of the relationship.
If a Calvinist like Matthew Henry can accept the passibility of God, then there must be something in the nature of God that defies the traditional view of God, one that is based, not on biblical revelation, but on the Greek idea of the Absolute.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Hebrew Bible, Passibility of God, Repentance of God
Doug also kind of chastised me for quoting Matthew Henry. Probably Doug did not see my sarcasm when I quoted Matthew Henry. Matthew Henry was a Calvinist and his Calvinism is seen throughout his commentary. My point was: if a Calvinist can believe in the passibility of God, then anyone can.
Although Doug and many other people who reject the passibility of God refuse to admit it, the passibility of God is based on biblical revelation. If the God of the Old Testament revealed himself in Jesus Christ, then the God of the Bible is a God who suffers and has emotions. In his book, The Humanity of God, Karl Barth said that the human characteristics of God are enthroned in heaven.
The passibility of God is true to biblical revelation, not to theological dogmas based on Greek philosophy. Those who desire to understand how Greek philosophy has affected our understanding of God should read Emil Brunner’s view on the attributes of God. Biblical teaching reveals God to be a personal God, a God who enters into a genuine relationship with the people of Israel. By establishing a covenant relationship with Israel, God gave the people real freedom to make decisions, even when those decisions could contradict what God intended for them.
In creation we see God as the Creator, a God who makes human beings in his own image. God gives genuine freedom to human beings to make real decisions, either to obey God or to go against his will. In this process of give and take, God chose to act in response to human choices. When humans obeyed God, he blessed them. When humans disobeyed, God acted as a righteous judge to bring his divine justice upon those who rebelled against his authority.
A good example of God’s dealing with human beings is found in the story of the flood. When God saw how evil human beings had become on the earth and that their actions were continually evil, “The LORD was grieved that he had made man on the earth, and his heart was filled with pain” (Genesis 6:6 NIV). God’s pain was real, not imaginary.
This assessment of the human condition and the response of God is very revealing. While every inclination of the human heart was evil all the time, God’s heart was broken, filled with pain. God was grieving for his creation, distressed because the bearers of his image had departed from the ideal he had established for them at creation.
The word for “grieving,” niham is used in the Hebrew Bible to describe both human and divine pain. The rebellious attitude of Israel in the wilderness caused much pain and agony to God’s heart: “How often they rebelled against him in the wilderness and grieved him in the desert! They tested God again and again, and provoked the Holy One of Israel” (Psalm 78:40-41).
The word niham is also used to reflect changes in God. The word is generally translated “repent”: “And God saw their works, that they turned from their evil way; and God repented of the evil, that he had said that he would do unto them; and he did it not” (Jonah 3:10 KJV).
More often, though, the word is translated as “regretting” or “changing one’s mind.”
“I greatly regret that I have set up Saul as king” (1 Samuel 15:11 NKJ).
“The LORD was sorry that he had made humans on the earth, and he was heartbroken” (Genesis 6:6 GWN).
These different translations of the word niham express God’s disappointment with human beings and his consternation that they had failed to achieve his purpose for them. The word niham also anticipates the suffering of God that was to be the result of the judgment he was bringing upon the world because of their rebellion.
Another passage that reflects the pain and suffering of God as a result of Israel’s sins and rebellion is found in Exodus 32-34 when Israel violated the demands of the covenant by fashioning a golden calf to worship while Moses was on Mount Sinai receiving the law from God.
God’s reaction to the apostasy of the people reflects another aspect of the nature of God. After calling Moses’ attention to what the people had done, Yahweh said to Moses: “Now leave me alone so that my anger may burn against them and that I may destroy them” (Exodus 32:10).
God’s disappointment with Israel was real. He had entered into a relationship with them so that the nation would accomplish God’s work in the world. Israel had become God’s special people, separated from the other nations to model a different type of life in the world.
The proper understanding of God’s words to Moses indicate that God was planning to bring a severe judgment against the people. However, God’s words also indicate that God expected Moses to intervene and pray on behalf of Israel. Thus, God wants to be left alone so that he can execute the punishment on his rebellious people.
But, Moses does not leave God alone. To the contrary, Moses spoke boldly, defending the people and asking for divine mercy for Israel. This dialogue between God and Moses demonstrates how seriously God values the relationship he had established with his people.
When it came to the future of Israel, God was not the only one who had a say in the matter. Moses argued with God and in a forceful way presented several reasons why God should not destroy the people.
Moses’ arguments on behalf of Israel moved God to change his mind about the punishment he had decreed to bring upon Israel: “And the LORD changed his mind about the disaster that he planned to bring on his people” (Exodus 32:14 NRSV) or as the RSV translated: “And the LORD repented of the evil which he thought to do to his people.”
God’s changing his mind is not a mere human way of describing what happened to God. To the contrary, the text speaks of a divine reversal taken because of Moses’ intervention on behalf of Israel. In the Hebrew Bible, God never “repents” of sins. The word “repent” reflects God’s decision to change his mind and reverse a decision made to bring judgment upon the people.
The word niham is translated “repent” thirty-eight times in the Bible. Most of the places where the word is translated “repentance,” it refers to God’s repentance, not human repentance. When the Bible says that God changes his mind or repents, it indicates that God’s decision about judgment is not set in cement. God is open to a change in human conduct. When people change their ways or repent, that change also brings a change in how God will deal with them.
An example of this is found in God’s words to Jeremiah. In the fourth year of Jehoiakim, king of Judah, God told Jeremiah to write down the words that he had proclaimed against Israel and Judah and read them in the temple as the people came to worship (Jeremiah 36:1-7). The Lord told Jeremiah:
“Perhaps, when the house of Judah hears all the evil I have in mind to do to them, they will turn back each from his evil way, so that I may forgive their wickedness and their sin” (Jeremiah 36:3 NAB).
And Jeremiah spoke to Baruch:
“Perhaps they will lay their supplication before the LORD and will all turn back from their evil way; for great is the fury of anger with which the LORD has threatened this people” (Jeremiah 36:7 NAB).
Twice the word “perhaps” is used in the same context. The use of the word “perhaps” by God and Jeremiah indicates that neither God nor Jeremiah knew how the reading of the scrolls would affect the people.
The shape of Judah’s future was based on how the people would react to the reading of the scrolls. God’s judgment upon Judah was coming, and it was coming rapidly. However, if the people would repent, God would change his mind and not bring the judgment. God had already said as much before: “Perhaps they will listen and turn back, each from his evil way, so that I may repent of the evil I have planned to inflict upon them for their evil deeds” (Jeremiah 26:3 NAB).
These few examples (there are many more) are sufficient to show that the passibility of God is biblical and rooted in biblical revelation. All that people know about God is derived from biblical revelation and what we learn from biblical revelation is that the God of the Bible reveals himself as a personal being who chose to enter into a personal relationship with human beings, a relationship in which God makes himself vulnerable for the sake of the relationship.
If a Calvinist like Matthew Henry can accept the passibility of God, then there must be something in the nature of God that defies the traditional view of God, one that is based, not on biblical revelation, but on the Greek idea of the Absolute.
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Hebrew Bible, Passibility of God, Repentance of God
Monday, March 07, 2011
The God Who Heals
“Bless the LORD, O my soul, and all that is within me, bless his holy name. Bless the LORD, O my soul, and do not forget all his benefits–who forgives all your iniquity, who heals all your diseases, who redeems your life from the Pit, who crowns you with steadfast love and mercy, who satisfies you with good as long as you live so that your youth is renewed like the eagle’s” (Psalm 103:1-5).
The writer of Psalm 103 was a person whose adversity and suffering allowed him to experience the grace of God in a more personal way, and that experience led him to compose his song of praise. In my previous studies of this beautiful psalm (see the links below), I described one of the reasons the psalmist called himself and the community of faith to praise God.
Today, I want to emphasize the second reason the psalmist is praising God with his psalm. The second reason for the psalmist’s praise was because he had experienced God as a God who heals. He said, “Bless the LORD, O my soul, and all that is within me, bless his holy name. Bless the LORD, O my soul, and do not forget all his benefits–who heals all your diseases.”
In the Old Testament, God reveals himself as the healer of his people. When the people came out of Egypt, after seeing all the plagues that God had brought upon the people of Egypt, and after seeing all the illness and all the sickness and death incurred by the Egyptians, the people marched through the wilderness, on their way to Mount Sinai, and eventually to their Promised Land.
However, after traveling three days in the wilderness of Shur, the people began to suffer because they could not find any water. When they arrived at Marah, they found water there but they could not drink it because the water was bitter. In their desperation, the people complained to Moses about their predicament. Moses prayed to God. In answer to Moses’ prayer, God showed him a tree. Moses threw the wood into the water and immediately the water became sweet. It was through that adversity and suffering that the people learned one important aspect of God’s nature: that Yahweh, the God of Israel, was their healer. God told the people of Israel: “I am the LORD who heals you (Exodus 15:26).
The word רָפָא (rāpā’) appears more than sixty times in the Hebrew Bible. The word rāpā’ means to heal, to make healthful. The verb is used in the Hebrew Bible for human healing. As a noun, the word is translated as “physician” (Genesis 50:2). The word also can be used to designate moral and spiritual healing.
The psalmist saw a connection between his sin and his illness. People today should not believe that all illness is a punishment for sins one has committed against God or other people. Job suffered much, but his physical suffering was not caused by his sins. When people are sick, their pain and suffering tend to bring to mind their sinful condition and their need of grace and forgiveness.
Whenever people are confronted with their mortality, the foreboding of things to come causes despair and motivates people to prepare themselves to meet their creator (Amos 4:12). The belief of the psalmist, that his sickness was the result of his sin, should not cause sick people to despair and believe they are sick because they have sinned against God.
Whatever his problem was, the psalmist knew that his sins, his iniquities, had offended, not only God, but had also offended himself and people in relation with him. The word for “iniquity” in Hebrew means “a deliberate rejection of the will and of the law of God.” So, in a sense, the psalmist knew that he had broken God’s law by offending someone in the community. Aware of his condition, the psalmist came before God to pray and ask for God’s forgiveness and healing. God forgave and healed him.
Now that he had been forgiven, and now that he had been healed, he praised the Lord because the gracious nature of God had been manifested in his life. God had forgiven him as a judge, but now he had healed him as a physician. This was the reason he wanted to praise God in the temple. This was the reason he wanted to worship with other believers in the house of God. Thus, in song, he called everyone to join him and praise God: “Bless the Lord, O my soul and all that is within me, bless his holy name.”
The psalmist had experienced a difficult time in his life because of his sin and because of his illness. At that time he turned to God in prayer and he was healed.
The experience of the psalmist has a lesson for people today. In today’s society people are suffering with all kinds of physical as well as spiritual illnesses. People with broken hearts, broken lives, and damaged emotions look for help without finding the solution to their problems.
When Isaiah described the sick conditions of his society, he was describing a situation similar to what is found in many societies in our present day. Isaiah said: “The whole head is sick, and the whole heart faint. From the sole of the foot even to the head, there is no soundness in it, but bruises and sores and bleeding wounds; they have not been drained, or bound up, or softened with oil” (Isaiah 1:5-6).
Isaiah compared Judah’s rebellion to a sick body. The body was affected from the sole of the foot to the top of the head, and the disease was, as Jeremiah saw it, “incurable” (Jeremiah 30:12, 15). And yet, since there is mercy with the Lord, the Lord spoke to the sick society of Judah and offered the possibility of healing: “For I will restore health to you, and your wounds I will heal, says the LORD” (Jeremiah 30:17).
At Marah, God used the healing properties of the tree cast into the water to cure the people of Israel. Today he uses the advances in medicine to produce drugs that are derived from plants, animals, germs, and mineral substances, but it is always God who is the healing hand behind the miracles of modern medicine.
The New Testament gives the context in which divine healing occurs. James said that divine healing occurs in the context of worship, prayer, and forgiveness (James 5:14-16). When the people of God pray, the sufferer experiences forgiveness and healing occurs. The most dramatic example of prayer for a sick person is Moses’ prayer for his sister Miriam. When Miriam was afflicted with a skin condition, Moses cried to the Lord, “O God, please heal her” (Numbers 12:13). People, however, must be aware that healing does not always occur when people pray. People also must be aware that it is not always God’s will to heal. Some sickness will end in death and others will not (John 11:4). When Timothy was sick with a stomach problem, Paul could not heal him.
God may not always heal the broken body, but he has the remedy that can cure the human spirit. Like the balm of Gilead, God sends his messenger with a message that brings healing to broken lives: “He has sent me to heal the brokenhearted” (Isaiah 61:1).
Like the psalmist, people of faith should rejoice and bless the Lord. “Bless the Lord, O my soul,” for God is a God who forgives and a God who heals.
Note: If you cannot see the Hebrew letters, download the biblical fonts (Hebrew and Greek) and install them in your computer. Click here to download the biblical fonts.
Other Studies on Psalm 103:
1. Bless the Lord, O My Soul
2. The God Who Forgives
3. The God Who Heals
4. The God Who Redeems
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Hebrew Bible, Psalm 103, Divine Healing, Sickness
The writer of Psalm 103 was a person whose adversity and suffering allowed him to experience the grace of God in a more personal way, and that experience led him to compose his song of praise. In my previous studies of this beautiful psalm (see the links below), I described one of the reasons the psalmist called himself and the community of faith to praise God.
Today, I want to emphasize the second reason the psalmist is praising God with his psalm. The second reason for the psalmist’s praise was because he had experienced God as a God who heals. He said, “Bless the LORD, O my soul, and all that is within me, bless his holy name. Bless the LORD, O my soul, and do not forget all his benefits–who heals all your diseases.”
In the Old Testament, God reveals himself as the healer of his people. When the people came out of Egypt, after seeing all the plagues that God had brought upon the people of Egypt, and after seeing all the illness and all the sickness and death incurred by the Egyptians, the people marched through the wilderness, on their way to Mount Sinai, and eventually to their Promised Land.
However, after traveling three days in the wilderness of Shur, the people began to suffer because they could not find any water. When they arrived at Marah, they found water there but they could not drink it because the water was bitter. In their desperation, the people complained to Moses about their predicament. Moses prayed to God. In answer to Moses’ prayer, God showed him a tree. Moses threw the wood into the water and immediately the water became sweet. It was through that adversity and suffering that the people learned one important aspect of God’s nature: that Yahweh, the God of Israel, was their healer. God told the people of Israel: “I am the LORD who heals you (Exodus 15:26).
The word רָפָא (rāpā’) appears more than sixty times in the Hebrew Bible. The word rāpā’ means to heal, to make healthful. The verb is used in the Hebrew Bible for human healing. As a noun, the word is translated as “physician” (Genesis 50:2). The word also can be used to designate moral and spiritual healing.
The psalmist saw a connection between his sin and his illness. People today should not believe that all illness is a punishment for sins one has committed against God or other people. Job suffered much, but his physical suffering was not caused by his sins. When people are sick, their pain and suffering tend to bring to mind their sinful condition and their need of grace and forgiveness.
Whenever people are confronted with their mortality, the foreboding of things to come causes despair and motivates people to prepare themselves to meet their creator (Amos 4:12). The belief of the psalmist, that his sickness was the result of his sin, should not cause sick people to despair and believe they are sick because they have sinned against God.
Whatever his problem was, the psalmist knew that his sins, his iniquities, had offended, not only God, but had also offended himself and people in relation with him. The word for “iniquity” in Hebrew means “a deliberate rejection of the will and of the law of God.” So, in a sense, the psalmist knew that he had broken God’s law by offending someone in the community. Aware of his condition, the psalmist came before God to pray and ask for God’s forgiveness and healing. God forgave and healed him.
Now that he had been forgiven, and now that he had been healed, he praised the Lord because the gracious nature of God had been manifested in his life. God had forgiven him as a judge, but now he had healed him as a physician. This was the reason he wanted to praise God in the temple. This was the reason he wanted to worship with other believers in the house of God. Thus, in song, he called everyone to join him and praise God: “Bless the Lord, O my soul and all that is within me, bless his holy name.”
The psalmist had experienced a difficult time in his life because of his sin and because of his illness. At that time he turned to God in prayer and he was healed.
The experience of the psalmist has a lesson for people today. In today’s society people are suffering with all kinds of physical as well as spiritual illnesses. People with broken hearts, broken lives, and damaged emotions look for help without finding the solution to their problems.
When Isaiah described the sick conditions of his society, he was describing a situation similar to what is found in many societies in our present day. Isaiah said: “The whole head is sick, and the whole heart faint. From the sole of the foot even to the head, there is no soundness in it, but bruises and sores and bleeding wounds; they have not been drained, or bound up, or softened with oil” (Isaiah 1:5-6).
Isaiah compared Judah’s rebellion to a sick body. The body was affected from the sole of the foot to the top of the head, and the disease was, as Jeremiah saw it, “incurable” (Jeremiah 30:12, 15). And yet, since there is mercy with the Lord, the Lord spoke to the sick society of Judah and offered the possibility of healing: “For I will restore health to you, and your wounds I will heal, says the LORD” (Jeremiah 30:17).
At Marah, God used the healing properties of the tree cast into the water to cure the people of Israel. Today he uses the advances in medicine to produce drugs that are derived from plants, animals, germs, and mineral substances, but it is always God who is the healing hand behind the miracles of modern medicine.
The New Testament gives the context in which divine healing occurs. James said that divine healing occurs in the context of worship, prayer, and forgiveness (James 5:14-16). When the people of God pray, the sufferer experiences forgiveness and healing occurs. The most dramatic example of prayer for a sick person is Moses’ prayer for his sister Miriam. When Miriam was afflicted with a skin condition, Moses cried to the Lord, “O God, please heal her” (Numbers 12:13). People, however, must be aware that healing does not always occur when people pray. People also must be aware that it is not always God’s will to heal. Some sickness will end in death and others will not (John 11:4). When Timothy was sick with a stomach problem, Paul could not heal him.
God may not always heal the broken body, but he has the remedy that can cure the human spirit. Like the balm of Gilead, God sends his messenger with a message that brings healing to broken lives: “He has sent me to heal the brokenhearted” (Isaiah 61:1).
Like the psalmist, people of faith should rejoice and bless the Lord. “Bless the Lord, O my soul,” for God is a God who forgives and a God who heals.
Note: If you cannot see the Hebrew letters, download the biblical fonts (Hebrew and Greek) and install them in your computer. Click here to download the biblical fonts.
Other Studies on Psalm 103:
1. Bless the Lord, O My Soul
2. The God Who Forgives
3. The God Who Heals
4. The God Who Redeems
Claude Mariottini
Professor of Old Testament
Northern Baptist Seminary
If you enjoyed reading this post, subscribe to my posts here.
Tags: Hebrew Bible, Psalm 103, Divine Healing, Sickness
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)